Education Department probing Washington state school district that refused to remove trans athlete
The Education Department says it is investigating a Washington state school district that recently moved to ban transgender students from participating on girls' sports teams after it also reprimanded a student-athlete who misgendered a transgender opponent.
A civil rights complaint filed Feb. 17 by the Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism (FAIR) alleges the Tumwater School District, a district of about 6,000 students in Western Washington, violated Title IX and a student's First Amendment rights by refusing to remove a transgender player on an opposing team from a girls' junior varsity basketball game last month.
Frances Staudt, a 15-year-old sophomore at Tumwater High School, had requested school officials either eject the student or forfeit the game, according to the complaint. When they refused, citing a Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA) policy that allows student-athletes to participate in line with their gender identity, Staudt removed herself from the game.
Staudt continued lobbying school officials from the bench to remove the student and repeatedly voiced 'her concerns about a boy playing in a game that was meant for girls,' according to the complaint. Tumwater High School said Staudt had violated the district's policies against bullying and harassment by intentionally misgendering the student, which Staudt then argued violated her free speech rights.
'I looked over, and I said, 'You are a man,' because that is my First Amendment right,' Staudt told KOMO-TV in Seattle about the game, which took place one day after President Trump signed an executive order to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports nationwide.
On Thursday, the Tumwater School District's Board of Directors voted 3-1 in favor of a resolution supporting an amendment to WIAA policy that would prevent transgender girls from participating in girls' sports.
The Education Department's Office for Civil Rights said Monday it was investigating the school district 'amid allegations that it continues to violate Title IX by allowing male athletes to compete in girls' interscholastic athletics.'
The investigation is one of at least eight the department has launched into states, school districts and athletic associations since Trump's executive order on transgender athletes. The president publicly sparred with Maine Gov. Janet Mills (D) last month after the state's governing body for high school sports said it would not enforce the restrictions, citing a state anti-discrimination law preventing them from doing so.
In a Feb. 20 YouTube video, Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal said state protections against gender identity discrimination similarly prohibit Washington State schools from barring trans student-athletes from teams that match their gender identity.
'Our state laws make clear that students get to identify and participate in activities based on the gender in which they identify. We're going to uphold that law,' he said.
'Until Congress acts differently and changes the law, or our state legislature changes the law, we're going to follow the current law and the current civil rights framework of this state and that's what it tells us to do, and I hope everyone can respect that,' Reykdal said.
The Senate is set to vote this week on a bill to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports at schools.
In an emailed statement, Laurie Wiedenmeyer, director of communications and community relations for the Tumwater School District, said the Education Department had notified the district of its investigation on Feb. 28.
'Our priority has always been to create a safe, welcoming, and inclusive learning environment for all students, families, and staff,' Wiedenmeyer said. 'While we cannot discuss specific details due to confidentiality requirements, we take all concerns seriously and remain dedicated to continuous improvement in our schools.'
'We appreciate the patience of our community as we work through this, and we remain dedicated to transparency and continuous improvement. Our focus remains on supporting each of our students, staff, and families while fostering an educational environment that upholds the values of respect and opportunity for all,' she added.
In a news release, Craig Trainor, the Education Department's acting assistant secretary for civil rights, said Washington state's federal funding could be at risk.
'If Washington wants to continue to receive federal funds from the Department, it has to follow federal law,' he said.
The number of transgender students participating in school sports is unclear.
In September, the National Federation of State High School Associations, which does not report how many student-athletes are transgender, said more than 8 million students competed in high school sports last year. Karissa Niehoff, the organization's CEO, told The Hill an openly trans athlete has never set a national record.
Charlie Baker, president of the NCAA, which barred transgender athletes from competing in women's college sports following Trump's executive order, told a Senate panel in December that he is aware of fewer than 10 transgender NCAA athletes.
