Controversial school play sparks chaos at Kenya drama competition
Kenya's national high-school drama competition has been overshadowed by drama of its own after police fired tear gas to disperse a crowd that had gathered to watch a controversial play.
The play, Echoes of War, highlights the role of digital spaces in governance and the power of youth in shaping societal change - with close parallels to Kenya's current political situation.
It was initially disqualified from the drama festival under unclear circumstances, but a High Court ruling later overturned the decision and ordered it to be included.
Tensions flared in the western town of Nakuru on Thursday morning when students stormed out of the venue, demanding the release of the play's author.
Cleophas Malala, the scriptwriter and a former senator who penned the production for students from Butere Girls School, was blocked by police from meeting the students for final rehearsals on Wednesday evening.
Malala was later released without charge and praised the students for boycotting the play.
"The young girls of Butere Girls' have exercised an act of heroic restoration. I'm determined to ensure that Echoes of War is displayed before a Kenyan audience," Malala said immediately after his release.
The students briefly sang the national anthem before dramatically leaving the hall, which was sealed off by anti-riot police, armed with batons and tear gas canisters.
"There's no audience. Who are we performing for?" one of the girls told journalists.
They also complained about police harassment.
Following news of Malala's arrest, large crowds had gathered outside the venue curious to watch the play.
But anti-riot police had been deployed overnight in case of trouble and they fired tear gas to disperse the would-be audience.
Education Minister Julius Ogamba questioned the involvement of Malala in the competition, saying the politician was neither a teacher nor a play director.
The row has sparked public uproar, with rights group Amnesty International saying it was "pointing to a worrying pattern of state-sponsored repression of free expression, press freedom, and the right to associate".
Prominent opposition figure Kalonzo Musyoka condemned the police for firing tear gas near students, praising the "brave" girls for declining to perform.
In a statement, the opposition Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) demanded that the students be allowed to stage their play like all the other competitors.
The play highlights a widening gap between two generations - the old and the young - demanding change through innovation and technology.
It reflects some of Kenya's most pressing problems, some of which sparked youth-led deadly protests last year.
New faces of protest - Kenya's Gen Z anti-tax revolutionaries
Kenyan president's humbling shows power of African youth
Batons, tear gas, live fire - Kenyans face police brutality
How Kenya's evangelical president has fallen out with churches
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Deja Foxx Is Running for Congress Because ‘Girls Like Me Deserve a Fighter'
Deja Foxx for Arizona Deja Foxx is many things: an organizer, a candidate for Congress, and a reproductive rights advocate. But there's one thing that she isn't, despite the headlines you may have read. 'I'm not an influencer,' she tells me with a smile. 'I'm a leader.' Foxx, 25, has been often described as a 'Gen Z influencer' in the many news articles covering her unique and viral campaign for the special election for the House seat in Arizona's seventh Congressional District, the primary for which will be held on July 15. The race was called following the death of longtime representative Raúl Grijalva in March, and the primaries will be one of the first times voters will select candidates for national office since the election of Donald Trump last fall. Foxx would be the youngest woman in Congress if elected, but she's no stranger to politics. At 17, she went viral for confronting then Arizona Senator Jeff Flake about his stance on Planned Parenthood at a town hall, and she hasn't stopped since. While a high school student and then a student at Columbia University, she has continued to advocate for Planned Parenthood, worked on digital strategy for both Kamala Harris's 2020 and 2024 campaigns, and even spoke at the Democratic National Convention. And yes, she's really good at social media, with half a million followers across platforms. So when the seat opened up in her home district, Foxx looked at the current state of American politics, at the now-decade of organizing work under her belt, and thought to herself, 'Why not me?' 'I've held a lot of different job titles,' she tells me via Zoom. 'I've worked at a gas station, I've been a digital strategist on a presidential campaign. I've been a content creator in front of the camera, and now I'm a candidate for Congress. But I want more than anything to be a good role model. And every single day I know I'm achieving that goal. I intend to win at the ballot box, but I rack up wins every single day.