
Steve Coogan interview: ‘There's no such thing as a no-go area in comedy'
'I had no burning desire to do a f—king penguin movie,'says Steve Coogan. 'Anyone who has seen my work would not say that's obviously the next step.'
Yet here he is, having very much done a f—king penguin movie, The Penguin Lessons, and he is sitting in the drawing room of a hotel in Soho to tell us all about it. As a journalist on a conservative newspaper, one approaches Steve Coogan with a certain degree of trepidation. He is as famous for his Left-wing politics as for his performances. He has supported Extinction Rebellion and the Green Party, campaigned to halt arms sales to Israel and for greater press regulation. He has railed repeatedly and vociferously against the Right-wing press and the 'handful of billionaires who control our print media'. They are all subjects on which he tends to disagree with The Telegraph.
Still, he also has a lot to promote at the moment, and needs must. A trim, tanned 59, in a casual green suit he has just purchased after wearing it for the photo shoot, Coogan is more relaxed and upbeat than he sometimes comes across. Compared to the blithe Alan Partridge, his enduring comic creation, there has often been an antsy, unsatisfied quality to Coogan.
Perhaps this is a preview of his late era: sober, at peace with Partridge, earnest but not furious about politics, and with a constant supply of interesting work. He has just come off playing Dr Strangelove in the West End and Brian Walden opposite Harriet
Walter's Margaret Thatcher in Brian and Maggie. In 2023 he played Jimmy Savile in The Reckoning. Another series of
Partridge is imminent, more The Trip is in the works, more films and books and plays and telly. His production company, Baby Cow, has helped launch dozens of comic careers.
'I'm never not grateful that I'm making a living,' he says. 'I've never had a proper job really. I remember student jobs cleaning out vegetable crates for Sainsbury's with horror. I try to remind myself of that. The fact I've got a varied career is great to me.'
The Penguin Lessons is an adaptation of Tom Michell's 2015 book, a true story about his time working as an English teacher in Argentina in the 1970s, when he struck up an unlikely relationship with a Magellanic penguin he named Juan Salvador. Coogan plays Michell, a little older than the 20-something of the book; Jonathan Pryce plays the headmaster of the exclusive boarding school where he teaches.
It was a febrile political atmosphere that helped Jeff Pope, the screenwriter, bring Coogan around to the film. The pair have worked together many times, including on the Savile series and on Philomena, the 2013 film about a journalist helping an elderly woman (Judi Dench) who has been searching for her son for 50 years, which earned Coogan Oscar nominations (his only ones so far) for best picture and best adapted screenplay.
'Pope said, 'I'm doing a penguin film,' and I was like, 'What's it about?'' Coogan recalls. 'He said, 'Nice guy rescues penguin, it makes him a slightly better teacher.' I said, 'I'll give that a miss.'
'But then I went to Buenos Aires and became fascinated by it. It's this strange European city that's been beamed down into South America. I went to the Naval Academy where they kept the disappeared [dissidents who were summarily arrested and held without charge]. It was very bleak. I said to Jeff, 'We need to fold that in. And make him someone who doesn't like penguins and children particularly, just ambivalent.'
'I mean, Martin Sixsmith in Philomena is pretty much the same character,' he adds. 'Cynical bloke meets Judi Dench, becomes uncynical at the end, and enlightened but not stupid. Ditto [with The Penguin Lessons ], but switch Judi Dench for a penguin.
'I had to have something called 'penguin familiarisation',' says Coogan with an expression that suggests he was surprised, 40 years into his career, to experience something genuinely new. 'I've never had that in my diary before. I had to learn to stroke them, talk to them, lift them up in the correct way. I jumped in with both feet. Jonathan [Pryce] didn't want to touch the penguin. Another actress wanted to wear rubber gloves to touch it. It's like, get over yourself. It's just an animal.'
The penguins helped create a calm atmosphere on set. 'Walking into this maelstrom of kids and animals was not the ordeal I thought it was going to be,' he says. 'You couldn't raise your voice or make loud noises when the penguin was there, which had the unintended consequence of making everyone calm. And the penguin doesn't always do what you want. Eight times out of 10 it will walk in the wrong direction. But you can't be annoyed; it's just being a penguin.'
