logo
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal

Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal

Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges.
Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%.
The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised.
The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday.
Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States.
'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement.
'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.'
Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal.
Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.'
UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry.
Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion.
'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.'
Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs.
Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.'
When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.'
The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing.
An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher.
Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher.
'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US.
'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods.
'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change.
'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brits can skip passport queues at major holiday destination from this week
Brits can skip passport queues at major holiday destination from this week

Daily Mirror

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Brits can skip passport queues at major holiday destination from this week

Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas Symonds confirmed Keir Starmer's deal with the EU was delivering benefits already - allowing holidaymakers to zip through eGates instead of lengthy passport queues Holidaymakers from the UK can skip lengthy passport queues at a major European holiday destination from today, after Keir Starmer cut a deal with the EU. Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of eGate access to UK arrivals this week, the minister for EU relations has said. ‌ Taking a question about steps "to improve relations with the EU", Nick Thomas-Symonds - a minister in the Cabinet Office - told the Commons: "The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests - good for bills, borders and jobs. ‌ "It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers. "Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week." Starmer described the deal as a "win-win" as he shook hands with the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, in London last month. "Britain is back on the world stage," he declared. "[The deal] gives us unprecedented access to the EU market, the best of any country... all while sticking to the red lines in our manifesto." The PM went on to explain the impact of the "new partnership between an independent Britain and our allies in Europe" on voters' daily lives. "Let me set out why it is good for Britain," he said in a speech posted to X. "Today's deal will [...] help British holidaymakers. We're confirming that they will be able to use e-gates when they travel to Europe, ending those huge queues at passport control." ‌ Since Brexit, British passport holders have been considered "visa-exempt third-country nationals" and have generally had to queue for manual checks at border control to have their passport stamped. Brits were able to use e-gates at a limited number of airports in Spain and Portugal. However, the EU has now agreed to ease checks on British travellers more universally. ‌ The deal states that "there will be no legal barriers to e-gate use for British nationals travelling to and from European Union." It's yet to be confirmed when the rest of the rollout will go ahead. But the EU plans to launch its new Entry/Exit System (EES) in October 2025, replacing the need for non-EU citizens to have their passports stamped. It is thought that more EU airports will allow UK passengers to use the e-gates after the new system comes into effect. ‌ The system will require travellers to have their fingerprints scanned and a photograph taken so they can be registered to a database. Their data will then be stored for three years. Those who do not provide a fingerprint scan and photo will be denied entry. Some EU airports will still require additional checks and Brits may not be able to use e-gates here. ‌ Brits will also still be subject to the '90-day rule', whereby eligible non-EU citizens can spend 90 days in any 180-day period in the EU without a visa. Travel records will be digitised under the new EES to enforce this rule and increase border security. The 'landmark deal' is also expected to "lower food prices at checkouts", improve UK defence and put "more money in people's pockets," according to Starmer. Von der Leyen described it as "a historic moment [...] opening a new chapter in our unique relationship."

Trump is strongarming companies elsewhere into cutting DEI. Those that cave in now will regret it later
Trump is strongarming companies elsewhere into cutting DEI. Those that cave in now will regret it later

The Guardian

time6 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump is strongarming companies elsewhere into cutting DEI. Those that cave in now will regret it later

