Supreme Court rules public has a right to wild camp on Dartmoor
The Supreme Court has ruled that people have the right to wild camp on Dartmoor.
Five justices unanimously dismissed a legal challenge brought by landowner Alexander Darwell
The legal battles over wild camping have been ongoing for the past two years.
In January 2023 Alexander Darwall succeeded in the High Court in a case against the Dartmoor National Park Authority, removing the right to wild camp.
Following a protest of 3,500 people on his land at Stall Moor the National Park appealed, and a unanimous verdict was reached by the High Court judges - wild camping on Dartmoor was to remain.
Reacting to the Supreme Court's ruling that the public can wild camp on Dartmoor, Caroline Voaden, Liberal Democrat MP for South Devon, said: 'I'm absolutely thrilled with this ruling.
'It is a vindication of something we've all known for a long time: that the stars are for everyone, and that access to nature is not a nice-to-have, but a fundamental necessity for a happy, healthy life.
'Wild camping is good for body and soul, I'm very pleased the judges could see this.
'It's a shame this had to be tested yet again in the courtroom.
'Now this is over, I hope we can begin work to extend our right to wild camp beyond Dartmoor.
'In opposition, Labour spoke about extending the right to wild camp across the UK. I hope they will put those words into action and expand access rights for walkers and campers across the country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ex-ESPN analyst claims Trump is trying to 'make America whiter'
President Donald Trump 's crackdown on illegal immigration stems from a desire to make the country 'whiter' and not necessarily safer, according to podcaster and former ESPN personality Dan Le Batard. 'Of course, everyone can agree, yes, illegal criminals in this country, yes, get them out of here,' began the 56-year-old Miami resident. 'But wait a minute, who gets to decide what's illegal and criminal when you're just going to violate the Supreme Court and democracy and the constitution and everything else in the name of, now you've got an armed militia that says every protest is dangerous. 'Even the peaceful ones. And you can frame it that way because the people are brown.' The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California after he deployed them there following protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids. The court said it would hold a hearing on the matter on Tuesday. The ruling came only hours after a federal judge's order was to take effect at noon Friday. Earlier Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests . The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. As Le Batard put it, it 'feels like state militia [is] rubber-bulleting about just basic American freedoms.' Producer and Miami Marlins TV host Jeremy Tache agreed. 'This is a use of the military against our own people,' Tache said. 'If this was happening in any other country, we would be looking at that as one of the most horrifying things that could possibly happen.' The Trump administration has urged immigration judges to deny asylum hearings, the vast majority of which involve Latin American immigrants, while simultaneously ushering in white Afrikaners seeking to leave alleged racist attacks in South Africa. An initial group of 59 white South Africans arrived at Dulles International Airport in Virginia on a chartered flight last month under the new program announced by Trump. A second group of nine others arrived on June 2. The Trump administration said it is offering refugee status to white South Africans it alleges are being persecuted by their black-led government and are victims of racially motivated violence. The South African government has denied the allegations and said they are a mischaracterization of the country. The son of Cuban immigrants, Le Batard believes these efforts are intended to disenfranchise Latino asylum seekers. 'This is exactly how it is that you circumvent what feels like American democracy to make sure that the others never unite like a union,' he said. 'You can always make them the others, and you'll always have white people on your side. 'Trying to make this country whiter in a way that is overt, that is political, that is hateful, and allows you to keep the right to make all people other than you criminals based on whatever you make the laws, including just being brown, not having a license or being a criminal, because you're 'just like all those other dirty Mexican [sexual offenders] that we had to build a wall to keep out.'' Le Batard wasn't arguing to forgive illegal immigration, but rather explained Trump's reaction to the problem is designed to marginalize America's ethnic minorities while rallying the President's white base. 'We can hide under the semantics argument of, well of course illegal people who are here committing crimes shouldn't be here,' Le Batard said. 'But that doesn't mean you should make all brown people and black people that.' Trump's supporters in the media recently began arguing for a ban on third-world immigration. Podcasters Matt Walsh and Charlie Kirk issued similar posts on the subject, with the latter claiming a declining white population in Los Angeles is proof of the 'Great Replacement Theory' – an idea that originated with white supremacists.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Ban on advertising and safeguard for child patients added to Assisted Dying Bill
The new parts to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill were voted in on Friday as a second day of debate on various amendments came to a close. It is expected the next major vote on the overall Bill could take place next Friday, which could see it either fall or pass through to the Lords. Campaigners supportive of a change in the law outside Parliament (James Manning/PA) Impassioned debate heard the Bill described by Conservative MP Kieran Mullan as a 'deeply consequential and highly contentious piece of legislation for our society'. He argued not enough time has been allocated for debate on such a divisive issue, but health minister Stephen Kinnock said there had been more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent so far, and more than 500 amendments had been considered at committee stage earlier this year. On Friday a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law was also approved. The amendment on child patients was hailed as a 'first major Commons defeat' by opposition campaigners Care Not Killing which welcomed 'MPs removing the ability of doctors to raise unprompted assisted suicide with children'. An amendment, by fellow Labour MP Paul Waugh, to limit exceptions on that ban did not pass. He said