logo
Faith drives Idaho legislator to reverse same-sex marriage. These faith leaders push back.

Faith drives Idaho legislator to reverse same-sex marriage. These faith leaders push back.

Yahoo17-02-2025

The Rev. Josh Lee talks to a reporter at Boise's First Congregational United Church of Christ on February 3, 2025. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)
A decade ago, the Rev. Josh Lee finally came to terms with his sexuality.
From a young age, Lee knew he wanted to be a pastor, but his attraction to men conflicted with his evangelical Christian upbringing. Raised in Illinois, Lee tried 'conversion therapy' three times in high school, and as a young pastor he believed he would live single and celibate for the rest of his life.
Within one month of moving to Idaho, the now married and openly gay pastor at Boise First United Church of Christ spoke up against legislation impacting the state's LGBTQ+ community. House Joint Memorial 1 — which passed 46-24 in the Idaho House of Representatives on Jan. 27 — is now headed to the Idaho Senate. The memorial asks the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its decision on same-sex marriage. While the North Idaho lawmaker who sponsored the memorial said it pushes to restore states rights and 'the natural definition of marriage,' Lee and other faith leaders say the memorial misrepresents their faith.
Lee's journey to advocating for LGBTQ+ rights in Idaho has been difficult. For many years, he was miserable, filled with self hatred, and had even contemplated taking his own life.
'I thought … maybe God would welcome me into heaven if I could die having been faithful to his cause,' he told the Idaho Capital Sun.
That was until he met other Christians from gay-affirming churches in 2015. After coming out and leaving the church where he had been pastoring, Lee began studying queer theology and deconstructing his faith. For the first time, he allowed himself to date men.
'I was taught that racism didn't exist, that women should submit to men, and that men have ultimate veto power over women,' he said, reflecting on his former beliefs.
Now, as Idaho lawmakers push to take away same-sex marriage, Lee said he can see his former self in the lawmakers who, like he once did, believe their faith defines marriage as solely between a man and woman.
House Joint Memorial 1 is not a bill, and its passage in both chambers would not adjust Idaho law. Its passage, however, would send the memorial to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Idaho already defines marriage between a man and woman in its state Constitution, but the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges declared that definition unconstitutional. If those federal protections were ever reversed, a ban on same-sex marriage would immediately take effect in Idaho.
The memorial's sponsor, Rep. Heather Scott, R-Blanchard, told the House floor the bill is meant to restore states' rights to define marriage. Scott could not be reached for comment. However, in an interview with The Ranch Podcast, Scott compared the issue to Roe v. Wade, saying that court precedent can be overturned.
'This is a Judeo-Christian based country, and our constitution was designed for a moral people,' Scott said in the podcast. 'So that morality was built on God's word … That's what our country was built on.'
Scott said the Bible is clear that marriage is between a man and a woman. Some Christian faiths, such as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, share this perspective. The LDS faith, which has 476,000 of its nearly 7 million nationwide members located in Idaho, does not permit church officers to perform same-sex marriages, according to its website.
'Just don't force me to say that that's a marriage, because in my eyes, that's an abomination to God,' Scott said in the podcast. 'Do I respect those people? Absolutely. Do I hate them because they believe in something different? No. I have no ill will towards them. I don't want their lives to be harder or anything like that. I want them to know the truth, but at the same time I don't want to keep things from them.'
Her bill received support from the Idaho Family Policy Center, a conservative organization focused on implementing Christian-based policies. Morgan MaGill, spokesperson for the organization, said the Idaho Family Policy Center affirms 'the biblical design for marriage is one man and one woman, joined together in a union blessed by God.'
'The Bible is clear that deviation from this design is a perversion of the sacred institution of marriage,' MaGill told the Sun. 'Because marriage was created by God for the organization of family life and child rearing, government has no legitimate authority to restructure this pre-political institution.'
The House Joint Memorial 1 has raised concerns among LGBTQ+ Idahoans about its potential impact on adoption, visitation rights and taxes. However, one legal expert says she doesn't believe people should panic.
