logo
Tesla's Cars Have the Worst Drivers in America, New Study Finds

Tesla's Cars Have the Worst Drivers in America, New Study Finds

Yahoo19-02-2025

There are plenty of stereotypes in the automotive world about which kinds of cars are chosen most by those with poor driving etiquette. (Priuses and Nissans often receive a strong degree of scorn.) To settle the score scientifically, the folks over at LendingTree have analyzed and categorized real-life driving data to give us a definitive answer: Tesla is ranked at the top of the "car brands with the worst drivers" list, under the quantitative model used by LendingTree.
Comparing incidents by brand for every 1000 drivers in 2024, Tesla has the highest rate of crashes, speeding citations, and DUIs, with 36.94 incidents for every 1000 drivers. (This is a sharp increase from the 31.13 incidents per every 1000 Tesla drivers in the 2023 version of the study.) Notably, Tesla drivers also rank as the worst drivers in nine different states. Instantaneous torque paired with relatively affordable pricing and widespread youth appeal makes this incident rate rather unsurprising,
The second and third-place finishers aren't all that startling, either. Ram takes the second slot in the list of brands with the worst drivers, with 33.92 incidents per every 1000 operators. Subaru follows, with 32.85 incidents per every 1000 drivers. These manufacturers saw a climb in their incident rates compared to 2023, though both automakers were previously podium finishers in the worst drivers list.
However, Ram drivers should be congratulated for their widespread lack of driving courtesy, as the American pickup brand managed to amass the worst driver title in 16 states. (That's down from 2023, when Ram was the worst-behaving brand in 23 states). New Jersey seems to remains a particularly challenging place for the brands' customers, based on Ram's 74.20 incidents per 1000 drivers in the Garden State.
The list goes on to rank Audi, Mazda, Volkswagen, and BMW in the following slots, with the incident rate slowly but surely going down as the list continues. Subaru managed to snag the worst driver credit in six different states. while Volkswagen claimed the crown in five; ptherwise, most remaining brands appear to be grabbing that title in only one or two states.
To temper out the shaming, LendingTree also categorized the car brands with the best drivers in the U.S. Surprisingly, many of these brands have ceased to exist at this point, potentially indicating a statistical variance in how many units are on the road — but the parallels between old age and the brands with fewest incidents is a bit shocking.
At the top of the list is Mercury, with only 18.63 incidents per 1000 drivers, followed by Pontiac's 19.72 incidents per 1000 drivers. (Interestingly, Pontiac accounts for the highest rate of DUIs across the board.) Cadillac, Chrysler, Lincoln, and Buick continue the list; Mitsubishi makes a surprising experience at number nine, and Ford and Chevrolet tie for tenth place. All told, these brands are often driven by those who take a slower approach to driving. Save for models like the CT5-V Blackwing, wheeling your grandpa's Cadillac around a corner can be a slow-moving procedure.
While it's fun to crack jokes about these incident rates, they do have a real effect on all of our insurance costs: the higher the incident rate is for the brand of car you drive, the more you're likely to pay more in month-to-month insurance costs. And the impacts on your premiums can be immediate, LendingTree auto insurance expert Rob Bhatt said in a statement.
"Most of these incidents are going to make your rates go up. The insurance rates for specific models are more impacted by accidents than some of these other incidents," Bhatt said. "If Tesla drivers get into accidents at a higher rate than other drivers, insurance companies will probably spend more to insure them than other vehicles. This, in turn, may prompt insurance companies to charge higher rates to insure a Tesla."
You Might Also Like
You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox
Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners
The Man Who Signs Every Car

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How GM + Nvidia are changing the face of the automotive industry
How GM + Nvidia are changing the face of the automotive industry

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How GM + Nvidia are changing the face of the automotive industry

