
A Maine bill would sweeten the deal for corporate mobile home park owners who sell to cooperatives
When Celeste Yakawonis was younger, she thought she would spend the rest of her life in her riverfront home on six acres of land in Turner.
But that was before Yakawonis's husband died, leaving her to live in the large farmhouse alone.
'Can you see how big that was, for me, one person rattling around?' she said, pointing to a framed photo of the home powdered with snow. 'I just couldn't take care of it.'
Without her husband, Yakawonis said she felt overwhelmed and isolated. But she was advised not to make big decisions too soon after the loss. She kept the home for a year before deciding to sell it. When she started house hunting in 2023, she had trouble finding anything in her budget.
Eventually, she chose an open-concept mobile home at Linnhaven Mobile Home Park in Brunswick. She purchased the home for $92,000, and paid $480 a month to rent the lot it sat on.
From the outside, it looks like any other double-wide, with a grey paneled exterior and a front porch. Inside, she has made it her own: her daughter draped ferns, pinecones, cranberries and warm white Christmas lights over the sleek white cupboards.
What changed her life more than the new home was the new community.
In 2024, after the owner announced that he was intending to sell the property, residents began working with the Cooperative Development Institute to learn more about purchasing the park themselves and becoming a resident-owned community. They created a resident board of directors and pooled together funds to submit a $27 million offer. It was accepted, making them the new owners of the park.
The co-op is now the largest of its kind in the state, with 278 homes. Twelve such resident-owned communities in the state have successfully purchased their manufactured home properties over the last fifteen years, from Arundel to Veazie, according to data provided by the Cooperative Development Institute, which has assisted with some of the deals.
As Maine grapples with a housing affordability crisis, advocates say these cooperatives offer lower-income residents more stability. State lawmakers are discussing a bill that would encourage the creation of resident-owned communities by providing tax incentives to businesses that sell to cooperatives.
The bill would provide a tax deduction of up to $750,000 on capital gains for owners who sell to cooperatives. The goal, according to bill sponsor Sen. Cameron Reny (D-Lincoln), is to preserve Maine's affordable housing units.
'Mobile homes and manufactured housing parks are some of the last truly affordable housing options in our state,' she said during a work session on the bill earlier this month.
Maine's housing crunch
The legislation fits into a broader effort to address the state's housing shortfalls, following a law passed in 2023 that required mobile home park owners to notify residents of their intent to sell and give them an opportunity to purchase the property.
In mobile home parks, owners typically own their units but rent the land, making them susceptible to unexpected rent hikes and fees when new buyers come in. These communities are often home to seniors who live on fixed incomes and are particularly vulnerable to rent changes.
Nationwide, investors have taken a keen interest in mobile home parks. In 2020 and 2021, private equity firms and other investors were behind nearly a quarter of all manufactured home purchases in the country, according to a report by the Private Equity Stakeholder Project and Manufactured Housing Action.
In Maine, many mobile home parks are owned and operated by families — but as some are aging out of the business, they are choosing to sell. As of last year, out-of-state investors owned more than a fifth of Maine's mobile home parks, according to the Bangor Daily News.
After such purchases take place, residents across the country have reported seeing their rents go up by as much as 60 percent, according to the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. They have also seen ballooning maintenance issues, unexpected fees and even water shutoffs.
In 2021, Philips International bought Mountain View Estates Mobile Home Park in Bowdoin. By the spring of 2024, according to News Center Maine, the lot rent had increased four times, pushing residents' bills up by nearly $200 a month.
Negotiating a deal
While the 2023 law has made it easier for groups like the Blueberry Fields Cooperative to purchase their mobile home parks, sellers are still wary of selling to cooperatives, which are typically newly formed and often don't have the kind of longstanding reputation that an investor might, said Nora Gosselin with the Cooperative Development Institute.
'You have a group of residents who are forming a co-op who are stepping into the negotiating room with a large Wall Street company and a local family, and it's just — it's challenging,' Gosselin said.
While sellers might still choose other buyers, the tax incentive in the proposed legislation could give residents a leg up without forcing them to pay more during the negotiation, she said.
The Genesis Fund, a community lender, has funded every resident-owned manufactured community in the state, according to the group's executive director, Liza Fleming-Ives. She said they combine their resources with other lenders and provide a framework to groups interested in financing the projects.
