logo
How ‘Patron Saint of Renegades' Transformed Cancer Care

How ‘Patron Saint of Renegades' Transformed Cancer Care

Medscapea day ago

Chinese American physician researcher Min Chiu Li, MD, liked breaking barriers and busting chops.
Min Chiu Li, MD
At a time when virtually every cancer researcher in the US was White, he landed a job at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the 1950s. As colleagues got along to get along, he made enemies galore. Then he went rogue, insisting on treating patients with chemotherapy beyond the point when their tumors had disappeared.
The strategy turned out to be the right approach, even though Li lost his job over his failure to follow the rules. His work helped transform cancer therapy by showing how biomarkers tell the real story of how treatment is working.
Li and his colleague Roy Hertz, MD, 'set the stage for a modern approach to chemotherapy, set the stage for hope,' Alan J. Hunter, MD, an internist at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, who studied Li's life for a 2003 report, told Medscape Medical News .
Pushing Forward and Paying the Price
In the mid-1950s, Li and Hertz were thrilled when antifolate treatment eliminated a young woman's metastatic tumors from choriocarcinoma, a rare type of cancer that develops from placenta cells after pregnancy.
But Li was concerned because levels of a hormone linked to the cancerous cells didn't dwindle back to normal. 'Li became progressively obsessed with the number,' author and cancer physician Siddhartha Mukherjee, MD, DPhil, Columbia University, New York City, wrote in his landmark 2010 book The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer .
Li refused to stop treating the patient despite fears that toxicity would hurt her. 'He kept on doing it' because the therapy worked, recalled Vincent DeVita, Jr, MD, a former director of the NCI and cancer therapy pioneer in his own right, in an interview. 'And he was told to leave at that point.'
The stubborn researcher had been sacked. 'Li was already known to be a renegade, an iconoclast. This time, the NCI felt, he had gone too far,' Mukherjee wrote.
But it turned out that treating cancer beyond the point when tumors are eliminated can be a wise approach. That's because it can kill off a hidden reservoir of tumor cells that are only revealed through biomarkers. The strategy worked in Li's patients. The ultimate result: The obstinance that cost him his job led to the first chemotherapeutic cure of cancer in adults.
From China to Los Angeles, Chicago, and Beyond
As colleague and childhood leukemia treatment pioneer Emil J. Freireich, MD, DSc, wrote in a 2002 remembrance, Li came to the US from China in 1947 for postgraduate studies in bacteriology and immunology at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
However, Li couldn't return home due to the 1949 Communist revolution. He went on to jobs at Presbyterian Hospital in Chicago, the Sloan-Kettering Institute in New York City (now an arm of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), and then the NCI in Bethesda, Maryland.
As Hertz recalled in a 1998 NCI oral history interview, he hired Li as a clinical associate after a colleague recommended him. 'Li had become a naturalized American citizen, and as soon as he became American, he was an MD, and as soon as he got his citizenship papers, he got drafted [in the Korean War], and when he got drafted, he wanted to stay out of the draft,' said in a 1998 NCI oral history interview.
Mukherjee picks up the story: 'His current plan was to lie low in Bethesda until the war blew over.'
In the mid-1950s, Li decided to test the antifolate methotrexate — which had recently become a breakthrough new treatment for leukemia — in a 24-year-old woman who'd developed lung metastases from choriocarcinoma. 'There was nothing to lose,' Li wrote in a 1979 report.
'To everyone's surprise,' he wrote, the woman — who was near death — survived the next 20 hours. She ultimately recovered after Li continued to treat her even though her tumors had vanished.
'The response was real: A metastatic, solid cancer had vanished with chemotherapy,' Mukherjee wrote.
But the NCI wasn't impressed. 'They were calling this a spontaneous disappearance, probably an immunologic effect,' DeVita said. 'Everybody was pushing it off as something that was being done mostly by the body.'
As DeVita recalled, Li tried the approach again with a second patient, and it worked again. 'He was told not to do it anymore because it was too dangerous. And he kept on doing it.'
NCI Decides It's Seen Enough
In his 1979 report, Li says he then went to the State University of New York in 1957, but he doesn't explain why he left the NCI. In fact, he'd been fired for failing to follow protocol when he treated patients past the point when their tumors were gone.
But Li had discovered something vitally important about chemotherapy. According to Freireich, who died in 2021, Li realized that patients with metastatic choriocarcinoma 'required intensive systemic 'adjuvant' treatment despite the fact that they had no clinical evidence of disease. This has subsequently proven to be an extraordinarily important new principle in cancer treatment, ie, the treatment of patients who have no [physical] evidence of disease because of either tumor marker or other indirect evidence of a high probability of developing recurrent malignancies.'
But the cautious brass at the NCI concerned itself with rules. 'Li was accused of experimenting on people,' Freireich told Mukherjee in a 2009 interview. 'But of course, all of us were experimenting…To not experiment would mean to follow the old rules — to do absolutely nothing. Li wasn't prepared to sit back and watch and do nothing. So he was fired for acting on his convictions, for doing something.'
'Irascible, Irritable, Pugnacious'
Li, known as 'MC,' had tense relationships with some colleagues. 'He was very irascible, very irritable, pugnacious individual, got into fights with everybody…,' Hertz recalled in the oral history interview. 'He got into fights with a number of people, and I had to intervene a number of times.'
According to Hertz, 'we attributed [this] to his loneliness and his privations' — Li had left his family in China — and 'I was the only one knew how to get along with Li.'
But a lifelong rift apparently developed between the two colleagues. According to Hertz, Li believed he — Hertz — had taken the credit and won a major award for work that Li had done.
'I feel so bad about the whole thing,' Hertz said. 'I've had 40-odd clinical associates. He's the only one who does not honor me. The only one. And that hurts.'
Racism may have played a role in isolating Li from his colleagues. Or perhaps it caused him to be resentful and bitter. Maybe both. DeVita, the former director of the NCI, said casual racism was common in mid-century. 'People would do it and do it casually, not even think they were doing something. That could be part of it,' said DeVita, 90, who once went to Li's home to meet him.
Jonathan P. Yarris, MD, an emergency medicine physician in Oregon City, Oregon, who co-authored the 2003 report that examined the work of Hertz and Li, recalled that he interviewed Hertz and looked at old photos of his lab. 'There's usually one woman in the room, and sometimes, there's someone who's not White. I can only imagine what he heard in the hallways and how he was being slighted at every corner,' Yarris told Medscape Medical News .
As for Li's stubbornness, 'having been a person who didn't always follow the rules, I was sympathetic,' DeVita said. 'Sure, he didn't follow the rules. But what people should have done is look at what happened. Nobody was seriously harmed by what he did, and the patients were actually cured.'
More Medical Advances and a 'Renegade' Legacy
Li conducted more pioneering research after the NCI imbroglio. He pioneered combination drug treatment for testicular cancer, and DeVita considers him to be the first to cure the disease. Patients were cured 'maybe 10% or 20% [of the time] when he tried it, not the 80%, 90% we get now, but it was significant enough to be mentioned in publications, and he usually wasn't,' DeVita said. 'He was generally not given the credit he deserved.'
In 1972, Li won the Albert Lasker Medical Research Award, and colleague Freireich noted in his 2002 report that 'Dr Li remained active both in clinical research, laboratory research, patient care, and perhaps most important, teaching.'
Later, Freireich wrote, 'one of his most important publications appeared…in which he showed that 5-fluorouracil given after colon cancer surgery could result in substantial improvement in long-term survival rate.'
Li died in 1980, decades before several colleagues of his generation, from what Freireich calls 'a tragic illness.'
As for his legacy, Yarris said that Li was 'ultimately vindicated.' And while his name isn't remembered as well as some other cancer researchers, Li's reputation survives at the NCI. There, Mukherjee wrote, he's the 'patron saint of renegades.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dads, healthy fish and the benefits of singing: The week in Well+Being
Dads, healthy fish and the benefits of singing: The week in Well+Being

