
Progress unravelled, and millions left vulnerable: how British aid cuts threaten British health too
Right now, aid reductions across the globe are jeopardising decades of progress against preventable diseases, leaving millions of people vulnerable. This retreat from global health threatens to unravel hard-won advances against diseases we have nearly conquered.
Polio, which paralysed hundreds of thousands of children annually just 40 years ago, has been eliminated in most parts of the world. Meanwhile, there has been a resurgence of diseases such as measles and cholera in populations besieged by conflict and climate emergencies.
Britain faces a critical choice: follow this global trend of disengagement or stand firm as a bulwark for international health security.
I understand the tough trade-offs the government must make to get public spending under control, but the stakes extend beyond humanitarian concerns to our own national interests. Last year, the detection of poliovirus in UK sewers threatened our own children and delivered a reminder that diseases respect no borders. Our protection at home depends directly on our commitment to efforts abroad.
Yet the government's budget spending review promises precisely the wrong direction. By slashing international aid to a 25-year low – from 0.5% of gross national income to just 0.3% – to finance increased defence spending, the government paradoxically risks undermining our own domestic health security.
In real terms, this would gut our development assistance by 40% in just four years. Such draconian cuts would severely undermine all major global health initiatives.
Of course, fiscal prudence is necessary, but how can we ignore the humanitarian and strategic costs of these reductions?
Even beyond self-protection, a strong global health budget surely reflects our deepest values. No child should die from a disease we can prevent.
Threats to global health inevitably become threats to Britain's health, and all our protection depends on maintaining our international leadership in this field.
Now, as vulnerable children face renewed threats from these very diseases, polio stands as a glaring example of what is at stake.
In 1988, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was formed – a landmark public-private partnership led by national governments alongside partners including Rotary International, the World Health Organization and Unicef. This collaborative effort is crucial for tackling a major health threat such as polio. Since worldwide vaccination efforts began, an estimated 20 million children who would have been paralysed are walking today, and approximately 1.6 million deaths have been averted.
This is remarkable, but fragile, progress. In 2024, the number of children paralysed rose in Pakistan and Afghanistan, the two remaining endemic countries. In grim examples of how conflict can upend everything, polio paralysed a child in Gaza for the first time in two decades last year and continues to afflict families in Sudan. Not investing in polio could translate to 200,000 new cases of the disease every year, including in countries where it has long been eradicated, and cost the world billions.
Pound for pound, prevention has consistently proved to be a 'best buy' compared with endlessly responding to outbreaks. The financial case for continued investment in polio eradication is unassailable.
Yet the global eradication agenda faces a critical funding gap of about £1.7bn to meet its overall £5bn target. The UK has invested £1.3bn since 1988 and is one of the effort's staunchest backers. Support is needed now more than ever. At its core, the GPEI is a partnership.
To abandon our commitments now, on the threshold of ending polio for good, would undermine decades of investment, leave millions of children unprotected and ultimately cost more in the long run.
We have the tools to end polio for good, along with strong public backing: last month, more than 85,000 people across the UK participated in the Rise Together movement challenge in support of efforts to end the disease.
As Britain faces its most challenging fiscal scrutiny in decades, the decisions made today will define our country's economic success – as well as our reputation as stewards of a safer, healthier world for all. The budget spending review presents an opportunity to state unequivocally that the UK will maintain a long-term commitment to protecting children worldwide, including our own, from preventable diseases.
The choice before us is clear. We can honour a proud tradition of global health leadership by maintaining our commitment to eradicate polio once and for all, or we can retreat at the very moment victory is within reach.