Reykdal, in his YouTube video last month, said out of nearly 250,000 student-athletes in Washington State, 'roughly 5 to 10 youth have identified themselves as transgender.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Junto Nakatani must ignore the 'Monster' under his bed as he prepares for Ryosuke Nishida's tough test
Seventy-nine seconds into Top Rank's official YouTube video titled "A Look Into Junto Nakatani's Training Camp" and the name Naoya Inoue is already mentioned. It's no surprise. The Japanese "Monster" has become boxing royalty down in the lower weight divisions and has been in the conversation for the sport's mythical pound-for-pound top spot for many years — but this weekend isn't about him. Advertisement In the early hours of Sunday morning inside Tokyo's Ariake Colosseum, Junto Nakatani (30-0, 23 KOs) makes the fourth defense of his WBC bantamweight title against IBF king Ryosuke Nishida (10-0, 2 KOs) — and in doing so, Nakatani is attempting to grease the wheel for a potential meeting with Inoue (30-0, 27 KOs) in a year's time. It's a mistake we've seen boxing make time and time again. When too much investment is placed in future, speculative real estate, it can cause the here and now to suffer. In this case, a three-weight world champion in Nakatani will see his career put on trial until he meets the one fighter who has been unfairly deemed his "final boss" — Inoue. This is not to suggest that us, as fans, shouldn't pine for these mouth-watering spectacles. But in doing so, context needs to be applied. The success of a boxing career isn't binary and Nakatani deserves his own moment in the sun before he is placed next to the Inoue measuring stick. Advertisement Nakatani, himself, is adding fuel to the Inoue fire. Though it's hard to dodge the bullet of questioning when it is fired so readily. "He (Inoue) inspires me to get better as a fighter," the 27-year-old explained during his final press conference ahead of his bantamweight unification clash. "We are hoping that this time next year we can get this fight [with Inoue], but a lot can happen between now and then." Like the "Monster," Nakatani has 30 wins on his pro slate, but has reached this milestone with less focus, attention and fanfare than his senior countryman. Based in the United States, the power-punching knockout artist has stopped all four of his opponents at 118 pounds so far, last hearing the final bell in September 2023 in a one-sided rout of Argi Cortes at super flyweight. I was in attendance that night in Tokyo, Japan, and it was Kenshiro Teraji and Tenshin Nasukawa who received the lion's share of the attention from the passionate yet traditionally subdued Japanese crowd. Much like that evening in his nation's capital, Nakatani's work thus far has been done in the shadow of others — but it has clearly been of benefit. The emotional drain of acting as the sport's flag-bearer for a nation can take its toll on those ill-prepared. Advertisement Nakatani's grounding is underpinned by his career-long head trainer, Rudy Hernandez, who has crafted his charge's tools since the age of 15. The head honcho of the L.A Boxing Gym knows all too well that nothing is promised in boxing. 'I believe that if it does happen (Inoue vs. Nakatani), it'll be the greatest fight in Japanese boxing history,' Hernandez told the Top Rank cameras. 'But there is not a single fighter in the history of this sport that maintained No. 1 forever. What comes up must come down. Junto is the guy today, but he might not be the guy tomorrow.' Nakatani's opponent this weekend can't be filed into the folder titled "William Scull and friends." Nishida is an unbeaten champion in his own right, and will be viewing Nakatani as his own potential stepping-stone to greatness in the sport. Both southpaws share similarities in their styles, and despite just the two stoppages on his record, Nishida has real pop in his punches. It's important we don't wish-cast careers like Nakatani's away. If he wins this weekend, he will undoubtedly deserve credit and to receive his flowers for unifying the bantamweight division, not to simply be treated as the victor of a supposed 'No. 1 contender' fight for Inoue. Similarly, if he loses, we shouldn't reduce his career to 'what might have been,' speculating on the size of the damage caused.


