Nation falls silent on anniversary of VE Day to honour those who ‘gave so much'
At the Scottish Parliament and at public spaces including train stations, a national two-minute silence was observed at midday.
Holyrood Presiding Officer Alison Johnson said: 'We honour the generation that gave so much to secure our peace and freedoms.
'We owe it to them to strive for that peace, to remember and to encourage future generations to remember.'
Party leaders also marked the anniversary in a series of tributes before First Minister's Questions.
Today @scotparl we honour the generation that gave so much to secure our peace and freedoms.
We owe it to them to strive for that peace, to remember and encourage future generations to remember. pic.twitter.com/LRUlbSNi1J
— Alison Johnstone (@POScotParl) May 8, 2025
John Swinney paid tribute to his uncle Corporal Tom Hunter of 43 Royal Marine Commando, who died on April 3 1945 in Comacchio, Italy.
He was posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross for offering himself as a target to German guns in order to save his own troop during the battle.
The First Minister said: 'I think of my uncle, Thomas Hunter, killed in Italy protecting his comrades 35 days before the end of the war.'
Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay said: 'None of us here can truly appreciate the selfless sacrifice, duty and bravery of the greatest generation who fought and died for our freedom.'
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said: 'We remember those who gave everything for the fight against fascism, the greatest tyranny we have ever faced.'
Representatives of Poppyscotland observed a two-minute silence at Glasgow Central Station (Andrew Milligan/PA)
Scottish Green co-leader Lorna Slater said: 'We cannot be complacent in the face of growing threats of fascism, international violence, hatred and oppression,' while Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton added: 'We must rededicate ourselves to the promise of that peace and its furtherance for our children and theirs to come.'
A service of thanksgiving took place at Glasgow Cathedral at 1pm, with guests including representatives from the military, veterans' organisations, emergency services and religious groups.
Members of the Royal British Legion, the Royal Air Forces Association, and the Armed Forces charity the SSAFA took part in the service, along with their families.
Speaking ahead of the service, Scotland Office minister Kirsty McNeill said: 'It's a huge privilege to attend the VE Day commemoration in Glasgow to honour all the men and women in Scotland who served during the Second World War, and also to recognise the great sacrifice of the people of Glasgow during the Clydebank Blitz in March 1941.
'We owe our lives to those who served, and what will be a moving ceremony in Glasgow Cathedral is a fitting reminder of that.'
Lord Provost of Glasgow Jacqueline McLaren said: 'Thursday's service in Glasgow Cathedral is a time for us to come together to remember and reflect on the sacrifices made, courage displayed and the resilience of those who put their lives on the line to keep us safe and help build a better world.
Today is the 80th anniversary of #VEDay. We honour all those servicemen and women who served in the Second World War, and the sacrifices made. To those who gave so much, we thank you. #VEDay80 #WW2 pic.twitter.com/hmu05oWzAN
— SSAFA (@SSAFA) May 8, 2025
'It's also a day to rejoice in peace and freedom, sometimes things that we take for granted.'
The anniversary was also marked in Scottish Government buildings, where a two-minute silence was observed at midday.
The Scottish Government's Victoria Quay and St Andrew's House buildings in Edinburgh will also continue to be lit up in red as part of a campaign to light significant buildings across the UK.
Edinburgh Castle was among the buildings to be lit up in red on Tuesday in the run-up to the anniversary.
Memorial events are also set to continue in Lerwick aboard vessels that arrived there from Norway on Tuesday, in commemoration of the Shetland Bus that operated between Scotland and Norway during the war.
