From Gaza to Ukraine to Iran, Trump's ‘peacemaker' promise collapses
In his inaugural address this January, Donald Trump declared that his proudest legacy would be that of 'a peacemaker and unifier', pledging that US power would 'stop all wars and bring a new spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent, and totally unpredictable'.
Five months later, his second presidency is witnessing the spectacular unraveling of that lofty aspiration.
A president who vowed to end global conflicts – including one which he said he would resolve within his first 24 hours – has instead presided over their escalation – most recently the spiraling conflict between Israel and Iran.
The timeline of the latest conflict resuggests a stark disconnect between Trump's aspirations and reality: the wave of Israeli airstrikes came just hours afterTrump urged Israel not to attack Iran.
Marco Rubio, Trump's secretary of state, took pains to describe the Israeli attack as 'unilateral', stressing that the US was 'not involved in strikes against Iran' – only for Trump to then insist he had been well informed of Israel's plans – and warn that further attacks would be 'even more brutal'.
Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who has emerged as Trump's primary diplomatic negotiator in the Middle East and Ukraine, still reportedly plans to go to Oman this weekend for talks on Tehran's nuclear program, but it appeared unlikely the Iranians would attend.
Trump's muddled peace agenda was already disarray long before Thursday's attacks.
The Gaza ceasefire his administration helped broker collapsed within weeks, with Israel resuming massive bombardments and imposing a three-month total blockade on humanitarian aid to the territory, where the death toll has now surpassed at least 55,000.
In Ukraine – a conflict Trump once bragged he would end on his first day back in office – Russian forces have pressed ahead with a summer offensive, entering the Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time in three years and accumulating more forces – evidence that Putin has no interest in Trump's peace overtures and intends to expand the war further.
Meanwhile, Trump's abrupt announcement of a ceasefire between India and Pakistan was met with fury in New Delhi, where officials denied his claims of brokering the deal.
And while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth acknowledged to Congress that the Pentagon has developed contingency plans to seize Greenland and Panama militarily, it's unclear how territorial conquest fits into Trump's definition of peacemaking.
His first term ended no wars, nearly sparked conflict with Iran, and saw his signature 'peace' achievement – the Abraham accords – normalize relations between Israel and countries that weren't fighting it anyway.
Part of Trump's appeal to voters was precisely a promise to avoid foreign entanglements. In the stands at the inauguration viewing party, supporters told the Guardian how they valued his restraint in military deployment and favored his America-first approach that prioritized domestic concerns over international aid and intervention. And there is a an argument that for Trump peace is not an absence of conflict but rather Washington's distance from it.
There is one potentially optimistic interpretation for the latest strikes in Iran. Alex Vatanka, the Iran director from the Middle East Institute in Washington, suggested that Israel's attack could be a calculated gamble to shock Iran into serious negotiations. The theory holds that Israel convinced Trump to allow limited strikes that would pressure Tehran without triggering regime change, essentially using military action to restart stalled diplomacy. On Friday Trump suggested that the strike on Iran might have even improved the chances of a nuclear agreement.
'This is not likely to bring Iran back to the negotiating table,' said Andrew Borene, executive director of global security at Flashpoint and a former staff officer at the US's office of the director of national intelligence. 'It marks the opening of yet another rapidly expanding flashpoint within the global context of a new hybrid cold war, one that will be fought both on the ground and in the darkest corners of the web.'
Whether this strategy succeeds depends entirely on Iran's response. The regime could either return to negotiations chastened, or abandon diplomacy altogether and pursue nuclear weapons more aggressively. Early indicators suggest Tehran may not be in a conciliatory mood after having its facilities bombed and leaders killed.
But even if the more optimistic readings prove correct, it does not change the broader reality: every major conflict Trump inherited or promised to resolve has intensified on his watch.
