TSMC suspends new factory in Japan due to traffic jams; tells government, 'we'll delay the construction until ...'
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.
(TSMC) CEO CC Wei attributed delays in expanding its operations in southwestern Japan to worsening traffic congestion. According to a report in Bloomberg, Wei confirmed that the construction of a second plant in Japan is facing minor delays. While TSMC has primarily operated from Taiwan, it established its first Japanese factory after receiving significant incentives from Tokyo.
The first TSMC plant in Japan, operational since last year, has boosted the local economy but strained the rural infrastructure, leading to housing and service shortages and extended commute times. 'We have created too big an impact on the local traffic. I have experienced that in person. For what used to take a 10-15 min drive, it now takes almost an hour,' Wei told reporters after a shareholders' meeting in Hsinchu, Taiwan, on Tuesday, as quoted by Bloomberg. He added, 'We told the Japanese government we'll delay the construction until the traffic improves. They said they'll make improvements as soon as possible.'
Wei did not specify the duration of the delay.
As the world's leading contract chipmaker, TSMC is central to the global tech supply chain, producing advanced chips for Apple's iPhones and Nvidia's AI servers. Governments worldwide, from the U.S. to Europe, have sought TSMC's investment, especially after pandemic-era chip shortages disrupted production across industries like automotive and consumer electronics.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dermatologista recomenda: simples truque elimina o fungo facilmente
Acabe com o Fungo
Undo
TSMC says worried about local residents
The planned second factory in Kumamoto Prefecture, initially expected to begin construction in early 2025, is critical to Japan's goal of revitalizing its semiconductor industry and attracting talent to an aging nation. However, the local infrastructure has struggled to accommodate the influx of workers from TSMC's first plant, even as the company's U.S. expansion reduces pressure on Japanese production. 'This will become negative for the area, for the local government, but I am most worried it will become negative for local residents,' Wei reportedly said. 'So we told the Japanese government to improve the traffic first.'
Japan's chief government spokesman, Yoshimasa Hayashi, responded, stating, 'Heightened uncertainty in the global economy, along with challenges including the lack of domestic infrastructure and labor can lead to hesitation among private companies thinking of investing,' according to Bloomberg. He emphasized Tokyo's commitment to improving conditions to attract foreign investment and talent.
The delay in Japan echoes earlier challenges TSMC faced in launching its U.S. facilities in Arizona, though progress has since been made. On Tuesday, TSMC executives noted that demand for AI chips continues to outpace supply. Wei reiterated the company's April forecast of mid-20% revenue growth for 2025, despite margin pressures from a strengthening Taiwanese dollar. TSMC expects record profits this year.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why RBI will hit a hattrick of 25 bps rate cut tomorrow
The global setting is characterized by heightened geopolitical tensions, viz., Russia-Ukraine war, the Middle Eastern situation, etc., and a precarious fisc with ' tremendous ' pressures for more spending on defense, climate, and aging populations. These aspects are starkly reflected in global public debt mounting to 100 % of global GDP by the end of the decade (IMF's Fiscal Monitor ) and higher long-term borrowing costs. An uncertain global trading system marked by trade protectionism and tariff turmoil causes extensive concern. Geopolitical events heightened economic instability, amplified sector-specific risks, and intensified regulatory uncertainties. These geopolitical events accentuated global tensions, disrupted trade, and made the global markets volatile, affecting investor confidence and capital flows into emerging markets like India. This assumes greater significance for energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing, which are sensitive to international trade dynamics and supply chain disruptions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Collagen is not needed, 42-year-old woman's skin changes URUHIME MOMOKO Learn More Undo The Court of International Trade struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping ' Liberation Day ' tariffs, ruling that he lacked the 'unbounded authority' to impose across-the-board import taxes on the entire world under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. These concerns have been exacerbated by President Donald Trump's 1000-page ' Big, Beautiful Bill .' While the Bill is ' big ,' there have been concerns about its ' beautiful ' nature due to a hike in the USA's already bloated and unsustainable deficit resulting from extended tax cuts and an aggravated skew in the distribution of income and wealth. The US grew by 2.8 % in 2024. But, in January-March 2025, growth turned -0.2 % due to policy uncertainties and geopolitical risks. The Fed is wary of cutting rates, despite declining growth prospects. Further, the labour market was expected to weaken, with the unemployment rate likely to exceed its natural rate by the end of this year. Overall, risks are tilted to the downside. Despite ongoing policy