Waddling hurriedly on the heels of The Penguin Lessons will be a more familiar personage. How Are You? With Alan Partridge will air 'soon-ish' on the BBC, six half-hour mockumentaries with an unusual starting point for a comedy: mental health. 'I think if saying a topic out loud causes you some anxiety, that's a healthy sign,' he says. 'As long as it's not repulsive, of course. But if you feel that if you handle this badly it will blow up in your face, if you feel like you're trying to defuse an incendiary device, that's a good thing for comedy. As long as you defuse it properly. But I'm excited. I think it's funny.'
How Are You? is the latest in Coogan's decade-long collaboration on Partridge with the sibling writing duo Rob and Neil Gibbons. Under their guidance the hapless broadcaster has continually pushed forward into new formats: books, podcasts, travel documentaries, a spoof magazine show.
When Coogan's most famous character was created for On the Hour on BBC Radio in 1991, the joke was that he was a reactionary figure out of step with the broadcasting elite. While the world has moved on, Partridge has attempted to move with it, always on the lookout for worlds to infiltrate. Where one might have thought #MeToo was risky for him, he saw it as an opportunity, as it took out most of the competition.
'It's about, where can I get back in, where's the schism in the current social/cultural climate that I can validate myself or make myself relevant or resonant?' Coogan says. 'But he's smart enough to know how to bend with the wind. He's a Trojan horse. You can talk about stuff but you have this level of protection.'
Partridge has attempted to exploit his depression before. Trying to impress a woman in an episode of I'm Alan Partridge, he confesses: 'I've had mental health problems […] I won't bore you with the details but I drove to Dundee in my bare feet.'
Coogan has spoken about his 'love-hate' relationship with the character, which he sometimes felt he had been 'saddled' with. But after more than 30 years, Partridge's longevity has become an asset. His career has straddled the birth of the internet and social media and the fragmentation of audiences. He emerged from a monolithic TV culture, in which Saturday night game shows attracted audiences of many millions.
'I don't think he would come to the fore now,' Coogan says. 'Uniquely in comedy, because your audience is familiar with the character, people feel like Partridge is theirs and they understand him best. You can explore topics that would normally be off-piste or wide of the mark. It gives you this superpower that has only been arrived at through 30 years of exposure. We don't want to jump the shark. One argument is to stop; that way you protect the canon of stuff. But we like doing it. There's a myth that you can't be funny about certain things. I think you can be funny about absolutely everything. There's no such thing as a no-go area in comedy.'
This helps explain Partridge's broad appeal. Not everyone sees him in the same way. 'At a live show there was a party of firefighters on a work outing,' he says. 'They said, 'We love Alan, he tells it like it is.' Sometimes he says things we agree with, but we won't tell you what they are. He started out reactionary and Middle England but then we evolved him into being socially progressive but economically conservative. Cameron-esque. Touchy-feely, but not when it comes to the bank balance.' What would Alan make of Nigel Farage? 'Fifteen years ago I'd have said he'd like him, but he's antsy about it now. Farage is like Bitcoin. You don't know if his currency will be really valuable or worth nothing.'
The differences between Coogan and his alter ego are becoming harder to notice. 'One morning shooting this last series I got to my trailer and there was a checked shirt hanging up for Partridge that was identical to the shirt I was wearing. It was literally the same shirt, hanging up for Partridge to put on. I still had to take mine off and put that one on, psychologically, so I could feel like it wasn't me. I sent it to the writers and said, 'The singularity has happened.'
'I used to put crow's feet on him,' he adds, reaching for the sides of his eyes. 'We're very unspecific about his age; I might pass him. I don't mind.' See: relaxed.
Rob Brydon and Coogan are also working on a fifth series of The Trip, the series in which they play fictionalised versions of themselves travelling around and eating in the world's best restaurants, although nothing has been formally confirmed. The news broke in an unusual fashion when Coogan used working on it as an excuse to escape a driving ban. He can't say much about it. 'I don't want to be rapped on the knuckles,' he says. 'But The Trip is not over. It will rear its head in some form. Something's going to happen.'
