logo
‘My biggest fear': the artist spending three days banged up in a jail cell

‘My biggest fear': the artist spending three days banged up in a jail cell

The Guardian2 days ago

A filthy mattress lies in the corner of an otherwise barren room. The only adornments here, screwed to the wall, are a metal table and a payphone. But this is no ordinary prison. Rather, it's a north London gallery which has been temporarily converted into a humid, fetid cell. For 72 hours, it will cage an artist in solitary confinement.
Cell 72: The Cost of Confinement at Harlesden High Street Gallery is the work of young American conceptualist Emmanuel Massillon, with fellow Washington DC artist Allen-Golder Carpenter performing the role of inmate for three days. The gallery is tiny, its glass storefront giving passersby an open view of its cramped, inhumane quarters. What they will see over the course of the performance is a black man in prison-issue attire, incarcerated behind one-way glass, suffering through the ignominy and humiliation of solitary confinement. It is a stark reminder of the cruelty currently being endured by thousands of prisoners who have fallen victim to the American prison industrial complex.
But if the idea of an artist recreating a cell and pretending to be imprisoned sets you on edge, you're not alone. What Massillon and Carpenter are doing could easily be read as little more than an exploitation of others' trauma. Are they not fetishising the prison experience for artistic gain?
'The purpose of the project is not to exploit prison culture or black men being incarcerated for profit. We are trying to raise awareness,' says Massillon, who points out that 15% of the sales from the exhibition will be split between the US prison reform organisation DC Access to Justice Foundation and Volunteer Supported Education, a charity which helps young offenders at Feltham Prison and Young Offender Institution. 'I don't think people really know the horrors of prison, because you might listen to a song, you might hear it in music, and you might say, 'wow, this seems cool', because people glorify it, but there's real people that are being put in these situations. I came up with this project to show people that this isn't a place you want to be.'
Though neither Massillon nor Carpenter have been to prison, they say that growing up in Washington DC – a city with one of the highest incarceration rates in America – made them aware of the the brutal societal impact of the prison system.
'We talk often about being black and from America and our personal experiences of having our family members incarcerated,' says Massillon. 'A lot of people talk about the people who are incarcerated, but they never talk about how it affects your family and the psychological trauma it inflicts on the people around you.' He talks about how prison changes people, how they have to adapt mentally to survive, how they go in as one person and emerge as someone totally different. People can, he says, come out 'over aggressive, with this animalistic nature, lashing out at my family, threatening our safety'.
Growing up surrounded by friends and loved ones being sent to prison creates a constant feeling that you might be next. 'No matter your socio-economic background, when you're black, you're still black,' says Massillon. 'The thing about being racially profiled is nobody knows at first glance if you're a doctor, a lawyer, an NBA player or a street level thug, you're just black, so if you match the profile, that's literally all it takes.'
Thirty-two per cent of American prisoners are black, despite making up just 13% of the general population. In Britain, those figures are 13% and 4% respectively. Those are statistics used by racists to justify their bigotry, but they tell a wider story of injustice that Massillon and Carpenter are laying bare.
Massillon took inspiration for the installation from pioneering German conceptual artist Joseph Beuys who, in his seminal 1974 piece I Like America and America Likes Me, locked himself in a room with a wild coyote for three days. 'What is my coyote? What do I fear?' asks Massillon. 'My coyote is prison. Just walking in the street, just being a black man, I could really go to prison at any given time.'
'Going to prison is probably one of my single greatest fears,' echoes Carpenter. 'My way of coping with it is getting as close to it as I can, facing it, not turning myself away from it.'
So Carpenter will spend three stuffy London summer days stuck alone in this tiny gallery, getting closer than ever to the idea of imprisonment. When I visit the gallery, on a muggy early June morning, it already feels claustrophobically tight and airless: it smells of bodies and sweat, it's too warm, too small, the atmosphere both dull and unnerving. Carpenter will spend their time in here making improvised artworks out of disposable toothbrushes – the kind used to create makeshift prison shivs – whittling them down and turning the shavings into hourglasses to mark the passing of these 72 hours. After the performance, the prison-issue sweatsuit will be hung on the wall – all that will be left for the rest of the exhibition's month-long duration will be the remnants of time served.
In among all the fear and anxiety of prison life is an acknowledgment that music and film have both spent decades glorifying it. 'Prison itself is so intimately tied up with black American culture, especially through hip-hop,' says Carpenter. 'It's inseparable almost, prison is a pressure cooker that deeply impacted and influenced blues and jazz and eventually rap music. I think the glorification of violence through music is at an all-time high. It's almost like a caricature of itself at this point.'
It's the same here, where an entire generation of UK drill rappers have ended up in prison for crimes ranging from murder to drug trafficking, as English artist RIP Germain recently explored at Cabinet Gallery to devastating effect. Going to jail has become something to aim for, a status symbol, a badge of honour.
So how do Massillon and Carpenter counter allegations that what they're doing is appropriative, a kind of incarceration cosplay? 'People might project whatever motive on to it they want, but what else could we talk about?' says Carpenter. 'I don't really want to paint pictures of flowers when [black people] are locked up at an all-time high and prison is one of the biggest businesses in America. When private universities like Columbia own shares in prisons and have an active role in profiting from disadvantaging people of colour on a mass scale. I'm trying to say the thing that's not being said.'
Regardless of whatever criticism gets levelled at them, they'll be satisfied to get people talking, thinking. 'I preserve history through artwork and put it in places where people can see it publicly to start conversations,' says Massillon. 'These are real-world problems that are being put in front of you. What do you do to make sure that people stay out of these situations? Are you donating money? Are you checking in on your loved ones that are incarcerated?'
Ultimately, he's hoping this confrontational work causes people to examine their own responses. As he says: 'If you're mad at us for creating a mock scenario of somebody locked in a box, why are you upset?'
The Cell 72 performance by Allen-Golder Carpenter is at Harlesden High Street Gallery, London from 6-8 June