Washington Post

time37 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Dads, healthy fish and the benefits of singing: The week in Well+Being

You are reading our weekly Well+Being newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox every Thursday. This weekend is Father's Day. It's a time that can be joyous or bittersweet, depending on your relationship with your father. The latter is particularly true if your parent has died, like Jordan Sondler's. This week, she writes about how she found deep comfort looking for 'signs' from her father, a tip she learned from a grief-support group. I could definitely relate, since my dad died a few years ago. I have him to thank for my formidable lawn-mowing skills, ability to ride a bike and much more, so I always appreciate the other dads out there, like the one in our Ask a Therapist column looking for the best way to raise his young son with love and affection. But before that … You might know that eating seafood is good for your brain, eyes and heart health. So why aren't you eating more of it? If you don't have it on your regular rotation at mealtimes, you're not alone — 90 percent of adults aren't hitting recommended intake targets. Part of the problem is that the seafood landscape can be confusing. There are so many options — from shrimp to salmon to canned tuna — how do you know which ones to eat? This week, nutrition reporter Anahad O'Connor took a deep dive into the best types of seafood, detailing those that are relatively low in mercury, high in omega-3 fats, sustainable, as well as accessible and affordable. First up is salmon, of course. While farmed salmon can certainly be a good choice, wild salmon is almost always the better option. 'Wild salmon is a triple win because it's high in good fats, low in mercury and sustainable,' Sonya Lunder, the director of community science at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told Anahad. For more great choices, check out our guide to choosing the healthiest seafood. If you are a car karaoke aficionado, you'll be glad to hear that music has the power to soothe the mind, promote brain health and bring people closer together. Singing, listening to music or making music all promote health. And the wonderful part about it is that the barrier to entry is low. Even if you won't be trying out for the opera any time soon, you can reap the benefits, according to our brain health writer, Richard Sima. For example, singing karaoke was linked to increased feelings of flow and meaning in life, reported one 2022 study of 305 older adults, so there's no need to sleep on this wellness trend. 'Nobody says you shouldn't jog if you are not good at it,' Daniel Levitin, a professor emeritus of neuroscience at McGill University and dean of arts and humanities at Minerva University, told Richard. 'That's not the point.' For some great tips on how to use your love of music to create and connect with others, check out our story on the health benefits of making music. This week, our Ask a Therapist columnist is Joshua Coleman, a clinical psychologist in the San Francisco Bay Area and senior fellow with the Council on Contemporary Families. My wife and I have a 4-year-old son. I'm very affectionate with him — I hug him a lot, tell him I love him and comfort him when he cries. But my wife is starting to express concern that I'll make him 'soft.' We're both good parents, but this is starting to create real tension. How do we resolve a parenting difference that touches on something so personal? It is common for people to parent similarly to how they were raised. It's partly role modeling, and partly a way to feel close to our parents by being aligned with them and sharing their values. At the same time, it's common to reinterpret painful childhood experiences in a more favorable light — to convince ourselves that what was hard was ultimately necessary. If your wife had a strict, emotionally distant father, she may have come to believe that his approach helped shape her strength — and that your son will need the same. You don't have to agree about everything in parenting to find common ground. Make it clear that your disagreements are about approach, not character. Get more useful tips on navigating a conflict if you can't agree on a parenting approach by reading the full response below. If you have a question for a therapist about mental health, relationships, sleep, dating or any other topic, email it to AskATherapist@ and we may feature it in a future column. Here are a few things that brought us joy this week. Let's keep the conversation going. We want to hear from you! Email us at wellbeing@ Want to know more about 'joy' snacks? Reporter and former neuroscientist Richard Sima explains what they are and how they can make you feel happier. You can also read his advice as a comic.

