Appeals court allows Trump to keep national guard in L.A. with marines on the way
A U.S. appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of national guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilization.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Trump, but it does leave command of the guard with the president for now.
Earlier on Thursday, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer found that Trump's deployment of the guard was unlawful. Breyer's 36-page ruling had ordered the national guard to return to the control of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who had brought the case.
It was a short-lived victory for Newsom, as Breyer's order was paused about two and a half hours later.
Asked for a comment, Newsom's press office referred to the governor's statement after the initial ruling, and noted that the appeals court put a temporary pause on the ruling but did not reverse it.
"I'm confident, on the basis of the review of the 36 pages — absolutely it will stand," Newsom said of the district judge's order.
The three-judge appeals court panel consisted of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of Breyer's order.
The court's action, called an administrative stay, gives the appeals judges additional time to consider the Trump administration's request to block Breyer's order while litigation in the case continues.
Law enforcement officers guard Los Angeles City Hall during a protest against federal immigration sweeps in Los Angeles on Thursday. |
REUTERS
Trump summoned the national guard on Saturday in response to protests that had broken out over immigration raids, then on Monday ordered the U.S. marines to support the guard.
A battalion of 700 U.S. marines is expected to arrive on Friday, marking an extraordinary use of military forces to support civilian police operations within the United States.
The troops have stood guard at a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks.
The guard had also accompanied Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on operations to detain immigrants.
In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters — a contention made by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, among others — and depriving the state of the ability to use the guard for other purposes.
Bass on Thursday called on ICE officers to stand down from the intensified series of raids that led to the protests, saying the local economy could be harmed as immigrants stayed home from work and school for fear of being snatched off the streets.
"The peace that we need to have happen needs to begin in Washington, and we need to stop the raids," Bass told a news conference as supporters flanking her broke out in a chant of "Stop the raids."
"Peace begins with ICE leaving Los Angeles," said Bass, who has imposed a nighttime curfew over one square mile (2.5 square km) of downtown L.A.
U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, who interrupted a news conference held by U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, is removed from the venue in Los Angeles on Thursday. |
REUTERS
Bass spoke after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to "liberate" Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him.
The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarization generated by Trump's hard-line approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power.
Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice.
Democrats have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Trump's authoritarianism.
Americans are divided over Trump's decision to activate the military. A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 48% of respondents agreed with a statement that the president should "deploy the military to bring order to the streets" when protests turned violent, while 41% disagreed.
Between the rulings, Newsom said the national guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling.
But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling Breyer's ruling "an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief."
Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterizing the protests in Los Angeles as a "rebellion," but Breyer said in his temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard.
"The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote.
Trump has said if he had not ordered in the national guard the city would be in flames.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nikkei Asia
10 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump cancels Biden order blocking Nippon Steel takeover of US Steel
TOKYO -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday cancelled the decision by former President Joe Biden to block Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel, paving the way for the Japanese company to finalize its takeover of its American counterpart. Alongside Trump's decision, the two companies also signed a National Security Agreement with the U.S. government.


The Mainichi
27 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Trump effectively approves Nippon Steel's takeover of US Steel
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday effectively approved a deal for Nippon Steel Corp. to acquire United States Steel Corp., reversing his staunch opposition to the Japanese company's takeover bid after it committed to investing heavily in the struggling American producer. Nippon Steel said Trump has "approved" their "historic partnership that will unleash unprecedented investments in steelmaking in the United States." Trump's green light for what he has described as a "great partnership" between the Japanese and U.S. producers caps a saga that began in December 2023, when both sides first announced the proposed $14.1 billion deal.


Asahi Shimbun
28 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
President Donald Trump talks to workers as he tours U.S. Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant, Friday, May 30, 2025, in West Mifflin, Pa. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) WASHINGTONーーPresident Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday.