
Trump plans Iran talks next week after US 'victory'
US President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands June 25, 2025. Photo: Reuters
Listen to article
US President Donald Trump hailed the swift end to war between Iran and Israel and said Washington would likely seek a commitment from Tehran to end its nuclear ambitions at talks with Iranian officials next week.
Trump said his decision to join Israel's attacks by targeting Iranian nuclear sites with huge bunker-busting bombs had ended the war, calling it "a victory for everybody".
"It was very severe. It was obliteration," he said, shrugging off an initial assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency that Iran's path to building a nuclear weapon may have been set back only by months.
Read More: Iran's parliament passes bill to halt cooperation with IAEA
Speaking in The Hague where he attended a NATO summit on Wednesday, he said he did not see Iran getting involved again in developing nuclear weapons. Tehran has always denied decades of accusations by Western leaders that it is seeking nuclear arms.
"We're going to talk to them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement. I don't know. To me, I don't think it's that necessary," Trump said.
Anxious Iranians and Israelis sought to resume normal life after the most intense confrontation ever between the two foes. Israel's nuclear agency assessed the strikes had "set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years". The White House also circulated the Israeli assessment, although Trump said he was not relying on Israeli intelligence.
He said he was confident Tehran would pursue a diplomatic path towards reconciliation. "I'll tell you, the last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now. They want to recover," he said.
If Iran tried to rebuild its nuclear programme, "We won't let that happen. Number one, militarily we won't," he said, adding that he thought "we'll end up having something of a relationship with Iran" to resolve the issue.
Also Read: US Intelligence report contradicts Trump's claim on Iran nuclear strikes success
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, dismissed what he called the "hourglass approach" of assessing damage to Iran's nuclear programme in terms of months needed to rebuild as besides the point for an issue that needed a long-term solution.
"In any case, the technological knowledge is there and the industrial capacity is there. That, no one can deny. So we need to work together with them," he said. His priority was returning international inspectors to Iranian nuclear sites, which he said was the only way to find out precisely what state they were in.
IRAN President hints at domestic reforms
Israel's bombing campaign, launched with a surprise attack on June 13, wiped out the top echelon of Iran's military leadership and killed leading nuclear scientists. Iran responded with missiles that pierced Israel's defences in large numbers for the first time.
Iranian authorities said 627 people were killed and nearly 5,000 injured in Iran, where the extent of the damage could not be independently confirmed because of tight restrictions on media. Twenty-eight people were killed in Israel.
Israel claimed to have achieved its goals of destroying Iran's nuclear sites and missiles; Iran claimed to have forced the end of the war by penetrating Israeli defences.
Trump said both sides were exhausted but the conflict could restart. Israel's demonstration that it could target Iran's senior leadership seemingly at will poses perhaps the biggest challenge yet for Iran's clerical rulers, at a critical juncture when they must find a successor for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, now 86 and in power for 36 years.
Read More: Fragile ceasefire holds with US-Iran talks dubbed 'promising'
President Masoud Pezeshkian, a relative moderate elected last year in a challenge to years of dominance by hardliners, said it could result in reform.
"This war and the empathy that it fostered between the people and officials is an opportunity to change the outlook of management and the behaviour of officials so that they can create unity," he said in a statement carried by state media.
Still, Iran's authorities moved swiftly to demonstrate their control. The judiciary announced the execution of three men on Wednesday convicted of collaborating with Israel's Mossad spy agency and smuggling equipment used in an assassination. Iran had arrested 700 people accused of ties with Israel during the conflict, the state-affiliated Nournews reported.
During the war, both Netanyahu and Trump publicly suggested that it could end with the toppling of Iran's entire system of clerical rule, established in its 1979 revolution. But after the ceasefire, Trump said he did not want to see "regime change" in Iran, which he said would bring chaos at a time when he wanted the situation to settle down.
Relief, Apprehension, Exhaustion
In both Iran and Israel, residents expressed relief at the end of the fighting, but also apprehension.
"We came back after the ceasefire was announced. People are relieved that the war has stopped, but there's a lot of uncertainty about what comes next," said Farah, 67, who returned to Tehran from Lavasan near the capital where she had fled to escape Israeli bombing.
Also Read: NATO allies agree to boost military budgets after Trump pressure
Her grandchildren were worried that the authorities would respond by imposing more severe enforcement of dress codes and other restrictions on social freedoms, she said by phone: "The world will move on and forget about the war – but we're the ones who will live with its consequences."
In Tel Aviv, Rony Hoter-Ishay Meyer, 38, said the war's end brought mixed emotions – relief that children could return to school and normal life resume, but exhaustion from the stress.