'The demand for our role is huge right now,' she said. 'We are very aware — and very focused — on the need that we have in the state to build our new supply of affordable housing.'
A 2023 report by the Maine Housing Authority found that the state needs to build approximately 84,000 new homes by 2030 to meet its expected population growth and account for historic underproduction.
Manufactured homes are a key part of the solution to the housing crisis because they provide permanent, lower-cost options for residents in different income brackets through housing that's already readily available, said Erik Jorgensen, director of government relations at MaineHousing. The agency helped fund the Blueberry Fields Cooperative's purchase in Brunswick, along with the recent purchase of the Cedar Falls Mobile Home Park in Bangor, through the state's mobile home park preservation fund.
'What's different about a co-op is that future cost increases are in the hands of a board of residents and not dictated by investors,' Jorgensen said during the work session. 'The question really does become, how do you motivate sellers to choose the option with greater public purpose?'
Yet not everyone supports the push to create more resident-owned communities.
The CEO of the Manufactured Housing Institute, Lesli Gooch, said she feels that the incentives in the proposed legislation could have unintended consequences in the long run.
She said there are real benefits that come from having an experienced property manager, rather than residents, run a mobile home park, noting that residents might not be as well positioned to support upgrades to water, electricity and waste management.
'Some people call (mobile home parks) a postage stamp plot of land that the house sits on. That's absolutely not true,' Gooch said. 'It does take someone who understands infrastructure to make sure that these communities are preserved over time.'
To Yakawonis, who moved to the Brunswick mobile home park after her husband died, the advantages of the new resident ownership structure are clear: stable lot rent prices, leadership opportunities and a strong sense of community. As a board member, she's become involved in everything from park maintenance to updating the park rules, keeping residents informed and even a game night.
The biggest change is a sense of stability — unlike in other mobile home parks.
'If their rent goes up, their rent goes up, and there's nothing they can do about it. It's just a horrible powerless feeling and we did not want that,' Yakawonis said. 'We wanted to be in control of our destiny.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Maine lawmakers give mobile homeowners a leg up in park purchases
Jun. 12—Lawmakers on Wednesday passed a bill to give mobile home residents the "right of first refusal" when their parks go up for sale, but it won't go into effect quickly enough to benefit Friendly Village, a large park in Gorham awaiting a decision on its multi-million offer. The bill, LD 1145, was enacted in both the state Senate and House of Representatives this week and now awaits a signature from Gov. Janet Mills. It did not receive the two-thirds majority needed to pass it as an emergency, which means it would have gone into effect immediately after receiving the governor's stamp of approval. Instead, it will take effect 90 days after the Legislature adjourns. Mobile home parks in Maine and across the country are increasingly being purchased by out-of-state investors who raise the monthly lot rents, in some cases doubling or tripling prices, according to national data. Park residents own their homes but not the land they sit on and are essentially helpless against rent increases. They could sell their homes but would need somewhere else to go. Plus, it's harder to sell an older mobile home in a park with high lot rents. An estimated one-fifth of Maine's 468 licensed parks are now owned by out-of-state investors. Following the passage of a 2023 "opportunity to purchase law," several communities, including ones in Brunswick, Bangor and Monmouth, have formed cooperatives to purchase their parks. But more than twice as many have failed, even with offers above those of the competition. That law only requires the seller to negotiate "in good faith," not accept the offer. Many park owners aren't willing to gamble against a sure thing by accepting an offer from a cooperative that might struggle to get the financing together. The bill, proposed by Sen. Tim Nangle, D-Cumberland and supported by the governor's top housing advisor, requires that the seller choose the residents as long as their offer is at least at the same price and has "substantially equivalent terms and conditions." Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut all have right-of-first-refusal laws. The bill is intended to give park residents the "opportunity to have some self-determination," Nangle said previously. Nora Gosselin, director of resident acquisitions at the Cooperative Development Institute, said right of first refusal is the "gold standard" and that Maine's legislation draws on 40 years of similar laws, ironing out issues that other states have run into. The Cooperative Development Institute helps manufactured housing communities looking to purchase their parks and provides ongoing support after the sale. "I think there's a lot of heartache when you have a group of residents that has done all of this work organizing ... (to) get to that point, put their offer in and get rejected for the same or equivalent" amount of money, she said. "In