General Motors is making significant strides in revolutionizing its manufacturing processes through a new partnership with chipmaker Nvidia. Announced in March, the collaboration aims to harness the power of artificial intelligence to enhance automation, cut costs and improve efficiency across GM's factories. At the heart of this partnership is Nvidia's advanced computing technology, which GM is leveraging to build custom AI systems for its manufacturing operations. The automaker is using Nvidia Omniverse with Cosmos to create digital twins of its assembly lines, allowing for virtual testing and simulation of production processes before physical implementation. This is JP Hampstead, co-host with Craig Fuller of the Bring It Home podcast. Welcome to the 25th edition of our newsletter, where we go deep into one of the largest-scale tech-industrial partnerships in the automotive industry. 'Using digital twins, we simulate a running production line before it's constructed, optimizing our planning process and allowing us to scale faster while saving time and money,' explained JP Clausen, GM's executive VP of global manufacturing and sustainability. 'It also helps our team members identify and solve problems more effectively.'These digital simulations enable GM to test and refine new production processes without disrupting existing vehicle manufacturing, a critical advantage as the company balances production of both traditional combustion engines and electric vehicles. The partnership extends to training robotics platforms for operations such as material handling, transport and precision welding. Through a combination of AI and machine learning, GM has developed systems that can identify potential issues in manufacturing, such as leaks in battery packs, allowing for quick repairs and supporting quality control. The automotive industry, led by companies like GM, remains the largest user of industrial robots in America. According to Brookings Institute data, nearly half of the 233,305 industrial robots in the United States are employed in auto manufacturing. Michigan, home to GM's headquarters, accounts for nearly 28,000 robots — approximately 12% of the nation's total. Detroit, in particular, stands out as the robot capital of America, with more than three times the number of industrial robots compared to other metropolitan areas. By 2015, the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn area had 15,115 industrial robots in place, or 8.5 per 1,000 workers, a significant increase from 5,753 robots in high concentration of automation has contributed to a dramatic shift in GM's workforce composition over decades. In 1979, GM employed 468,000 American hourly workers, representing 76% of its U.S. workforce. By 2021, that number had dropped to just 45,000 American hourly workers, or 46% of the company's domestic workforce. GM's innovation hub, the Global Technical Center in Warren, Michigan, employs approximately 24,000 people with an average annual salary of $120,000. This facility has become central to developing the company's AI-driven manufacturing technologies. Using both robotics and proprietary AI tools, GM has implemented systems to inspect welds and paint coats, identifying irregularities and anomalies that might affect vehicle quality. This technology not only improves product quality but also enhances workplace safety by automating potentially hazardous tasks. 'We're using AI and advanced software to help our team minimize ergonomic stressors, enable workplace safety and enhance quality in our manufacturing plants,' notes Clausen. 'Investing in our current and future workforce with better technology helps ensure that our teams have the skills and tools needed as we continue to evolve our manufacturing footprint to meet customer demand.' GM's automation advancements come at a critical time as the company navigates challenges in electric vehicle production. In October 2023, GM announced delays in the production of electric trucks, including the Chevy Silverado EV and GMC Sierra EV, pushing the start date at its Orion Assembly plant from 2024 to late 2025. The company cited the need to 'align its capital investments with electric vehicle demand and implement vehicle engineering improvements to boost profitability' as reasons for the delay. GM's partnership with Nvidia aims to address these challenges by improving engineering efficiency and manufacturing processes. Engineers collaborate in real time on digital twins of manufacturing robotics using Nvidia's Omniverse. (Photo: Nvidia) Despite production delays, GM maintains ambitious plans, projecting to have more than 1 million units of EV capacity in North America by the end of 2025 and to convert 50% of its North American assembly capacity to EV production by automation raises concerns about job displacement, GM emphasizes that AI is being implemented to enhance, not replace, its workforce. The company describes its approach as 'people-centric,' using AI to help employees avoid ergonomic stressors and improve workplace safety. 