logo
Medicaid, individual market health insurance would be harder to get in Colorado under GOP bill

Medicaid, individual market health insurance would be harder to get in Colorado under GOP bill

Miami Herald5 hours ago

Veronica Montoya relies on Medicaid for the $15,000 infusions that restrain her immune system from attacking her body, and worries she may lose that access if Congress adopts drastic changes to the health care program.
Provisions of congressional Republicans' "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" would add work requirements for some people covered by Medicaid and require them to go through the full process of proving eligibility twice a year instead of once.
The bill, backed by President Donald Trump, also would restrict immigrants' access to health insurance and raise costs for people who buy their health coverage on the exchange, while extending tax cuts for higher earners and spending more on national defense.
Taken together, the provisions would create hurdles for people who don't have job-based coverage to find and keep health insurance through Medicaid or the marketplace, even if they are employed or have a disability. While the bill wouldn't entirely return the U.S. health insurance market to its pre-Affordable Care Act state, it would take away options that helped bring down the uninsured rate, experts said.
The House passed the legislation in late May by a single vote. The bill's chances in the Senate aren't clear; both fiscal hawks and centrist Republicans have expressed concerns.
At face value, the work requirements shouldn't affect Montoya, because she has a disability and has caregiving responsibilities for her mother. But she also knows proving that could be a problem. Even without changes, Montoya said she sometimes struggles to prove her continuing eligibility because her condition causes "brain fog."
"It's very stressful to navigate a system that is set up to catch you," she said.
The health policy nonprofit KFF estimated between 120,000 and 190,000 people in Colorado could lose their insurance, mostly through falling off the Medicaid rolls, over the next 10 years because of the bill. If pandemic-era increased subsidies for individual coverage expire this year, the number of uninsured people in the state could rise by 140,000 to 240,000.
Colorado produced different estimates, finding as many as 110,000 people could leave the individual marketplace because the bill would make insurance harder to get and more expensive. The state hasn't estimated how many people could lose Medicaid coverage.
About 1.2 million people in Colorado had Medicaid coverage as of April, and about 296,000 bought insurance on the individual marketplace for the current year.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that about 10.9 million people nationwide would become uninsured, with about 72% losing Medicaid coverage, and the rest losing insurance they bought through the individual marketplace because of eligibility changes in the budget bill. Another 5.1 million could lose individual coverage if enhanced subsidies expire this year.
The bill would require some people between 19 and 64 to work or complete other activities for at least 80 hours each month. States would also have the option to require applicants to show they met it in the months before applying for Medicaid.
If the economy takes a downturn, people may not be able to consistently work 80 hours a month to keep their coverage, said Adam Fox, deputy director of the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative. Theoretically, they could fill in the gaps by volunteering when their hours fall short, but no one knows how the state will track and verify that, he said.
Rachel Sanchez, of Greeley, said she can't hold down a job while going through her third bout with cancer. Medicaid paid for her care for ovarian and colon cancers, and for follow-up care that helped her recover from the physical damage that treatment inflicted. Now, it covers her medication for leukemia, which costs about $1,500 for a weekly dose.
Sanchez's two sisters also relied on the program during their cancer care. (The three inherited a genetic mutation that increases their odds of multiple cancers.) Not having to worry about paying for treatment, and eventually for supportive care as they neared the end of their lives, reduced the family's stress during a terrible time, she said.
Cancer patients "can't just get up every day and go to work, and then go to treatment, and then go back to work," she said.
The bill would mandate that states go through the full process of verifying eligibility every six months for people who qualified for Medicaid under the expansion, which raised the threshold for adults to qualify for Medicaid to 138% of the poverty line, or $21,587 for one person.
The process is complicated, said Diana Corona, a Denver resident. Once, she forgot to file some paperwork, and only discovered she and her husband had lost coverage when he got sick.
"It's back and forth, back and forth" trying to provide the right information, she said.
The intention behind the bill is to add friction to the system of getting and maintaining insurance through Medicaid and the individual marketplace, said Sara Collins, senior scholar at the Commonwealth Fund, which researches health policies.
If it passes, people will lose coverage, either because they don't understand how to keep it, or in the case of the individual market, because insurance has become too expensive, she said.
"The savings (projected with the bill) really come from people not being able to navigate the system," she said.
Fox said he thinks the estimates of how many people will lose coverage are low, particularly for states like Colorado, where county human services offices have to handle Medicaid eligibility. Automated systems already check recipients' income eligibility monthly, so making them fill out paperwork and the counties process it twice a year instead of once just creates more opportunities for people to get lost in the shuffle, he said.
Colorado can renew Medicaid coverage automatically for about three-quarters of people who qualify based on income by using existing databases, said Marivel Klueckman, eligibility division director at the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing. The rest have to fill out the full renewal packet. If they don't return the paperwork, they lose coverage even if they'd still qualify.
The renewal packet typically runs about 16 pages, though not all parts apply to every household. It focuses on changes in income and who lives in the home. People who qualify for Medicaid because of a disability have to fill out a longer packet, verifying their health status and assets.
If the bill passes, Colorado will have to assess how much the workload will increase for county offices that process the packets, Klueckman said. The state will also need to look for ways to verify how many hours people are working without requiring individuals to report it, she said.
People who lose Medicaid in the future would face more hurdles in buying coverage on the individual marketplace.
The bill would forbid states from allowing low-income people to enroll in the marketplace at any point during the year and would require potential customers to verify more information before they can receive tax credit subsidies, effectively ending automatic reenrollment. It also would shorten marketplace enrollment window to 45 days, from 76.
Marketplace plans also will be more expensive in the coming years, assuming the bill becomes law, Fox said. It directly raises the maximum deductible and out-of-pocket limit that plans can set, and paradoxically, would raise the price of bronze and gold plans by lowering the cost of silver plans. (Subsidies rise or fall with the cost of silver plans.)
Combined, the marketplace and Medicaid changes will return the insurance system to something close to its state when the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010, particularly if Congress also allows larger subsidies for the individual market to expire this year, Collins said.
Then, Medicaid covered only adults with the lowest incomes, and the individual marketplace was prohibitively expensive, she said.
"It's a way of repealing parts of the Affordable Care Act without really saying it," she said.
_____
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gov. JB Pritzker says he wasn't among Midwest officials on alleged Minnesota shooter's lists
Gov. JB Pritzker says he wasn't among Midwest officials on alleged Minnesota shooter's lists