right of first refusal states, we just don't see that." At Friendly Village, one of the latest parks in Maine to go up for sale, residents received notice in April that a Wyoming investment firm had put in an $87.5 million offer for their 300-lot park and seven others in different states. The firm, Crown Communities LLC, offered $22 million for Friendly Village, specifically. Under state law, the residents had 60 days to decide to attempt to purchase their park. The Friendly Village Cooperative said it submitted an offer above $22 million two weeks ago and is waiting to hear back. The sale, whether to the cooperative or to Crown, will likely be complete by the time the new legislation takes effect. But the residents aren't entirely without hope. A different bill, sponsored by Sen. Chip Curry, D-Belfast, could stop the sale of mobile home parks with more than 25 lots for three months after the Legislature adjourns. The moratorium has exceptions for sales between family members and for communities whose residents do not wish to purchase the park. The bill is proposed as an emergency and if it gets enough support, could halt the pending sale of Friendly Village for long enough for LD 1145 to take effect. The bill received initial approval by the Senate Thursday but by a narrower margin than the two-thirds required. Sen. Joe Baldacci, D-Bangor, called the bill "drastic." "Passing a statewide moratorium on the sale of all mobile home parks in order to satisfy one particular situation is, in my view, not appropriate public policy," he said. But Curry said the moratorium would delay, not prevent, sales, and that while it might help Friendly Village, there are other parks receiving similar notices. "We have legislation to better support residents to buy their own communities, we're just looking for this pause so that we can get those laws into effect," he said. The Legislature also passed a bill that could dis-incentivize future investor purchases. The bill will go to the governor for approval. Proposed by Sen. Cameron Reny, D-Bristol, LD 1016 will impose a $10,000 per-lot fee when an investor with a net worth over $50 million moves to purchase a park. That per-lot fee (which would amount to an additional $3 million for a park like Friendly Village) will go into a preservation fund to help resident groups compete. Resident cooperative and small businesses would be exempt from the fee. Gosselin, at the Cooperative Development Institute, said the legislation is, to her knowledge, "the first of its kind" and sends a message to large equity firms that if they intend to buy a park in Maine, they better be prepared to make a real investment in the state. "It's a pretty elegant way to bolster resident ownership," she said. Copy the Story Link

Wall Street Journal
4 days ago
- Wall Street Journal
Schools Can Pay Their Athletes—and College Sports Will Never Be the Same
College sports are dying, college sports are dead, college sports aren't about college anymore—it's Christmas in June for anyone feeling apocalyptic about the state of college sports, now that a settlement has been approved allowing schools to directly pay their athletes. This isn't a salary, technically. This is compensation from schools to athletes for use of their 'name, image, likeness,' but it's not a measly NIL like a burly offensive lineman getting all the bratwurst he can eat. This is a real paycheck, directly from the college. It's really happening—for Division I schools that have opted in. It's set to start July 1. 'A new beginning,' NCAA boss Charlie Baker called it. Is it going to work? Will it cannonball Olympic and nonrevenue sports? How does it square with Title IX? Will it withstand legal challenges? Will it all fall apart? I have no idea! Neither does anyone else! Hold on to your helmets, everyone. We're all jumping off the diving board together. (I will now pause 90 seconds for you to climb the ladder and jump off the diving board with the rest of us.) The settlement of this class action—House vs. NCAA, in which current and former athletes sought name, image and likeness opportunities and a share of athletic department revenue—had been in the works for a while. On Friday, a federal judge signed off on the $2.6 billion settlement, which includes back pay to litigants but also creates a revenue-sharing system 'in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes,' the Journal reported. That's right. Colleges can chop up $20 million and split it among their jocks. It will take some getting used to. Naturally, the revenue sharing is already provoking some to bemoan the demise of 'amateurism' and the college sports landscape. But schools have to be oblivious to not see who's to blame: They are! College sports did this to itself. The NCAA and its member schools set professionalization into motion with decades of arrogance and denial about the bountiful but warped economy they built around the games we love to watch. When college sports started chasing every dollar as a market-driven business—and frankly, there's a case that college sports has always been a business—paying athletes became inevitable. The bigger the money got, the harder the system was to defend. When college sports started indulging in the $10 million dollar coach, the billion-dollar television deal, the megabuck locker rooms and the assistant to the assistant strength coach making more than a surgeon, the hypocrisy was easy to see. Everyone was making a buck, except the talent on the field. It's why the Supreme Court more or less reacted to the NCAA's claims of