uncertainty, the Eurozone's Economic Sentiment Indicator rose 1pt to 94.8 in May because of an upgraded outlook for household finances and industrial performance. Live Events In the UK, a sustainable world trading system is basic to the economy. While trade facilitates specialization and productivity, post-COVID supply-chain frailty has damaged the rules-based system. The ominous impact of trade wars and escalating tariffs on growth and inflation across countries has been effectively demonstrated. Shared prosperity necessitates a more connected, secure, and efficient trading environment - an environment marked by strong standards and international cooperation. Major central banks, including the US Federal Reserve , the European Central Bank, and the Bank of England, are expected to adopt a dovish stance, keeping interest rates low to bolster languishing economic growth. The Indian Macroeconomy India's economy rose 7.4% in Q4 of FY 2025, exceeding expectations, despite heightened global uncertainties. This is the strongest quarterly growth in FY 25, accelerating from 5.6 % growth in Q2 and 6.4% in Q3. India's GDP growth rose 6.5% in FY 25, the lowest in four years (9.2 % in FY 24 and 7.6 % in FY23). The growth outlook in Asia's third-largest economy remains relatively robust, making it the world's fastest-growing major economy again, thanks to strong domestic consumption, government investments, and a relatively lower dependence on exports. Sectorally, manufacturing, construction, financial real estate, professional services, and public administration, defence, etc., performed well. However, private consumption growth slowed, and government final consumption expenditure shrank in Q4 of FY25 after two quarters. ' Improving domestic consumption is likely to support industrial activity... domestic consumption demand to improve, driven by healthy agricultural growth, easing inflation, supporting discretionary spend and income tax relief this fiscal '. But this growth will require continued recovery in domestic demand and support from both monetary and fiscal stimulus. The real GDP growth reflects the economy's underlying strength and resilience, driven by robust domestic demand, sustained government capex, and gradual recovery in private investment. Industrial production rose modestly to an eight-month low of 2.7% in April 2025 (5.2% in April 2024), and a 4% rise in industrial output in FY 25, which was the lowest in four years. While manufacturing (3.4%) and electricity (1.1%) grew, mining shrank (0.2%) in April, the first since August 2024. Persisting contraction in consumer non-durables' output for the third successive month manifested in low rural consumption despite CPI inflation reaching an almost 6-year low at 3.16% in April. India's foodgrain production rose 6.6 % to reach 354 million tonne (MT) in FY 25, including record production of all major crops, rice, paddy, maize, wheat, etc. India's economic trajectory remains resilient despite global headwinds and regional geopolitical tensions, including persistent border concerns with Pakistan, because of a ' pickup in private consumption, healthy balance sheets of banks and corporates, easing financial conditions, and the government's continued thrust on capital expenditure '. India will continue to be the fastest-growing major economy in the world and consolidate its economic size and heft in the comity of nations. While external uncertainties, such as supply chain disruptions and energy market volatility, pose challenges, India continues to benefit from demographic dividend, ascendant middle class, huge markets with rising consumption demand, strong service sector performance, an accent on infrastructure and capex, a stable banking system, and improving manufacturing output under schemes like PLI. External sector risks, tariff disputes, ease of doing business, credit delivery to the target group, tax reforms, and expenditure rationalization, however, cause some concern. Bank Credit Credit growth is expected to remain robust, driven by economic growth, consumption, and investment. Bank credit moderated to 11.2 % as on April 18, 2025, compared to 15.3 % in the previous year. Bond Yields Domestic bond yields fell to multi-year lows because of successive rate cuts and liquidity-boosting measures by the RBI . Both credit and monetary conditions are in sync with the RBI's plan to support the economy while containing inflation. Liquidity Liquidity remains volatile because of advance tax and GST outflows and government cash balances with the RBI. Liquidity remained in surplus as reflected in average daily net absorption under the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF), increasing to ₹1,605 crore during FY 25 from ₹485 crore in FY 24. The RBI conducted market operations, including open market operations (OMO) purchases, USD/INR buy/sell swaps, and longer tenor variable rate repo (VRR) operations, besides reducing the CRR by 50 bps (in two tranches of 25 bps each), to provide durable liquidity to the system. The RBI transferred ₹2.69 lakh crore surplus to the government. Inflation Inflation remained within the target in FY 25, aided by easing vegetable prices. Headline inflation moderated to 4.6 % during FY 25 from 5.4 % in the previous year, largely driven by moderating core (CPI excluding food and fuel) inflation to 3.5 % and deflation in fuel at 2.5 %. However, the rise in core inflation in the second half of the year occurred because of surging global gold prices. Other tailwinds are