How would recent events in America appear if they happened elsewhere?
At times the gesture can seem like a cliche, but I like to imagine, for the sake of perspective, how political developments in the United States would be covered by the media if they were happening in any other country. I imagine that Thursday's events in Los Angeles might be spoken of like this:
A prominent opposition leader was attacked by regime security forces on Thursday in the presence of the national security tsar, as he voiced opposition to the federal military occupation of the US's second-largest city following street demonstrations against the regime's mass deportation efforts.
Alex Padilla, a senator from California, was pushed against a wall, removed from the room, and then tackled to the ground and handcuffed, reportedly by Secret Service and FBI agents, at a press conference in LA by Donald Trump's homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem. He was trying to ask a question about the deployment of marines and national guard forces to LA in his capacity as Angelenos' elected representative. Padilla, the son of Mexican immigrants, was later released; Noem, speaking to reporters after the incident, said both that she knows the senator and that agents tackled and detained him because neither she nor they knew who he was. In a video of the attack, Padilla can be heard identifying himself as a senator as Noem's security forces begin to grab and shove him.
Seconds later, after he has been pushed out of the room, Padilla can be heard yelling to the men attacking him: 'Hands off!' The video cuts out after a man steps in front of the camera to block the shot, and tells the person filming, 'there is no recording allowed here, per FBI rights,' something of an odd statement to make at a press conference. Several federal court decisions have upheld the right to record law enforcement.
The violence toward a sitting senator is yet another escalation of administration's dramatic assertions of extra-constitutional authority, and another item in their ongoing assertion of the illegitimacy of dissent, even from elected leaders. In responding with violence toward the senator's question, Noem, her security forces and by extension the Trump administration more broadly, are signaling that they will treat opposition, even from elected officials, as insubordination.
They do not seesenators as equals to be negotiated with or spoken to in good faith, because they do not believe that any of the people's representatives – and certainly not a Democrat – has any authority that they need to respect. Padilla, like the people of Los Angeles and the people of the United States, was not treated by the Trump administration as a citizen, but as a subject.
The attack on Padilla by security forces, and the viral video of him being tackled to the ground and handcuffed by armed men, has threatened to overshadow the content of Noem's press conference, which underscored in rhetoric this same sense of absolute authority and contempt for dissent that the attack on the senator demonstrated with action.
Noem was in Los Angeles to tout the administration's military escalation against citizens there, who have taken to the streets as part of a growing protest movement against Trump's mass deportation scheme, which has led to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (Ice) kidnapping of many Angelenos and left families, colleagues, neighbors and friends bereft of their beloved community members.
The protests have been largely peaceful – Ice and police have initiated violence against some demonstrators – but the Trump administration has taken them as an opportunity to crush dissent with force. The deployment of the California national guard – in violation of a law that requires the administration to secure cooperation from the governor – and the transfer of 700 marines to the city has marked a new willingness of the Trump administration to use military force against citizens who oppose its policies.
But to the Trump administration, the Americans who have taken to the streets to voice their opposition to Trump policies are no Americans at all. 'We are not going away,' Noem said of the military occupation of Los Angeles. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists.' By this, she meant the Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass and California governor Gavin Newsom, who are not socialists but Democrats.
The term – 'liberate' – evokes the US's imperialist adventures abroad, in which such rhetoric was used to provide rhetorical cover for the toppling of foreign regimes, many of them democratically elected. The people's elected representatives – be it Newsom or Bass or Padilla – are not figures they need to be 'liberated' from. That is, not unless you consider the only legitimate 'people' to be Trump supporters, and the only legitimate governance to be Republican governance.
Trump, as he expands his authoritarian ambitions and uses more and more violence to pursue them, has made his own will into the sum total of 'the will of the people'. All those other people – the ones marching in the streets, and trying to stop the kidnappings of their neighbors – don't count.
A few hours after Noem's goons attacked Padilla, a federal district court judge ordered the Trump administration to relinquish control over the California national guard, agreeing with California that the guard had been illegally seized when Trump assumed control of the armed units without Newsom's consent. 'That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' said district judge Charles Breyer in a hearing on the case earlier that day. 'It's not that the leader can simply say something and then it becomes it.'
The judge was pointing to the constitutional order, to the rule of law, to the guarantees, once taken for granted, that the president has limits on his power. He gave the Trump administration about 18 hours to hand control of the national guard back to the state of California. It was not immediately clear whether they would comply. So much for us having a 'law and order' president.
Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Australian man shot to death at a villa on the tourist island of Bali
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump's military parade taps an ancient tradition of power: from Mesopotamia to Maga
To Donald Trump, the inspiration is the pomp and pageantry of Bastille Day, France's annual celebration of the 1789 revolution. For his critics, it is redolent of the authoritarian militarism proudly projected by autocracies like Russia, China and North Korea. Despite its military prowess and undoubted superpowers status, overt military displays in civilian settings are the exception rather than the rule in US history. But in bringing to the streets of Washington DC on Saturday the military parade Trump has long hankered after he – consciously or otherwise – is tapping into a tradition that harks back to antiquity. The first known instances of victorious exhibitions of military might date back to ancient Mesopotamia, whose territory now comprises modern-day Iraq and parts of Turkey, Syria and Iran. Mesopotamian emperors decorated their palaces and citadels with friezes portraying heroic conquests. Portraits would display a massive potentate striding ahead of his troops and crushing on his opponents' skulls. Military parades were also integral rituals of the Roman Empire, where generals and emperors who had won battles would march from the field of Mars into the temple of Jupiter, witnessed by thousands of adoring peasants. The looted possessions of conquered nations were said to be conveyed in chariots, while abducted barbarians were dragged along in chains. Slaves were encouraged to murmur 'Memento mori' (remember that you will die) to their captors, it is said, as part of a drama supposed to link the Roman public to its leaders. In one depicted image, created in the 19th century by the artist Bartolomeo Pinelli, the Roman military leader, Marcus Claudius Marcellus, is seen leading his triumphant army to Rome after defeating the Gauls, having personally triumphed over their leader in one-to-one combat. These Roman rituals were later adopted by European countries as they evolved into nation states and sought to project images of power and military potency. The military parade is widely believed to have been refined in Prussia, a European state that later became part of a unified Germany under the leadership of Otto von Bismarck. Featuring choreography including salutes, precise spacing between soldiers, and goose steps, the Prussian model became a prototype for other armies in Europe and beyond. Other European countries had different versions, that have in some cases become annual rituals. In Britain, starting during the reign of Charles II, Trooping the Colour is held every year on Horse Guards Parade near Buckingham Palace to celebrate the sovereign's birthday. This year's parade, celebrating the birthday of the current King Charles, coincidentally takes place on Saturday, which is also Trump's 79th birthday. Staring under the Soviet Union and continuing in present day Russia, Moscow plays host on 9 May every year to victory day, commemorating victory over Nazi Germany in the second world war. During the cold war, the parades, featuring Red Army soldiers marching through Red Square viewed by the Soviet leadership, became a symbol of Moscow's implacable hostility to the west in the ideological struggle between capitalism and communism. Red Square was the venue for what is believed to be the largest military parade ever staged, on 24 June 1945, when 40,000 troops and 1,800 armored vehicles passed through to mark victory over Germany. This year's occasion, marking the 80th anniversary of the war's end, featured even greater pomp than usual, with troops from China, Egypt, Belarus and several central Asian countries marching alongside their Russian counterparts. China's leader, Xi Jinping, was among several international statesman joining Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, in the reviewing stands. Comparable displays of military muscle are seen in China. The national day parade in Beijing's Tiananmen Square – marking the anniversary of the Communist regime's ascent to power – is now a once-a-decade affair but used to occur more regularly. The most recent event, which took place on 1 October, 2019 to celebrate the regime's 70th birthday, was billed as the biggest military parade and mass pageant ever held in China. Beijing's ally, North Korea, holds annual parades to celebrate the date of the state's founding, as well as separate events to mark the birthdays of its dynastic leaders. Strikingly, if less well-documented, Pyong Yang's parades are mirrored by equivalent events in democratic South Korea, which stages armed forces day annually on 1 October to mark the anniversary of its troops crossing the 38th parallel during the Korean War. By contrast, choreographed exhibitions are much rarer in the US. The most recent parade was instigated by Trump himself during his first presidency when – apparently triggered by having watched a Bastille Day parade alongside the French president, Emmanuel Macron, in Paris – his administration organized a Salute to America event to coincide with the 4 July celebrations in 2019. That display on Washington's national mall included aircraft flyovers, presentations of military vehicles and an address by Trump at the Lincoln memorial. It was the first military parade in the US Capitol since a June 1991 extravaganza, watched by an estimated 200,000 spectators, to celebrate expelling Saddam Hussein's Iraqi forces from Kuwait in the first Gulf war. Tanks and Patriot missile batteries were rolled out while Stealth fighter jets flew above a parade led by general Norman Schwarzkopf, the