Man sentenced to nearly 6 years for buying 150+ guns in GA, trying to smuggle them to Mexico
A man will spend nearly six years in a federal prison after federal agents say he bought more than 150 guns in Georgia and smuggled some of them to Mexico.
According to a federal lawsuit, Edson Areguillin received detailed instructions from agents in Mexico and bought weapons on their behalf.
Areguillin would then allegedly cross the border into Mexico with the guns.
'It was indicating that he was operating as a straw buyer, meaning he would buy guns on behalf of other people,' Attorney Chris Timmons said. 'What would happen first, he would get a wire transfer from Mexico to here in the United States. And he would take that money and use it to buy firearms and keep a portion of it. And then he would drive those guns down to Mexico, where they were used in crimes.'
TRENDING STORIES:
President Donald Trump to pardon Todd and Julie Chrisley
R&B singer Jaheim charged in metro Atlanta animal cruelty case
Georgia Tech student killing: Shooter snuck into apartment building, waited for victim, police say
Timmons is a former prosecutor and now a partner at the law firm Knowles, Gallant and Timmons.
According to the lawsuit, one weapon bought from a gun shop in Cherokee County was later recovered in Mexico after it was used in a shootout that left eight people dead and four others injured.
This is not an isolated incident.
Earlier this month, Channel 2 Action News reported how members of the ATF seized nearly a quarter million dollars' worth of guns that were meant to be illegally smuggled into Mexico.
The U.S. attorney says the man here was mainly directed to buy 9 mm pistols and AR-style weapons, and would make thousands of dollars with each smuggling trip.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Multnomah County DA lobbies hard for retail theft budget
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – The Portland Police Bureau joined the Multnomah County District Attorney's office to share the results of a large-scale retail theft bust in Portland last Friday. The operation turned up Portland Police said this large mission stretched from the Eastport Plaza in Southeast Portland to downtown, and up to Jantzen Beach. Along with the thousands in stolen property recovered, police seized two guns and a stolen car. PPB's Central Precinct Commander Brian Hughes said operations like these are about more than just safety in the stores. 'It has a ripple effect on prices, public safety, and neighborhood quality of life,' he said. 'These missions are part of our broader strategy to address crime and restore a sense of safety across Portland. And I think that's one of the things we did last Friday.' A grant from the helps fund these operations in the city of Portland. Hughes said the real difference maker is having a prosecutor and investigator from the DA's office on-site with them for these missions. 'They work with us in real time on these cases as they're moving forward, which is so helpful when officers have legal questions,' he said. 'There's a DA front and center ready to answer those questions and enables us to be more effective in the work that we do.' Bend man who threatened mass shooting was armed with AR-15, police say Looming budget cuts means uncertainty for the District Attorney's office. DA Nathan Vasquez has said proposed cuts to his office would mean losing a prosecutor dedicated to focusing on retail theft. 'You're not going to see the very coordinated, organized effort, at least from our offices, ability to do that. You're going to see gaps, and there are going to be people that fall through the cracks,' Vasquez said. 'And that's what I'm fighting every day, is to make sure that we are holding people accountable, particularly the ones that are having a large impact on our community.' When the budget was first released in late April, Vasquez wasted no time voicing his displeasure. At the time, Multnomah County Chair Jessica Vega Pederson said in a statement that cuts to his office were some of the smallest in the county, and that The cuts come from a decision to not renew one-time funding. But Vasquez said the programs the money has gone towards are not one-time projects. 'It's really a need for an ongoing effort,' he said. 'You can't just hope that you stand up something and organize it, which we've done a tremendous job in that short period of time. But there's a lot more work to be done. And now's not the time to take our foot off the gas. We really need to continue fighting.' Vasquez said the work his office has done has shown that funding should be permanent, and he has provided information to county commissioners. The deadline to approve the county budget is June 12. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California gun ban still alive. For now
A divided U.S. Supreme Court on Monday allowed states to continue to ban semiautomatic AR-15-style rifles, which can be fired repeatedly without reloading and are owned by millions of Americans. But the issue is far from settled. Only two of the nine justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented from the court's decision to deny review of a federal appeals court ruling in September that upheld Maryland's AR-15 ban, similar to laws in California and seven other states. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh, another member of the court's conservative majority, said in a separate opinion that the appeals court ruling was 'questionable' and the Supreme Court 'should and presumably will address the AR-15 issue soon.' Thomas, in a dissent joined by Alito, said tens of millions of Americans own AR-15s, and an 'overwhelming majority … do so for lawful purposes.' And in a separate case, the court denied a challenge to a Rhode Island law, similar to California's, that bans possession of gun magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Justices Thomas, Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. The actions reflect the uncertain status of gun-control laws since the court's 6-3 ruling in 2022 that said Americans have a constitutional right to carry concealed firearms in public. Thomas, in the majority opinion, said any restrictions on owning or carrying guns could be upheld only if they were 'consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearms regulation,' dating back to the nation's founding. Based on that ruling, many state gun laws have been overturned, and California has narrowed, though not repealed, its restrictions on carrying guns in public. But the Supreme Court appeared to move in a different direction last June when it ruled 8-1, with only Thomas dissenting, that the government could ban gun ownership by domestic abusers who have attacked or threatened someone in their household. It was the court's first direct ruling on guns since 2022. Kavanaugh's opinion suggested that reviewing bans on semiautomatics or other widely used weapons may be next for the court, despite Monday's denial. 