Marilyn Chinitz, a matrimonial attorney and partner at Blank Rome LLP, told the Sun that although people may worry the U.S. Supreme Court could reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as it did Roe v. Wade, she said the constitutional arguments behind the two cases are different. In Obergefell, the court ruled that states cannot deny same-sex couples the right to marry, basing its decision on both the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment.
Additionally, in 2022, President Joe Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act, which adds protections for interracial marriage and same-sex marriages. If the Supreme Court were to overturn Obergefell, the legality of same-sex marriage would revert to state law. While states like Idaho and Texas, which have pre-existing bans, would likely stop performing same-sex marriages, they would still be required to recognize marriages that were already legally performed under protections from the Respect for Marriage Act.
'If you do get married in one state, even though you live in a state that doesn't recognize that marriage under federal law, it will be protected,' Chinitz said.
Lee was the first faith leader to speak out against the memorial before the House State Affairs Committee, but he was joined by faith leaders from the Jewish, Evangelical Lutheran and Unitarian Universalist traditions — some of whom protested by walking out of the committee or testifying against the memorial.
Rabbi Dan Fink, who recently retired from the Congregation Ahavath Beth Israel in Boise, has long supported same-sex marriage. When his congregation moved to its Boise Bench campus in 2003, the first wedding he conducted in the synagogue was a same-sex couple, he told the Sun. Though it was not legally acknowledged before 2015, he said it was a way of joining people religiously in the Jewish faith.
Fink acknowledged there are differences of opinion within the American Jewish community, but he said a strong majority are supportive of same-sex marriage.
'We should be supporting love and human dignity, and more people being able to commit to a sacred partnership is a good thing,' Fink said. 'Marriage is not an easy thing. Marriage takes work, whether you're same sex or heterosexual partners. What makes it sacred is love and respect, and that's not a function of gender.'
As someone who has spent his lifetime studying the Hebrew Bible, Fink said marriages in the Bible are 'very complicated,' and he doesn't believe they offer a good guide to marriage, noting that some marriages involve handmaids or more than one wife.
Pastor Connie Winter-Eulberg is also an LGBTQ+ affirming faith leader. She testified in opposition to the memorial when it was in committee, representing the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America which has nearly 2.8 million members in the U.S.
In 2009, the church began welcoming and performing marriages on same-sex couples, she said, emphasizing the church's deep commitment to the principle of 'loving thy neighbor.'
'I think it's more about control versus, 'this is what God says,'' Winter-Eulberg told the Sun about the memorial. 'I think they want the male and the family to have control.'
Like Winter-Eulberg, the Rev. Sara LaWall felt compelled to speak up against the memorial during the committee hearing. LaWall is a minister at Boise Unitarian Universalist Fellowship, and her faith is deeply rooted in justice, equity and compassion, she told the Sun. Unitarian Universalism draws wisdom from a variety of sources, she said, rather than a single text like the Bible in the Christian tradition.
'The Bible is rife with contradictions,' she told the Sun. 'The Bible says a lot of things that we no longer practice or believe… We no longer stone people to death. The Bible also says that women are property. So this whole notion of marriage between a man and a woman — well, that used to mean that a man could own a woman as his wife, and perhaps even more than one.'
LaWall said she doesn't believe Obergefell v. Hodges marginalizes anyone's faith because religious institutions still have the right to define marriage as they choose.
'In their private spheres, in their churches, they're allowed to make rules and policies that suggest that marriage is only between a man and a woman, and they can uphold those,' LaWall said. 'I may not agree with them, but that is what religious freedom actually means.'
For now, House Joint Memorial 1 is headed to the Idaho Senate side, where the chairman of the Senate State Affairs Committee may choose to hold a hearing on it in the coming days or weeks. If approved by the committee, it would advance to the Senate floor. Approval from the Idaho Senate would send the memorial to the U.S. Supreme Court.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No Kings rallies set in GB, Larned
No Kings rallies set in GB, Larned

