How North Sea tanker crash could impact wildlife-rich coastline

Yahoo

11-03-2025

Academics have raised fears over the ecological impact the dramatic crash involving an oil tanker and cargo vessel could have on the Norfolk coastline.
The two ships – including one carrying jet fuel - went up in flames in the North Sea off the coast of East Yorkshire on Monday.
Although the air quality at ground level has been recorded as at normal levels, experts said the event could damage the environment of the protected Norfolk coastline.
Environmental biologist Prof Ben Garrod said "we should be doing all we can to ensure this never happens again".
Thirty six people were rescued from the collision and one crew member remained unaccounted for.
Prof Garrod, from the University of East Anglia's School of Biological Sciences, said the coast's shallow bay, The Wash, could be particularly impacted.
"The Wash is recognised for its local, national and international ecological importance for flora and fauna alike," he said.
"Some migrate there, others breed there, and for many species of plants, fungi, and animals, it's home.
"The possible addition of tonnes of highly soluble toxic material which shuts down the respiration system into such a fragile and important habitat will likely have far-reaching impacts on our local wildlife, especially fish, birds and mammals.
"We should be doing all we can to monitor the impact that the release of tonnes of ecologically damaging chemicals has on our fragile marine environment."
The collision occurred at about 10:00 GMT, sparking fires and a mass evacuation, with one crew member saying the incident "came from out of the blue".
The Stena Immaculate ship, the US-flagged oil and chemical tanker, was carrying jet fuel on behalf of the US military.
The Solong meanwhile, a Portuguese-flagged container vessel, denied that it was transporting 15 containers of sodium cyanide.
"There are four empty containers that have previously contained the hazardous chemical and these containers will continue to be monitored," said Ernst Russ, the ship's owner.
Dr Paul Johnston, senior scientist at Greenpeace Research Laboratories at the University of Exeter, said he was "very concerned".
"The wind is blowing from the north and will drive any material that is released towards the north Norfolk coast," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
"There are bird colonies, there will be seals hauled out, dolphins and porpoises passing through the area and animals, together with fish and marine vertebrate.
"[They will] all be very vulnerable to toxic events, from both oils and chemicals."
Videos from the scene showed large clouds of smoke billowing out from the tanker, and the firm which managed the Stena Immaculate reported "multiple explosions".
"The jet fuel will continue burning [but] the heavy fuel oil is more of a problem if it comes ashore - it will fell beaches and be very difficult to clean up," added Dr Johnston.
"Any containers that go over the side are likely to be a navigational hazard in so far as any ship that strikes them could become disabled or even sink."
When asked if he thought this could result in the largest environmental disaster for a generation, he said it was a "very difficult thing to predict".
"And that's why so much effort is being put into salvage efforts in order to minimise the amount of material entering the sea.
"An ounce of prevention is worth many tonnes of cure but what we can learn from previous events in terms of clean-up is that it is very, very difficult."
Prof Alastair Grant, from the University of East Anglia's school of environmental sciences, said "a detailed evaluation" of the environmental risks posed by the jet fuel would need to be conducted.
"It contains up to 25% aromatic hydrocarbons, which are relatively toxic and slow to break down in the environment," he said.
"This makes it approximately 50 times more toxic to aquatic life than diesel oil, which in turn is more toxic than crude oil."
These concerns were also echoed by the Norfolk Wildlife Trust (NWT), which said "any pollution spillage could be devastating" for habitats in the area.
A spokesperson said: "Depending on wind direction and contaminants, The Wash and North Norfolk coast, including NWT Holme Dunes nature reserve could potentially be at risk.
"These areas are home to internationally important populations of seabirds and fragile habitats.
"We'll continue to keep a close eye on the situation and work with marine authorities if needed."
While the incident happened in UK waters, the responsibility for the investigation will fall to the United States and Portugal.
The Marine Accident Investigation Branch, however, is already gathering evidence and undertaking a preliminary assessment of the accident.
The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) is also "rapidly assessing" the potential environment impact of the collision.
When it is considered safe to do so, the BBC understands the MCA will deploy equipment to contain and disperse the oil spills.
The government agency is also working with the owners of the ships and the Department for Transport to understand potential risks to public health.
According to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), any public health risk on shore is deemed to be very low.
Labour MP Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, said she was grateful to HM Coastguard, the RNLI and emergency services for their response.
"They were on the scene swiftly, have helped rescue those in immediate danger and I know they will continue to work tirelessly over the coming days.
"My thoughts are with all those involved, especially the family of the missing crew member.
"I am working closely with the MCA as they conduct an assessment of any counter pollution response which may be required over the coming days."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
North Sea tanker collision - what we know so far
Search for ship collision crew member called off
Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Marine Accident Investigation Branch
Department for Transport