above normal monsoon, early arrival of the southwest monsoon, elevated reservoir level, favourable rainfall outlook, and softening food inflation. Crude prices are expected to remain volatile because of global demand, supply disruptions, and geopolitical tensions. CPI inflation softened to 3.2 % in April, the lowest since July 2019, from 3.3 % in March because of a sustained fall in food prices. CPI inflation is expected to remain range-bound, driven by factors such as food prices, fuel prices, and economic growth. With benign inflation (inflation remaining below the 4 % from February to April 2025) and plunging inflation, the CPI is likely to durably align with the 4 % target over 2 months, inducing the RBI to cut policy rates by 25 bps to 5.75 % in June. A downward bias in FY26 CPI inflation will be symptomatic of the depth of the rate-cutting cycle. CPI is expected to moderate from 4.9% in FY25 to 4.3% in FY26. However, inflationary risks persist because of global commodity prices and any escalation in geopolitical tensions. Under the flexible inflation targeting (FIT) framework, the RBI has been mandated by the government to maintain CPI at 4 % with a band of +/-2 %. Decelerating inflation and moderate growth warrant ' monetary policy to be growth supportive, while remaining watchful about the rapidly evolving global macroeconomic conditions ' (RBI's Annual Report for 2024-25). Revised GDP and inflation forecasts The RBI is likely to revise its projections on real GDP and inflation for FY26. Rate Action The RBI has already cut the Repo Rate twice in 2025- in February and in April, by 25 bps each. These cuts reduced the key lending rate to 6%. Further, the RBI also changed its stance from 'neutral' to 'accommodative' in April. Accordingly, most banks reduced their repo-linked lending rates. Lenders also lowered their marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR), with a beneficial impact on interest-rate sensitive segments, viz., real estate, small businesses, and home loans. A further 25-bps cut in the Repo Rate will drive economic traction, promote borrowing, investment, and growth, and enhance job creation by making it cheaper for people to borrow money. A 25-bps reduction in the Repo Rate will cause a corresponding drop in all external benchmark lending rates (EBLR), with equated monthly installments (EMIs) on home and personal loans decreasing by 25 bps. A boost in real estate will have a multiplier effect on the economy, particularly in sectors like cement, steel, and construction equipment. This would be the third consecutive reduction in the Repo rate since February 2025. Since inflation is within the RBI's target band, and given the likely growth-inflation dynamics, we expect another reduction of 50 bps in FY26. Policy Stance The MPC is likely to retain the 'accommodative' monetary policy stance adopted in April 2025. (The author is Chief Economist, Infomerics Valuation and Ratings) ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Labour Has No Choice But to Break Its Promises
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Most governments, of whatever political stripe, would agree there's never enough money to go around. It's a problem that's particularly acute for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as he prepares to launch the results of his year-old administration's 'comprehensive spending review,' setting out budgets for each department for the next few years. Starmer's team not only lacks the funds to deliver what they'd like to do during their time in power, they don't have the money to do what they've already committed to. Something has to give, and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves will ultimately need to do at least one of three things: slash spending, raise taxes or increase borrowing. Right now, she's not being clear which. Voters deserve at least a vague understanding of what tough decisions need to be made. It's a clarity Starmer and Reeves have seemed unwilling or unable to provide; instead, they've hoped for economic expansion to bring additional tax revenue to pay for their plans. Unfortunately, the boom is proving elusive: The OECD has downgraded Britain's growth forecast to 1% from 1.2% for 2026. Much of that contraction, the OECD said, is due to Donald Trump's tariffs, which may not be as punitive for the UK as on much of the rest of the world. But they will still likely have a significant impact, even if Britain can stave off 50% tariffs on steel within the capricious president's capricious new five-week deadline. Trump's move to pull back in Ukraine is also adding pressure on the British economy. This week, a UK government defense review confirmed an 'ambition' to raise spending on the military to 3% of gross domestic product, a hike Starmer believes is necessary as he continues to pursue his plan for a 'coalition of the willing' to counter the threat from Vladimir Putin in Ukraine without depending on the US. As my Bloomberg Economics colleague Dan Hanson has calculated, this would cost £17.3 billion by 2029-30, the equivalent of an increase in debt of 1.5 percentage points. NATO, which is preparing to gather this month, is pushing for a hike to 3.5% of members' GDP, rising to 5%, which Bloomberg calculates would cost the UK £350 billion ($475 billion). When she sets out her CSR on Wednesday, Reeves should be overt about how much the unfavorable economic winds are driven by Trump — voters are more likely to accept pain if they understand the reasons