ABC to learn fate in lawsuit by pro-Gaza radio host
A casual ABC radio host and Palestine advocate taken off air after three days on the job will soon learn if she is owed damages for unlawful termination.
Antoinette Lattouf was hired for a week-long stint on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program before Christmas 2023.
She was let go after sharing a Human Rights Watch post that said Israel was using starvation as a "weapon of war" in Gaza.
She has taken her unlawful termination case to the Federal Court which is due to hand down its judgment on Wednesday.
The 41-year-old is seeking compensation and penalties.
She claims she was fired from the job because of her race and political opinion after publicly commenting on the plight of Palestinians during the ongoing conflict with Israel.
During a hearing in February, Justice Daryl Rangiah heard Lattouf was let go 48 hours into a campaign by a pro-Israeli group which sent a barrage of complaints to ABC executives including then-chair Ita Buttrose.
The public broadcaster has been accused of taking a partisan view despite claiming to be an impartial news source.
However, the ABC denies this.
The broadcaster claims it took Lattouf off the air because she failed to follow a direction not to post about Israel or the war in Gaza during her five-day shift.
She rejects this, saying her direct supervisor Elizabeth Green agreed she could post facts from reputable sources.
As well as Ms Buttrose, she has also targeted the ABC's former content chief Chris Oliver-Taylor and former managing director David Anderson as being responsible for the allegedly unlawful termination.
She has blamed the broadcaster for making her sacking public after an article in The Australian was put out before she had returned home the day she was fired.
ABC executives blamed head of capital city networks Steve Ahern for putting the organisation in an "unacceptable position" by failing to assess Lattouf's history before hiring her, the court previously was told.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
19 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared
If the Iranian regime survives the conflict with its sworn enemies, it will be no thanks to its powerful autocratic comrades, China and Russia. With a fragile ceasefire now holding after Israel and the United States launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran has emerged a more diminished and isolated figure on the international stage. Yet its supporters in Beijing and Moscow proved unwilling to come to its rescue – even as US President Donald Trump and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu mused openly about regime change. If Russia's invasion of Ukraine gave rise to a so-called new axis of CRINK powers (China, Russia, Iran and North Korea) – as many western experts argued it had, pointing to the countries' varying levels of support for Moscow's war efforts – then the past 12 days have demonstrated its limits. This unofficial grouping, according to a theory popularised in Washington circles, represents an emerging 'axis of upheaval', coalescing around a shared ideological view of anti-US hegemony and is pursued through strengthening diplomatic, economic and military ties. Loading But when tested this month, the heavy hitters – China and Russia – offered only rhetorical support for Iran. In Beijing's case, those statements were particularly cautiously worded. An 'axis of resistance' became an 'axis of bystanders', as Tom Miller from consultancy firm Gavekal Research put it. With its resources tied up in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that no concrete support was coming from Moscow.
The Age
19 minutes ago
- The Age
An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared
If the Iranian regime survives the conflict with its sworn enemies, it will be no thanks to its powerful autocratic comrades, China and Russia. With a fragile ceasefire now holding after Israel and the United States launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran has emerged a more diminished and isolated figure on the international stage. Yet its supporters in Beijing and Moscow proved unwilling to come to its rescue – even as US President Donald Trump and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu mused openly about regime change. If Russia's invasion of Ukraine gave rise to a so-called new axis of CRINK powers (China, Russia, Iran and North Korea) – as many western experts argued it had, pointing to the countries' varying levels of support for Moscow's war efforts – then the past 12 days have demonstrated its limits. This unofficial grouping, according to a theory popularised in Washington circles, represents an emerging 'axis of upheaval', coalescing around a shared ideological view of anti-US hegemony and is pursued through strengthening diplomatic, economic and military ties. Loading But when tested this month, the heavy hitters – China and Russia – offered only rhetorical support for Iran. In Beijing's case, those statements were particularly cautiously worded. An 'axis of resistance' became an 'axis of bystanders', as Tom Miller from consultancy firm Gavekal Research put it. With its resources tied up in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that no concrete support was coming from Moscow.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Antoinette Lattouf defeats ABC in unlawful dismissal case
Antoinette Lattouf has won her legal case against the ABC after she was unlawfully dismissed over posts she made about the Israel-Gaza war on social media in 2023.