'We are disappointed that some members of the Supreme Court did not have the judicial courage to do their most important job and enforce the Constitution,' said the Firearms Policy Coalition, a gun-advocacy nonprofit based in Sacramento. 'We are more resolved than ever to fight forward and eliminate these immoral bans throughout the nation, whatever and however long it takes.' The group urged the Trump administration to join a future legal challenge. The administration did not file arguments in the Maryland case, but President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to review all firearms policies of President Joe Biden's administration and 'protect the Second Amendment rights of all Americans.' David Pucino, legal director of the San Francisco-based Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, was relieved by Monday's Supreme Court action. 'Courts have repeatedly upheld laws limiting access to highly dangerous weapons,' Pucino said in a statement. 'They are proven measures that protect families and reduce gun violence.' The court left intact a 9-5 ruling in September by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia upholding Maryland's AR-15 ban. The appeals court had rejected a challenge to the law in 2017, then was ordered by the Supreme Court to reconsider it under the standards of the 2022 ruling. The semiautomatic rifles are 'military-style weapons designed for sustained combat operations that are ill-suited and disproportionate to the need for self-defense,' Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, appointed by President Ronald Reagan, wrote in the appeals court's majority opinion. A California appeals court gave similar reasons in 2023 for upholding the state's ban on many AR-15-style rifles, which has also been allowed to stand by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Under California's ban, semiautomatic rifles with fixed ammunition magazines — bullet chambers that require disassembly of the firearm to swap them out — can't hold more than 10 rounds. Those with detachable magazines, which enable swift reloading, can't have any of a number of additional features, such as pistol grips. In other states, the weapons are sometimes sold with forced-reset triggers, which pull the trigger back after each shot, allowing rapid refiring. Trump's Justice Department agreed last month to allow their sale under federal law, withdrawing the government's previous classification of the weapons as illegal machine guns. But California Attorney General Rob Bonta said Monday he has notified law enforcement agencies that the triggers are still prohibited by state law. In dissent from the 4th Circuit ruling, Judge Julius Richardson, a Trump appointee, said 20% of all firearms sold in the United States are AR-15s. 'Maryland's ban cannot pass constitutional muster as it prohibits the possession of arms commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,' Richardson said. Maryland's law contains similar restrictions to those in the California ban. It also limits some features and bans semiautomatic rifles that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The Maryland case is Snope v. Brown, 24-203. The Rhode Island case is Ocean State Tactical v. Rhode Island, 24-131.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mel B Gushes About Her Return to ‘America's Got Talent': ‘This Feels Like a Triumph'
Mel B couldn't be more excited to be back at the judges' table on America's Got Talent after a seven-year absence. 'We're pulling out all the stops,' she says of the upcoming 20th season. Her return — alongside Simon Cowell, Howie Mandel and Sofía Vergara — is an emotional one: The 49-year-old Spice Girls singer (real name: Melanie Brown) was still dealing with the fallout of a messy divorce from ex Stephen Belafonte when she stepped away in 2018, and she's done a lot of healing since then. 'In my final year on AGT, I was not in a good place,' says the mom of three (she shares Phoenix, 26, with Jimmy Gulzar, Angel, 18, with Eddie Murphy and Madison, 13, with Stephen). 'So, this feels like a triumph for me. There is hope. You can piece your life back together with the support of good people around you.' Here, she talks to Life & Style's Fortune Benatar about her wedding plans with her hairdresser fiancé Rory McPhee and the latest on a Spice Girls reunion tour. You've said you were going through a rough time toward the end of your last stint on the show. What has your healing process been like? MB: It has involved a lot of hard work. I had to resolve issues with my family — as I was isolated from them for so long — and be totally honest with myself and others. [Back then] AGT represented a safe place. I could put on a Mel B mask and enjoy myself. How are you feeling now? MB: I see this current chapter in my life as a continuation of the work I've done. You don't just recover overnight. Tell us about your fellow panelists. MB: I love to play pranks with Howie. Sofía has been a revelation. She's so gorgeous, but she's also incredibly warm and really, really funny. Simon and I have known each other since he turned the Spice Girls down when we tried to get him to sign us. I love reminding him of that! You're turning 50 on May 29, 2025. Any party plans or goals for the year? MB: My goal for the year is to be happy and to do what I love, and AGT is part of that. I've made no plans, but I think there may be a little surprise in store for me! How has Rory changed your view on love? MB: Rory enabled me to trust a man and believe in kindness again. It was a slow romance, because I wasn't looking for a partner. He's a family friend — the best friend of my cousin — so he's known me and my family all his life. Tell us about your wedding. MB: We're getting married at St. Paul's Cathedral in London, where Princess Diana was married. I'm allowed to be married there because I was awarded an MBE [Member of the Order of the British Empire] by the late Queen [Elizabeth II] for my services to survivors of abuse and abused women. We've had many meetings with the dean and the bishop and have talked about the spiritual and religious importance of marriage and why we want to be married. I can promise my wedding will be a very happy day.