Chicago Tribune

time10 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Gov. JB Pritzker says he wasn't among Midwest officials on alleged Minnesota shooter's lists

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said Monday his name was not among those of Midwestern officials kept on lists by the 57-year-old man charged with assassinating the Democratic leader of the Minnesota House and her husband. Pritzker, who was in Minnesota on Friday for a state Democratic Party fundraiser, made the comments about 12 hours after Minnesota law enforcement officials confirmed late Sunday the alleged shooter, Vance Boelter, had information that featured public officials in other states, including Wisconsin, Michigan and Illinois. 'There is not a hit list that has Illinois politicians on it,' said Pritzker, who told reporters he'd been in touch with the head of the FBI's Chicago office as well as Illinois State Police Director Brendan Kelly and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz. In addition to a list of about 70 names found in Boelter's vehicle before he was apprehended on Sunday night, there was 'a hodgepodge of names that were put together, but not, as I have been told, a hit list of any sort,' Pritzker said. 'As I understand, I was not on that list,' the governor said. Pritzker said there were 'Illinois folks' listed but the governor did not provide any names of who those Illinois politicians were. 'The FBI specifically said to me that these people are not targets, and they certainly, now that he has been apprehended … they're not concerned about those people being targeted in any way whatsoever,' Pritzker said. A spokesman for Illinois Senate President Don Harmon had no immediate comment on whether the Oak Park Democrat's name or those of any state Senate Democrats appeared on any such list. A spokesman for Illinois House Speaker Emanuel 'Chris' Welch said there was no indication the Hillside Democrat was among those named. But Welch spokesman Jon Maxson said he understood some House Democrats' names were found on some documents among Boelter's possessions. Maxson said there will be a more formal briefing from the Illinois State Police for any lawmakers concerned about their security. A spokeswoman for the Illinois State Police said the agency 'is communicating with individuals in Illinois whose names were on one of the lists found' among Boelter's possessions. 'The information the shooter had accumulated, potentially in paper and electronic form, was filled with inaccuracies and needs to be put into the appropriate context before being shared with the individuals being referenced, and has been in the process of being vetted overnight by ISP special agent,' Illinois State Police spokeswoman Melaney Arnold said Monday morning in an emailed response to questions. She said she had no other information to provide at that time. At a separate news conference Monday after federal charges were filed against Boelter, Joseph Thompson, the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota, said it was 'clear from the evidence that he's been planning these attacks for quite some time.' 'There's voluminous writings, as you've seen in the reporting, that were found both in his car and his house, about his planning, lists of names and individuals,' Thompson said. 'In terms of the why, it's unclear.' In addition to being charged in the deaths of state House Democratic leader Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, Boelter allegedly also shot and injured Democratic Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, in the early morning hours Saturday.

Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements

Los Angeles Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements

It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House has passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. 'What sense does that make?' she asked. 'What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?' The measure is part of the version of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill as it stands would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails — or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry — based largely on their past experience — that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. 'It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid,' said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. 'If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping.' Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. 'Should I expect the government to take care of him?' he asked. 'I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity.' About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt the ability of them or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. 'Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern,' she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able — but worries about how that would be sorted out. 'It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it,' she said. Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with 'serious or complex' medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in 'gig' jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. 'I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not have health insurance,' she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. 'There's no way I could have afforded that,' he said. 'I would have lost my foot and probably died.' Mulvihill writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Conn., contributed to this report.

Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast
Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast

The headquarters of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting in Tehran was hit by an Israeli airstrike during a live broadcast Monday, setting the building on fire and knocking the network off the air for a short time. Footage shows a female anchor speaking on-air on the state-run broadcaster as the bomb from an Israeli fighter jet struck. A loud boom was heard, shaking the camera and knocking out the stage lights as the anchor hurriedly left the desk. More from Deadline What To Know About Saturday's Army Parade, Donald Trump's Birthday And The No Kings Protests Networks Return To Special Reports On Iran's Retaliatory Strikes On Israel - Update House Votes To Rescind PBS, NPR And Public Broadcasting Station Funding - Update Israel's defense minister confirmed the attack on the building, which houses Iran's state TV operations, calling the IRIB a 'propaganda and incitement broadcasting authority' in a post on X. Al Jazeera is reporting the anchor on the air at the time of the attack is Sahar Emami, referring to her 'one of the most famous state TV presenters in the country.' The IRIB said in a statement that 'live programs were briefly halted at the IRIB News Network but returned to normal a few minutes afterwards.' It added that 'it was not immediately clear if and how many personnel had been wounded or killed.' Video online showed the building on fire. Israeli officials and Iranian journalists on the ground confirmed there were evacuation warnings issued for that part of Tehran ahead of the strikes, which come on the fourth day of an Israeli offensive across Iran in response to intelligence that warned of Iran's increasing nuclear capability. The two countries have been trading bombing attacks using aircraft, ballistic missiles and drones since Sunday, with air raid sirens heard across Israel and civilians fleeing Tehran. Best of Deadline 'Bachelor in Paradise' Cast Announcement: See Who Is Headed To The Beach For Season 10 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store