‘Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor
Elmo has a friend, indeed.
Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., brought along a stuffed friend to help make a point on the House floor Thursday.
Jeffries held up a stuffed Elmo doll while accusing Republicans of targeting beloved children's shows like "Sesame Street" in their push to slash federal spending."Today, we are on the floor of the House of Representatives debating legislation that targets Elmo. And Big Bird. And Daniel Tiger and 'Sesame Street,'" Jeffries said, waving the puppet as he railed against the GOP-led rescissions package.Trump Sends $9.4 Billion Doge Cuts Proposal To Congress, Targeting Npr, Pbs
The moment, widely circulated online, came during debate over the Republican-backed Proposed Rescissions of Budgetary Resources from President Trump, which would eliminate over $9 billion in unspent or low-priority federal funds.
Among the targeted programs: $3 million in taxpayer support for an international version of Sesame Street in Iraq.
Democrats objected to what they characterized as cultural and humanitarian vandalism disguised as fiscal responsibility. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, D-Calif., delivered one of the sharpest lines of the day: "While you all have killed off Elmo, I urge my colleagues to vote no on this trash and I yield back," Garcia said.
Read On The Fox News App
Republicans dismissed the theatrics and defended the package as a commonsense rollback of bloated, ideological spending. The bill also includes broader cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports PBS and NPR, long-time targets of fiscal conservatives who argue the taxpayer shouldn't subsidize public media.Rep. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., rebutted, "I never realized Elmo was more important to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle than the American people."
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., pushed back forcefully: "The Minority Leader held up a Sesame Street character here on the floor as if Sesame Street's somehow going to go away," Scalise said. Sesame Street's Pride Month Post Sparks Backlash From Republican Lawmakers Amid Pbs Funding Threats
"I was watching a commercial on TV yesterday where the Cookie Monster was actually doing an advertisement for Netflix because a private company is paying money to run Sesame Street. It's not going away. It's doing just fine. Very lucrative."
Scalise argued the bill doesn't threaten Sesame Street's survival, only its taxpayer subsidy, and called out what he described as "far-left, radical views" being promoted through outlets like NPR and PBS."There is still going to be a plethora of options for the American people," he said. "But if they are paying their hard-earned dollars to get content, why should your tax dollars go to only one thing that the other side wants to promote?"
He concluded bluntly: "They can still watch Sesame Street in Iraq. But let the Iraqi people pay for it — not the taxpayers of the United States of America's children."
Even more eyebrow‑raising was the inclusion of taxpayer‑funded global health spending for procedures like circumcisions.Among the line items flagged by GOP lawmakers: $3 million to subsidize circumcisions, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia, alongside similar grants for transgender surgeries in Nepal. Republicans contended that pulling back these types of low-impact or ideological slush funds was a logical first step toward returning more than $9 billion to the U.S. Treasury.
The bill passed the House Appropriations Committee earlier this week and Senate Democrats have signaled strong opposition.
The bill passed the House in a 214–212 vote. Four Republicans, Reps. Mark Amodei, R-Nev.; Mike Turner, R-Ohio; Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.; and Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., broke ranks to vote against the bill. All Democrats voted no.Original article source: 'Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Nevada traffic ticket laws to go into effect
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Nevada lawmakers unanimously passed and Gov. Joe Lombardo signed a proposal to amend the state's traffic-ticket system. Senate Bill 359, which will become law Oct. 1, gives courts flexibility to reduce the amount a driver needs to pay upfront. Courts interpreted the current law as a driver having to pay the full amount of a ticket before a hearing. The 8 News Now Investigators first looked into the issue this spring when a retiree had to pay her $417 ticket in full before her court hearing. Before Senate Bill 359, Nevada law required her to pay the fine in full — whether she wanted to fight the ticket or not. Since 2021, Nevada lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, have changed most traffic infractions, like a speeding ticket, to be a civil infraction, not a criminal one. That means tickets no longer carry the threat of jail time, and missed court appearances do not really matter in the long run since the court may already have your money. Democratic State Sen. Melanie Scheible sponsored the change, which passed unanimously. The governor signed it last week. In addition, changes written in Senate Bill 359 now combine civil and criminal infractions — minor speeding offenses versus driving without a license — and allow a judge to deal with both in one hearing. The new law also gives judges more discretion, not a 'presumption in favor' to reduce a traffic ticket to a nonmoving violation should the driver pay all their fines and have a good driving record. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lombardo notes education, housing advances in statement on Nevada Legislature