The events mark 80 years to the day since the formal acceptance by the Allies of Nazi Germany's unconditional surrender on May 8 1945, bringing the Second World War in Europe to an end after more than five years of bitter fighting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
My plan for Prevent
In the autumn of 1940, British cities were being bombed every night by large aeroplanes whose provenance was apparently of some considerable doubt. While the public almost unanimously believed the conflagrations to have been caused by the Luftwaffe, the authorities – right up to the government – refused to speculate. Indeed, when certain members of the public raised their voices and said 'This is all down to Hitler and Goering and the bloody Germans!', they received visits from the police who either prosecuted them for disturbing the peace or put their names on a list of possible extremists. The nights grew darker. The number of towns and cities subjected to these nightly bombardments widened. Very soon everybody in the country knew somebody whose home had been destroyed or who had themselves been killed. The government was forced to take action, and so in November 1940 it came up with what it called its 'Prevent' strategy, which aimed to protect British cities from further destruction. In the introduction to this new policy, civil servants listed possible vectors for these bombing raids and top of the list, by some margin, were the Slovaks. A senior intelligence officer told the public: 'The greatest threat to our nation today is from the Slovaks. We must train our people in how to spot Slovaks and report them to the police whenever they can.' The Germans were also mentioned, further down the list of possible perps, but the wording here was heavily caveated. Yes, some Germans may have been involved, but over all the German population was utterly devoted to peace and regretted the nightly infernos every bit as much as did the people who suffered under them. Our own air force was directed to drop its bombs on Bratislava, Kosice, Poprad and (the consequence of an understandable confusion over the names of the two countries) Maribor. And yet for some mystifying reason, the raids on Britain did not lessen. This seems to me exactly the response of our government(s) and most importantly of Prevent to the threat from Islamic terrorism. Let me be clear: I am not remotely comparing Muslims with Germans or Islam with National Socialism – I am simply saying that, in effect, this is what our government would have done in 1940 if it had been gripped by the same cringing witlessness and outright lying that possesses seemingly all of our authorities today when it comes to terrorist attacks upon the British people. You may be aware of the manifestly stupid quote from the Prevent halfwits that people who believe that 'western culture is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups' are cultural nationalists at risk of becoming the kind of extremists who end up murdering people. People who believe the above probably consist of 70 per cent of the British population and, if his latest speeches are anything to go by, include the Prime Minister. And yet this stuff pervades everything Prevent puts out, while at the same time exonerating Islam and in some cases even those Muslims who do become terrorists (because they have suffered, you see). If people who support Brexit or worry about immigration are extremists, you're going to get pretty high figures So, for example, Bolton council's useful 'Prevent' handbook singles out 'right-wing extremists' as being at the forefront of terror attacks in the UK, and these extremists include people who are cultural nationalists: 'Cultural nationalism is ideology characterised by anti-immigration, anti-Islam, anti-Muslim, anti-establishment narratives, often emphasising British/English 'victimhood' and identity under attack from a perceived 'other'.' Islamic terrorism is also mentioned – but, again, heavily caveated. Then there's Prevent's own list of people who were picked up under its guidelines: 45 per cent were related to extreme right-wing radicalisation (230); 23 per cent were linked to Islamist radicalisation (118); the rest were related to other radicalisation concerns, including incels and those at risk of carrying out school shootings. But then I suppose if people who proclaim their support for Brexit or worry a bit about immigration are extremists, you are going to get pretty high arrest figures. If you add into the mix the fact that simply to associate Islam with terrorism you are guilty of Islamophobia, then you can see why we're in the state we're in. Incidentally, when she was Prime Minister, Theresa May, to her credit, drafted a new introduction to the Prevent guidelines which made it clear that the biggest threat to British security was al Qaeda, not Tommy Robinson et al. But that message does not seem to have sunk in with those in Prevent. It seems almost pointless to run through the facts. The truth is that almost every fatal terrorist attack in Britain since 2001 has been perpetrated by Islamists. All bar three. Have these people got a twisted or perverted understanding of Islam, as Prevent insists? I haven't a clue. I am no Quranic expert. I'm just, y'know, taking their word for it. Further, 80 per cent of the Counter Terrorism Policing network's investigations are related to Islamism (2023). Some 75 per cent of MI5's surveillance cases are Islamists. There are around 40,000 potential jihadis being monitored by our security services. There is not the remotest doubt as to the provenance of the gravest terror threats to our country. It's not the shaven-headed nutters with swastika armbands. It is Islamists. Nigel Farage's answer is to sack everyone working in Prevent. That seems a perfectly reasonable suggestion. But I may have a better one. Scrap Prevent entirely and initiate a new network of monitoring and reporting which focuses solely on Islamic terrorism. Junk the sixth-form philosophising over what is meant by the term 'extremist' and locate the problem precisely where it is: somewhere within our Muslim communities, even if we accept that our Muslim communities may not want them there. In short, get real and tell the truth. This kind of approach worked pretty well 85 years ago.
