logo
Santa Monica business owner offering one-way tickets out of town for homeless people

Santa Monica business owner offering one-way tickets out of town for homeless people

Independent5 hours ago

Fed up with the escalating homelessness crisis in Los Angeles, one man is taking an unconventional but heartfelt approach: buying one-way plane tickets to help people on the streets reconnect with family and friends.
John Alle, a real estate advisory business owner and co-founder of the Santa Monica Coalition, launched a no-questions-asked program last week offering free flights home to unhoused people in LA with ID and someone waiting at their destination.
After a Fox 11 story aired Thursday, Alle said a woman from a San Diego shelter reached out, along with about 25 others.
'We're going to get her a flight on July 3 to Wyoming,' Alle told The Independent on Friday. 'She's been trying to use her disability income to book a flight to see her family there, but she doesn't have enough income to do that and pay her bills for the month.'
Funded by Alle and Santa Monica Coalition donors, the program offers flights and, when needed, bus or train rides to unhoused people, despite LA's billion-dollar spending to address homelessness.
'We're trying to send people home on a bus to Oregon on Monday and Tuesday,' Alle said.
The business owner is frustrated by what he claims are slow, ineffective government efforts.
'The most frustrating part is just to see people that you know have the means to do something and make a difference, but they're trying to go towards another solution that benefits them financially,' Alle said.
Alle and his team came up with the ticket home idea by researching how other countries address homelessness. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chinese government addressed urban homelessness by relocating people to their hometowns, offering temporary shelters, and clearing them from city streets.
'We started thinking creatively in terms of what we would be able to do to create an immediate impact. Otherwise, we just have people lying around in front of City Hall,' Alle said.
While any unhoused person in LA can utilize the program, Alle said they focus on helping women who are subject to becoming victims of crimes and people who have lived on the streets for less than two years, as they have the best chance of reintegrating into society.
'I think if you've been out there more than five or six years, you're pretty much a lifer at that point,' Alle said. 'It's really tough to get people to want to come back inside when they've been out there so long, especially when they've been beaten down by so many elements of what's going on outside.'
If you or someone you know is interested in the homeless relocation program, call (213) 652‑7463.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marjorie Taylor Greene offers rare GOP praise of Mamdani's campaign: ‘He talked directly to the people'
Marjorie Taylor Greene offers rare GOP praise of Mamdani's campaign: ‘He talked directly to the people'

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Marjorie Taylor Greene offers rare GOP praise of Mamdani's campaign: ‘He talked directly to the people'

MAGA firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has offered some rare Republican praise for the New York mayoral primary campaign of Democrat Zohran Mamdani. The Georgia congresswoman initially reacted to the presumed victory of the three-term New York State assemblyman, a Muslim, with an edited image of the Statue of Liberty cloaked in a burqa. She now calls his campaign 'unique and smart.' In an appearance on Steve Bannon 's podcast War Room on Real America's Voice, Green attributed Mamdani's apparent win over the frontrunner, former Governor Andrew Cuomo, to having 'talked directly to the people.' She said Mamdani 'was focused on their issues, focused on their problems, and talking to the people about his solutions.' Greene added: 'I think it's extremely important that we get a hard focus on solving our problems, and that's what people really want. And you know that guy that won … the Democrat primary in the [New York] mayor's race. I've watched quite a few of his videos, and he did something pretty unique and very smart, even though I don't agree with anything he says.' She continued: 'He really ran a campaign where he talked directly to the people. He was focused on their issues, focused on their problems, and talking to the people about his solutions, even though his solutions are insane and they're socialist, probably communist, but … he was talking directly to the people.' 'When we are not talking to the people and not working on the people's problems, we lose the people, and the people will turn elsewhere,' she concluded. While the Georgia lawmaker is no fan of Mamdani, acknowledging his abilities on the campaign trail is of note amidst the torrent of Islamophobic bigotry otherwise directed at the man who is likely to become the next mayor of New York. The New York Young Republican Club reacted to the primary results with a 'call to action' on X. 'The radical Zohran Mamdani cannot be allowed to destroy our beloved city of New York,' the group wrote. The group urged the president to invoke the Red Scare-era Communist Control Act to yank Mamdani's citizenship and 'promptly deport him.' The club called on White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, to take action. Miller claimed New York City is the 'clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration.' 'The entire Democrat party is lining up behind the diehard socialist who wants to end all immigration enforcement and abolish the prison system entirely,' he added. Republican Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee referred to Mamdani as 'little Muhammad' and said he's 'an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York.' 'He needs to be DEPORTED. Which is why I am calling for him to be subject to denaturalization proceedings,' he added. President Donald Trump reacted to Mamdani's win on Truth Social: 'Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous.' He added: 'He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he's not very smart, he's got AOC+3, Dummies ALL, backing him, and even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him. Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!' Mamdani, who could become the city's first Muslim and Indian-American mayor, won one of the first major Democratic primaries since the start of Trump's second stint in the White House. His platform has largely focused on a growing affordability crisis, with plans for universal childcare, free buses, and a freeze on rent increases in rent-controlled units.