commander of coalition forces in the conflict. The 1953 presidential inauguration of Dwight Eisenhower, a former general of US and allied forces in the second world war, included a parade by 22,000 troops and even a nuclear-capable canon. In similar vein, John F Kennedy, a decorated military veteran, had military hardware on show at his 1961 inaugural. Others notable military parades took place to mark the end of the first and second world war, as well as the American Civil War. A ticker tape welcome was afforded victorious troops, including 13,000 members of the 82nd airborne division, in a spectacular victory parade in New York in 1946 that was seen by an estimated four million people. Similar parades were staged in New York and Washington in 1919, with General John Pershing, commander of the American Expeditionary Force that had fought in France, leading 25,000 parading soldiers in full battle dress. In 1865, after Abraham Lincoln's assassination in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War, his successor Andrew Johnson ordered a two-day grand review of the armies. The result saw about 145,000 soldiers from the armies of the Potomac, Georgia and Tennessee marching down Pennsylvania Avenue, to be reviewed by victorious Union generals, Ulysses S Grant, William Sherman and George Meade. In general, however, US presidents have avoided explicitly militaristic displays – until now. A stark contrast to Trump's bullish attitude was offered by his Republican predecessor, Gerald Ford, who declined to take part in the military parades organized for the 1976 bicentennial celebrations, citing the enduring negative sentiment over the Vietnam war. Ford's posture may seem extreme but it may be more in keeping with the feelings of America's founding fathers towards militarism, according to Jonathan Alter, a historian who has chronicled several US presidencies. 'The United States was founded by men who were admirers of the Roman Republic, which had an important law that military commanders could not bring their troops into Rome,' he explained. The law, however was violated by Julius Caesar, who crossed the Rubicon river in 49BC with his forces at the start of a civil war that was to result in him acquiring dictatorial powers. 'It was a hugely significant thing, and a violation of 400 years of very important Roman tradition which the founders of our country were quite aware of,' Alter said. 'That's the way military dictatorship lies, if you have the head of state bringing his army into the capital. 'We have a more modest tradition when it comes to showing military power. It goes back to George Washington. There's always been a sense that tanks in the capital are a bad sign, even if it's just for a parade.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Tanks to roll through Washington as Trump hosts US military parade
Thousands of troops accompanied by dozens of tanks and aircraft will stream through the National Mall in Washington DC for a military parade billed as celebrating the US army's 250th birthday on Saturday – which also happens to be the day Donald Trump turns 79. The president has long desired to hold a military parade in the capital, and is finally getting his wish months after returning to the White House for a second term, and days after ordering federalized California national guard and US marines to the streets of Los Angeles in response to protests against deportations. Washington DC will briefly become the second American city to see soldiers in its streets, albeit for markedly different reasons. The all-day event held in the shadow of the Washington Monument will begin with a fitness competition and official ceremony to mark the army's birthday with a cake. At 6.30pm ET, 6,700 soldiers accompanied by armored vehicles such as the M1A2 Abrams tanks are scheduled to march down Constitution Avenue Northwest past the White House, as Black Hawk, Chinook and Apache helicopters fly overhead. Trump will appear to preside over an enlistment and reenlistment ceremony and accept a flag from the Golden Knights Parachute Team, before fireworks will fill the sky. 'I think it's time for us to celebrate a little bit. You know, we've had a lot of victories,' Trump said earlier this week. He has denied any connection between the parade and his birthday, instead noting that it coincides with the Flag Day holiday. While Washington DC is used to playing host to an array of events in and around the National Mall and White House, the parade has proven to be particularly disruptive to day-to-day life in the overwhelmingly Democratic city of more than 700,000. Coming at a cost the army estimates to be between $25m and $45m, the parade's preparations have caused the closure of busy roads for up to four days, while flights at Ronald Reagan Washington National airport will halt for an unspecified time during the event. City leaders have expressed concerns that the tanks and armored vehicles will damages roads not designed for their weight, and the army has said they will place metal plates on parts of the route, and outfit the equipment with rubber on their treads. 'President Trump's longstanding wish to waste millions of taxpayer dollars for a performative military parade in the style of authoritarian leaders is finally coming true on his birthday,' said Eleanor Holmes Norton, the federal district's Democratic non-voting delegate in the House of Representatives. She condemned the event's expected impact on the city's roads, as well as the decision to hold it after Trump's administration spent months firing federal workers or coaxing them to resign. 'Although this parade will feed President Trump's ego and perhaps his base, it will not serve any legitimate purpose,' Holmes Norton said.