South Wales Guardian
8 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Murray asks who Scots voters ‘trust to spend' £9.1bn rise in funding
Chancellor Rachel Reeves set out her spending plans for the next three years on Wednesday, pledging to increase funding for housing and the NHS south of the border – which will have an impact on Scotland. She also announced development funding for the long-awaited Acorn carbon capture and storage facility in Aberdeenshire, as well as the reinstatement of up to £750 million to build the UK's most powerful supercomputer at Edinburgh University. According to the Treasury, the Scottish Government will see an increase of £9.1 billion over the next three years. In a briefing for Scottish journalists, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said on average, the increase will mean £2.9 billion extra for Scotland each year – £2.4 billion of which will be revenue spending up to 2028-29 and around £510 million in capital for the slightly longer period of four years. The funding will take effect from April next year, just weeks before Scots go to the polls in the Holyrood election. In the same briefing, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray asked: 'The question then becomes, who do you trust to spend that? 'The record of the SNP Government of the last 18 years has not been beneficial in terms of how they would spend it. 'In fact, I think there'll be broad support for the view that the £4.9 billion that they got in the budget last year has not been spent wisely either.' He said Wednesday's spending review was 'great' for Scotland. One of the key announcements was confirmation of development funding for the Acorn project. The project – which will store carbon emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea – was repeatedly overlooked by successive UK governments for funding. But asked for clarity on how much cash the project will receive, Mr Jones was unable to say. The 136-page document also said that while the Government supports Acorn, 'a final investment decision will be taken later this Parliament, subject to project readiness and affordability'. Mr Murray said: 'We're working with the Acorn partners and have been for some time now about what they need for the development of it and that's what this commitment is for.' The SNP pushed for more detail on Acorn following the announcement. Accusing successive UK governments of having 'dragged their heels' on the project, Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said: 'The glaring omission in today's announcement was any detail on the scale of funding and the timescales for delivery, which stands in stark contrast to the £22 billion commitment the Labour Government has already given to carbon capture projects in England. 'Westminster has had 20 years to hammer out the detail on Scottish carbon capture, so it must now deliver meaningful funding and concrete support at pace.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the overall funding increase does not match that of Whitehall departments, claiming Scotland has missed out on more than £1 billion. 'Today's settlement for Scotland is particularly disappointing, with real-terms growth of 0.8% a year for our overall block grant, which is lower than the average for UK departments,' she said. 'Had our resource funding for day-to-day priorities grown in line with the UK Government's overall spending, we would have £1.1 billion more to spend on our priorities over the next three years. In effect, Scotland has been short-changed by more than £1 billion pounds. 'It is also disappointing that despite apparent briefing to media in advance, we are still awaiting clarity on funding for the vital Acorn project in the north-east of Scotland. 'We made extensive representations to the UK Government on our priorities for the spending review, including calls for an end to spending that bypasses devolution, but there has been limited opportunity to engage with them. 'It appears that the continuation of local growth funding – which fails to match the European Structural Funds it was supposed to replace – will come directly from Whitehall, yet again bypassing devolved governments.' The Scottish Government will respond to the announcement in the medium-term financial strategy on June 25, the Finance Secretary said. But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar praised the spending review as 'game-changing', adding: 'The plans set out today will bring billions of pounds of investment to Scotland, on top of the record budget settlement delivered in the budget. 'From the Acorn Project to a national supercomputer in Edinburgh to our defence industry, this Labour Government is investing in Scotland's future while the SNP carps from the sidelines.' Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy described the spending review as a 'spend-now-tax-later statement' which will result in the Chancellor 'almost certainly' having to raise taxes.