Sarah Champion is the Labour MP for Rotherham
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Nursing home documentary should be investigated by gardai
He also said the state is too reliant on private nursing home care and 'far too many' people in Ireland go into nursing homes 'far too early'. Labour TD Marie Sherlock said during Leaders' Questions that there are 'huge questions for Government' over how to care for older people in Ireland. She said there are no minimum staffing levels for nursing homes, despite there being such standards in Northern Ireland and elsewhere. 'Are you comfortable that the nursing home sector is becoming dominated by big business in Ireland?' she asked. Responding, Mr Harris said: 'The short answer is I believe the state is too reliant on the private market when it comes to nursing home provision. 'That's why we established a commission of care because I do think we need to look at the entire model of how we care for older people in this country.' He also told the Dail: 'I've been reflecting on this, and I fully accept that people work in very demanding environments, I fully accept that as well. 'But I do also believe what stems from what we've seen on our television screens in recent days are real questions of personal accountability. 'There are laws in our land today. There are laws in relation to assault, there are laws in relation to how we conduct ourselves, and I would urge that a referral is made to An Garda Siochana in relation to the footage that we saw. 'Because what I saw with my own two eyes, the haunting scenes of people being, in my view, physically assaulted in their home, is something that – the Government has responsibilities here to do things, absolutely, but so too do people who carry out those actions. 'I do think there's a need for a Garda investigation into what we saw in relation to the individual actions of people in relation to that.' He also said Hiqa has questions to answer as there were 'serious shortcomings'. He added: 'There are many good private nursing homes, big and small, right across the country and I don't have an ideological view in relation that. 'I just want older people to have choice in relation to their care. I want their families to be supported in making those decisions. 'I want to know, whether it's a public nursing home or a private nursing home, that everyone is safe, that everyone is being treated with dignity. 'I do think we should also be more ambitious about care in the community. I do believe that. I believe far too many people in Ireland go into a nursing home far too early. I can think of good examples of where we have housing alternatives in place and home care opportunities, but they're far too rare. 'But I also think there are genuine, serious issues of personal accountability. 'There is no law, there is no ideology, or there is no model of care that can excuse away – either in its existence or its absence – the conduct of people who decided to physically manhandle elderly people with dementia, and I want them held accountable and I want the gardai to look at the matter.'


The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Half of new parents believed pregnancy myths that turned out to be FALSE – which ones do you think are right?
FOOD cravings and bump size are among the most common myths expectant parents believe. But half of parents believed myths during pregnancy that turned out to be false, according to new research. 1 By just looking at the bump and analysing pregnancy cravings, the challenge is to decide if it's a boy or a girl. According to these commonly believed myths, carrying the baby high in the womb means it's a girl, while lower means a boy. And salty or sour cravings point towards a boy whereas those craving sweet things are carrying a girl. It comes after research, commissioned by Vitabiotics Pregnacare, found 47 per cent of new parents originally believed well-known myths during pregnancy that they later realised weren't all true. A poll of 1,000 parents of children aged 0-10 found 11 per cent of those believed having sour cravings during the first trimester indicated you were expecting a boy. While the same percentage (11 per cent) thought carrying the baby high up in the womb meant you would be welcoming a little girl to the world. And 12 per cent believed that experiencing an influx of spots on your skin also indicated a female. But 79 per cent feel at least a few of the superstitions about pregnancy that they'd heard about and believed in ended up coming true. As a result, 51 per cent of those who had heard of a superstition used this to try and predict their baby's gender. With 44 per cent of these trying the 'swinging ring test' - where you tie a ring to a string and swing it over the belly to see which way it moves. Carly Sandland, doula and founder of The Doula Club, which matches pregnant women with doulas to provide support to families during pregnancy, labour, birth and postpartum, said: 'As a doula, I've heard every pregnancy myth going. 'Carrying high? Must be a boy. Bad skin? Definitely a girl. Craving savoury food? That's obviously a boy. 'It's amazing how confidently people will make these calls - even from complete strangers in the supermarket. 'What this research shows is how common these myths still are - and how many people believe them, even just a little. 'But why not enjoy the guessing games? Have a laugh at the wild ones, and let people guess if they must. But don't let any of it carry more weight than it deserves. 'Myths aren't facts. And they definitely aren't a substitute for understanding your own body and the right professional advice. 