logo
Cattle claimants 'bitterly disappointed' after court downplays compensation claim from live export ban

Cattle claimants 'bitterly disappointed' after court downplays compensation claim from live export ban

Northern cattle producers say they are "bitterly disappointed", after a federal court decision downplayed the scale of their claimed losses following the 2011 live cattle export ban.
Fourteen years on from the ban that started it all, and five years after winning their class action against the federal government, hundreds of claimants had been seeking $510 million in compensation, plus costs and interest, from the Commonwealth.
The group includes cattlemen, trucking companies, livestock agents and shippers whose lives and businesses were up-ended after the ABC's Four Corners aired evidence of animal cruelty in Indonesian abattoirs, prompting the then-Labor government to issue a temporary ban on the live export trade.
Late last week, the Federal Court's Justice Thawley concluded that exports to Indonesia were already in "steep decline" leading up to Australia's temporary ban.
"Indonesia had pursued a beef self-sufficiency policy for many years, but it was pursued with renewed vigour under the new program, which began in January 2010," he said.
"The court has concluded that the decision to set the quotas at the levels they were set were not affected in any material way by the ban.
Northern Territory cattle producers are still digesting the judgement, but have pushed back against the court's conclusion that the temporary ban played a limited role in the subsequent decline in exports to Indonesia.
"We're bitterly disappointed about the ruling," said David Connolly, former president of the Northern Territory Cattlemen's Association, and someone who has been closely involved in the class action.
"We deal one-on-one with the people who import our cattle … we know how the customer reacted, but it's very difficult to prove that in court."
The court is yet to determine how much compensation is due to the industry, and the parties will confer by June 18, with court orders to follow.
"I don't know what that number might look like – it might look like $300 milllion, $400 million, or $500 million, but that's something to be determined to be determined down the track," Mr Connolly said.
"We'll take some advice, we'll read the Justice's rulings, but we'll certainly consider an appeal."
On May 30, 2011, ABC's Four Corners broadcast shocking footage from inside Indonesian slaughterhouses. It showed Australian cattle being kicked, struggling while retrained by ropes, and being slaughtered without having been stunned.
In response, and under political pressure, then-agriculture minister Joe Ludwig announced a ban on June 7, prohibiting the export of live cattle to Indonesia – Australia's largest market.
Overnight, a roughly $400 million industry was shut down, and hundreds of thousands of cattle were stranded in Australia.
The ban only lasted six weeks, but the industry claimed it cost hundreds of millions of dollars and devastated businesses.
Their criticism was that the government had completely failed to consult with the industry and Indonesia over the animal cruelty concerns.
The Labor government initiated an independent review and industry support packages, but in 2014 a 300-strong class action began, seeking $510 million in compensation for lost income as a result of the ban.
The lead plaintiff was the Brett Cattle Company.
"We suffered immense financial hardship because of the ban, so much stress, it was overwhelming at times," Emily Brett told the ABC in 2020.
In June 2020, the Federal Court's Justice Steven Rares found that former agriculture minister Joe Ludwig acted with misfeasance, in banning cattle exports in 2011.
Justice Rares said the the blanket ban had been "invalid and capricious".
"I am comfortably satisfied, based on the whole of the evidence, that the minister was recklessly indifferent as to first, the availability of his power to make the ban order in its absolutely prohibitory terms without providing any power of exception and, secondly, as to the injury which the order, when effectual, was calculated to produce," he said.
"Accordingly, the minister committed misfeasance in public office when he made the ban order on June 7, 2011."
The current Labor government offered "a very substantial settlement offer of $215 million" within months of taking office in 2022, but no settlement was reached.
The Brett family was later awarded nearly $3 million in compensation, but the hundreds of other claimants have had to wait.
Former NT Cattlemen's Association chief executive Will Evans said the process has been "disgraceful".
"We're bringing all guns blazing and will take [the government] for every cent we can," he told the ABC earlier this year.
Since the Four Corners episode aired in 2011, an Exporter Supply Chain Assurance System (ESCAS) has been introduced, and after a slump, the live export trade with Indonesia has recovered.
In 2024, live cattle exports grew by 13 per cent to 766,044 head, the second consecutive year of growth. Indonesia now accounts for 70 per cent of Australia's live cattle exports.
Industry peak bodies say the trade, both directly and indirectly, contributes billions to the Australian economy and employs more than 6,500 people.
Australia has been putting farm animals on boats and sending them out to sea since the 1830s.
One senate report from the 1980s reviewing the trade of live sheep to the Middle East captures the ongoing ethical tension of the live export trade.
"If a decision were to be made on the future of the trade purely on animal welfare grounds, there is enough evidence to stop the trade," the report said.
But the committee "agreed that the animal welfare aspects of the trade cannot be divorced from economic and other considerations".
"After consideration of all factors, the committee acknowledges the reality of the situation that any short-term cessation or disruption to the trade would cause considerable dislocation both in Australia and in the Middle East."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Property price growth sparks interest in home builders around Australia
Property price growth sparks interest in home builders around Australia

News.com.au

time28 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Property price growth sparks interest in home builders around Australia

REA Group Senior Economist Angus Moore discusses the key costs for home builders as auction clearance rates drop alongside interest rates. 'Two of the key costs for home builders are obviously the cost of building the home but also the cost of financing, and so as we are starting to see rates fall, that is going to start to make a lot more projects a bit more feasible,' Mr Moore told Sky News Australia. 'The fact we are starting to see home prices grow, in a bit more broad base … more than we were last year, that is also going to start to make more projects feasible and encourage home builders to start those projects … hopefully as rates start to come through that is what we will start to see.' In partnership with

Big changes are coming to Buy Now Pay Later. Here's how it affects you
Big changes are coming to Buy Now Pay Later. Here's how it affects you

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Big changes are coming to Buy Now Pay Later. Here's how it affects you

Big changes are coming for Buy Now Pay Later providers as tighter regulations aim to stop consumers being affected by potentially harmful credit contracts. From Tuesday June 10, BNPL products – including Afterpay, Zip and Humm, as well as low cost credit contracts for significant purchases, including solar panels or dental work – will be regulated in the same way as credit cards. The new legislation was introduced by the Albanese government in June 2024, requiring BNPL providers to hold an Australian credit licence, comply with existing credit laws regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and establish a new category of low cost credit under the Credit Act. BNPL providers, under ASIC, may be required to complete mandatory checks and inquiries about a consumer's financial situation, including in relation to their income and expenditure, to prevent financial strain. BNPL products are the third-most used credit product in the country, sitting behind credit cards (58 per cent) and home loans (21 per cent), according to CreditSmart. This means consumers may begin to see missed or late repayments appearing on their credit reports. It also means consumers can expect to undergo mandatory credit checks, which could impact their credit scores. 'Some BNPL providers will report additional information, such as repayments, on consumers' credit reports,' Arca chief executive officer Elsa Markula said. 'However, BNPL providers such as Afterpay will report credit checks only.' A study from CreditSmart revealed one fifth of Australian consumers use a BNPL service such as Afterpay or Zip, but one third (33 per cent) have never checked their credit reports. Younger Australians are the biggest consumer of BNPL, with Millennials making up 38 per cent and Gen Z representing 13 per cent. However, 15 per cent of Gen Z said they didn't believe lenders would check their credit report during an application process. Ms Markula said the change in BNPL regulations would give consumers a harsh reality check when it comes to their credit scores, especially if they were hoping to apply for a loan or a mortgage. 'BNPL is now the third most used credit product in Australia, behind credit cards and home loans,' she said. 'But too few people understand how it affects their credit profile, especially young Australians. 'Under the new rules, your BNPL behaviour could directly impact your credit score and your future ability to get a loan, a credit card, or even a mortgage.' She urged consumers to be wary as the changes may catch them off-guard. 'Not all providers will report the same data at the same time, so check updates from your BNPL provider,' she said. Ms Markula said the sweeping legislation changes could be a positive move for Australians hoping to improve their credit score. 'Done right, BNPL usage can now be a tool for strengthening your credit profile, especially for younger or credit-invisible consumers looking to access more traditional forms of credit down the track,' she told NewsWire. She urged consumers to make repayments on time to avoid a negative hit to the credit reports. 'While not all BNPL providers report payment history, where this information is reported it is the most important factor for building or protecting your credit score,' she said. Consumers have also been cautioned to check their credit score regularly, and watch for errors or missing information. 'Check your credit reports from all three major credit reporting bodies to ensure your information is accurate,' she said. Ms Markula said the regulation changes should make Australians consider when they use BNPL products, and limit credit applications if unnecessary. 'Apply for credit only when needed; multiple applications in a short time may signal financial stress to lenders,' she said. 'Only take on credit – including BNPL – you can comfortably repay.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store