Panama's president appeals to a higher power as nearly 2 months of protests roil nation
PANAMA CITY (AP) — Panama's José Raúl Mulino appealed to a higher power on Friday, calling in an archbishop and a rabbi to deliver a message to striking banana workers after nearly two months of social protest that have roiled the country.
Mulino has said he won't reverse controversial changes to Panama's social security system, courts have deemed the strike illegal and top banana Chiquita Brands fired nearly 5,000 striking workers last month in Panama's western Bocas del Toro province.
But nothing has stopped the protests.
So at his weekly news briefing Friday, Mulino said he had met with Archbishop José Domingo Ulloa and one of Panama's leading Jewish figures, Rabbi Gustavo Kraselnik, to enlist them as intermediaries. He gave Ulloa a personal letter to bring to Francisco Smith, leader of the striking banana workers' union.
In the letter, Mulino said, he committed to send proposed legislation to the Congress that would be favorable for the country's banana sector, above all its workers. But he conditioned the proposal on former workers lifting their protest.
There was precedent for the maneuver.
In 2022, Ulloa brokered a dialogue that eased protests over the high cost of fuel and food. In 2018, Ulloa mediated a dispute between parts of the government.
Smith, secretary general of the Banana Industry Workers Union, had said earlier Friday before Mulino's announcement that he was open to dialogue. Union leaders planned to travel to the capital Monday to meet with the president of the National Assembly and present a list of demands. He insisted, however, that changes be made to the social security reform.
Smith, who has led the protest in western Bocas del Toro province, has said the social security reform passed in March threatens the special privileges laid out for banana workers in another law, covering things like subsidies and labor protections.
The impact has been acute. Chiquita Brands said last month they had lost at least $75 million before announcing a temporary halt to their operations in Panama.
Demonstrations have not been limited to the banana workers, to Bocas del Toro or even to the social security changes. At various times teachers, construction workers and students have protested as well.
Authorities have said they'll withhold the pay of 15,000 treachers for their strike.
On Thursday, border police clashed with protesters who had blocked a highway in eastern Darien province, leaving injured on both sides.
In addition to the social security changes, demonstrators have protested a security agreement giving U.S. troops access to some Panamanian facilities and efforts to reopen a massive copper mine.
Alma Solís, The Associated Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's big bill could affect your taxes
President Trump's bill to cut taxes and spending centers on an extension of his previous round of tax cuts, which Republicans slated for expiration at the end of this year back in 2017. As such, it will preserve the status quo on many big parts of the code so that taxpayers won't see any change in things like the amount of money the government takes out of their paychecks. Other tax cuts in the legislation now moving through Congress will be brand new, though most of the new additions are scheduled to end after a few years. Here's a look at some of the big-ticket items in the latest round of GOP tax cuts. Trump's 2017 tax law cut many individual income tax rates, and those would continue into the future through the current legislation. Under current law and moving up the income spectrum, marginal rates are 10 percent, 12 percent, 22 percent, 24 percent, 32 percent, 35 percent, and 37 percent. The new GOP law will lock those rates in place. The extension of those rates will reduce federal revenues by $2.2 trillion through 2034, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). If they were allowed to lapse, rates would change to 10 percent, 15 percent, 25 percent, 28 percent, 33 percent, 35 percent, and 39.6 percent. Only the 10-percent and 35-percent rates were left alone by the 2017 tax cuts. Trump in recent weeks floated letting the top rate go back to 39.6 percent from 37 percent as a way to lower the $3.8 trillion cost of the bill's tax portion, but he has since backed away from that idea. The law preserves — and temporarily boosts — the higher standard deduction, which was nearly doubled back in 2017. The new boost is $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for couples filing jointly and will last for four years. This is paired with getting rid of personal exemptions, making tax filing simpler for many taxpayers. In 2024, the standard deduction was $14,600 for individuals and $29,200 for married couples. The higher standard deduction is projected to reduce revenues by $1.3 trillion through 2034. The loss of personal exemptions will add $1.9 trillion to federal revenues, resulting in a net revenue gain between the two measures. The bill creates a temporary full deduction for tips and overtime pay, allowing taxpayers to avoid paying taxes on those types of compensation. Taken together, the tax breaks will reduce revenues by about $164 billion through 2028 when they expire. People who work in the restaurant industry say they're concerned that the tax break will motivate customers to pay fewer gratuities, since tipping is left to the discretion of individual shoppers and diners as opposed to being a component of the employer-paid wage. 