'If something feels off, ask questions. If it doesn't sit right, trust yourself.' Parents-to-be who have heard about pregnancy myths also believed severe morning sickness would suggest a female baby, while mild sickness pointed towards a boy (14 per cent). While 10 per cent thought jumping up and down vigorously after sex would stop conception happening. It also emerged 30 per cent of those who tried to use a superstition to guess the baby's gender had a go at the 'key test', where the expectant parent is observed picking up a key and if they opt to grab it by the narrow end, it means a girl is due. And while 53 per cent of new parents asked friends and family for advice about their baby's arrival, 42 per cent turned to Google – and 23 per cent searched social media. But 13 per cent of parents who had heard about myths or superstitions claim they influenced their expectations of pregnancy 'a lot', according to the figures. A spokesperson for Vitabiotics Pregnacare added: 'Of course, not all of these tales are rooted in fact - but they can still be surprisingly persuasive. 'While these stories are usually fairly harmless, it's always best to check anything that may be concerning or unusual with a midwife or medical professional.' Top 20 myths expectant parents believed 1. Severe morning sickness means it's a girl/ mild or no morning sickness means it's a boy 2. Eating spicy food can induce labour 3. Having clear skin means it's a boy/ having bad skin means it's a girl 4. In your third trimester, if you're carrying high it's a girl and low for a boy 5. Craving sweets means it's a girl/ salty or sour foods means it's a boy 6. A round belly means it's a girl/a pointed belly means it's a boy 7. If you gain weight in your face, it's a girl/ if you gain weight in your hips and thighs, it's a boy 8. Avoiding spicy foods will prevent colic in the baby 9. A baby's heart rate above 140 bpm indicates it's a girl/ below indicates it's a boy 10. You shouldn't breast feed if you're ill 11. Jumping up and down immediately after intercourse will prevent conception 12. After intercourse, a hot bath or a heating pad on the stomach prevents conception 13. If the dark belly line extends above the belly button it means it's a boy/if it stays below the belly button it means it's a girl 14. Using the missionary position helps to conceive a girl 15. Eating yams increases fertility 16. You should only eat plain food while breastfeeding 17. If you're moodier, it's a girl/ if you're more relaxed, it's a boy 18. Dreaming about having a boy means you're having a girl, and vice versa 19. If when you swing a ring over your belly it moves in a circle it's a girl/ if moves back and forth it's a boy 20. Expectant parents will deliver babies similarly to the way their mothers did


Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bad news for hairy hipsters as scientists warn men with beards carry more germs than dogs
Hairy hipsters have received some shocking news as scientists have revealed men with beards carry more germs than dogs. Hollywood heartthrobs including Jason Momoa and Zayn Malik are known for their luxuriant facial hair, but a new report may make clean-shaven men more attractive. An expert revealed beards provide a unique environment for bacteria to thrive, and in extreme cases hirsute guys carry more germs than the average toilet. SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO Dr Primrose Freestone, an expert in clinical microbiology at the University of Leicester, in England, explained the findings in an article for The Conversation. She said: 'Beards create a warm, often moist environment where food debris and oils can accumulate – ideal conditions for microbial growth. 'These microbes thrive not just because of the warm, moist conditions beards provide, but also because of constant exposure to new contaminants and microbes, especially from hands that frequently touch surfaces and the face.' Studies dating back 50 years show that facial hair can retain bacteria and bacterial toxins even after it has been washed. This led to the longstanding idea that beards harbor bacteria and could pose an infection risk to others. One study, published in 2018, looked at whether it would be hygienic to evaluate dogs and humans in the same MRI scanner. Analysis revealed most beards contained significantly more microbes than dog fur – including a greater number of harmful bacteria. The study, published in the Nature journal European Radiology, said: 'Our study shows a significantly higher bacterial load in specimens taken from men's beards compared with dogs' fur. 'All 18 men showed high microbial counts, whereas only 23 out of 30 dogs had high microbial counts and seven dogs moderate microbial counts.' Beards can also sometimes spread skin infections such as impetigo – a contagious rash often caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which is commonly found in facial hair. Sometimes, in rare cases, parasites like pubic lice, which usually live in the groin area, can also show up in beards. However, other studies have challenged the idea that beards increase infection risk. One investigation concluded there was no significant difference in bacteria colonization between bearded and clean-shaven healthcare workers. But Dr Freestone said: 'Neglected beards can foster irritation, inflammation and infection. 'The skin beneath a beard – rich in blood vessels, nerve endings and immune cells – is highly sensitive to microbial and environmental stressors. 'When sebum, dead skin, food debris and pollutants accumulate, they can irritate the skin and provide fuel for fungal and bacterial growth.' Bearded men should wash their beard and face every day, experts say, to help remove dirt, oils, allergens and dead skin. Other tips include moisturizing to prevent dryness, using a beard comb to remove debris, and trimming to control loose hairs. 'With daily hygiene and proper grooming, beards pose little risk and may even be healthier than we once thought,' Dr Freestone concluded.