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Orwell's 1984 now comes with ‘trigger warning'
Orwell's 1984 now comes with ‘trigger warning'

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Orwell's 1984 now comes with ‘trigger warning'

George Orwell's estate has been accused of attempting to censor 1984 by adding a 'trigger warning' preface to the 75th anniversary edition of the dystopian novel. The new introductory essay describes the novel's protagonist Winston Smith as 'problematic' and warns modern readers may find his views on women 'despicable'. Critics claim the preface, written by Dolen Perkins-Valdez, an American novelist, and included in the 75th anniversary edition published in the US last year, risks undermining the work's warning against state control of thought. In 1984, citizens of the superstate Oceania are punished for subversive thoughts by the Thought Police. Now, in a real-world twist, the estate that oversees Orwell's literary legacy stands accused of ideological policing. 'We're getting somebody to actually convict George Orwell himself of thought crime in the introduction to his book about thought crime,' said Walter Kirn, a novelist and critic, on the podcast America This Week, hosted by journalist Matt Taibbi. 'We're not yet in a world where books and classic books are being excised or eliminated,' Kirn added, but warned the Orwell estate-approved edition of 1984 had been 'published with an apology for itself'. Ms Perkins-Valdez's preface is included in the anniversary edition of the 1949 classic, published by Berkley Books, an imprint of Penguin Random House. In it, the award-winning novelist said she aimed to approach 1984 as a new reader, and admitted that, given the protagonist's views, she might once have abandoned the book entirely. 'I'm enjoying the novel on its own terms, not as a classic, but as a good story, that is, until Winston reveals himself to be a problematic character,' she wrote. 'For example, we learn of him: 'He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones'.' The novel follows Winston Smith, a minor bureaucrat who secretly rebels against the regime with Julia, a fellow party member. Their doomed affair is cut short when they are arrested, tortured and brainwashed into betraying one another. Although Ms Perkins-Valdez eventually concludes Orwell was portraying misogyny as a feature of totalitarianism, her comments have provoked a backlash. Her preface also takes issue with the novel's handling of race. As a black woman, she says she finds little to connect with characters in Oceania. 'The most 1984-ish thing I've read' Mr Kirn questioned the need for Ms Perkins-Valdez's introduction, pointing out the 75th anniversary edition of 1984 already included a foreword by Thomas Pynchon, one of the greatest living American novelists. 'If you have a foreword by Thomas Pynchon to a book, you don't need another foreword, right? You got maybe the greatest living novelist of our time, who's also a recluse, to come out and write something. That's all you need. 'But no, these people felt they needed an introduction before the old white man's introduction. So this version of 1984 has a trigger warning!' He called it 'the most 1984-ish thing I've ever f---ing read'. The controversy follows real-life cases of so-called 'thought crime' in Britain. In February, The Telegraph revealed that Julian Foulkes, a retired special constable, had been wrongly arrested and cautioned by Kent Police over a social media post that warned of rising anti-Semitism. Officers who raided his home commented on his 'very Brexity' bookshelves and leafed through titles including The War on the West by Douglas Murray and The Demise of the Free State by David Green. His caution has since been deleted, and he has received compensation. Last month, The Telegraph reported that Scotland Yard had charged a Jewish counter-protester for holding a placard mocking Hezbollah's leader, claiming the sign could 'distress' terrorist sympathisers. The charge was dropped after eight months. Orwell himself has not escaped modern reassessment. In 2023, his wife's biographer Anna Funder described him as 'sadistic, misogynistic, homophobic, sometimes violent' and claimed 1984's darkness reflected the author's own. 'He desperately wants to be decent,' she told an audience at the Cheltenham Literature Festival in 2023. 'But writing a book like 1984, which is violent, misogynist, sadistic, grim, paranoid: that comes out of a writer's flaws.' Nor is this the first time 1984 has been flagged for 'problematic' content. In 2022, the University of Northampton warned students it contained 'explicit material' that may be 'offensive and upsetting'.