One of the conceits in The Trip is 'Steve Coogan''s longing to be taken seriously as an actor, ideally in America, while being constantly borne back to Alan Partridge. He refers frequently to his work with famous American actors, his Oscar nominations, his Baftas. He bellows 'Aha!' into the wind. The script delights in the narcissism of the small differences between his and Brydon's characters, their relative statuses within entertainment, their competitive impressions.
Partridge, too, is hyper-attuned to anything that might grant him a sense of superiority, if only in his own eccentric world view: the blazers, the driving gloves, the desperation to be granted another series or invited to Esther McVey's barbecue.
Coogan has always been sensitive to class. He was born in October 1965 and grew up in north Manchester, one of six children of an IBM engineer and a housewife, Irish immigrants. 'Depending on your point of view I was upper working class or lower middle class,' he says. 'I can't be written off as a Hampstead liberal. My father had a respectable career. Our aspiration was not material, it was to try to be a better person. My dad bought an encyclopaedia before he bought a colour TV. I'm not easily pigeonholed. I'm not some privileged Lefty, neither am I a horny-handed son of the soil. I'm sort of in the middle somewhere: I think that's my superpower.'
His politics are less ambivalent. He is feeling 'not great' about Keir Starmer's run as PM. 'I understand there is no single virtuous way to be Prime Minister,' he says. 'But when you look at the things he did as DPP and an advocate, you think, 'What happened?' He has to be a pragmatist. The one thing Margaret Thatcher did do was offer an ideology. It was specific and clear. That's not Keir Starmer. Populism is the fault of the centre-ground politics, the failure to deliver for those people.
'You can't be all things to all people. Sometimes you have to nail your colours to the mast and accept that some people won't like what you've done. I feel everything is a strategic political decision. Sincerity is at the bottom of a long list of priorities.'
Press regulation is another long-standing cause of Coogan's. He was a witness during the 2011 Leveson Inquiry, after he was set up in what he called a 'sociopathic sting' by the News of the World. Earlier this year, Prince Harry became the latest high-profile figure to settle out of court with Rupert Murdoch's organisations.
'Murdoch has never had to have his day in court,' Coogan says. 'I accepted a settlement from News International and the Mirror Group for fairly substantial sums of money, which was very nice for me.
'When you have unlimited funds like Rupert Murdoch you can buy your way out of justice. With the Mirror Group they kept offering me more money. I kept saying I wanted to go to court. Eventually I got to the point where they said if you go to court and don't get what they've offered, you'll be liable for the entire costs. That's when I could have lost my house.
'Intrusion into anyone's life is wrong, even Prince Harry. Despite the soap opera that is the Royal family, it took guts for Prince Harry to take on the press.'
Coogan is relaxed about the prospect of turning 60. 'It's weird, when I started out I was 22 and everyone said, 'God, you're so young,'' he says. 'Then one day they stopped saying it. If I go to east London and eat I know pretty much anywhere I go I'll be the oldest person in the room. But I live in Lewes [East Sussex]. One of the most gratifying things was that when they had the Covid vaccine I was one of the last ones to get it, because I was one of the youngest people in Lewes.'
Since his brush with tabloid notoriety Coogan is more careful about his private life. His daughter, Clare, 28, is a chef and food stylist, in a relationship with the actor/comedian Jamie Demetriou, star of Stath Lets Flats. The Christmas table must be intimidating. He has been sober for years, after well-publicised problems with booze and drugs, but doesn't regret his wild days.
'I think the most interesting people are people who partied once, rather than people who've never partied,' he says. 'I don't regret it at all. There's levels of responsibility. I regret some things if you get into the nitty-gritty, but I don't particularly want to. The Dylan Thomas myth that you have to be self-destructive to be creative is nonsense. The complexity of that conflict in the human heart between being hedonistic and selfish and instant gratification, versus contemplative delayed gratification, that's the stuff of life. That conflict is the stuff of comedy: wanting to do the right thing but doing the wrong thing.'