… In a moment where people feel so hopeless because things are hard, because Donald Trump is making a circus of our government and he's putting families in the crosshairs, it can't be overstated how important it is that someone like me is moving people toward hope again.' Foxx chatted with Glamour about how her background influences her work, how Democrats can embrace change, and how other young women can get involved. : You're running for Congress in the district where you were born and raised. How would you describe your background? Deja Foxx: I was raised by a single mom. She and I relied on Section 8 housing, SNAP benefits, which some folks know as food stamps, and Medicaid. I was a free-lunch kid in our public schools here. So that was my introduction to politics; the things I needed to survive and just get by being decided by people in elected office who more often than not felt really far away from families like mine. Programs like SNAP change based on elections and who's in charge. How did you come to realize that these things you relied on were, in actuality, political? As a kid, you only understand things the way that they are in front of you. You don't have a comparison of what's going on in other people's houses. So there wasn't this 'aha' moment of, Oh, it's elections deciding this stuff. It was the lived experience of there being years where our food stamps would get cut. There would be harder months or Section 8 visits where they would come and inspect our house, and that might look like picking up extra chores to make sure the house was ready. So it was a lived and day-to-day experience. There were moments of comparison about being a free-lunch kid at public school when other kids' parents might pack them Uncrustables and all of the name-brand snacks. But it was clear to me that our family was affected by the things going on in the news and in Washington. I was raised in the era of Obama, which was a very different political understanding. When Obama got elected, I was eight years old. I was so filled with hope. It felt like things were bending toward justice, things were going the right way. And then by the time I was 15, Donald Trump was running for president, which I think blows some people's minds—that for the last decade and for most of my political understanding, Donald Trump and his chaos and cruelty have defined the political landscape. You were involved in political advocacy starting as a teenager. How did you have the moxie to jump into it at such a young age? For me, politics was always about survival. My very first organizing memory was seeing my mom and my neighbors make enough together. Everybody had a deficit in their house: Somebody was short on bills, somebody's car was broken down, somebody needed a babysitter, but my neighbors knew each other. We talked, we spent time together, and we made enough together. I think about the ways that when my mom was between jobs, and I mean she worked every odd job you could imagine. She delivered flowers, she worked at a post office, she cleaned houses. She was a caregiver for the elderly, and when she was between jobs, she would step up to babysit so one of our neighbors could take on an extra shift and because they took on that extra shift, they might have gas in their car to drive me to school when we didn't have a car. And so I really watched as my neighbors came together to overcome the ways that they were made to not have enough in one of the richest countries in the world. At 15 you made the difficult decision to move out of your mom's home as she battled addiction and moved in with your then-boyfriend and his family. How did that factor into your political origin story? I lived there until I went to college…they weren't folks with a whole lot extra to give, but they made space in their home to treat me like their own child and take me in. At the same time, I was learning sex education in my public school. It was the only place I was going to get it. The curriculum I was taught was last updated in the 1980s. It didn't mention consent. It was medically inaccurate and more ridiculously, it was taught by the baseball coach. So I started showing up to these school board meetings and telling my story, which was a very vulnerable story, something I hadn't shared yet. You could imagine being a teenage girl, the last thing I wanted everyone to know about me was that I didn't have a home of my own and that things were kind of rough. Yet I showed up to these school board meetings and during community calls, I stood in front of a crowd and shared the story and demanded that they update this curriculum. I invited my friends along to do the same. And after six months of organizing, we won a victory to update that curriculum in Southern Arizona's largest school district. That was my first true advocacy battle. You went to Columbia University, moved back to Arizona, and are now running for Congress at 25. Why run now? I feel a deep sense of responsibility. I wasn't born on a path to Congress. I'm running against someone whose father was the former congressman. For me, this has been a hard choice. I had to ask, Can my friends and family handle this? Do I even have the money to get through this race? I'm no career politician, but I'm in this because I feel a deep sense of responsibility to families like mine who have the most to lose…there's a sense of urgency for me and a responsibility to my community, to my family, to my friends, to give them a fighter in this moment. Because what I hear most on the ground is that people don't feel like anyone's fighting for them right now. What do you say to those who say you don't have enough 'experience' or are too young to run? Let's be clear. When we talk about our party, it's two pieces: the establishment and the voters. Right now, they are not in agreement. The establishment goes around and in their stump speeches, every single one of them says, 'We need newer and younger leaders. We need a new generation of leadership.' And they get applause. And yet, when newer and younger comes around…I have watched them put their thumb on the scale, endorse in a primary, a Democratic primary where we have more than one good candidate, where we have the opportunity