POINT: By striking Iran, Trump made the right decision
President Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear capability represents a turning point in modern foreign policy — one that will keep the United States, the American people, and Americans abroad safe for years. It sends a signal to our adversaries: America will not tolerate the threat of nuclear-armed rogue states.
The name of my organization, the Center to Advance Security in America, is self-explanatory. We educate citizens about the actions of our government that affect their peace and safety. We believe Trump's decision was bold and consistent with his 'America First' outlook.
There is widespread agreement across the Western world that Iran must never possess nuclear weapons. Iran is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans and thousands of others worldwide. Iranian leadership has called for 'Death to America' and for the destruction of Israel. Iran has sponsored terrorist attacks and assassination attempts on four continents and in the United States. It may have helped plan Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, atrocities in Israel, in which 1,000 Israelis were killed and American citizens were taken hostage.
This is a regime that thrives on violence and destabilization, undergirded by martyrdom in the cause of jihad. Iran's nuclear ambitions are the logical next step.
Every president since Bill Clinton has agreed in principle that Iran should never have a nuclear weapon. They haven't all shown the same resolve, however.
Former President Barack Obama's nuclear deal gave significant concessions in exchange for minimal limitations on Iran's nuclear program — he even sent them $1.3 billion in cash to sweeten the deal.
Not to be outdone, President Joe Biden released $6 billion to Iran in September 2023 as part of a prisoner swap. The administration claimed the money was only for humanitarian use. But money is fungible, and the American people aren't that gullible.
Trump's 'America First' foreign policy has always made room for denying the mullahs nuclear weapons. First, it would be negligent to shrug off a threat to the homeland. Even before Iran could develop intercontinental missile technology, 'dirty bombs' or 'suitcase nukes' could wreak destruction on a U.S. city.
Second, consider the trouble Iran causes without a nuke, and then imagine a world vulnerable to Iranian nuclear blackmail. Finally, the mutually assured destruction that has maintained stability between nuclear-armed powers since the 1950s may not hold sway over a regime that welcomes martyrdom.
From his first day on the 2016 campaign trail, Trump has been consistent in saying that Iran would never obtain a nuclear weapon. His strategy unfolded in several phases: withdrawing from Obama's Iran deal in 2018, reimposing crippling economic sanctions, designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization, eliminating terror mastermind Qassem Soleimani, and negotiating the Abraham Accords, which brought historic diplomatic breakthroughs between Israel and Arab nations.
In April, Trump issued a final 60-day deadline for Iran to abandon its nuclear program. Iran didn't comply, so the U.S. moved to destroy its nuclear facilities. This decisive action will reshape global perceptions of American leadership and deterrence.
Iran's token 'retaliation' against an American base was ineffectual, and it has agreed to a ceasefire with Israel — a testament to the effectiveness of the administration's strength-based diplomacy.
The era of red lines with no consequences is over. 'Peace through Strength' is more than a slogan — it is a proven doctrine for ensuring American national security. This is the right path forward for the safety of the American people and a powerful reaffirmation that Trump is willing to act to put 'America First.'
–––––
ABOUT THE WRITER
James Fitzpatrick is the director of the Center to Advance Security in America. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.
–––––
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Makes Legal Threat To CNN And The New York Times Over Their Reporting On Iran Intel Assessment
Donald Trump has again threatened news outlets over coverage he dislikes, this time The New York Times and CNN over their reporting on a preliminary intelligence assessment that raised doubts that the U.S. strikes on Iran destroyed their nuclear program. The White House has been on the warpath against journalists over their reporting, even though the press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, has acknowledged the existence of the intelligence assessment. Trump and his allies have go so far as to accuse CNN and the Times of denigrating the members of the military who carried out the strikes, even though their reporting was not critical of how the mission was carried out. More from Deadline Bill Moyers Dies: Influential Public Media Journalist And Commentator And Former White House Press Secretary Was 91 Peter Bart: Barbara Walters Built A Career On Trust In A Bygone Era Far Removed From Today Pete Hegseth Chides Former Fox News Colleague Jennifer Griffin As "About The Worst" During Defense Secretary's Press-Bashing Briefing Trump has insisted that Iran's nuclear capabilities were 'obliterated.' Per the Times, Trump demanded a retraction and an apology, as his attorney, Alejandro Brito, described the reporting as 'false,' 'defamatory' and 'unpatriotic.' David McCraw, senior vice president and deputy general counsel for the Times, 'No retraction is needed. No apology will be forthcoming.' McGraw wrote to Brito, 'While the Trump administration protests that the assessments were only preliminary — which, by the way, was the second word of our article — and that later assessments may come to different conclusions, no one in the administration disputes that the first assessments said exactly what the article said they did: the destruction caused by the raid was not as significant as the president's remarks suggested.' He added that the 'American public has a right to know whether the attack on Iran — funded by the tax dollars and of enormous consequence to every citizen — was a success. We rely on our intelligence services to provide the kind of impartial assessment that we all need in a democracy to judge our country's foreign policy and the quality of our leaders' decisions. It would be irresponsible for a news organization to suppress that information and deny the public the right to hear it. And it would be even