'It's not about automating everything or building more vehicles faster — our winning formula is driven by a combination of flexible manufacturing, advanced technology, and a talented workforce,' states Clausen. Nevertheless, GM's transformation from 'automaker to platform innovator' suggests a continuing shift toward higher-skilled, technology-focused employment. In its presentation to investors titled 'From Automaker to Platform Innovator,' GM projected that software and new business ventures would grow from $2 billion to $80 billion by 2030, indicating a future in which salaried professionals may increasingly outnumber traditional manufacturing workers. The Nvidia partnership positions GM to remain competitive in an increasingly technology-driven automotive landscape. Jensen Huang, Nvidia's founder and CEO, emphasized the significance of the collaboration: 'The era of physical AI is here, and together with GM, we're transforming transportation, from vehicles to the factories where they're made.' GM plans to build next-generation vehicles on Nvidia DRIVE AGX, based on the Nvidia Blackwell architecture, delivering up to 1,000 trillion operations per second of high-performance compute. This technology will not only power manufacturing but also enhance future advanced driver-assistance systems and in-cabin safety features. As automotive manufacturing continues to advance, GM's strategic investments in AI and robotics may provide a competitive edge. The company has maintained its position as the U.S. sales leader for three consecutive years through 2024, offering what it describes as 'the broadest portfolio of electric vehicles in the industry,' with plans to expand to a dozen EV models by the end of 2025. 'The era of physical AI is here.' – Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO (Image: Fortune Business Insights) GlobalFoundries Announces $16B U.S. Investment to Reshore Essential Chip Manufacturing and Accelerate AI Growth GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ: GFS) (GF), working with the Trump administration and with support from leading technology companies aiming to onshore critical components of their supply chain, has announced plans to invest $16 billion to expand its semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging capabilities across its facilities in New York and Vermont. GF's investment is a strategic response to the explosive growth in artificial intelligence, which is accelerating demand for next-generation semiconductors designed for power efficiency and high-bandwidth performance across data centers, communications infrastructure and AI-enabled devices. Kraft Heinz confirms $3B investment in US manufacturing Kraft Heinz will spend $3 billion on its U.S. manufacturing facilities, the company confirmed to Food Dive. It's the largest investment in its plants in decades. Pedro Navio, president of Kraft Heinz's North America operations, told Reuters earlier this month that planned investments could add 3,500 employees to the Lunchables producer's workforce. Rolls-Royce to invest $24 million in US manufacturing Rolls-Royce has announced a $24 million U.S. investment that will more than double production of backup power generation systems for data centers and create more than 100 new jobs in the U.S. The investment includes a new 250,000ft2 Logistics Operations Centre adjacent to the existing manufacturing facility in Mankato, Minnesota. It will enable Rolls-Royce to increase production capacity for its mtu Series 4000 generator sets, which are in high demand from the rapidly growing data center industry. The post How GM + Nvidia are changing the face of the automotive industry appeared first on FreightWaves. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten

Residents Aggravated as Tesla Dumps Dozens of Cybertrucks in Shopping Center
Residents Aggravated as Tesla Dumps Dozens of Cybertrucks in Shopping Center

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Residents Aggravated as Tesla Dumps Dozens of Cybertrucks in Shopping Center

Residents of Farmington Hills, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit, were left baffled last week when their local shopping center was overrun with unattended Tesla vehicles, mostly Cybertrucks. Some residents, who estimate they've seen up to 100 Cybertrucks left in the shopping center's parking lot, initially assumed the trucks were unsold inventory from a nearby dealership. However, Tesla employees who spoke with CBS Detroit insisted the vehicles have already been sold. They say the company is merely storing these units at the shopping center, which shares an owner with a local Tesla service center, until it can deliver them to their new owners. City officials, however, say Tesla never got their approval to use the lot, and that doing so is a clear violation of local policy. Charmaine Kettler-Scmult, director of planning and community development for Farmington Hills, told CBS Detroit that the city had already reached out to the shopping center about removing the Cybertrucks, explaining that 'storage of vehicles is not a permitted use' of the parking lot. Outside of Farmington Hills, however, Cybertrucks seem to be a tough sell. Only about 40,000 Cybertrucks have sold since the model launched in 2023, a far cry from the 250,000 units Musk once predicted Tesla would sell annually. Beyond Cybertrucks, overall Tesla sales have crashed across Europe, where even consumers interested in electric vehicles are increasingly disinterested in buying from Musk. In April, Tesla was dethroned for the first time ever as Europe's top-selling electric vehicle manufacturer, being outsold by Chinese company BYD. Then in May, Tesla's sales fell 29 percent in Spain, 53.7 percent in Sweden, and a staggering 67 percent in France. Meanwhile, in Germany, Europe's largest car market, sales of Tesla vehicles have been in a nosedive for five consecutive months. The sharp decline in Tesla's sales isn't surprising, considering Elon Musk's stint with DOGE severely damaged his business reputation. Last month, the annual Axios Harris poll revealed that Tesla, which once ranked eighth in respondents' list of their 100 most trusted American companies, had fallen to 95th place. Just last week, CNN obtained a letter to Musk from a group of Tesla investors in which they criticized him for 'divert[ing] his time and attention from actively managing Tesla's operations.' The letter also demanded that he spend at least 40 hours a week working at Tesla. Though he initially lashed out at the investors behind the letter, Musk himself has hinted that he knows his time in the White House hurt his other business dealings. In an interview with Ars Technica, Musk admitted that his 'relative time allocation… probably was a little too high on the government side.' Musk departed his White House position with a bizarre press conference on May 30, so it's too soon to know if doing so has helped to stymie Tesla's free fall. For now, the company maintains that its unapproved use of the Michigan parking lot is merely storage for the few trucks that have sold. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Elon Musk's Tesla Cries 'Competitive Harm' Over Self-Driving Crash Data Disclosure
Elon Musk's Tesla Cries 'Competitive Harm' Over Self-Driving Crash Data Disclosure

The Drive

time42 minutes ago

  • The Drive

Elon Musk's Tesla Cries 'Competitive Harm' Over Self-Driving Crash Data Disclosure

The latest car news, reviews, and features. Lawyers for Tesla have filed a motion asking a judge to throw out a public information request that would require the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to release data about crashes that occurred while its vehicles were under the control of automated or semi-automated driving systems. Tesla misleadingly calls its systems Autopilot and Full-Self Driving. Tesla asked the judge to dismiss the motion on the grounds that competitors could use the data to 'assess the efficacy' of Tesla's hardware and software, which could lead to 'financial and economic harm.' The Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) suit was brought by The Washington Post last year in an effort to obtain additional data about vehicles that were under the control of driver assistance systems (either Autopilot or Full Self-Driving) when a crash occurred, Reuters reports. With Tesla lobbying the Trump administration to end existing reporting requirements for self-driving vehicle accidents, it's a case with a lot of eyes on it. Tesla's motion argues that competitors would normally have to pay a lot of money to learn what Tesla has over the course of developing its driver aids, and that by releasing crash data, NHTSA would effectively be handing a watered-down version of that (valuable) accumulated data to competitors, allowing them to essentially 'read ahead' in their own development process by learning from Tesla's progress (or perhaps more accurately in this case, its public mistakes). 'These are precisely the types of competitive harms long recognized by courts in this circuit,' Tesla argued in the motion. But it really comes down to this: if NHTSA releases Tesla's crash data to the public, it may (whether directly or indirectly) deter people from buying its cars, and it would be unfair to compel the company to reveal them. 'Tesla has explained (and as NHTSA has concurred), competitors may review the disclosed information and draw speculative conclusions about the quality of Tesla's ADAS technology with respect to a certain version or feature—which may very well be flawed given that the disclosed information may reflect only preliminary investigations—and use that to improve or tout their technology at the expense of Tesla's,' the motion says. 'Thus, even under Plaintiff's articulation, Tesla and NHTSA have established a reasonable likelihood of disparagement harm resulting from the disclosure of the withheld information,' it concludes. It's a neatly packaged argument that has the benefit of support from the very agency the Post is suing, but it compels us to ask a far more fundamental question: Is NHTSA's duty to protect the private interests of a multi-billion-dollar corporation, or the public safety of America's roadways? Got a tip? You can send it here: tips@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store