Russia requests UN meeting on ‘threats' by Ukraine's backers
Russia has requested a UN Security Council meeting to address what it sees as attempts by EU countries to derail the peaceful settlement of the Ukraine conflict, Dmitry Polyansky, the first deputy permanent representative to the UN, has said. The announcement came after Germany said Ukraine has been permitted to strike targets deep into Russian territory using Western-supplied weapons.
In a statement on Telegram on Tuesday, Polyansky said the session is expected to take place at 10am New York time (14:00 GMT) on Friday, and will focus on 'threats to international peace' posed by Kiev's backers. According to Polyansky, the session is a mirror response to a similar meeting requested by 'the European sponsors of the Kiev regime on the humanitarian situation in Ukraine,' scheduled the day prior.
The diplomat suggested that Kiev's backers convened their meeting because they grew impatient waiting for the results of the Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul and for a reaction from US President Donald Trump, who has positioned himself as a key mediator in the conflict. 'They feel it is important to them to keep the Ukrainian topic afloat at the Security Council, even at the risk of misjudging the tone favored by the new US administration,' Polyansky said.
The move came after Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany and its allies no longer have range restrictions in place on weapons provided to Ukraine, adding that the decision was made months ago.
However, German Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil appeared to dispute Merz's statement, saying, 'There is no new agreement that goes beyond what the previous government has done.'
The previous German government, led by Olaf Scholz, opposed the delivery of long-range systems, as well as long-range strikes deep into Russia using Western-supplied weapons, due to concerns that the moves could result in an escalation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Moscow has long criticized Western weapons deliveries to Ukraine, saying they only prolong the conflict without changing the outcome. On Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said continued military assistance to Kiev by NATO countries represents 'indirect participation in the war against Russia,' which 'does not contribute to a peaceful settlement.'
Earlier this month, Russia and Ukraine held their first direct peace talks since 2022, in which the sides agreed to a record prisoner swap. Moscow also pledged to hand over a memorandum for resolving the conflict to Kiev, which will include its key terms for a potential ceasefire, conflict settlement, and a timeline for an eventual peace agreement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
21 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine fails to accept remains of fallen troops
Editor's note: RT initially erroneously reported that a swap of bodies in a 6,000-for-6,000 format had been agreed between Moscow and Kiev. Ukraine has not accepted the bodies of its fallen troops which Russia offered to return, providing 'strange reasons' for its decision, according to Moscow's lead negotiator in the peace talks with Kiev, Vladimir Medinsky. Russia decided to repatriate the remains of over 6,000 slain Ukrainian soldiers in a unilateral humanitarian gesture during the talks in Istanbul on Monday. Both sides also agreed to exchange 1,200 prisoners each. 'The first batch of frozen remains of 1,212 Ukrainian soldiers has already arrived in refrigerated trucks at the exchange area' on the border between the two countries, he said. 'The rest are on their way,' the negotiator added. Kiev has also been handed a list of 640 heavily wounded and younger prisoners held by Moscow so that they may be exchanged as well, according to Medinsky. 'The contact group of the Russian Ministry of Defense is on the border with Ukraine. However, the Ukrainian side unexpectedly postponed both the acceptance of bodies and the exchange of prisoners of war for an indefinite period,' he wrote. According to the Russian negotiator, the Ukrainian team 'did not even arrive at the exchange site.' The reasons Kiev provided to justify its decision 'are various, and rather strange,' he said without elaborating. 'We call on Kiev to strictly adhere to the schedule and all agreements that had been reached, and to immediately begin the exchange' so that the wounded could return home and the dead receive a proper burial, Medinsky urged. Moscow's team is on site and 'fully ready to work,' he reiterated, adding that 'Russia always keeps its word.'