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Gov. Joe Lombardo emphasized progress on education and housing laws as he released a statement Friday on this year's legislative session. Lombardo, a Republican, also touched on decisions he made in vetoing a record 87 bills approved by the Democrat-controlled Nevada Legislature — just over 14% of everything that passed. He signed 518 bills into law. While contentious, this session had a smoother end than in 2023, when Lombardo called two special sessions immediately following adjournment. One session dealt with an unresolved budget that Republicans blocked, and the other passed the A's stadium deal. New Nevada traffic ticket laws to go into effect And despite this year's harsh criticism coming from progressive groups and advocates who cast many of his vetoes as betrayals, he thanked lawmakers for working in good faith toward 'a stronger, safer, and more affordable Nevada for all.' The Governor's Office said ceremonial bill signings are forthcoming for Senate Bill 460, the landmark bipartisan education reform package, and Assembly Bill 540, the Nevada Housing Access and Attainability Act. Lombardo's full statement appears below: I am proud of the meaningful progress we made this session – particularly in the areas of education and housing. Working together, we've taken important steps to expand educational opportunity, begin restoring accountability in our public schools, and make housing more attainable for working families across our said, I did not take lightly the decision to veto 87 bills. I do not enjoy using the veto pen, but as Governor, it is my responsibility to protect Nevadans from legislation that goes too far, expands government unnecessarily, or creates unintended consequences that hurt families, businesses, or our veto was carefully considered. My priority will always be to ensure that every law enacted serves the best interest of the people of Nevada – not special interests, and not bigger the legislators who worked in good faith throughout this session: thank you. I remain committed to working with you to build a stronger, safer, and more affordable Nevada for all. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo The Nevada Legislature convenes once every two years for a 120-day session. The 83rd session ended on June 2. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska AG Sues Temu Over Alleged Consumer Protection Violations
Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers announced Thursday that his office had filed a lawsuit against low-priced e-commerce platform Temu. The complaint alleges a host of consumer protection violations, including misrepresentation of goods, greenwashing, embedding illegal malware into consumers' personal devices and sharing Nebraskans' data with the Chinese Communist Party. More from Sourcing Journal France Moves to Curb 'Ultra-fast' Fashion With Bill Targeting Shein and Temu Federal Appeals Court Grants Trump Temporary Relief on Tariff Ruling Labor Department, Which 'Ridiculed Supporting Worker Rights Abroad,' Responds to ILAB Lawsuit The crux of the complaint is centered around consumers' data. Hilgers alleges in the complaint that Temu has illegally 'siphoned' personal information about Nebraskan consumers, leaving them at risk. Hilgers said Temu's famously low-cost products 'come with a one-two punch to Americans.' 'Temu's app operates as malware; its code is designed to exfiltrate an enormous amount of sensitive information, from access to a user's microphone, pictures and messages, to information sufficient to track their movements,' Hilgers alleged in the complaint. 'This sensitive information that is unlawfully exfiltrated to Temu naturally flows to its powerful patron—the Chinese Communist Party. In the United States's great power competition with China, Temu presents yet another way in which China can extract and exploit information about Americans for its own purposes.' Temu was founded in China and is a subsidiary of PDD Holdings, but its headquarters are now located in Boston. A spokesperson for Temu said the claims made in the complaint are untrue. 'The allegations in the Nebraska Attorney General's lawsuit are without merit and appear to be a rehash of misinformation circulated online, much of it originating from a short-seller. We categorically deny the allegations and will vigorously defend ourselves against them,' the spokesperson told Sourcing Journal via email. This isn't the first time Temu has come under fire for the way it handles consumer data; in June 2024, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin announced that the state had filed a lawsuit against Temu, calling it 'a data-theft business that sells goods online as a means to an end.' Last year, Republican members of Congress asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to pursue further information about Temu and its business practices. Throughout the rest of the complaint, Hilgers goes on to allege that the means by which Temu entices Nebraskan consumers are also unlawful. He alleges that the company uses greenwashing to mislead consumers and that it deceives consumers with its local warehousing business model, leading them to believe that they are purchasing from local businesses. 'Temu misleadingly uses the 'local' tag for products shipped from warehouses located in the United States,' Hilgers contended. 'These products could originate from foreign countries, such as China, but Temu passes them off as local goods because the products are temporarily stored for distribution in the United States.' In this section of the complaint, Hilgers is referring to the fact that Temu has been making a push for what it refers to as 'local warehouses.' These warehouses, located in markets of interest, like the U.S. and the EU, make it possible for the company to get products to consumers' doorsteps faster than sending them directly from China. While it has looked to onboard U.S. sellers, many of the sellers who use these local warehouses are based in China. Hilgers further said that the platform is 'awash in products infringing copyrights and other intellectual property.' In the complaint, the attorney general states that Nebraska believes Temu is in violation of multiple state laws, including its Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act and its Consumer Protection Act. Hilgers asks the judge overseeing the case to enjoin Temu from 'continuing to engage in such unlawful acts and practices' and to award affected Nebraskan consumers compensation. Hilgers said the lawsuit is intended to shield the state's residents from unlawful company conduct. 'Temu is putting Nebraskans' privacy at risk and running a platform rife with deceptive listings, unlawful promotional practices, and products that rip off Nebraska brands and creations,' he said in a statement. 'Our office will hold Temu accountable for its exploitation of Nebraska consumers, brands and creators and fight hard for honesty and safety in the online marketplace.'