Trump promised to be a peacemaker. Instead, he's managing multiple wars while his diplomatic initiatives collapse in real time. From Gaza to Ukraine to Iran, the world appears more volatile and dangerous than when he took his oath five months ago.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Keir Starmer's challenge in dealing with the G6 plus 1
Sir Keir Starmer has proved himself to be a rather more adept negotiator on the world stage than his detractors would suggest. The timing was partly fortuitous, but it remains the case that he concluded three advantageous trade deals last month, with India, the United States and the European Union. He will need those diplomatic skills this weekend at the G7 summit in Canada. The geopolitical order has been shaken by Israel's attack on Iran, and there is an urgent need for the leaders of the world's rich democracies to show unity and resolve in response. Solidarity and resolution are hardly the qualities associated with Donald Trump, however, and even before the bombs fell on Tehran there were serious differences between the US president and his fellow leaders. Never before in the history of the G7, which goes back to the oil crisis of 1973, has one of its members sought to annex another, for example, as Mr Trump has offered to do with Canada. While most leaders of G7 nations seem to share a broadly similar outlook, there is one who does not. It is almost as if it is a summit of the Group of 6 plus 1. So far, it has to be said that Sir Keir has managed to deal with the unpredictable ego of the US president more adroitly than most. For all that some Britons might find it emotionally satisfying for their prime minister to tell Mr Trump to his face what they think of him, there can be no doubt that it is in our national interest for Sir Keir to lay on the compliments with a trowel. That is the approach that secured agreement in principle to exempt the United Kingdom from at least some of Mr Trump's tariffs. If Sir Keir has to continue that approach in order to get those exemptions locked down, then so be it. The prime minister will also need to work hard to try to keep the US president from straying too far from the G7 consensus on support for Ukraine – Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, has invited Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, to join the summit in Kananaskis, Alberta. Mr Trump will find it harder to try to bully Mr Zelensky in a setting in which the US president is so obviously outnumbered. There is the linked subject of Nato's future, and the forthcoming discussions about Nato's European members raising their defence spending to take up more of the burden of supporting Ukraine from the US. Then Sir Keir will also want to lobby Mr Trump to keep the Aukus submarine agreement between the US, the UK and Australia, about which some members of the US administration have been sceptical. Finally, there is the Middle East, where a gap has opened up between the US and UK responses to Israel's attempts to ensure that Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons. The Israeli strikes were a rebuff to Mr Trump, who seems to have imagined that his diplomacy aimed at restraining the Iranian nuclear programme was making progress. Yet the US president – despite Marco Rubio, his secretary of state, initially standing back from the onslaught – quickly declared his support for the 'excellent' attacks. The British government's response has been – rightly – more circumspect, and the leaders of the other G7 countries have likewise also called for restraint and de-escalation. On his arrival at the resort in the Canadian Rockies, Sir Keir will be walking a tightrope. Let us hope that he is as successful as he has been up to now.
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Will Israel-Iran conflict spark fresh inflation crisis? Rachel Reeves admits spiking energy prices and threats to trade routes are 'cause for concern' - with fears public finances are too bad to respond
Fears are mounting about the economic impact of the Iran-Israel conflict today as energy prices rise and trade routes face disruption. Rachel Reeves admitted a 10 per cent spike in oil and gas costs and threats by Tehran to close the Straits of Hormuz were 'cause for concern'. In TV interviews this morning, the Chancellor stressed energy costs were still lower than 'a few months ago' - but said the potential fallout for UK plc was partly driving the UK's calls for de-escalation. Ms Reeves dodged questions on whether her already-delicate spending plans would be smashed by the crisis, insisting Britain has a 'strong economy'. The comments came as former BP boss Lord Browne warned oil prices would 'go up a long way' if Iran shut the Straits of Hormuz. Deutsche Bank has suggested that such action could see Brent crude hit $125 a barrel - compared to around $74 now. Former Chancellor Lord Hammond told Sky News that the government was not in a good position to respond to serious disruption because Ms Reeves had not rebuilt the Treasury's reserve. Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'We've already seen in the last few days, for example, oil and gas prices begin to go up'. 'Over the course of this week, oil and gas prices, oil prices have gone up by just over 10 per cent, they're still down compared to a few months ago but of course we're keeping an eye on that,' she said. 'And at the same time, as you say trade routes are very important through the Middle East and we've seen disruption there in the past, partly because of the Houthi attacks for example. 'And so that is a cause for concern.' Pressed how bad the situation could be, she said: 'It is very early days and things are moving quickly. But when we urge for de-escalation in the region that is in part because of the lives at risk… but also because what happens in the Middle East affects us here at home. 'It's why in the Spending Review this week we invested heavily in our defence to keep our country safe.' Ms Reeves confirmed the UK is deploying military assets to the region to 'protect ourselves' and 'potentially to support our allies'. She noted that in the past Britain has 'helped protect Israel' from 'incoming strikes'. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Lord Hammond told Sky News: 'What she should have been doing of course a long time ago is rebuilding our reserve. But she hasn't done that… 'If there's an economic shock we will be in a much more difficult position in responding to it.' He added: 'It's only if the situation becomes long term sustained that I think there is a risk we could see serious economic disruption.'
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
President Trump's most profitable ventures revealed in financial disclosure report
Donald Trump 's financial disclosure report reveals he made over $10 million selling merchandise like watches, sneakers, Bibles, and guitars; however, his cryptocurrency platform stake was the most profitable. Trump made $57,355,532 from his stake in World Liberty Financial. While his $Trump meme coin, not included in the report, is estimated to have earned $320 million in fees. Trump 's Mar-a-Lago estate brought in over $50 million, while other items like Trump watches, coffee table books, sneakers, and fragrances generated millions more. Sales of the Greenwood Bible made over $1.3 million, and '45' guitars made $1,055,100. Trump 's cryptocurrency venture has faced scrutiny, with his media company reportedly planning to raise $3 billion for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, leading to conflict of interest concerns.