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kiev sends the living to die, but won't accept its dead
It is sad, but peace remains elusive in the war between, on one side, Ukraine and – through Ukraine – the West and, on the other, Russia. Recently, the US has at least admitted that Moscow has plausible and important interests at stake and that the West has been using Ukraine to fight a proxy war against Russia. While very late and still incomplete, such truthfulness could help fashion the kind of realistic compromise needed to end this war. Yet Washington's European vassals have chosen this moment to discover their usually terminally atrophied capacity for talking back to the US: They clearly want the war to continue, even though that means Ukraine – about which they pretend to care – will lose even more people and territory. Against this backdrop, it was no wonder that the latest round of the renewed Istanbul talks between Russia and Ukraine produced no breakthrough, little progress, and only very modest concrete results. Also, on the eve of the talks, the Zelensky regime launched terror attacks on civilian trains in western Russia and a series of sneak drone strikes throughout the country that – in the most generous reading – involved the war crime of perfidy: That, obviously, did not help find a way forward either. Indeed, by now it is clear that Kiev's sneak drone attacks in particular have only further undermined the Zelensky regime's already fragile standing in Washington: US President Donald Trump has been explicit that he accepts Russia's right to massively retaliate, or, in the original Trumpese, 'bomb the hell' out of Ukraine. Luckily for Ukraine, Moscow is generally more restrained than America would be in a similar situation, and it should stay so. Yet the fact remains, Kiev's sneak drones have made no substantial military difference in its favor, but they have done significant political damage – to Kiev, that is. Regarding the Istanbul talks, it is likely that these assaults were meant to torpedo them. Yet Moscow did not fall for that rather transparent play. Its delegation turned up; so the Ukrainian one had to do the same. In addition, Russia ended this round of the negotiations with several good-will gestures, including an agreement to exchange POWs who are particularly young or in bad health and the offer to hand over the frozen (a common practice in war) bodies of 6,000 fallen Ukrainians. Both initiatives have run into trouble. To be precise, both are being impeded by the Ukrainian leadership. The POW swap has been delayed, and Ukrainian officials have failed to show up at the border to receive the first 1,212 of their deceased soldiers. Regarding both, Kiev has blamed Russia. Yet, remarkably, the Ukrainian statements, in reality, prove that it is indeed Kiev that is – at the very least – slowing these processes down. For what Ukrainian officials are really accusing Russia of is moving faster. The reasons for this obstructionism are unclear. The Ukrainian authorities have not shared them with the public. But there are some plausible guesses. One very likely reason why Kiev is reluctant to accept the 6,000 bodies of its own fallen soldiers is that the 'preponderant majority' of them, according to a Ukrainian member of parliament, were killed specifically during Ukraine's insane and predictably catastrophic incursion into Russia's Kursk region. Started on August 6 of last year, the operation was initially hyped by Ukrainian propagandists and their accomplices and useful idiots in the West. For the clear-eyed, it was obvious from the beginning that this was a mass kamikaze mission, wasting Ukrainian lives for no military or political advantage. Was the Zelensky regime trying to create a territorial 'bargaining chip'? Or once more 'shift the narrative,' as if wars are won by rewriting a movie script? Influence last year's US elections? Prepare for a possible victory by then presidential candidate Donald Trump? All of the above? We don't know. What we do know is that nothing Kiev may have fantasized about has worked. Indeed, by now the Kursk fiasco has only made Kiev's situation worse. Russia has retaken the territory in Kursk Region that Ukraine had seized and is advancing on the Ukrainian side of the border, taking settlements at an accelerating pace and getting close to the major regional city of Sumy. Clearly, those fallen during that particular suicide mission are evidence of Kiev's recklessness, hypocrisy, and incompetence. No wonder they seem to be less than welcome at home. A second reason for Kiev's reluctance may be even more sordid. There is speculation, for instance on social media, that it is financial. More importantly, a Russian diplomat, Sergei Ordzhonikidze, has made the same claim on the Telegram channel of the Izvestiia newspaper. For according to Ukrainian legislation, the families of the fallen soldiers are entitled to substantial compensation. Painful as it may be to acknowledge it, the Zelensky regime is not incapable of such a massive lack of piety. Whatever the precise reasons for Kiev's odd refusal to take back its prisoners and dead, they are certain to be base. This may jar with the West's well-organized and stubbornly delusional Zelensky fan club. But the best they could do for 'ordinary' Ukrainians is to put pressure on their worn-out idol to accept the prisoners and the fallen. And, of course to finally end the war.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia accuses Ukraine of self-genocide in feud over troop remains
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has branded Ukraine's failure to receive the bodies of its fallen soldiers an act of self-genocide, accusing Kiev of turning its back on its own people in both life and death. During talks between the two sides in Istanbul on Monday, Moscow decided to return the bodies of over 6,000 Ukrainian soldiers in a unilateral humanitarian gesture. However, Russia's top negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, said on Saturday that the Ukrainian team failed to show up when the first batch of remains was delivered to the exchange point on the border between Belarus and Ukraine. Zakharova took to Telegram later on Saturday to slam the deliberate inaction of Vladimir Zelensky's government, saying that it 'does not need its people; neither dead nor alive.' 'There is no nation or ethnic group in the world that would refuse to bury its soldiers. But there is the Kiev regime, which professes a misanthropic ideology and is committing genocide against its own people,' Zakharova wrote. Russian MP Dmitry Belik, who is a member of the State Duma's International Affairs Committee, told RT that one of the reasons for Ukraine failing to accept the bodies of its soldiers could be its unwillingness to pay compensation to their families. 'This is how – thinking of how to stuff their own wallets and not give a penny to their citizens – the Kiev regime, led by Zelensky, pursues its bloody policy and destroys its own people,' Belik argued. Former Pentagon analyst Michael Maloof also suggested that Ukraine's decision could be rooted in financial concerns. 'I think they are embarrassed by the numbers,' he told RT. 'I've heard sums up around more than a billion dollars that they would have to repay to families – and they don't have the money,' he added. The chairman of the Russian parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee, Leonid Slutsky, told RT that the move by the Ukrainian authorities is an example of 'rare cynicism and a disregard for the memory of their own fallen servicemen.' 'In a war to the last Ukrainian, they are exclusively focused on preserving their own power, even at the cost of actual sacrilege,' Slutsky said. Kiev explained its refusal to collect the remains of its troops by claiming the date of the transfer had not yet been agreed upon.