to make history and elect a new generation of leadership. And so in action, our party is failing a new generation of leaders. Then, when we think about the voters, they're excited, they're open to younger leaders. What have you experienced in your campaign? Are voters open to a younger leader? I will tell you that aside from the other 20-somethings, the people who are the most receptive to our message are these older folks. They want so badly for someone to take on the fight, to pick up the torch and know that what they fought for was not for nothing. That someone will keep that work alive. We hear it all the time. I just knocked on a woman's door, and I gave her my speech that I'd be the youngest member, first woman in my generation, I've been fighting for reproductive rights for the last 10 years. And she said, 'Young lady, you just tell me what to do. You young folks need to just tell us what to do.' I think there's this sort of created narrative that because older people who sit in positions of power are unwilling to cede them, that means that all older voters are unwilling to elect a young person. That's not true from what we're hearing. These older folks are more excited than anyone else that they are seeing young people show up and that they have an assurance that their fight will be kept alive. We are in an era of rampant misogyny in politics. What new energy will you bring into the Capitol, and how do you combat this rapid hate? Let me be clear. I got my first death threat when I was 16 years old, but running for Congress is an entirely different experience. It's a different experience for someone like me, a young working-class woman of color, than it is for some of the other people in my race or your traditional candidate. I'll just give you one example. When you file your paperwork to run for office here in Arizona, you're required to list your residential address, essentially self-doxxing and putting your sensitive information into the public record. That is enough to keep most of the women I know out of politics. There are structural barriers to participation, and I am less safe today than I was three months ago. I want people to hear that and know that even though you see me on social media and it looks like incredible energy and momentum because it is, I have taken, rather, I have made this decision. In all seriousness, I have crossed a threshold. I will never be able to walk back. I do it because families like mine, girls [who grew up] like me who are 16 years old and working at the gas station and relying on Planned Parenthood deserve a fighter, and I'm not going to wait around for somebody else to do it. It is with a deep sense of responsibility and personal risk that I'm in this race. The Democratic party clearly has rebuilding to do before the 2026 midterms. What do you think needs to change? I've worked behind the scenes of campaigns, and I've been on the front lines as an activist on the ground and a content creator online reading the comment sections. Democrats believe that we can govern from the top down—that is, if we craft the perfect press release and message, everybody's going to hop on. That's not how our media ecosystem works anymore. We need to be coming from the comment sections up. We need to be listening to people. Something our campaign implemented that I'm really proud of is that on our policy section of our website, there's a box at the bottom. You want to see something, leave us a suggestion. We don't have to wait until we're in office to listen to our constituents. We host listening sessions often right here in my living room where we sit with people and they tell us their stories of what these Medicaid cuts could mean to them. It's a different question of how we govern, and Democrats are failing to listen. If they had, they'd be embracing candidates like me who are energizing and mobilizing the young people and the working-class people we have left behind. What's your advice to other young women who want to be involved in politics or activism in the era of Trump? Politics is personal. It is for me. You don't have to run for office to get involved politically. I'm asking folks to find the issue that personally impacts you. Where does your life overlap with what you see in the news? And then, get really specific on your personal story. Maybe you start by journaling it or telling a friend or talking about it at Sunday dinner with your family. The next step has to be mobilizing your personal network. You show up to that protest for the first time or that school board meeting, but then the next time you go, you bring your daughter or you bring your best friend or your neighbor along. That is how we are going to create change. Originally Appeared on Glamour Abortion After Roe The abortion advocates turning pain into power The journey of an abortion in South Carolina Confused about the fetal personhood bill introduced in Congress? Let us explain A colleague of the doctor charged for a 'criminal abortion' says they aren't backing down
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Russia's State Duma passes bill to create state messaging app as it considers blocking WhatsApp