Judge approves $7m settlement for men suing bar over ‘ladies' night' admission fee
Judge approves $7m settlement for men suing bar over ‘ladies' night' admission fee

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Judge approves $7m settlement for men suing bar over ‘ladies' night' admission fee

A judge has given preliminary approval of a $7 million settlement in a lawsuit alleging a 'ladies' night' event at a San Diego bar discriminated against men and nonbinary people. The owners of the Omnia Nightclub, which closed in 2020 in the city's lively Gaslamp Quarter, were sued in 2020 after the plaintiffs claimed the themed night violated California's civil rights law. The plaintiffs alleged that they, along with other men and nonbinary people, were made to pay full price on entry, while women were let in for free or at discounted rates at the 'ladies' night' event. The men also alleged that they were frisked by security before entering the club but women were not. The claims in the class action date back to 2015. San Diego Superior Court Judge Matthew Braner gave preliminary approval to the settlement in May and a final fairness hearing is scheduled for August 29. The agreement does not include an admission of any wrongdoing by the defendants. California 's anti-discrimination statute, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, is at the heart of the case. The law prohibits businesses, including bars and nightclubs, from discriminating against customers based on sex, race, religion, gender identity and age. Alex Maystrenko and Steve Frye, the two named plaintiffs in the suit, will each receive $25,000 for their roles as the class representatives. There could be thousands of men who are eligible for a slice of the settlement, which, depending on the final number of claimants, could be between $245 and $4,000 each. Up to 40 percent of the settlement will likely go toward legal costs. Courts in California have previously ruled that gender-based promotions at venues violate the Unruh Act. A family-run San Francisco restaurant was forced to shut down at the end of last year because of a 'ladies' night' discrimination lawsuit. Alfred Rava, a San Diego-based attorney, has brought hundreds of other 'ladies' night' suits. Rava is representing two men who decided not to join the other members of the 2020 class action. 'I and my clients hardily disapprove of businesses treating patrons or consumers differently based solely on their sex,' Rava said.

Supreme Court justices brawl over birthright ruling as Amy Coney Barrett rips Ketanji Brown Jackson for dissent
Supreme Court justices brawl over birthright ruling as Amy Coney Barrett rips Ketanji Brown Jackson for dissent

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Supreme Court justices brawl over birthright ruling as Amy Coney Barrett rips Ketanji Brown Jackson for dissent

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson 's passionate dissent in the birthright citizenship case appeared to strike a nerve with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who used three pages of the majority opinion to chide her liberal colleague's legal argument. On Friday, the court released its decision in a case brought by President Donald Trump seeking to expand his executive authority by limiting the power of federal judges. Barrett, joined by the five conservative justices, authored the court's main opinion agreeing to narrow judges' ability to issue nationwide blocks on Trump's executive orders. Jackson authored a concurring dissent, accusing the majority of hastening 'the downfall of our governmental institutions.' The liberal justice of the court accused the majority of being 'so caught up in minutiae of the Government's self-serving, finger-pointing arguments that it misses the plot.' Barrett seemingly did not care for Jackson's sharp admonishment of the court and spent several pages dismissing Jackson's argument as a 'startling line of attack' with no legal precedent and 'many problems.' 'The principal dissent focuses on conventional legal terrain, like the Judiciary Act of 1789 and our cases on equity,' Barrett wrote, referring to Justice Sonia Sotomayor's main dissenting opinion. 'Justice Jackson, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever,' Barrett added. For multiple paragraphs, Barrett brushed off her colleague's fiery dissent as illogical. 'We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,' Barrett wrote, before spending another page discussing Jackson's dissent. Barrett, a conservative who was appointed by Trump in 2020, has occasionally toed the line between the conservative wing and the liberal wing of the court, earning ire from Trump supporters. But her scathing takedown of Jackson's dissent was an eye-opening reminder of where her loyalty lies. 'Justice Jackson would do well to heed her own admonition: '[E]veryone, from the President on down, is bound by law.'' Jackson, a liberal appointed by former president Joe Biden in 2022, expressed intense opposition to the court's decision on Friday, believing it to be 'destructive,' 'perverse,' and 'wrong.' Jackson claimed that the decision would embolden the executive to act more as a monarchy than a democracy. 'A Martian arriving here from another planet would see these circumstances and surely wonder: 'what good is the Constitution, then?'' Jackson said in her dissent. It's not uncommon for justices to display their passion for a certain issue in opinions and dissents. It's become standard to find justices sharply disagreeing with one another in written decisions. But Barrett's relentless attack and Jackson's heated dissent was even surprising to some people online. Republican Representative Dan Crenshaw wrote 'Wow' in response to Barrett's opinion, saying she 'slapped down' Jackson's credibility. Former vice president Mike Pence called Barrett's rebuke 'brilliant.' 'Justice Barrett's brutal takedown of the dissent authored by Justice Jackson is something one wouldn't have predicted from oral arguments,' Fox News host Laura Ingraham said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store