Andrew Tate fined for driving 90mph over limit in Romania
Andrew Tate fined for driving 90mph over limit in Romania

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Andrew Tate fined for driving 90mph over limit in Romania

Controversial influencer Andrew Tate has been caught speeding at 196km/h (121mph) in a 50km/h zone in Romania, officials have British-American national was recorded driving at nearly four times the speed limit in a village about 184km from the Romanian capital, 38-year-old received a fine of £310 ($420), in line with local traffic legislation, and has his driving licence suspended for 120 days due to the severity of the offence, police self-proclaimed misogynist and his brother, Tristan, are currently facing charges including rape and human trafficking in Romania, as well as separate allegations in the UK and US. They deny any wrongdoing. The brothers are allowed to travel in Romania, where they live, subject to court-ordered conditions while their cases are Tate was caught speeding on Saturday in the central village of Bujoreni, police said. They added in a statement that excessive speed remained one of the leading causes of road deaths in Romania. Tate brothers to return to the UK to face chargesBrothers travel to the US despite inquiryWho is Andre Tate? The elder Tate has often flaunted his collection of sports cars, including Bugattis and Lamborghinis, frequently posting photos of himself alongside them on social former kickboxer has gained millions of followers online, where he has often mixed political messages with showcasing a flashy has been caught speeding on numerous occasions in Romania. In April 2021, Tate was stopped in a town near Bucharest for allegedly driving a Porsche at 138km/h, according to local reports. A year prior, he had received a speeding fine in of his luxury cars were seized by Romanian authorities in 2023, as part of legal proceedings against him. Tate has reportedly criticised British police for refusing bribes during traffic stops, calling it "offensive". He has cited such attitudes as among the reasons for moving his businesses to Romania in 2017.A central theme in Tate's online messaging is the idea that an "elite club" of successful individuals live free from the challenges faced by has stated that he escaped "the Western world" by moving to Romania, "where corruption is accessible to everybody". A fan site quoted him saying: "If corruption exists, which it does, let us all play."British prosecutors have said Andrew and Tristan Tate will return to the UK to face 21 criminal charges - including rape and human trafficking - once proceedings against them in Romania have the US, the brothers are facing a separate, civil lawsuit brought by four women who allege they were coerced into sex brothers have characterised themselves as innocent in relation to all the cases against them.

PETER HITCHENS: If any person acted like this Govenment, they'd be confined in a locked ward for delusions
PETER HITCHENS: If any person acted like this Govenment, they'd be confined in a locked ward for delusions

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

PETER HITCHENS: If any person acted like this Govenment, they'd be confined in a locked ward for delusions

If the British Government were a person, it would long ago have been sectioned and placed in a locked ward because of its severe delusions of grandeur. It is like a man who rushes into the street and picks fights with large strangers for no reason, or a man who offers to buy a generous round in the pub and turns out to have no money, just a few American nickels and a piece of string in his dusty pocket.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store