
Nigel Farage chases the Welsh dragon
Photo byReform is coming for Wales. That was Nigel Farage's key message in Port Talbot today (9 September), as he fired the starting gun for the Senedd election in May 2026.
It's been a mixed few days for the insurgent party. Its third-place finish in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election might seem disappointing, were it not for the fact that Reform has come out of nowhere to achieve 26 per cent of the vote – just five points below Labour's victorious performance. 'Reform blew up Scottish politics last week,' Farage told the assembled journalists. Wales is, he argued, due for a similarly seismic shock. And Reform had two new recently defected councillors to prove it.
The Hamilton news, however, was overshadowed by the drama unfolding within Reform regarding Zia Yusuf, who resigned as chairman on Thursday afternoon with zero notice. A mere 48 hours later, Yusuf had un-quit and was back in Reform (albeit in a slightly different role), fuelling attacks that the party is riven with infighting and not nearly grown-up enough to be taken seriously.
Farage tackled that head-on today, joking that 'We did hit a speed bump last week – it could be we were driving more than the recommended 20 miles an hour' (a reference to Wales's oft-derided speed-limit policy). Mostly, though, he wanted to talk about the other big political news of the hour: the Labour government's announcement that more than 75 per cent of pensioners would have their winter fuel payments restored. Farage wasted no time taking credit for the U-turn, repeatedly hailing the change in policy as a win for Reform and arguing at one point 'Pensioners saw us as being the best people to fight their cause on winter fuel payments'.
What does any of this have to do with Wales? The answer is about narrative. Building on his Westminster press conference last month, Farage is gradually trying to establish his party as a serious option for government. First, that meant eclipsing the Conservatives as the de facto opposition party. The next step is challenging Labour. And where better to do that than in Wales, where Labour has held power for 26 years – and where there is likely to be an audience for Reform's message of 'reindustrialisation'?
Because once Farage was done crowing about pressuring the Labour government into a winter fuel U-turn, reindustrialisation was the theme. Reform's ambition, he insisted, is to re-open the Port Talbot steelworks, whose blast furnaces were closed last year. (Still in credit-taking mode, he argued that Scunthorpe's blast furnaces would have faced a similar fate had he and Richard Tice not gone there at the crucial moment, pressuring the government into stepping in.) For an added bit of nostalgia, Reform also wants to bring back coal-mining.
There are a couple of issues with this. As intrepid journalists tried to point out multiple times, the way the blast furnaces were shut down means it is not possible to simply restart them. 'You can't restart a blast furnace with a press conference,' as a Welsh Labour spokesperson put it. While Farage insisted 'nothing's impossible', he did concede 'it might be easier to build a new one'. Which begs the question of why restarting the blast furnaces was such a core pillar of this speech in the first place.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
On re-opening the coal mines, another journalist pointed out that Welsh youngsters might not relish the opportunity of going down mines, not least as their fathers and grandfathers made every effort to spare them that fate. 'We're not forcing people down pits for goodness sake,' Farage quipped back, deflecting to the number of Brits working in the Australian mining industry.
As for the small issue of how Reform in Wales would achieve their coal plans when the Labour government in Westminster is never going to allow a return to coal-mining, Farage said simply 'we could always have a fight', suggesting his party could 'just do things'.
The clash between fantasy and reality continued. Since Reform laid out the beginnings of its economic programme in May, both the mainstream parties and independent economists have been falling over themselves to point out fiscal black holes in the region of tens of billions. Farage's defence was to deflect to the 'two or three trillions' of liabilities regarding public sector pensions. In other words, Reform's economic plans may be fantasy, but so (he suggested) were everyone else's. While this might have economist tearing their hair out, shock polling from More In Common over the weekend revealed that Labour and Reform are currently tied on who the public trust most to manage the economy.
Beyond the specific issue of de-industrialisation in Wales, two core themes emerged. First is that Farage is putting everything he has into presenting his party as ready for government – first councils, then Wales, then perhaps the United Kingdom. 'Our aim is to win. Our aim is to win a majority. Our aim as a party is to govern in Wales,' he said at one point. Later, he argued that Reform was the 'only party with a real chance of beating Labour next year'. This is no longer about being protest party. In fact, if the rapid exoneration of Zia Yusuf by Farage (not a man known for re-welcoming those who appear to have crossed him) tells us anything, it's how determined the Reform leader is to professionalise the party, even if it means letting go of grudges.
Second is that the media has cottoned on. Farage didn't get an easy ride today. Whereas the delusions of Reform's 2024 manifesto largely went unremarked upon, the flaws (financial, legal, practical) in Farage's proposals were picked apart. He was grilled on how he would define a Welsh person, on disability benefits, tax policy – and yes, on his party's personnel troubles and why it hadn't yet announced its Welsh leader. This isn't entertainment – and with the party just a few points behind Plaid Cymru in the polls, Reform's efforts to win Wales are not a publicity stunt.