There are other benefits to ageing too.
'As you get older, you're less bothered by what people think of you,' he says. 'I don't do social media. I don't need to know if someone's slagging me off. I don't want to be a grumpy old man. You get more comfortable in your own skin. Your priorities change. And you do get happier.'
He sounds surprised, but if a penguin can teach an important lesson, so can experience.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Scott Mills' big admission about his finances after bagging £450k Radio 2 job
Radio DJ Scott Mills revealed he has 'made it' after he took over the BBC Radio 2 breakfast show after previously 'risking' his health from working too much over two decades Scott Mills has revealed he is finally 'financially secure' and has 'made it' after he took over the BBC Radio 2 breakfast show after Zoe Ball left the post. Scott, 51, took over the position in January from Zoe, who left to focus on her family. Opening up about his career and his new ability to say 'no' to work, after missing sleep for jobs, Scott told The Telegraph: 'For the first time, I really do believe in myself. You have to look at the facts. They've put you on the breakfast show, you must be doing something right.' It comes after he admitted to taking on 'too much' work, sometimes at a 'risk' to his own health. Reflecting on his jam-packed career, Scott said: 'I was working way too much, because my mindset was that you don't know when it might end. There was one freshers' week where my schedule for playing in student unions was: Monday: Aberdeen, Tuesday: Glasgow, Wednesday: Edinburgh.' While Scott said he 'enjoyed' taking every opportunit y he got for two decades, 'life is different now' and he 'doesn't want to' do that anymore. Last month, Scott opened up to the Mirror about the hard work that goes into the show and that Zoe gave him a warning when he took over the job, but he still describes it as his 'happy place'. He said: 'The show is a lot, it's hard work. It's a treadmill every day. I remember when Zoe finished, she said to me: 'Look, doing breakfast on Radio 2 is quite a lot. It's quite demanding, and you've just always got to be on." He added: "She was right. The amount of guests we have - it's continuous. When she said it to me, I was like: 'I'm ready'. And I am, it's my happy place." The Mail previously reported that Scott took a small pay rise for presenting the show, however, it was significantly less than his predecessor, Zoe. While it is reported that Scott is earning approximately £450,000 a year, Zoe was reportedly on £950,000. Zoe confirmed her departure from the early morning slot back in November, telling listeners it was 'time to start a new chapter' before she left in January. However, that wasn't the end of her journey on the radio. On air, she told her listeners: "After six years of fun times alongside you all on the Breakfast Show, I've decided it's time to step away from the early alarm call and start a new chapter'. She added: "I just want to say I'm so grateful to my incredible boss ladies... they have always been so supportive of me, especially in this job and particularly this year." Just months after her final Breakfast Show, Zoe has already returned to the Radio 2 line-up with a brand new Saturday afternoon show. The new programme launched on May 3 and will continue to air weekly. According to Radio 2 bosses, it will deliver "the best songs and chat for a Saturday". Zoe herself says listeners can expect "lots of laughs" and upbeat favourites.