the ban as it stands has 'unspecified exceptions, which could make the ban itself worthless', warning online harms from ads about assisted dying on TikTok 'could be a reality without the tighter safeguards in my amendment'. A number of other amendments were passed, including a provision for assisted dying deaths to not automatically be referred to a coroner and around the regulation of substances for use in assisted dying. Other issues debated included an amendment requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law. Pledging her support for the amendment, which was tabled by Liberal Democrat Munira Wilson, Kim Leadbeater said MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. Campaigners against a change in the law gather outside Parliament (James Manning/PA) Ms Wilson's amendment is supported by Marie Curie, which said it is 'desperately needed as the end-of-life care system is in crisis, with huge gaps in services and a lack of NHS leadership on this vital part of our health and care system'. It is expected that amendment could be voted on next Friday. One MP, who became emotional as she recalled the death of her husband who she said had been 'in extreme pain' with terminal cancer, urged her colleagues to 'mind our language' after words like 'murder' were used. Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden, whose husband died of oesophageal cancer, said it is 'so wrong' to use such language. She said: 'This is about helping people die in a civilised way and helping their families not go through a horrendous experience of watching a loved one die in agony.' The beginning of Friday's session saw MPs add a new opt-out clause to the Bill. A person holds a hard copy of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The amendment, meaning no person including all health and social care professionals, can be obliged to take part in assisted dying had been debated and approved last month, but has now been formally added to the Bill. The Bill passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 during a historic vote in November which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying. Demonstrators both for and against a change in the law once again gathered outside Parliament to make their views known on the Bill. Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying which is in favour of a change in the law, said: 'Our country is closer than ever before to the safe, compassionate, and tightly regulated assisted dying law that so many people want, from all walks of life and every part of the country.' But former MP Caroline Ansell, from Christian Action Research and Education (Care), which opposes assisted dying, urged parliamentarians to vote against the Bill. She said: 'It is irredeemably flawed in principle and in detail. Parliament should close the door to assisted suicide and focus on truly compassionate and life-affirming forms of support.' As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump is trying to 'make America whiter', says ex-ESPN analyst in blistering rant
President Donald Trump 's crackdown on illegal immigration stems from a desire to make the country 'whiter' and not necessarily safer, according to podcaster and former ESPN personality Dan Le Batard. 'Of course, everyone can agree, yes, illegal criminals in this country, yes, get them out of here,' began the 56-year-old Miami resident. 'But wait a minute, who gets to decide what's illegal and criminal when you're just going to violate the Supreme Court and democracy and the constitution and everything else in the name of, now you've got an armed militia that says every protest is dangerous. 'Even the peaceful ones. And you can frame it that way because the people are brown.' The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California after he deployed them there following protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids. The court said it would hold a hearing on the matter on Tuesday. The ruling came only hours after a federal judge's order was to take effect at noon Friday. Earlier Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. As Le Batard put it, it 'feels like state militia [is] rubber-bulleting about just basic American freedoms.' Producer and Miami Marlins TV host Jeremy Tache agreed. 'This is a use of the military against our own people,' Tache said. 'If this was happening in any other country, we would be looking at that as one of the most horrifying things that could possibly happen.' The Trump administration has urged immigration judges to deny asylum hearings, the vast majority of which involve Latin American immigrants, while simultaneously ushering in white Afrikaners seeking to leave alleged racist attacks in South Africa. An initial group of 59 white South Africans arrived at Dulles International Airport in Virginia on a chartered flight last month under the new program announced by Trump. A second group of nine others arrived on June 2. The Trump administration said it is offering refugee status to white South Africans it alleges are being persecuted by their black-led government and are victims of racially motivated violence. The South African government has denied the allegations and said they are a mischaracterization of the country. The son of Cuban immigrants, Le Batard believes these efforts are intended to disenfranchise Latino asylum seekers. 'This is exactly how it is that you circumvent what feels like American democracy to make sure that the others never unite like a union,' he said. 'You can always make them the others, and you'll always have white people on your side. 'Trying to make this country whiter in a way that is overt, that is political, that is hateful, and allows you to keep the right to make all people other than you criminals based on whatever you make the laws, including just being brown, not having a license or being a criminal, because you're 'just like all those other dirty Mexican rapists that we had to build a wall to keep out.'' Le Batard wasn't arguing to forgive illegal immigration, but rather explained Trump's reaction to the problem is designed to marginalize America's ethnic minorities while rallying the President's white base. 'We can hide under the semantics argument of, well of course illegal people who are here committing crimes shouldn't be here,' Le Batard said. 'But that doesn't mean you should make all brown people and black people that.' Trump's supporters in the media recently began arguing for a ban on third-world immigration. Podcasters Matt Walsh and Charlie Kirk issued similar posts on the subject, with the latter claiming a declining white population in Los Angeles is proof of the 'Great Replacement Theory' – an idea that originated with white supremacists.