Organising a women's networking event in the US has become an act of defiance. Companies with equality-driven agendas risk losing government contracts. Some are receiving McCarthy-like letters asking them to confirm that they have no diversity policies. Activities designed to support women, including healthcare research, are being threatened, and companies are backtracking on former commitments. Women's networking events, the gathering of diversity data and targeted training are being questioned. And some companies are requesting that charities focused on women and girls consider changes to their programmes in order to navigate the current climate. The one I founded, Inspiring Girls, has already been asked to 'include men as role models'. This anti-diversity wave isn't just a social backlash to the many excesses of wokeness – it is politically orchestrated and driven. It crystallised in 2021, when the senator Josh Hawley devoted his entire keynote speech at the second National Conservatism Conference to 'reclaiming masculinity', calling for boys (not girls) to be taught competitiveness, strength, honesty and courage – as if those were only male values. Since then, the movement has reached the highest offices of power: the White House is its headquarters and its commander-in-chief is Trump's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, who promised last year to tackle 'anti-white racism' if Trump won a second term. The anti-diversity brigade has no shortage of money or allies: several 'tech bros' (whether out of conviction or FOMO) have joined in – as have tech venture capitalists and other Maga financiers. These are men who operate in fields dominated almost exclusively by other men and who wield enormous wealth and influence, yet they often cast themselves as victims. They hide their anti-diversity stance under the disguise of meritocracy. On the progressive side, there is a movement claiming that it is actually boys – particularly white working-class ones – rather than girls who are 'in crisis'. It is led by the American Institute for Boys and Men, which last week received a $20m grant from Melinda French Gates. They argue that boys lag behind girls in education and employment. It is true, of course, that many of the manufacturing jobs that many young men used to rely on are vanishing due to automation and tech (ironically, for the benefit of mostly male tech moguls). Unfortunately, however, this well-meaning movement is fuelling the anti-diversity brigade's narrative – because they can now claim that even progressives admit it is white men who are suffering. The Trump administration has not yet imposed specific obligations on businesses to withdraw diversity programmes beyond companies who have contracts with the government – including, now, some companies across the EU, but many are taking spontaneous actions. Some companies are doing so because their diversity policies were just for show, while others are simply acting out of fear. The trend is clear: many are eliminating references to diversity and equality from their websites and in their reporting; others are reneging from aspirational targets, stopping data-gathering on recruitment and promotions, and dismantling training programmes. Some of the companies that are backtracking have headquarters in the UK or Europe. And many of the US tech companies and funds that are leading the diversity backlash have subsidiaries and offices on this side of the Atlantic. Their actions are in straightforward conflict with the letter and the spirit of British and EU legislation on equality, such as EU corporate sustainability reporting rules or equal opportunities and equal pay directives. And yet the equality ministries in the British and other European governments – and in the European Commission – have remained largely silent. Most equality ministries and agencies are led by herbivorous politicians and officials who favour performative programmes over meaningful action. Confronting Trump is far too scary for them, which is why they have not set the limits of what companies can and cannot do, whether specifically or in general guidelines. Over time, it is possible the anti-diversity movement will yield some positives, as it could drive companies who continue to believe in diversity towards more meaningful, effective and data-based policies. Besides, in a litigation-led country such as the US, it is only a matter of time before the courts impose some limits on government-led anti-diversity intimidation. When they do, the backlash against companies that have acted spinelessly will have its own consequences. But the UK and the rest of Europe cannot be passive spectators waiting for the pendulum to swing again. Our equality authorities should counteract Trump's raid on diversity by providing clear official guidance to companies on what they can and cannot do – it is their legal and moral duty to do so. America First should not mean America Everywhere when it comes to the fundamental principles of diversity, equality and inclusion. Miriam González Durántez is an international trade lawyer and the founder and chair of Inspiring Girls

White House staff were ‘caught off guard' by Elon Musk's broadside against Trump's bill, report says
White House staff were ‘caught off guard' by Elon Musk's broadside against Trump's bill, report says

The Independent

time9 minutes ago

  • The Independent

White House staff were ‘caught off guard' by Elon Musk's broadside against Trump's bill, report says

President Donald Trump 's White House advisers were 'caught off guard' by Elon Musk 's astonishing attack on his 'big, beautiful bill' this week while Trump himself is said to be 'losing patience' with his billionaire ally, according to a report. Just days after Musk's 130-day tenure as a special government employee came to an end, the world's richest man began lashing out at Trump's signature tax and spending package, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' in an X post on Tuesday. A senior White House official now tells The Wall Street Journal that the president is not happy about Musk's intervention and is 'confused' by the billionaire's stance, given that they have spent the past four months working closely together. Asked whether it had hurt the relationship between the two men, the Journal 's sources indicated it was 'too soon to tell' but noted that, while Trump can be forgiving, he does not easily forget slights. Musk's bond with Trump certainly appears to be fraying, with the Big Tech boss cutting an increasingly beleaguered figure and reportedly annoyed by the bill's inclusion of a cut to an electric vehicle tax credit that benefits his Tesla customers and by Trump's recent decision to scrap his friend Jared Isaacman 's nomination to lead Nasa. The Tesla CEO last intervened over a Republican spending bill six months ago, firing out a string of tweets that forced House Speaker Mike Johnson into hasty rewrites just hours before Congress broke up for the Christmas recess. Musk's tweet on Tuesday sent shockwaves across the corridors of power in DC. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk wrote. He followed that up on Wednesday with a fresh appeal to 'KILL the BILL', imploring his millions of followers to contact their representatives and senators to remind them that 'bankrupting America is NOT ok!' Musk's opposition has garnered the support of conservative fiscal hawks like Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who share his concern that the bill could add at least $2.4 trillion to America's national debt over the next decade, with some estimates placing the total closer to $5 trillion. Invited to respond on Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill; it doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' While that has not yet happened this time, Speaker Johnson has expressed frustration. 'We had a great, very friendly, very fruitful conversation together,' Johnson said of Musk at his weekly press conference on Wednesday. 'Twenty-four hours later, he does a 180 and he comes out against the bill. And it surprised me, frankly.' Johnson argued that Musk is 'flat wrong' in his objections and said that while he himself was 'not upset,' Trump was 'not delighted that Elon did a 180,' a statement that might well be interpreted as a warning. One person who was delighted with Musk was Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, one of just two House Republicans who voted against the bill in the lower chamber last month. 'I figured he would eventually get there,' Massie told the Journal. 'You don't land rockets backwards or get cars to drive themselves by ignoring the people who are lying to you.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store