for it. And she should go further and provide a coherent sense of what the government believes, an ideological prism though which tricky choices can be viewed. It's something severely lacking from the government's messaging. Having witnessed the disastrous mini-budget of Liz Truss and following painful tax rises on farmers and employers in last October's budget, the mantra from Starmer and Reeves had been that the books would be balanced not via further borrowing or tax increases but through departmental cuts. That commitment was difficult for a left-leaning government that would rather be spending money on things it cares about, but it was at least intellectually coherent. It's no longer clear that the government will stand firm. Last month, Starmer unwisely gave in to pressure from his own MPs to partially reverse the move to withdraw winter fuel benefits from pensioners. The reversal revealed a soft underbelly in the iron chancellor's armor. Labour MPs are now pressing Reeves to also end a controversial two-child benefit limit and relax plans to remove some disability benefits, even if that means either increasing borrowing or taxes. If she does stick to her guns and square the fiscal circle by spending restraint, the UK will surely fall into the austerity she has vowed to resist. At minimum, she'll have to let go of manifesto commitments such as halving violence against women and girls, making homes more energy efficient and building affordable social housing. There is no way Labour can avoid breaking some of its promises; now we need to know the rationale shaping which promises they are. None of this is simple — which is why it's important the government's priorities are made explicit. Instead, Starmer is offering mixed messaging. In speeches and interviews, he's said his first priority is the defense of the realm, but also that he sees nothing more important than protecting 'working people' from the consequences of market turmoil, and also that he believes 'profoundly in driving down poverty and child poverty.' As Labour resists the threat from the upstart populist Reform UK party, Starmer has pledged to fix public services, slash NHS waiting lists and reduce immigration by making it harder to come to Britain to work and study (which Bloomberg estimates will cost £9 billion by 2028-2029.) At the same time, the PM seeks to drive growth through a youth-mobility arrangement with the European Union that leaves him vulnerable to accusations of open borders. Does he avoid strikes by boosting public-sector pay or focus on keeping down inflation? Encourage entrepreneurship or tax the rich so that many quit these shores? No wonder voters are confused — they've been given no framework within which to anticipate where the ax will fall or how else the government will make the sums add up. If Starmer's team doesn't lay out a clear vision for how they'll approach these touch choices, then they'll be more than confused — they'll be let down. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Rosa Prince is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering UK politics and policy. She was formerly an editor and writer at Politico and the Daily Telegraph, and is the author of 'Comrade Corbyn' and 'Theresa May: The Enigmatic Prime Minister.' More stories like this are available on
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
iPhone 17 tipped to feature 120Hz display, but without ProMotion tech: Details
Apple has featured a ProMotion display on its Pro model iPhones since the iPhone 13 Pro. However, since then, it has remained a feature limited to the Pro models. No standard models have gained access to ProMotion, not even the Plus variants. This is widely expected to change with the iPhone 17 series, with multiple reports claiming the same. However, the real benefit of ProMotion displays is the variable refresh rate, which adjusts the refresh rate according to different content forms in order to be more efficient. Nevertheless, it could be possible that the standard iPhone model may not get a ProMotion display, despite getting a high refresh rate screen. This was tipped by Fixed Focus Digital, a tipster known for Apple-related predictions, stating what we know so far. The tipster posted on China's Weibo that the iPhone 17 standard model display is going to be an ordinary 120Hz screen and not feature a ProMotion adaptive refresh rate (facilitated by LTPO display tech). According to this claim, it would mean that Apple's ProMotion display features, like the smart adaptive refresh rate which adjusts the refresh rate according to the content you are displaying and can change the refresh rate to even single-digit levels, may not make it to the iPhone 17 standard model. In real terms, this could mean that the iPhone 17 could have a limited refresh rate range instead of the LTPO technology that the Pro models may feature. All in all, the display will be smooth if it is 120Hz, but it could lack the efficiency that the Pro models may feature. The iPhone 17 series, including the standard models, is expected to launch in September. There is also going to be a new addition to the lineup, according to reports. It could be called the iPhone 17 Air, which is expected to replace the iPhone 16 Plus from the previous year, as no Plus model is expected this year. As for what to expect, Apple may bundle iOS 26 with these models, as the company is expected to undergo a major naming change, with Apple anticipated to switch to year numbers for its software.
