Trump-Putin Call Yields No Immediate Ceasefire in Ukraine
The US President, Donald Trump, on Monday held separate phone calls with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, and the Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, to negotiate a ceasefire agreement between Russia and Ukraine aimed at ending their three-year war.
The calls did not produce any major breakthrough. Although Trump and Putin said that Moscow and Kyiv would start talks on a future peace, the Russian President did not agree to an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump-Putin Call
On Monday, Trump held a much-awaited call with Putin, which the US President described as 'excellent.' Trump praised the call on a social media post, saying that Russia and Ukraine would begin peace talks soon.
'Just completed my two-hour call with President Vladimir Putin of Russia. I believe it went very well. Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations toward a Ceasefire and, more importantly, an END to the War. The conditions for that will be negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be, because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of,' Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Trump said that the Vatican has expressed interest in hosting the talks, adding that he informed Zelensky, as well as the European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, and the leaders of France, Italy, Germany, and Finland, of his call with Putin.
The US President added that Russia is eager to resume trade with the US after the war ends. 'Russia wants to do largescale TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic 'bloodbath' is over, and I agree,' Trump said. No Immediate Ceasefire
After the call, Putin described his conversation with Trump as 'constructive' and thanked the US President for his diplomatic efforts. However, he suggested that Moscow had not agreed to an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine.
Speaking to reporters in the Russian resort city of Sochi, Putin said that Moscow 'is ready to work with the Ukrainian side on a memorandum on a possible future peace accord, defining a number of positions, such as, for example, the principles of a settlement, the timing of a possible peace agreement.'
The Russian President hinted that his country's demands had not changed. 'At the same time, I would like to note that, in general, Russia's position is clear. The main thing for us is to eliminate the root causes of this crisis,' he noted, according to the Associated Press (AP).
The Russian Presidential Advisor, Yuri Ushakov, said that the call between the two leaders were friendly, adding that they could hold a face-to-face meeting at some point. Ushakov said they also discussed a Russia-US prisoner swap, which could involve the two countries releasing 9 prisoners each. More Pressure on Russia
On Monday, Zelensky said he spoke with Trump before and after his call with Putin. He reiterated Ukraine's readiness for a full and unconditional ceasefire, reaffirming Kyiv's willingness to take part in direct negotiations with Moscow in any format that could yield results.
'This is a defining moment. The world can now see whether its leaders are truly capable of securing a ceasefire and achieving real, lasting peace. At the beginning of our bilateral conversation, I reaffirmed to President Trump that Ukraine is ready for a full and unconditional ceasefire,' he posted on X.
The Ukrainian President also called the international community to increase pressure on Russia if it refused to end the war. 'If the Russians are not ready to stop the killings, there must be stronger sanctions. Pressure on Russia will push it toward real peace – this is obvious to everyone around the world,' he said. US Engagement
Zelensky also urged the US not to 'distance itself from the talks or the pursuit of peace, because the only one who benefits from that is Putin.' The Ukrainian President's remarks came as Trump suggested he could back out of the process.
Speaking to reporters later on Monday, the US leader said: 'I'll tell you big egos involved, but I think something's going to happen. And if it doesn't, I just back away, and they're going to have to keep going again. This was a European situation. It should have remained a European situation.'
After Trump's conversation with the European Commission President and the leaders of France, Italy, Germany, and Finland, von der Leyen stressed Europe's support for Ukraine and urged the US President to stay involved in the peace talks.
'I want to thank President Trump for his tireless efforts to bring a ceasefire to Ukraine. It's important that the US stays engaged. We will continue to support Volodymyr Zelensky to achieve lasting peace in Ukraine,' she wrote on X.
Short link :
Post Views: 20
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
32 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
We can't ignore Russian threat, says UK PM ahead of defense review
Britain cannot ignore the threat posed by Russia, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Monday, ahead of the publication of a strategic defense review that is expected to call for greater readiness to fight a modern war. 'We cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses. We've seen what's happened in Ukraine just over three years ago,' Starmer told the BBC, when asked if Britain would have to send troops to fight in a future European conflict.