Politico
15 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP lawmakers stick with Trump in messy Musk breakup
Amid the messy ongoing divorce between the president and the world's richest man, this much is already clear: Donald Trump has sole custody of the House GOP. Republican lawmakers are making clear that, if forced to choose, it's Trump — not Elon Musk — they're sticking by as leaders race to contain the fallout for their 'one big, beautiful bill.' Even Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who helms a House panel inspired by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative, blasted Musk's public attacks on Trump as 'unwarranted' and criticized his 'lashing out on the internet.' 'America voted for Donald Trump on Nov. 4, 2024 — every single vote mattered just as much as the other,' Greene said in a brief interview. 'And whether it was $1 that was donated or hundreds of millions of dollars, the way I see it, everybody's the same.' Like many Americans, GOP members watched Thursday's online exchange with a sense of car-crash-like fascination. Many shared that they hoped Musk and Trump could somehow patch things up. But many — including some of the former DOGE chief's biggest backers on Capitol Hill — were wholly unsurprised to see the billionaire suddenly cut down to size after months of chatter about who was really calling the shots at the White House. 'It's President Trump, not President Musk,' said one lawmaker granted anonymity to speak frankly about prevailing opinions inside the House GOP. Speaker Mike Johnson made no secret of where he stands on the public breakup. He told reporters Friday that he hoped the two men 'reconcile' and that it would be 'good for the party and the country if all this worked out.' But in the nearly same breath, Johnson quickly reaffirmed his allegiance to the president and issued a warning to Musk. 'Do not doubt, do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. 'He is the leader of the party. He is the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era. And he's doing an excellent job for the people.' Other House Republicans concurred with the speaker's assessment Friday, even as they faced the looming threat of Musk targeting them in the upcoming midterms or at least pulling back on his political giving after pouring more than $250 million into the 2024 election on behalf of Trump and the GOP ticket. 'I think it's unfortunate,' said Rep. Tim Moore (R-N.C.) of the breakup. 'But Donald Trump was elected by a majority of the American people.' Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio, who was one of only two Republicans to oppose Trump's megabill in the House last month, also made clear he stood with the president over Musk. 'He does not have a flight mode — he's fight, fight, fight … and he's been pretty measured,' Davidson said of Trump. 'I think Elon Musk looked a little out of control. And hopefully he gets back and grounded.' GOP leaders who have spent weeks cajoling their members to vote for the sprawling domestic-policy bill hardly hid their feelings as Musk continued to bash the legislation online, even calling on Americans to call their representatives in an effort to tank it. 'Frankly, it's united Republicans even more to go and defend the great things that are in this bill — and once it's passed and signed into law by August, September, you're going to see this economy turning around like nothing we've ever seen,' Majority Leader Steve Scalise said in a brief interview Friday. 'I'll be waiting for all those people who said the opposite to admit that they were wrong,' Scalise added. 'But I'm not expecting that to happen.' A few Republicans are still trying to walk a fine line by embracing both Trump and Musk — especially some fiscal hawks who believe Musk is right about the megabill adding trillions to the national debt. 'I think Elon has some valid points about the bill, concerns that myself and a handful of others were working to address up until the passage of it,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said in an interview. 'I think that'll make the bill stronger. I think it'll help our standing with the American people.' Both Trump and Musk 'have paid a tremendous price personally for this country,' Cloud added. 'And them working together is certainly far better for the country.' Notably, House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, a key Musk ally on the Hill, declined to engage Thursday when asked about the burgeoning feud. Instead, the Ohio Republican responded by praising the megabill Musk had moved to tank. Democrats, for their part, watched the unfolding and public breakup with surprise and a heavy dose of schadenfreude. 'There are no good guys in a fight like this,' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.). 'You just eat some popcorn and watch the show.'


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits
The conservative House Freedom Caucus said on Friday that it would 'not accept' changes that 'water down' its cuts to green energy tax credits as the Senate weighs whether to alter the legislation. The House version of the 'big, beautiful bill' would make drastic changes to tax cuts for low-carbon energy sources passed in the Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Climate-friendly energy projects, including wind and solar, would only be able to qualify for the credits under the House bill if they begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment. This brief window would likely make many projects ineligible for the credits, and is expected to significantly hamstring the development of new renewable power. In a post on social media on Friday, the Freedom Caucus warned the Senate against loosening that restriction or others included in the bill. 'We want to be crystal clear: if the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,' said the post, which was attributed to the Freedom Caucus's board. 'The House Freedom Caucus Board will stand united holding the line. The American people didn't send us here to cave to the swamp — they sent us here to change it,' they added. The Senate has been widely expected to consider changes that could slow the rapid elimination of the tax credit passed under the House version of Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and John Curtis (Utah) released a letter warning against a 'full scale' repeal of the tax credits. Senate Republicans can only afford three defections and pass their bill. On Friday, a group of 13 House GOP moderates released a letter calling on Senate leadership 'to substantively and strategically improve clean energy tax credit provisions' in the legislation. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense and deliver a truly pro-energy growth final bill that protects taxpayers while also unleashing the potential of U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers,' said the letter, which was led by Reps. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.). Altogether, the letters illustrate what could be a tough task ahead of the Republican leadership as they look to find a measure that will keep at least 50 senators on board and appease the House. Emily Brooks contributed.