Cuomo admits to seeing COVID nursing home death report, says he may have altered it
Cuomo admits to seeing COVID nursing home death report, says he may have altered it

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Cuomo admits to seeing COVID nursing home death report, says he may have altered it

Ahead of the second New York City mayoral debate, former New York Democrat Gov. Andrew Cuomo admitted that, despite previous testimony to Congress to the contrary, he did see the report detailing the number of COVID nursing home deaths and that he may have altered the report. Speaking with local outlet PIX 11 News on Wednesday, Cuomo said, "I did not recall seeing the report at the time. I did see the report, it turns out." He also said, "I'm sure that if I read the report. I made language changes." Despite this, Cuomo said the published report "was accurate" and that "this has been politicized from day 1." Cuomo, who resigned his governorship in 2021 amid sexual harassment allegations, is the leading candidate running for New York City mayor. However, he continues to face criticism over the misconduct allegations as well as claims that he altered a report to undercount the number of COVID-19 nursing home deaths. During the first New York mayoral debate last week, fellow Democrat opponents blasted Cuomo for allegedly lying to Congress, an allegation pushed by Republicans that the Trump administration is currently investigating. The Trump Department of Justice opened a criminal investigation in May to get to the bottom of whether Cuomo lied to Congress about the decisions he made during the COVID-19 pandemic while serving as governor. Cuomo repeatedly dismissed questions throughout the debate about whether he lied to Congress about his role in drafting a New York State Department of Health report that officials determined had undercounted the number of nursing home deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, Cuomo blasted the current investigation as a symptom of partisan politics and insisted the report in question "did not undercount the deaths." Though he admitted on Wednesday to incorrectly testifying about not seeing the report and possibly making changes, Cuomo continued to maintain the accuracy of its numbers. "Let's just be clear for the record, because a lot of misinformation has been spread, New York always followed the federal guidance on what to do with nursing homes from the best federal medical minds available," he said. He noted that the federal guidance "changed over time as the federal officials learned more," saying that "the state and other states followed the federal guidance." "When all is said and done, New York state is No. 38 in the rate of nursing home deaths. Think about that, 38 out of 50 states. Only 12 states had a lower rate of death than New York," he said. Cuomo is expected to again face intense questioning from opponents and moderators about the report during the second mayoral debate on Thursday night.

Meet RFK Jr.'s New Vaccine Advisers
Meet RFK Jr.'s New Vaccine Advisers

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Meet RFK Jr.'s New Vaccine Advisers

We didn't think anyone could do more to damage trust in public health institutions than Anthony Fauci, but Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is giving it a whirl. See the eccentric crew the Health and Human Services Secretary has tapped to advise the department on vaccines. Mr. Kennedy this week purged the agency's independent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), claiming its members had conflicts of interest. Those ostensible conflicts were well-managed. But Mr. Kennedy vowed his committee replacements 'will exercise independent judgment.' Readers can judge whether this is likely to be true. Two of his new members have served as 'expert' witnesses paid by plaintiff attorneys in lawsuits against vaccine makers. Conflicts, anyone? Biostatistician Martin Kulldorff backed claims against Merck over its HPV vaccine. Mr. Kennedy held a financial stake in one of the cases, which after he became secretary he bestowed to his son, who works at the law firm suing Merck, Wisner Baum. Another appointee is biochemist Robert Malone, a loud critic of the Covid mRNA vaccines. He also served as a paid expert in litigation against Merck's mumps vaccine, which was rejected by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Dr. Malone has downplayed the Texas measles outbreak and said two deaths of unvaccinated children owed to medical errors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store