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

No Kings rallies set in GB, Larned

Jun. 12—Rallies and protests are taking place across the nation on Flag Day, June 14. Two "No Kings" rallies will take place in the Golden Belt. The Pawnee County Democratic Committee will sponsor a "No Kings" rally from 10 a.m. to noon next Saturday, June 14, at the Pawnee County Courthouse in Larned. Organizers said they will have a peaceful rally on the sidewalk in front of the courthouse. In Great Bend, the Barton County chapters of the League of Women Voters and Women for Kansas will sponsor a "Pro Democracy No Kings" demonstration rally from 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at the courthouse band shell. There will be speakers and live music. Participants are welcome to bring signs, flags, drums, lawn chairs and water. After the rally, they will march in protest on the courthouse square. Questions may be emailed to w4kgreatbend@ Pam Martin, chapter leader for Women for Kansas — Barton County, said both her group and the League of Women Voters are non-partisan and are protesting on an issue, not a candidate. "What we are emphasizing is, this is a nonpartisan issue," she said. "We welcome Democrats, Republicans and Independents — anyone that is concerned with the consolidation of power in the Executive Branch. This is going to be a celebration of our democratic republic that we hope to retain." That should concern everyone, she said. Martin said she hopes to see plenty of U.S. flags at the rally. "The flag belongs to us all." Janice Walker, president of the League of Women Voters — Barton County, said the two organizations teamed up "to continue to give a voice to the concerns people have regarding the impact of the various cuts this administration has made and how they can affect communities. "We want this to be peaceful, non-violent and full of good energy, as we encourage rally-goers to share their patriotic enthusiasm." Larned's rally Jaccques Molleker, chairperson for the Pawnee County Democratic Committee, will speak in Larned. His focus will be the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and exactly where the powers of government fall within the Constitution — what branch has what power. Committee members are making signs and he hopes there can also be someone who can speak from the viewpoint of agriculture and what impact tariffs have on this region. "Our rally is based on defense of the Constitution of the United States of America," he said. The "No Kings" title recognizes that "all public officials, when they are sworn in, take an oath to defend the Constitution." The Pawnee County Democratic Committee has been growing over the last four to six years and its members want to actively demonstrate what their beliefs are, he said. "Not everybody in western Kansas has the same beliefs about everything. We just want to be heard." Nationwide, No Kings Day on June 14 is described as a day of action and mobilization against the Trump administration and in support of democracy and the U.S. Constitution. There are at least a dozen No Kings protests organized in Kansas communities from Arkansas City to Wichita. Websites and list some of the locations. June 14 is also Flag Day, the 250th anniversary of the Army and the 79th birthday of President Donald Trump. The U.S. Army's Birthday Festival parade and celebration will take place at 5:30 p.m. local time on Constitution Ave. NW between 15th Street and 23rd Street in Washington, D.C.

'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses
'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Afraid' for court: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courthouses