'I'm afraid that people are going to want to tip less with that income not being taxed,' one New York City bartender, who asked not to be named, told The Hill. The person also expressed concern that the no-tips rule could add to tensions in his restaurant between the front-of-house staff, who work for tips, and the kitchen staff, who do not. 'In the industry, the bigger concern is, why would the front-of-house not pay taxes when the back-of-house will still be paying taxes because they don't get tips?' the person said. Tax experts told The Hill the measures could add to the amount of paperwork that tax filers — both employers and employees — need to fill out, depending on how the IRS interprets the law and modifies its regulations and forms. The law gives an additional $4,000 tax break to seniors below a certain income threshold, which would be added to the $15,000 standard deduction and an already existing $2,000 deduction for seniors. Trump promised while campaigning to remove taxes on Social Security, which is funded through a payroll tax and then taxed again, above an income threshold, upon disbursal to bolster the Social Security fund along with Medicare. The enhanced deduction for seniors is a close substitute for the Social Security tax cancellation promised by Trump but is technically a different tax. According to congressional rules, the Social Social program cannot be altered through budget reconciliation, which is the legislative workaround Republicans are using to allow a party-line vote on their bill and avoid a Democratic filibuster in the Senate. Republicans haven't agreed on the most controversial provision of their tax bill — the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap — but they're getting close. The initial proposal from the Ways and Means Committee raised the cap to $30,000, but members of the SALT caucus shot it down. Another proposal floated late Tuesday would bump the SALT deduction cap up to $40,000 — four times the current $10,000 cap — for people making $500,000 or less in income, three sources told The Hill. That level would increase by 1 percent a year over 10 years, according to one of the sources. Whatever they agree to, it will be expensive. Various estimates from the JCT put the cost of canceling the cap — which is a top priority for many blue-state Republicans — at around $1 trillion over 10 years. The SALT cap interacts with different parts of the tax code, including the higher standard deduction and the extended effective repeal of the alternative minimum tax (AMT), which costs more than $1.4 trillion in revenues. 'Even if you live in a place like New York, the combination of repealing the AMT and the $10,000 SALT cap was actually still positive for you. You were better off with the SALT cap because you lost the AMT than you would have been if the law hadn't happened at all,' Tax Policy Center senior fellow Howard Gleckman told The Hill. 'It was actually a good deal for people,' Gleckman said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
Why the Democratic NYC mayoral candidates have housing all wrong
The Democratic primary candidates for mayor all agree: the city faces a housing cost crisis. Brad Lander says it requires declaring a 'state of emergency.' Andrew Cuomo fears losing the 'soul of our city.' Scott Stringer insists 'the housing system is broken.' Unfortunately, the solutions which they — and especially Queens Assembly member Zohran Mamdani — offer will only make matters worse. They're ignoring the financial distress of private residential property owners, many operating at a loss, which could lead them simply to walk away from their buildings and bring New York back to the 1970s days of 'the Bronx is burning.' 6 Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani (second from right) present arguments as Whitney Tilson and Michael Blake look on during a Democratic mayoral primary debate this past week. AP What's more, they overlook the damage and high costs of their preferred solution: still more subsidized, rent-regulated 'affordable housing.' By far the most potentially dangerous idea is the centerpiece of the Mamdani campaign: a freeze on all rent-stabilized rents. A rent freeze would be a quick way to drive those struggling small landlords out of business altogether. That's what the city's Rent Guidelines Board, which sets the rents for nearly a million rent-stabilized buildings, heard at its April 10 meeting. They were told by Mark Willis of the Furman Center on Real Estate at NYU that owners of rent-stabilized properties in The Bronx are, on average, losing a stunning $120 per month on every apartment, such that 200,000 units, concentrated in that borough, are under 'severe distress.' Their income has simply not kept up with rising costs — property taxes and utilities, whose prices are definitely not frozen. They've been hit hard, too, by the 2019 state Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act, which limited any rent increases even for building improvements. Yet Mamdani asserts that 'our government works for the landlords.' 