[See also: Non-voters are Nigel Farage's secret weapon]
Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
31 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
North missed £140bn of transport investment during last government
Independent analysis by think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) looked at Treasury figures between 2009/10 and 2022/23, during which time the Conservatives were in power. It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period. While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said. The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively. This amounted to £140 billion of missed investment for the North, more than the entire £83 billion estimate of capital spending on transport in the region since 1999/2000, according to the analysis. The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person. Among the most divisive transport investment projects for the previous government was the HS2 rail project, which was axed north of Birmingham in October 2023. Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak pledged to 'reinvest every single penny, £36 billion, in hundreds of new transport projects in the North and the Midlands', including improvements to road, rail and bus schemes. Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands ahead of the spending review. It is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire. Rachel Reeves has set out plans for new transport investment in the North and Midlands (Peter Byrne/PA) Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at IPPR North, said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit. 'We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her rein – while our transport chasm widens. 'This isn't London bashing – Londoners absolutely deserve investment. But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right. 'This Government have begun to restore fairness with their big bet on transport cash for city leaders. 'They should continue on this journey to close this investment gap in the upcoming spending review and decades ahead.' Former Treasury minister Lord Jim O'Neill said: 'Good governance requires the guts to take a long-term approach, not just quick fixes. So the Chancellor is right in her focus on the UK's long-standing supply-side weaknesses – namely our woeful productivity and weak private and public investment. 'Backing major infrastructure is the right call, and this spending review is the right time for the Chancellor to place a big bet on northern growth and begin to close this investment chasm. 'But it's going to take more than commitments alone – she'll need to set out a transparent framework for delivery.' Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, said: 'For too long, the North of England has been treated as a poor relation to the South when it comes to government spending on transport infrastructure, and this analysis makes stark reading – exposing the vast scale of underfunding over many years. 'The Chancellor's announcement of £2.5 billion funding for transport in Greater Manchester will be a game-changer for our city-region, enabling us to expand the Bee Network, and deliver the UK's first, zero emission, integrated, public transport system by 2030. 'We have also made the case for a new Liverpool-Manchester railway, which would further rebalance infrastructure investment, and could boost the UK economy by £90 billion by 2040.'

South Wales Argus
31 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' Nadia Whittome (James Manning/PA) The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.'


Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bigger and better person than Farage? Nigel thinks you're wrong
Relax chaps, Reform is back under control. 'We did hit a speed bump,' Nigel Farage told a press conference in Wales: 'Zia lost his rag, he put out an intemperate comment or two,' but the former party chairman 'expressed his regret' and 'I forgave him.' So, where is he now? Not with us today. But any worry that Zia isn't answering his phone, or that his car was found abandoned in a pond, is misplaced. 'I'm loyal to people all the while they are loyal to me,' said Nigel - who I'm told laid a new patio in the middle of the night - and 'if anybody talks behind my back or betrays my trust, I'll never speak to them again.' Silence across the room. Message received. In that spirit, let me be the first to say, thank you Nigel for pushing the Government to reverse its winter fuel cut, rescuing millions of pensioners from certain death. Proof that you don't have to be in power to make a change - a principle tested with equal courage by Greta Thunberg and her net-weirdo flotilla - till they were 'kidnapped' by the IDF. Conditions in the Israeli prison are described as sub-human - I'm told they only have one flavour of ice-cream - and got worse when the PM rang Tel Aviv to demand that they 'release the sausages'. Imagine Greta's horror when confronted with a buffet of kosher hot dogs and told that there is no vegetarian option. 'Attention-seeking narcissist,' Piers Morgan called her - naked on a giraffe in Trafalgar Square - and it occurred to me that we live in an era of rolling self-owns. Zia quit after a Reform MP floated a burka ban, then returned saying he'd probably ban it himself. Greta's boat claimed it was sprayed with a 'white irritant substance' - when it was crewed by white irritants. And the Government, having banked everything on 'clearing up the Tory mess', reverses a winter fuel cut it previously said was necessary to avoid economic Armageddon. 'When should the City of London… expect the run on the pound?' asked Conservative Simon Hoare in the Commons. The minister sent on the suicide mission to defend this U-turn, a child soldier called Torsten Bell, oozed oily self-confidence, yet his hands trembled. He has only two modes of performance: bemused and angry, the latter red-faced and nose-twitching as he declared the opposition has 'no plan'. Prior to being in government, Torsten ran a think tank of the 'Paddington loves a wealth tax' variety and made popular videos about how one could abolish poverty by taxing Pimms – so watching him struggle with the realities of power (like Greta trying to explain the dangers of carbon to an Israeli interrogator) is a joy. If you can throw money at pensioners, asked Left-wing MPs, why not benefits for poor parents and the disabled? 'All levers are on the table,' Bell replied. Does the boy dream in meaningless cliches, too?! No wonder Wales is flirting with Reform, a land that values language and big characters. 'There are people,' said Farage, 'who think they are bigger and better than me.' Well, they're not. And proof is that if you ring Zia's number, Nigel's patio plays La Cucaracha.