more irresponsible for a president to use the threat of libel litigation to try to silence a publication that dared to report that the trained, professional and patriotic intelligence experts employed by the U.S. government thought that the president may have gotten it wrong in his initial remarks to the country.' CNN also received a legal threat. A spokesperson said 'we can confirm we received a letter and responded to it, rejecting the claims in the letter.' Trump has called for reporters on the stories to be fired, but has singled out CNN's Natasha Bertrand. On Thursday, at the press briefing, Leavitt attacked Bertrand's past reporting. The network has said that they stand behind '100% behind' Bertrand and her work. The president's legal threat is not unusual. He has previously sued the Times and CNN, but the various lawsuits were dismissed. He sued CBS over the way that a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris was edited. The network has said that the lawsuit is meritless, as do a number of legal scholars, but its attorneys are in settlement talks with Trump's team. CBS parent Paramount Global is seeking administration approval for its merger with Skydance Media. Earlier on Thursday, Trump's defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, held a press conference in which he also bashed media outlets for reporting on the intelligence report. 'You cheer against Trump so hard, in your DNA and in your blood, cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad, you have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes,' Hegseth said to the journalists at the Pentagon. He said that he was 'urging caution about premising an entire stories on biased leaks to biased publications to make something look bad. How about we take a beat, recognize first the success of our warriors, hold them up, tell their stories, celebrate that, wave an American flag, be proud of what we accomplished.' Best of Deadline 'The Buccaneers' Season 2 Soundtrack: From Griff To Sabrina Carpenter 'The Buccaneers' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Nine Perfect Strangers' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nike says Trump tariffs could raise its costs by $1bn
Nike says US President Donald Trump's tariffs on key trading partners could add around $1bn (£730m) to it costs this year. Company executives also said the the sportwear giant would cut its reliance on producing goods in China to ease the impact of US trade policies. Last month, Nike said it would raise prices on some trainers and clothing in the US from early June, weeks after rival Adidas warned it would have to hike the cost of goods due to tariffs. Nike's shares jumped by more than 10% in extended trading after the firm forecast a smaller drop in first quarter revenue than many analysts had expected. The company's earnings for the last three months also topped estimates, despite being its worst quarterly figures for more than three years. Nike announced fourth quarter revenue of $11.1bn - the lowest since the third quarter of 2022. Chief financial officer Matthew Friend said Nike would move some production from China, which was hit with the biggest tariff increases, to other countries in response to Trump's tariffs. China currently manufacturers 16% of Nike footwear that ends up in the US. Mr Friend said that figure would be cut to a "high single-digit percentage range" by the end of May 2026. Trump announced sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs on most goods from countries around the world on 2 April. In April, he suspended most of those tariffs to allow for talks with the affected countries, with one top adviser promising "90 deals in 90 days". The move dropped tariffs to 10%, instead of the far higher rates that goods from many trading partners faced. What tariffs has Trump announced and why? The White House is now facing growing questions about what the president is planning to do about tariffs, as the 90-day pause is due to expire on 9 July. In remarks at the White House on Thursday, Trump maintained that talks were going well, pointing to an agreement reached with China and saying there was another "coming up with India, maybe". But he also warned "We're not going to make deals with everybody". "Some we're just going to send them a letter, say thank you very much. You're going to pay 25, 35, 45%. That's the easy way to do it," he said. "My people don't want to do it that way. They want to do some of it, but they want to make more deals than I would do," he added. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later told Bloomberg that the agreement with China formalised terms laid out in trade talks, which included a commitment from Beijing to deliver rare earths minerals used in everything from planes to wind turbines. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has previously raised the possibility that Trump could extend the deadline, depending on how talks are going. On Thursday, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said both that the deadline was "not critical" and that Trump was prepared to present countries with "deals" that would set new tariff rates. The US and China announced an agreement earlier this month aimed at ensuring US supply to critical magnets and rare earths, after concerns about access had risked re-igniting trade tensions between the two economic superpowers. At the White House on Thursday, Trump said he had "signed" a deal with China without giving further details. "The administration and China agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement," a White House official said later. Trade between the two sides was nearly shut down after Trump raised tariffs and China hit back in a barrage of tariffs in April that had nearly shut down trade between the two countries. The US and China subsequently agreed to reduce - but not eliminate - those tariffs. What tariffs has Trump announced and why? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Dem Sen Briefed On Iran: I Don't Think Trump 'Was Telling The Truth' - Erin Burnett OutFront - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Dem Sen Briefed On Iran: I Don't Think Trump 'Was Telling The Truth' Erin Burnett OutFront 48 mins A democratic senator says Iran's nuclear program was not obliterated after receiving a closed door intelligence briefing. Republicans are coming to Trump's defense. Plus, Zoran Mamdami joins to discuss his stunning victory against Andrew Cuomo in New York City.