6 Brad Lander says NYC housing requires declaring a 'state of emergency.' AP 6 Mayor Eric Adams has recently acknowledged the tension between tenants' costs and building maintenance. Luiz Rampelotto/ZUMA / Ann Korchak, who heads the Small Property Owners of New York, disagrees. 'The costs of everything are rising. We're not in a vacuum. A freeze would crush us. You'd see foreclosures and abandonment.' A squeeze on operating income also decreases the value of a building, and makes banks unwilling to make loans for repairs. It's a vicious downward spiral — that's already left rent-stabilized buildings in bad shape. In its 2023 New York Housing and Vacancy Survey, the Census Bureau found that rent-regulated buildings had higher rates of rodents, leaks, mold, and heating breakdowns than market-rate units. These are the real housing emergencies. Eric Adams has at least acknowledged the tension between tenants' costs and building maintenance. He's defended a potential 1.75 to 4.75% rent increase approved by the RGB as 'protecting the quality of rent stabilized homes as costs continue to rise without overburdening tenants with unreasonable rent increases.' Instead, Democratic Socialist Mamdani proposes to 'unleash the public sector' and build 200,000 new units of public housing — despite the fact that NYCHA has struggled to maintain its existing 177 properties and faces a multi-billion-dollar repair backlog. Nationwide, public housing authorities, including NYCHA, are turning to the private sector to renovate and manage their buildings, not returning to Mamdani's Stalinist housing socialism. The debt financing he'd use would drain city funds from schools, parks, and police. Even less extreme Democrat proposals threaten to perpetuate housing problems. Cuomo, Lander, and Stringer all advocate building hundreds of thousands of costly new 'affordable' units, which, in exchange for property tax abatements, will be rent-stabilized. 6 Mamdani is proposing both a rent 'freeze' and the construction of hundreds of thousands of affordable housing units. Paul Martinka As those units age, they'll face the same revenue problems as older buildings in The Bronx. And they'll distort the city's housing market in a way that locks out talented newcomers the city needs. The proposed units are also costly, at least $500,000 a piece. Per Census data, turnover in rent-regulated units is half that of market-rate units, one of the reasons the city's overall turnover is 46% lower than the national average. 6 New public housing might sound logical, but NYC can barely manage and maintain the 117 existing public housing buildings already in operation. OLGA GINZBURG FOR THE NEW YORK POST That helps explain why the city's vacancy rate is so low and young adults must double and triple up in small apartments while Boomers age in place with empty bedrooms. Then there's 'inclusionary zoning' — a centerpiece of Council Speaker Adrienne Adams' housing policy. It actually drives up rents. Requiring that 20% of units be 'affordable' means that rents must be higher for the market-rate units for construction to make financial sense. 6 Supporters were seen holding signs in Bedford Stuyvesant during Zohran Mamdani's campaign rally. MediaPunch / BACKGRID Smart Democrats are backing what's been dubbed the 'abundance' agenda, which emphasizes the importance of building, not just redistribution. They should realize we need to encourage the construction of any and all housing. More supply will bring down the price of new housing and old, and help to meet demand. That would actually solve the housing crisis. Howard Husock is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Pope Leo Sells Out US Event Clashing With Parade on Trump's Birthday
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Pope Leo XIV has helped sell out a stadium show in Chicago with a promised virtual appearance—scheduled for the same day as a major military parade in Washington, D.C. Within the first 15 minutes of ticket availability, more than 9,000 people requested seats for the Chicago gathering. By the end of the first day, that number had climbed to 20,000. As of Friday, the $5 tickets were completely sold out. The event will be streamed live online, although CatholicTV has not confirmed whether it will air the broadcast. Why It Matters Pope Leo's expected involvement in the Chicago event, which will be streamed online, will draw huge interest and will divide some attention away from the Trump-backed military parade the same day, the president's birthday. The pope, in his first address to world diplomats, said the dignity of migrants had to be respected, potentially putting himself on a collision course with the Trump administration, which has stepped up enforcement of immigration