NEW YORK − The Trump administration on June 12 sued New York state for its law restricting federal immigration enforcement inside state courthouses. The lawsuit challenges a New York state law that blocks immigration officials from arresting people at or near New York courthouses. The complaint, filed in federal court in Albany, New York, alleges the law frustrates federal immigration enforcement at a venue - state courthouses - where authorities can safely make arrests. U.S. Justice Department lawyers said New York's law and policies restricting cooperation with federal immigration officers violated the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, which gives federal law precedence over state law. The lawsuit filed in federal court in Albany comes after the administration has increased immigration enforcement at workplaces and while people appeared for immigration court hearings. People have protested against the federal actions in cities across the country. Attorney General Pam Bondi blamed so-called 'sanctuary city policies' for violence seen in California. Sanctuary policies generally refers to those limiting local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has also sued four New Jersey cities for their laws. New York state had similar policies preventing agents from apprehending migrants, Bondi said in a statement. 'This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law,' she said. Justice Department lawyers challenged the 2020 state law preventing federal officials from arresting people for civil immigration violations at state courthouses without a signed judicial warrant. New York's 2020 law doesn't apply to federal courthouses or immigration court, according to the legislation's author, state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Manhattan Democrat who called the lawsuit 'baseless and frivolous." The Justice Department said in a news release that enforcement at courthouses reduces risk of people fleeing or dangerous situations, especially since there is enhanced screening inside court buildings. State officials said federal agents entering local courthouses make communities unsafe by preventing people from accessing the judicial system. The law ensures New Yorkers can pursue justice without fear, Geoff Burgan, a spokesperson for state Attorney General Letitia James, said in a statement. 'Due process means nothing if people are too afraid to appear in court,' he said. James would defend the law and 'all of New York's laws, just as she will continue to defend the rights and dignity of all who call New York home,' Burgan said. Hoylman-Sigal, who authored the law, said the lawsuit was part of the administration's 'ongoing assault on the rule of law in New York.' To avoid conflicting with federal law or federal immigration authority, the law doesn't apply to federal courts or immigration courts, he said in a statement. Meanwhile, it allows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest people in local courthouses when they have 'actual, valid judicial warrants.' 'At a time when masked ICE officials are roaming the state and lawlessly detaining New Yorkers without any due process, the law preserves access to justice and participation in the judicial process,' he said. A contentious issue has been federal agents targeting people in 'sensitive" areas. Prior Department of Homeland Security guidelines banned enforcement in areas such as schools, places of worship and hospitals. When President Donald Trump took office in January, DHS overturned the longstanding policy to give agents discretion on such actions. The administration enacted another policy permitting enforcement at or near courthouses. Justice Department lawyers also challenged two New York executive orders restricting civil immigration arrests at state facilities, and a separate policy preventing state employees from sharing information to federal officers related to civil immigration enforcement. 'Through these enactments, New York obstructs federal law enforcement and facilitates the evasion of federal law by dangerous criminals, notwithstanding federal agents' statutory mandate to detain and remove illegal aliens,' the complaint said. The same day as the lawsuit, Gov. Kathy Hochul was one of three Democratic governors testifying before Congress about "sanctuary" policies and immigration enforcement. Hochul said her state has cooperated with ICE since she's taken office. "But we have to draw a line somewhere,' Hochul said. 'New York cannot deputize our state officers to enforce civil immigration violations, such as overstaying a visa.' The administration's attack on the 2020 law would turn courthouses 'into traps,' Donna Liberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. It would further force immigrant communities into the shadows. An initial conference date for the lawsuit was scheduled for Sept. 10, court records showed. Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@ or on Signal at emcuevas.01. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump DOJ sues NY over immigration enforcement in state courts

South Korea's Lee pledges support on trade issues in meeting with top conglomerates
South Korea's Lee pledges support on trade issues in meeting with top conglomerates

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

South Korea's Lee pledges support on trade issues in meeting with top conglomerates

SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korean President Lee Jae-myung said on Friday that his government would focus on easing regulations and helping companies on trade issues. His comments were made at a meeting with heads of top conglomerates and other business leaders. He sat between Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee and Hyundai Motor Group Executive Chair Euisun Chung. SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won also attended the meeting, according to the president's office. The future of South Korea's export-oriented economy may hinge on what kind of tariff deal Lee can strike with U.S. President Donald Trump, with all of his country's key sectors from chips to autos and shipbuilding heavily exposed to global trade. "Companies are currently having difficulties in international competition, and we will focus on minimising the difficulties they are experiencing in international competition and expanding their economic territory," Lee said at the meeting. "Please tell us what we should do regarding overseas trade situations, and we will do our best to align with those," he told the executives. Lee, a liberal, was elected on June 3 with promises to become business-friendly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store