"Those past two weeks were catastrophic in Israel and we are very much exhausted and we need to get back to our normal energy."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
PARTLY FACETIOUS: The abusive language Trump used publicly against Israel
'How ridiculously fawning must you be to get Trump's attention?' 'I would say, on a scale of one to ten, ten.' 'Right, and we achieved that exalted level when we recommended Trump for a Peace Prize.' 'Hey, he got the Indians to back off…' 'Our air force with Chinese weapons achieved that.' 'I agree, but the Indians are saying it's a pause, so I reckon our recommendation has merit. Besides don't forget he also got a ceasefire going between Israel and Iran and need I add the abusive language he used publicly against Israel warning them to turn their planes around which they did…' 'Agreed, and that showed the true power of a US President on the Israelis – power that was never ever exercised by anyone ever and…' 'Hmmm, true, just for that alone I would award President Trump with which ever award he fancies….' 'Nobel Prize for literature? The abusive language he used merits…' 'Don't be facetious. He is my kind of a President.' 'What about President Zardari?' 'Next question. You know our government's recommendation to the Nobel Prize committee pales into a distant third place when we compare it to the fawning message sent by the NATO head Rutte surrounded by the SAR's who have imposed what 18 sanctions against Russia.' 'SAR's?' 'Sanctioners Against Russia, and building a false narrative that Russia's economy is suffering, though data released by the international agencies that the West heads proves otherwise.' 'Right anyway eighteen is a good number, our eighteenth amendment supported by President Zardari's party not only gave up the president's power of dissolving assemblies back to parliament but coupled with the National Finance Commission award also laid the foundation of devolution and…' 'Implementation is still either pending or shall we say deferred and this has been going on since 2010.' 'Hmm, hallelujah to our parliamentarians – considering that they are considering the 27th amendment which has been deferred due to some court cases that are continuing…' 'Hallelujah indeed.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
A brittle calm
EDITORIAL: The fragile truce between Iran and Israel, which took effect on June 24 soon after Tehran's retaliatory strikes on American bases in Qatar and Iraq in response to US attacks on its nuclear sites a day earlier seems to be holding so far despite reports of initial violations from both sides and lingering nervousness over the potential for renewed escalation. President Donald Trump's extraordinary outburst shortly after the agreement took effect, targeted not just Tehran, but also Tel Aviv for the ceasefire violations, a striking departure from the diplomatic restraint typically exercised by American leaders towards their closest Middle East ally, and this public chastisement appears to have had the desired effect as some stability seems to have been restored in the region. As recent events show, both Washington and Tehran exercised calculated restraint, deliberately refraining from inflicting maximum damage by providing prior warnings before striking each other's assets. This was followed by Qatar playing a seminal role in offering a diplomatic off ramp that paved the way for de-escalation. All sides have now claimed victory: President Trump has doubled down on his assertion that Iran's nuclear capabilities have been completely destroyed, despite a Pentagon initial report indicating that the US strikes only delayed Tehran's nuclear programme by a few months. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also declared a 'historic victory', claiming Iran's nuclear ambitions had been neutralised. Meanwhile, Iran framed the truce as one it had 'imposed on the enemy'. Notwithstanding the claims of victory, the reality on the ground suggests a far more inconclusive outcome, with both Iran and Israel suffering substantial costs and achieving only limited gains. It is now of the utmost importance that the cessation of hostilities lasts and is not derailed through any miscalculation or reckless adventurism, particularly by Israel, which has a long history of scuttling peace processes and ceasefires on the most spurious of pretexts. That Israel initiated this unprovoked conflict while Iran and the US were engaged in nuclear negotiations lays bare Tel Aviv's strategic objective: to sabotage diplomacy and force Washington into a confrontation with Tehran. It is now incumbent upon the US to ensure that it reins in its long-standing ally's belligerent impulses and clearly communicates the consequences of escalation. The fact remains that the real cost of instability and violence in the region is borne by hapless civilians in the form of lives lost, infrastructure obliterated, economies decimated and the climate of intense fear that lingers long after the bombs have ceased to fall. More than 600 Iranian civilians lost their lives in this needless war. Moreover, the global economy — still coming to terms with US trade tariffs and the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza — can scarcely withstand further hostilities in a region critical to the world's oil supplies. World powers must, therefore, ensure that this brittle peace holds, prioritising regional stability over geopolitical brinkmanship. If there is one overarching lesson that has come to the fore in recent days, especially in the aftermath of the ceasefire, it is this: when the US chooses to act decisively, it possesses the means to curb Israel's reckless aggression. That it has consistently refused to use this influence to stop Israel's genocidal rampage in Gaza over the last 20 months, choosing instead to enable the slaughter through unchecked arms transfers and diplomatic support, lays bare the complicity of American power in this humanitarian catastrophe. How much longer will the US wait before using its considerable leverage to force an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and end the conflict that has had the world on edge since October 2023? Failure to do so ensures that it bears the responsibility of every subsequent death. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Was that all, folks?