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
5 things Scots should know from Rachel Reeves' spending review
She also announced development funding for the long-awaited Acorn carbon capture and storage facility in Aberdeenshire, as well as the reinstatement of up to £750 million to build the UK's most powerful supercomputer at Edinburgh University. In a briefing for Scottish journalists, chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said on average, the increase will mean £2.9 billion extra for Scotland each year – £2.4 billion of which will be revenue spending up to 2028-29 and around £510 million in capital for the slightly longer period of four years. READ MORE: Rachel Reeves is making her contempt for Scotland very clear The funding will take effect from April next year, just weeks before Scots go to the polls in the Holyrood election. Here's everything you need to know in five minutes. The 'largest settlements in real terms since devolution was introduced'? Rachel Reeves announced £52 billion for Scotland, £20 billion for Northern Ireland, and £23 billion for Wales, as she pledged the 'largest settlements in real terms since devolution was introduced'. However, the Scottish Government has claimed Reeves's has 'short-changed Scotland by more than a billion pounds'. Later, Reeves added there would be 'additional funding to support up to 350 communities, especially those in the most deprived areas'. However, the Poverty Alliance warned that the investment figures 'mask cuts to day-to-day spending'. Acorn carbon capture project The Chancellor said the Government would also support the Acorn project for carbon capture in Scotland, but did not attach nay figures to the announcement. She said: 'These are investments to make sure the towns and cities which powered our last industrial revolution will play their part in our next industrial revolution, to reduce our reliance on overseas oil and gas and protect working families from price shocks. 'A new generation of energy industries – for a renewed Britain. That is my choice. That is Labour's choice. And that is the choice of the British people.' READ MORE: Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process Responding to the announcement, Rosemary Harris, North Sea senior campaigner at Oil Change International, said: 'CCS [carbon capture and storage] has been failing for half a century and its only significant success has been the billions pocketed by industry in public subsidies. "With the decision to grant funding for the Acorn and Viking carbon capture projects, Rachel Reeves has added to that track record. Instead of funding real transition policies like training for workers, port upgrades and investments in the UK wind industry, the Chancellor chose to funnel more money to the oil and gas industry's latest distraction tactic. "The government still has an opportunity to get serious about a just transition and put money where it is really needed, which is not the pockets of oil and gas bosses.' Munitions spending in Glasgow Defence spending will rise to 2.6% by April 2027, Rachel Reeves confirmed, as she said Britain will become a 'defence industrial superpower'. 'That uplift provides funding for the Defence Secretary, with a £11bn increase in defence spending and a £600m uplift for our security and intelligence agencies. That investment will deliver not only security, but also renewal in Aldermaston and Lincoln; Portsmouth and Filton; On the Clyde and in Rosyth. Investment in Scotland. Jobs in Scotland. Defence for the United Kingdom, opposed by the Scottish National Party, delivered by Labour.' READ MORE: Scottish Government responds as bus firm set to move all manufacturing to England Reeves said £4.5 billion would be invested in munitions in Glasgow, Glascoed, Stevenage and Radway Green. £6 billion will be spent on upgrading nuclear submarine production in Barrow, Debry and Sheffield. She added: 'We will make Britain a defence industrial superpower. With the jobs, the skills and the pride that comes with that.' Hotels to house asylum seekers to be scrapped The Government will end the 'costly' use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament, Rachel Reeves told the Commons. The Chancellor said: 'To support the integrity of our borders I can announce that funding of up to £280 million more per year by the end of the spending review for our new Border Security Command. 'Alongside that, we are tackling the asylum backlog. The party opposite left behind a broken system: billions of pounds of taxpayers' money spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels, leaving people in limbo and shunting the cost of failure onto local communities. We won't let that stand. 'So I can confirm today that, led by the work of … the Home Secretary, we will be ending the costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament. What are the opposition saying? The SNP has said that it will become clear that "cuts are in every detail' of today's review. The SNP's economy spokesperson, Dave Doogan MP, said that while capital investment for the future is sensible and welcome - including some progress on the Acorn Project and Labour's u-turn on funding Edinburgh University's supercomputer - the gaping hole is that it "singularly fails to help hard pressed families in the here and now". Doogan added that the review also reaffirmed that Labour's priorities were "slashing support for disabled people, doubling down on a jobs tax that is already increasing unemployment and imposing massive real-terms cuts to departmental spending that have already suffered austerity". READ MORE: Three Scottish poets immortalised in carvings on Holyrood wall Responding to the Chancellor's review, Plaid Cymru Westminster leader, Liz Saville Roberts MP said: 'The announcement of £44.5 million a year for Welsh rail over the next decade is Labour's flimsy fig leaf to excuse the multi-billion-pound, multi-decade scandal that is the Welsh rail injustice. Today's funding is only meaningful if it matches what Wales will continue to lose from HS2 and all other English rail projects in the future. 'Labour hopes a few token projects will distract from deep cuts to vital services that hit the most vulnerable hardest, all while shifting the goalposts on Welsh funding. The unfair Barnett formula remains open to manipulation, just as the recent example of the Oxford-Cambridge line displayed, with the Treasury bizarrely claiming that a railway line in the south-east of England would benefit Wales. "For Wales, today's statement was more smoke and mirrors. It's time to deliver the fair funding Welsh communities desperately need and deserve.'
