Public Sector Union Out Of Touch With The Reality Of Real Work
Press Release – ACT New Zealand
The idea that Wellington bureaucrats should be entitled to stay home in their pyjamas while the taxpayers funding their inflated salaries head into work each day is frankly insulting.
'The Public Service Association taking the Government to the Employment Relations Authority over new work-from-home rules shows just how entitled and out of touch the union has become,' says ACT Public Service spokesperson Todd Stephenson.
'Most Kiwis don't get to unilaterally decide their working conditions – especially when it compromises productivity. The idea that Wellington bureaucrats should be entitled to stay home in their pyjamas while the taxpayers funding their inflated salaries head into work each day is frankly insulting.
'In no other workplace would employees get to dictate terms like this, let alone set their lawyers on their employer for asking them to turn up.
'In the real world, working conditions are negotiated one-on-one. If you can prove a flexible setup won't drag down performance, you reach an agreement. That's how normal jobs work.
'Instead, the PSA wants to cling to Labour's failed 'flexible by default' fantasy – a policy that left Wellington's streets empty, public service performance in decline, and no one able to say who was working where, or on what.
'In Opposition, ACT asked about working from home, but our questions went unanswered. The new policy puts an end to that confusion and restores accountability for what people do, or don't, deliver.
'It takes a special kind of organisation to do worse with more money. Rather than fighting for the right to stay home, the PSA should go outside, touch grass, and get back to the office to deliver for the Kiwis who pay their wages.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Minnows, pike and parliamentary sovereignty
"In a lake stocked with minnows and minnow-eating pike, freedom for the pike means death to the minnows." So said 20th century philosopher Isaiah Berlin. He was warning us to be wary of occasions when the rich and powerful argue for greater freedom. They already have a great deal of freedom, usually a lot more than the rest of us. Act New Zealand's proposed Regulatory Standards Bill appears to be one of these occasions. The Bill states that any proposed legislation will have to be held up to certain principles. However, they are a very limited number of principles, mostly based on individual rights and property. Why just the principles important to Act? Why not hold legislation accountable to how it will affect child poverty? How it will impact on rights to education and health? Whether it will lead to increases in crime or unemployment? There are any number of principles they could align legislation to, and yet individual and property rights is where they are focused. Why have principles that primarily benefit the rich and powerful? Why not have principles that benefit the majority, especially those in these unending crises we have had since the Global Financial Crash in 2008? One of the main objections to the Regulations Standards Bill is that it puts limitations on Parliament's sovereignty and it is beyond ironic that one of Act's objections to the way that the Treaty of Waitangi was being applied was that it encroached on Parliament's sovereignty. We have a system that has created a lot of wealth for certain individuals, and some of those who have accumulated that wealth want to ensure that they keep it and are also able to accumulate it at an even faster rate. This month the NBR announced that the total valuation of New Zealand's rich list had risen from $95.55 billion last year to $102.1b this year. Their wealth has gone up by 6.8% and is not an outlier. In 2023 the valuation of the rich list was $72.79b, meaning that their combined wealth had gone up 50% in the two years that included a recession and a cost of living crisis. The annual inflation rate is currently 2.5%. The New Zealand cash rate is 3.25%, Kiwi Bonds are around 3.5%, and one-year term deposits are less than 4%. So the very wealthy are accumulating wealth at a much faster pace than the rest of society. Some of the money the very rich make is ploughed back into their businesses to make them more efficient and productive, and some is used to look for further business opportunities. Sometimes these are very risky opportunities, and sometimes that riskiness is a surprise such as earthquakes, cyclones and their close cousin, presidentially declared tariffs. However, a lot of their wealth appears to go into buying assets. United Kingdom economist Gary Stevenson claims that the super wealthy live in an economic black hole that sucks in wealth. If you have $100million and your wealth conservatively goes up 6% that is $6m a year. That is a lot of money to try to spend on holidays, food and clothes. They can't spend that much and so what they do, according to Stephenson, is buy assets. They are always ahead of inflation so their money just grows and the value of the assets they have, and the assets they buy, goes up. It is his explanation as to why it is so much tougher to buy a house than 20 years ago and why real estate, gold and the stock market continually trend upwards. Structurally, if it is true that our current system is tailor-made to shift wealth from one part of society to a very small minority of society, it is no wonder they want to lock it all in place before the rest of us find out. At the same time as our small population of very wealthy are growing wealthier, the number of homeless people is skyrocketing. Statistics New Zealand claimed at the 2023 census over 112,000 New Zealanders were "severely housing deprived", including 61% living in "uninhabitable housing". This did not include any of the 396,000 people they had no information on. Change needs to come, but not in legislation that locks in the gains of the top 5% and locks in the losses of the majority. We don't have to worry about the rich, they will be OK. Even if they lose their fortunes, they have the skills and networks to bounce back up again. We need an economy that rewards risk and innovation but at the same time provides affordable housing and health, education and social services. Parliament is perfectly able to do all this without passing the Regulatory Standards Bill. Submissions on the Regulatory Standards Bill close on June 23. • Dr Anaru Eketone is an associate professor in the University of Otago's social and community work programme.