Edinburgh Live
2 days ago
- Edinburgh Live
Kate Middleton's royal title 'almost went to someone else' before 'intervention'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Within the ranks of the royal family, it's common for senior royals to be known by their secondary titles such as Duke, Duchess, Earl, and Countess, to name a few. Each title is distinctive, often passed down through generations, yet occasionally, more than one Royal could be in line for the same title. Back in 1999, a unique situation arose that nearly saw the now-Princess of Wales miss out on her former title as the Duchess of Cambridge. When Sophie Rhys-Jones married Prince Edward in 1999, it was anticipated that Edward would receive the prestigious title of Duke of Cambridge, making Sophie the Duchess of Cambridge. However, according to an insider speaking to The Telegraph in 2010, Prince Edward found inspiration from the silver screen to choose a different path, eschewing the dukedom earmarked for him, unlike his elder sibling Prince Andrew. READ MORE - Inside 'ghost town' shopping centre near Edinburgh that's been left to rot READ MORE - The giant lost Edinburgh building that once took up half of the Meadows The palace source divulged: "Prince Edward was going to be the Duke of Cambridge, but he watched the film Shakespeare in Love, which had a character called the Earl of Wessex. He liked the sound of it and asked the Queen if he could have that instead." Therefore, Sophie was styled as the Countess of Wessex, leaving the Cambridge titles to be bestowed upon Prince William and Kate Middleton upon their marriage in 2011, reports the Mirror. (Image: Jason Dawson/JASONPIX) (Image: POOL/AFP via Getty Images) In 2024, Prince Edward and Sophie underwent another title change, becoming the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh in honour of Edward's late father, Prince Philip. This change was part of the celebrations for Edward's 59th birthday in March. The Duke of Edinburgh title has a long history, having been first created for Prince Frederick, the eldest son of King George II, back in 1726. In 1764, it was bestowed upon Prince William, brother of King George III, as part of the joint title The Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh. Prince Alfred, Queen Victoria's second son, assumed the title in 1866, before it was passed on to Prince Philip upon his marriage to the late Queen Elizabeth II. Prince Edward is now the fifth holder of the Duke of Edinburgh title, which he will retain for the rest of his life. However, the title is no longer hereditary, meaning there's no guarantee that it will be passed on to Edward and Sophie's son James when Edward passes away. This could potentially see the title being handed down to one of the children of the Prince and Princess of Wales in the future, with Prince Louis being the most likely candidate to inherit it. The practice of bestowing specific titles upon royals is rooted in a long history of lineage and land ownership, with each title signifying everything from a royal's duties and responsibilities to the correct way to address them.


Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Princess Kate's prestigious title 'almost went to another senior royal'
Before Kate became the Duchess of Cambridge when she married Prince William in 2011, one other unlikely royal was also in the running for the prestigious title. Within the royal family, many senior members of the Firm are often referred to by their alternative titles, such as Duke, Duchess, Earl, Countess, Lady, and countless others. While each royal holds their own unique title, which can often go back generations, there have been rare occasions of two people eligible for the same moniker. One such instance stems back to 1999, and almost cost the Princess of Wales her previous title of the Duchess of Cambridge. When Sophie, born Sophie Rhys-Jones, tied the knot with Prince Edward in 1999, Edward was originally to be awarded the coveted title of Duke of Cambridge, while Sophie would become the Duchess of Cambridge. However, according to a palace courtier, Prince Edward - the youngest of Queen Elizabeth's children - drew inspiration from a very unusual source to establish his own unique title as an alternative, opting not to be awarded dukedom like his older brother Prince Andrew. The courtier explained to The Telegraph in 2010: "Prince Edward was going to be the Duke of Cambridge, but he watched the film Shakespeare in Love, which had a character called the Earl of Wessex. He liked the sound of it and asked the Queen if he could have that instead." As a result, Sophie became the Countess of Wessex and the titles of Duke and Duchess of Cambridge eventually went to Prince William and Kate Middleton when they got married in 2011. Prince Edward and Sophie changed their titles once more in 2024 as they became the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh as part of the Edward's 59th birthday celebrations in March, in honour of his late father Prince Philip. The Duke of Edinburgh title was originally created for Prince Frederick, eldest son of King George II back in 1726. In 1764, it was given to Prince William, brother of King George III, as part of the joint title The Duke of Gloucester and Edinburgh. Prince Alfred, second son of Queen Victoria, took over the title in 1866, before it was handed to Prince Philip when he married the late Queen Elizabeth II. Prince Edward is the fifth Duke of Edinburgh title and will hold the title for the rest of his life. The role is no longer a hereditary one, meaning there is no guarantee the moniker will go to Edward and Sophie's son James when Edward dies. This could mean the title could be passed to one of the Prince and Princess of Wales 's children in the future, with Prince Louis the most likely candidate to inherit the name. The tradition of awarding royals with certain unique titles stems from a long history of genetic lineage and land ownership, with each title denoting everything from a royal's roles and responsibilities to how they should be referenced.