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Araghchi, the Bomb and the Iranian Train
The United States has no interest in resorting to the military solution to resolve the dispute with Iran over its nuclear program. The use of force in the Middle East revives memories of costly experiences. President Donald Trump himself does not believe that the military solution is viable, unless all other options to persuade Iran to abandon its nuclear dream run out. Iran, in turn, says it has no such dream. However, despite its repeated denials, the nuclear file continues to return to the spotlight. The lack of trust between the US and Iran is not unusual. Both countries have traded direct and indirect blows over the past decades, deepening this crisis of trust. The current Iran always views the US or 'Great Satan' as the top danger. It is aware that the US is a major power that is capable of upending balances of power in most parts of the world. Meanwhile, the US views Iran as the main backer of terrorism in the Middle East and it has accused it of having a hand in every attempt to destabilize the region. Trump's return to the White House has enflamed the crisis with Iran. He is connected to two major events in Iran's recent history: Washington's withdrawal from the nuclear agreement and the killing of Qassem Soleimani. Trump has opened the door for negotiations with Iran, but with the constant reminder that it will never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons, even if this ultimately means resorting to military force to prevent it from doing so. The current nuclear crisis with Iran has entered a new phase in wake of the latest International Atomic Energy Agency report that accuses Tehran of speeding up its rate of uranium enrichment. Trump's repeated statement that Tehran will not be allowed to acquire nuclear arms is accompanied by repeated signs from him that an agreement is possible with it, and soon. The US has no interest in sliding into a military confrontation with Iran. It also has no interest in Israel taking the reins in such a mission with unpredictable repercussions. In all likelihood, Iran, which has long avoided slipping into a direct confrontation with the US, will continue to walk the same path in avoiding such a costly clash. Moreover, Iran today is in no shape to become embroiled in such a test of force. The recent changes in the Middle East have not at all been in Iran's favor and they have denied it some of its most valuable cards. On this note, we have to wonder what Abbas Araghchi will feel when his plane approaches Beirut airport. Will he sense that Beirut has changed or that the region has changed, along with Iran's position in it? He knows that his mission these days is very difficult, if not impossible. The world is calling on Iran to reassure it, while he responds that it should reassure Iran instead. Araghchi is aware of what happened to the Iranian train in recent months. Syria has hopped off and there is nothing that would lead anyone to believe that it would jump back on again. What changed in Syria was not just the name of its president, but an entire way in how it treats the Syrian people, its neighbors and the world. Damascus ousted the 'way of the resistance' that the Assad regime had long relied on. The US is no longer viewed as an enemy. Syria is now being desired and is in demand. Its advice and demands are also being heard. Syria no longer hosts the officers of Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps as part of the plan Qassem Soleimani spent years in drawing up, especially after he successfully persuaded Putin's Russia in saving the Assad regime from collapse. Syria no longer hosts the headquarters of Palestinian 'resistance' organizations and offers its leaders safe havens. These groups are no longer welcome in Syria, while Lebanon's Hezbollah is now viewed as an enemy. Lebanon has also changed. The naming of presidents is no longer in the hands of Hezbollah commanders. The current president of the republic was elected after vowing to achieve state monopoly over arms. The same can be said of the current prime minister. The current rule in Lebanon is based on the full implementation of United Nations Security Council resolution 1701. Any delay is full of dangers and risks wasting opportunities for reconstruction and reestablishing stability. Araghchi knows that the current nuclear crisis erupted at a very difficult time. The changes in Syria are comparable to the changes that took place in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was overthrown. Another Iraq and another Syria. Iran has not been able to make up such losses. Iraq did not hop off the Iranian train in wake of the Al-Aqsa Flood Operation and its ensuing wars, but it managed to remain outside of the storm and avoid any adventures. The Houthi missiles are not enough compensation for Iran's losses. One must pause at the situation in Gaza. The catastrophe there has not bounds and there are no limits to Israel's savagery. Hamas fought long and hard and paid hefty prices, but today, it has no other practical alternative than to seek shelter in Witkoff's proposal. Araghchi is aware of what happened to the Iranian train in wake of the Al-Aqsa operation. He knows that the countries of the region encourage building bridges with his own. Perhaps he even knows that accepting a lesser role for his country is much better than risking exposing it and its regime to a direct clash with the American military machine.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Ukraine destroyed 13 planes, damaged others in attack on Russian air bases: Officials
Ukraine destroyed at least 13 planes during an attack on Russian air bases, Ukraine's national security and defense council official said on Monday. Andriy Kovalenko, the head of Ukraine's Center for Countering Disinformation, said some other planes were also damaged in the attack, in a post on the Telegram messaging app. Developing