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Labour Lets Greens Take The Opposition Lead On Finance
Press Release – New Zealand National Party Its easy to discount the Greens promises as ridiculous, but Labours approach is looking increasingly similar. The only difference is the Greens can be bothered explaining theirs.' It is no surprise that the Greens' new 'fiscal strategy' calls for more spending, never-ending budget deficits, more debt and more tax to be saddled on Kiwis, reflecting what appears to be Labour's approach too, says National's Finance Spokesperson Nicola Willis. 'It's easy to discount the Greens' promises as ridiculous, but Labour's approach is looking increasingly similar. The only difference is the Greens can be bothered explaining theirs. 'Both parties, and their mates in Te Pati Māori, are following a recipe that stretches the bounds of fiscal reality. 'So far, Labour has opposed almost every savings measure and signed up for billions of dollars to reinstate old policies, while also saying they will increase spending across the board, continue this Government's infrastructure projects and repeal several measures designed to grow the economy. 'And that's before they tuck their knees under the negotiating table with their four co-deputy prime ministers in the Greens and Te Pati Māori. 'Our kids cannot afford the generational debt and massive tax hikes that would come from a Labour-Greens-Te Pati Māori Government, which would double down on the inflationary, high-tax approach that wrecked the economy in the first place. 'While the Greens have done at least some work in opposition, all Kiwis have seen from Labour is vast spending promises, ever-changing positions on everything from debt limits to public-private partnerships to pay equity. And of course, the promise to tax Kiwis up to their eyeballs if given the opportunity to govern again. 'In contrast, National has spent 18 months pulling every lever possible to get the economy growing after it was sent into the ditch by Labour and Chris Hipkins. 'We are reducing red tape, backing our farmers, ruthlessly pursuing trade opportunities, fast-tracking crucial infrastructure and encouraging investment in new kit with Investment Boost. 'It's been hard, but our plan is working, with growth expected to average 2.7%, wages growing faster than inflation every year, and 240,000 jobs expected to be created over the next four years.'
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Labour Lets Greens Take The Opposition Lead On Finance
Press Release – New Zealand National Party Its easy to discount the Greens promises as ridiculous, but Labours approach is looking increasingly similar. The only difference is the Greens can be bothered explaining theirs.' It is no surprise that the Greens' new 'fiscal strategy' calls for more spending, never-ending budget deficits, more debt and more tax to be saddled on Kiwis, reflecting what appears to be Labour's approach too, says National's Finance Spokesperson Nicola Willis. 'It's easy to discount the Greens' promises as ridiculous, but Labour's approach is looking increasingly similar. The only difference is the Greens can be bothered explaining theirs. 'Both parties, and their mates in Te Pati Māori, are following a recipe that stretches the bounds of fiscal reality. 'So far, Labour has opposed almost every savings measure and signed up for billions of dollars to reinstate old policies, while also saying they will increase spending across the board, continue this Government's infrastructure projects and repeal several measures designed to grow the economy. 'And that's before they tuck their knees under the negotiating table with their four co-deputy prime ministers in the Greens and Te Pati Māori. 'Our kids cannot afford the generational debt and massive tax hikes that would come from a Labour-Greens-Te Pati Māori Government, which would double down on the inflationary, high-tax approach that wrecked the economy in the first place. 'While the Greens have done at least some work in opposition, all Kiwis have seen from Labour is vast spending promises, ever-changing positions on everything from debt limits to public-private partnerships to pay equity. And of course, the promise to tax Kiwis up to their eyeballs if given the opportunity to govern again. 'In contrast, National has spent 18 months pulling every lever possible to get the economy growing after it was sent into the ditch by Labour and Chris Hipkins. 'We are reducing red tape, backing our farmers, ruthlessly pursuing trade opportunities, fast-tracking crucial infrastructure and encouraging investment in new kit with Investment Boost. 'It's been hard, but our plan is working, with growth expected to average 2.7%, wages growing faster than inflation every year, and 240,000 jobs expected to be created over the next four years.'