I'm not surprised that financial markets were the first to call Iran's retaliation 'de-escalatory' (Bloomberg) – oil fell, equities and futures rose as ballistic missiles targeted the al Udeid airbase in Qatar. It's remarkable how markets now decode foreign policy more astutely than the press briefings meant to explain it. Within minutes, risk assets began recovering, pricing in not the beginning of a regional war, but a carefully orchestrated endgame. But I'm still trying to make sense of how the war fizzled out so suddenly. Because if Iran really telegraphed the move perfectly enough to get a public 'thank you' from Donald Trump himself—especially if POTUS also tipped the ayatollahs off before dropping Midnight Hammer, helping save lives and uranium—then Netanyahu would not be a happy man. Either that, or Israel too is reeling from Iran's shocking response and isn't sure about the opportunity cost of pushing for regime change at this point. Whatever the case, he'll have to work harder to sell 'victory' to his people than Khamenei. Even after successfully engineering genocide in Gaza, destroying Hamas, gutting Hezbollah, ending the Assad dynasty rule in Syria, isolating and then bombing and pulverising Iran, even finally getting America to 'obliterate' its nuclear facilities, he knows he still needs to feed more blood and war to the extremist coalition that'll keep him in office till the next election. He's done so much for their cause, but he didn't come back from Iran with the head of the mullah regime. Instead, memories of the failure of the Iron Dome—and Gaza-like images from Tel Aviv and Haifa—will linger. Also, who'll answer for the 400kg of missing Iranian uranium? But all that's true only if Trump can be trusted this time. After all, his penchant for deception is now at the heart of the most important policy calculus of the most powerful country in the world. In just the last two weeks, he's twice boasted about lying to fool Tehran. First, he admitted that direct talks were a ruse—a way to 'pin down' Iran's leadership before giving Israel the green light. The same was true for his two-week window, when America directly bombed Iran. Two is a trend—and this trend of talks-betrayal-war-spin shows duplicity as doctrine. Besides, he mulled regime change just a day before thanking Iran for its restraint, not long after his secretary of state and VP went to great lengths to stress that the US only targeted nuclear facilities, not the leadership. So who's to know if Trump really meant it when he ordered Israel to 'BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!' or if this is the prelude to another video showing Netanyahu smirking about how they once again tricked the Iranian leadership into lowering its guard—just before going in for the kill. People close to the region are in no doubt. Author, journalist and editor of the Palestine Chronicle, Ramzy Baroud, calls Trump's latest burst of anger at Israel a 'manufactured farce'. 'What we are witnessing is a staged political performance—a carefully orchestrated spat between two partners playing both sides of a dangerous game,' he wrote in his column. 'In truth, this was always a joint US-Israeli war—one planned, executed, and justified under the pretext of defending Western interests while laying the groundwork for deeper intervention and potential invasion.' Nobody who knows this business really doubts that the Israelis and Americans have been working to take out Iran's theocratic regime ever since Bashar al-Assad was forced to flee Damascus on the early morning of 8 December 2024. And almost all of them are convinced that the plan had to be shelved—or at least paused—because of Iran's shocking success in hitting Israeli targets, repeatedly and with precision. Even after Israel's brilliant campaign successes—especially the early wave that took out Iran's entire military high command and top scientists—and the fact that four militaries from three countries and two seas attempted to intercept Iran's ballistic missiles, Iran still scored higher in terms of beating expectations, even though much more of it lies in ruins than Israel. It has also shattered the myth of the IDF's invincibility. Now everybody knows that even a sanctioned, cornered, poor and badly hit country can easily target Israel's vulnerabilities—the biggest being its reliance on a much bigger power for something as basic as its own security. Even the Iron Dome works only when American taxpayers subsidise its interceptors. So far, the choreography of this de-escalation has left a lot of people breathing easier. Trump doesn't know what more he needs to do to win the Nobel peace prize. The Iranians honoured their reputation, fighting back with dignity and pride even against the most overwhelming of odds, always preferring death to disgrace. The ayatollahs survived the most direct lunge at their jugular. The markets are calm and war risk premiums are fading. But the real mood in Tel Aviv—even as it publicly celebrates victory over evil—will only become clear once Bibi's radical cabinet delivers its own verdict on the restraint Trump has apparently forced on it. They have elections in October next year. And if, by then, the same mullahs that bombed their cities are still entrenched in power—and also able to resume their nuclear programme—then they'll want Netanyahu to deliver yet more. And that, more than Trump's peace tweets or f-bombs or Tehran's self-congratulatory broadcasts, will determine whether this ceasefire holds. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025