The State Duma, the lower chamber of Russia's parliament, passed a bill on June 10 to create a new messaging app, the so-called "national messenger," the Duma's press service reported, as the Kremlin tries to reduce its dependency on WhatsApp and Telegram The new app "combines the features of a messenger and the functions of government services," a statement read. The news comes as Russia tries to reduce citizens' access to foreign messengers and other online services in favor of domestic applications. The new online platform is needed to increase "the availability of governmental services" and "strengthen the protection of information exchanged among users," according to the bill. The new application will be integrated into Russian state and municipal databases, and private information can be transferred with the user's consent, particularly for "identification, signing contracts, paying for services or goods." Documents submitted through the "national messenger" will be equated to paper originals. The system will also allow users to certify documents with their electronic signatures. The Russian messenger will include all "educational services and chats that educational institutions of all levels currently use." The Russian government will choose a company to develop the application. In March 2022, the Russian government blocked Facebook and Instagram. Two years later, Russia's communications regulator, Roskomnadzor, announced the blocking of Viber and Signal apps. The Russian government is also considering blocking WhatsApp, an app owned by Meta, a company labeled as an "extremist organization" in Russia. In July 2024, Russia's communications regulator, Roskomnadzor, began throttling YouTube speeds, initially blaming technical issues caused by wear and tear on Google's servers. Google dismissed the claim, while Russian lawmaker Alexander Khinshtein later confirmed the slowdowns were intentional. Read also: In African universities, Russia's war against Ukraine finds new supporters We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer's Chagos ‘surrender' will fund tax cuts for Mauritians
Sir Keir Starmer's Chagos 'surrender' deal will fund tax cuts for Mauritians, it has emerged. The Mauritian government has said it would use almost £500 million in payments under the terms of the Chagos agreement to pay off its national debt. This will allow ministers to abolish income tax entirely for 81 per cent of employed Mauritians, and raise minimum salaries. Sir Keir has been criticised over the deal, which will cost the UK up to £30 billion over a 99-year period, including rent payments to use a joint US-UK military base on the Chagos Islands and creating a pot of development spending for Mauritius. Conservative and Reform MPs have said the 'surrender' of the islands, which have been owned by the UK since before Mauritius was granted independence in 1968, was unnecessary and expensive. The terms of the deal include rent payments of £165 million a year for the next three years for the Diego Garcia military base, which has been used for bombing runs by Britain and America in the Middle East. Mauritian leaders celebrated the deal as the 'decolonisation' of the Chagos Islands, which lie at the centre of the Indian Ocean and are uninhabited except for military personnel. Navin Ramgoolam, the Mauritian prime minister, has now announced that the money paid by the UK will help Mauritius cut taxes, so that 81 per cent of people in the African island nation will not pay any income tax. It comes despite warnings that Britons face tax hikes in Rachel Reeves's Budget this autumn, which is now thought to contain a black hole tens of billions of pounds large. The Mauritian reforms were announced in a budget speech by Mr Ramgoolam last Wednesday, when he said that the UK's Chagos payments for the next three years would be used to help pay off the country's national debt, which has reached 90 per cent of GDP. He said that to reach a long-term debt level of 60 per cent, the government would adjust 'both the expenditure side and the revenue side of the budget', and raise the minimum salary before an employee pays income tax to £8,073 a year. That increase, of 28 per cent, will scrap income tax entirely for 44,000 people and reduce levies on all other earners. 'As a result of the measures I have introduced, 81 per cent of employees in our country will not pay any income tax,' he said, adding that he had also decided to cut VAT on some food products. After three years, British payments for the Chagos Islands will be used for a 'future fund' to 'create wealth for future generations', Mr Ramgoolam said. Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, said the announcement showed that Mauritius had taken the 'feeble and pathetic' Sir Keir 'for a ride'. 'The only people benefiting from Labour's higher taxes are the people of Mauritius,' she said. 'While causing a financial black hole in Britain, whacking up our taxes and planning further tax raids, Labour's Chagos surrender deal means families in Mauritius will see their taxes cut at our expense. 'This is an insult to hard-working British people who have once again been betrayed by Keir Starmer with millions more paying more in tax.' Announcing the deal last month, Sir Keir claimed that the deal would have a 'net cost' of £3.4 billion, with annual payments averaging £101 million a year. But documents later published by the Foreign Office showed the UK had agreed to pay as much as £30 billion over 99 years, with most of the payments increased in line with inflation. A last-minute legal challenge succeeded in delaying the signing of the deal by several hours, but was ultimately dismissed by the High Court. It comes as an expert panel commissioned by the UN Human Rights Council said that the deal should be suspended after complaints that it did not respect the rights of the native Chagossians. 'We call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended, and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia,' they said. The Government has been approached for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