law, arguing voters' concerns on the topic have long been ignored. From left: Donald Trump attends a meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., June 5, 2025; and Pope Leo XIV leaves after his weekly general audience in St. Peter's Square at The Vatican, May... From left: Donald Trump attends a meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., June 5, 2025; and Pope Leo XIV leaves after his weekly general audience in St. Peter's Square at The Vatican, May 28, 2025. More AP What To Know The pontiff is set to appear on big screens at Rate Field, home of Major League Baseball's Chicago White Sox, on June 14. "Although Pope Leo XIV will not be present in Chicago for the event, he has announced that he will be participating remotely from Rome, with a video message to be played at the gathering," the Vatican's news service said in a June 2 release promoting the event. That same date, President Donald Trump's birthday, Washington D.C. will play host to a major military parade celebrating the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport will be forced to shut down for several hours on June 14 to accommodate the parade, affecting more than 100 flights and thousands of passengers, according to The Washington Post. The New York Times reports the parade will feature 28 M1A1 Abrams tanks (each weighing 70 tons), 28 Stryker armored personnel carriers, more than 100 other military vehicles, 6,700 soldiers, 50 helicopters, 34 horses, two mules, and one dog. Notably, the Army did not hold a parade for its bicentennial in 1975. While the pontiff's message will be delivered from Rome, commentators noted the symbolism in the timing. "A bit of counterprogramming there," said MSNBC's Jonathan Lemire. "But I will say, when the Pope does come for real in the flesh—Chicago. Millions of people." John Heilemann, speaking alongside Lemire, added: "The counterprogramming point remains, Lemire, because the truth is—for America and Trump's military parade in Washington, if you don't live in Washington, that's a television spectacle. If you don't live in Chicago, the Pope's doing a video mass there at Rate Field. It's the same thing for those of us who live in New York. They're both just TV shows. And, you know, that's the definition of counterprogramming." The parade in Washington, meanwhile, is being promoted as a patriotic tribute to the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. A May 21 statement from the event organizers said it aims to "showcase the Army's modern capabilities" and "inspire a new generation to embrace the spirit of service, resilience, and leadership that defines the United States." Critics say the event is excessive and politically charged. "You know, there are so many reasons that you might want to push back on this military parade. All of them have been discussed before. There's a very kind of Kim Jong Un vibe to it," Heilemann told Lemire. "It's obviously going to be a kind of a nightmare, logistics-wise, for Washington, D.C. The streets are going to get all torn up. They're going to be filling in potholes from the damage that gets done for months to come." Trump and Pope Leo's Clash Over Immigration Since becoming the pontiff, Pope Leo has clashed with Trump—most notably over immigration policy. In one of his first major addresses as pope, U.S.-born Pope Leo XIV signaled a clear break from Trump's immigration stance, urging respect for migrants' dignity and compassion for those seeking a better life abroad. Speaking to diplomats at The Vatican, Leo reflected on his own roots as a descendant of immigrants and a former missionary in Peru. "My own story is that of a citizen, the descendant of immigrants, who in turn chose to emigrate," he said, adding that all people—"citizens and immigrants alike"—are equally worthy of dignity and protection. Leo's message contrasts sharply with Trump's vow to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. The late Pope Francis also clashed with Trump over immigration, once saying the president was "not Christian" for wanting to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. Leo's comments suggest that the Church under his leadership will continue to advocate for migrant rights. Before his election, Leo—then-Cardinal Robert Prevost—had pushed back on U.S. Vice President JD Vance's claim that Catholic theology prioritized caring for one's own over others, a statement Pope Leo reportedly disagreed with. In May, Pope Leo's brother John Prevost told The New York Times that his brother was "not happy" with Trump's immigration policy, adding that he "won't just sit back." "I know he's not happy with what's going on with immigration. I know that for a fact. How far he'll go with it is only one's guess, but he won't just sit back. I don't think he'll be the silent one," John Prevost said. What Happens Next Gates for the Chicago event will open at 12:30 p.m. on Saturday, June 14, with the program set to begin at 2:30 p.m. The day will conclude with a Holy Mass at 4 p.m., led by Cardinal Blase Cupich, Archbishop of Chicago. Tickets are still available for President Trump's parade.