amateur status with the following: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Public opinion shifted, too. A decade ago, I'd write about proposals to pay athletes and I could hear the jeering a mile away. Boooooooo! That's not what college sports are about, man! Eventually, those big-dollar media deals, private jets and Pop-Tart Bowls caught up with college sports. It was hard to argue there was anything amateurish about it anymore. Now schools will have to figure it out for themselves. I mean that literally: schools and conferences are navigating a new wilderness in which they are permitted to directly compensate athletes—but without a precedent or a clear road map. Yikes. We do know a few things: The bulk of those $20 million allotments are expected to go to high-revenue sports like football and men's basketball—that's where the money's coming from, after all. Other beneficiaries may be growing sports like women's basketball and softball. The settlement also attempts to inject some calm into the craziness around name, image and likeness. The revenue sharing payments will come from the schools, and third party NIL deals over $600 will be subject to review by 'NIL Go,' an oversight group overseen by Deloitte. The idea here is to put outside NIL deals under a microscope—find out what player deals are legitimate arrangements, and what are booster largesses masquerading as NIL. Good luck! Enforcement will be a headache. So will the invariable league challenges. Defenders of the settlement maintain it shouldn't be entangled with Title IX protections against gender discrimination. Already there are parties who want to argue. Also unknown is the impact on nonrevenue Olympic sports. Do schools start eliminating or rolling back certain sports because they're not big contributors to the bottom line? Possible! We'll see. The new setup isn't free of denial, either. While colleges are now entitled to pay athletes, the system still resists the idea that athletes are employees. Good luck with that, too. There will likely be challenges to the revenue sharing system—is the proportion of revenue (22 percent) given to athletes a fair amount, or should it be renegotiated? Is it tantamount to a salary cap? It's hard to not see this heading in the direction of classifying athletes as employees, and eventually, collective bargaining. If you're lying down on a couch right now with a bag of ice on your head, I understand. It's a lot. It's confusing. Imagine being an athletic director in 2025. No job has changed more. A new day is here. It might not be the apocalypse, but college sports will never be the same. Write to Jason Gay at
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Dollar General expands home offering with celebrity brands, designers
This story was originally published on Retail Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Retail Dive newsletter. Dollar General has teamed up with multiple celebrities, brands and designers to introduce new home goods products and collections, the discount retailer announced Thursday. The retailer's 'Home Valley' section will feature products from Kathy Ireland's Ki by Kathy Ireland, Betseyville, Beverly Hills Polo Club and Simply Belle by Simply Southern. Ki by Kathy Ireland is launching into over 20,000 stores this summer. Items include throws for $12, sheet sets for $15 and a three-piece comforter set for $35. The retailer plans to add another collection from Kathy Ireland this fall, according to the press release. Dollar General continues to build out its product assortment. With its new home collections, the discount chain wants to reach shoppers seeking affordable, quality items from noteworthy brands 'through a treasure hunt experience,' the company said in a statement. 'Dollar General is committed to offering our customers a constant flow of exciting industry brands that amplify the surprise element of our non-consumable initiative,' Johanna Blankush, senior vice president and general merchandising manager at Dollar General, said in a statement. 'We are dedicated to delivering exceptional value to our customers while staying on top of the latest trends.' Additional products in the company's name-brand home push include seasonal throws from Betseyville, sheets from Beverly Hills Polo Club, Faberware flatware and hydration items from Simply Belle by Simply Southern, Hydraflow and Manna Hydration. The company recently announced that it expanded its Dolly Parton kitchen and housewares collection after a successful release of its first product line with the singer last summer. Dollar General will also debut a Dolly Parton summer entertaining collection and a Christmas collection for the holiday season. Earlier this year, the company said it planned to add roughly 100 new private brand items, with a focus on its Clover Valley grocery brand. Alongside a rollout of new products, Dollar General is reshaping some of its store fleet. In March, the retailer said it would close 96 of its namesake stores and 45 Popshelf stores. The company also planned to convert six Popshelf stores to Dollar General locations, further shrinking the footprint of its higher-end store concept. Dollar General's home goods expansion follows the company's first-quarter results last week. Net sales in Q1 saw a 5.3% bump year over year to $10.4 billion. Net income grew almost 8% to $392 million compared to the year-ago quarter. Continuing its store overhaul, the company said it plans to remodel roughly 20% of its fleet annually. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data