Clothing Retailer Dynamite Raises Prices 9% Amid Trade Tensions
Women's fast-fashion retailer Groupe Dynamite Inc. raised prices by 9% over the past year and plans to increase them at twice the rate of inflation for the foreseeable future, its chief executive officer said. Shares on Tuesday rose by the most since the company went public last year after it reported strong first-quarter results, including higher revenue.
'If you extrapolate, the cost of our goods with or without tariffs is really a negligible piece of the average unit,' CEO Andrew Lutfy said in an interview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
22 minutes ago
- The Verge
Trump is giving TikTok another ban extension
For the third time, President Donald Trump will extend the deadline for TikTok to spin out from its Chinese parent company or face a US ban. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed in a statement Tuesday that Trump will sign an executive order this week extending the deadline another 90 days, landing the new deadline in mid-September. The Trump administration will spend the next 90 days 'working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure,' Leavitt said. The extension, first signed on January 20th, theoretically offers legal cover for TikTok's US service providers who are subject to the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act from the hundreds of billions in penalties they could face for keeping the app online and in US app stores. But that legal cover was already shaky given that Trump's extensions are not codified into the law, which was passed overwhelmingly by a bipartisan vote in Congress, and upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court. As The Verge previously reported, ByteDance and an Oracle-led coalition had nearly hammered out a deal in April, but Trump's tariffs abruptly blew up the tentative agreement. While trade tensions between the US and China have simmered down, there's been no recent news about resurrecting that deal or another one. Even when a sale seemed likely, it was unclear whether China would allow ByteDance to sell the valuable algorithm that powers TikTok's video recommendations. 'The whole thing is a sham if the algorithm doesn't move from out of Beijing's hands' Several lawmakers, including those who've criticized a divest-or-ban law for TikTok and ByteDance, have warned that Trump's repeated extensions are untenable and illegal. After Trump's last extension in April, Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Mark Warner (D-VA) told The Verge the move was 'against the law' and said 'the whole thing is a sham if the algorithm doesn't move from out of Beijing's hands.' Even before the second extension, Sens. Ed Markey (D-MA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Cory Booker (D-NJ), who oppose a ban of TikTok, wrote Trump that it would be 'unacceptable and unworkable for your Administration to continue ignoring the requirements in the law.' They warned, 'any further extensions of the TikTok deadline will require Oracle, Apple, Google, and other companies to continue risking ruinous legal liability, a difficult decision to justify in perpetuity.' That's because TikTok service providers in the US can be fined for facilitating access to the app after the ban deadline, and Trump's extensions fall outside of the mechanisms allowed for in the law. So far, however, these companies appear to be relying on assurances from the administration that they won't be sued for keeping TikTok online, although it reportedly took a letter from the US attorney general herself to assuage Apple and Google's concerns. A court could evaluate whether Trump's actions are legal, but only if somebody sues to stop the extension — and so far, nobody has. Earlier this month, though, a Google shareholder filed a lawsuit against the company for allegedly failing to share internal records about its decision to flout the law under the Justice Department's assurances. The same shareholder had already filed suit against the DOJ for allegedly failing to share information about its decision not to enforce the law against Apple and Google. While members of Trump's party generally haven't gone so far as to call his extensions illegal, a dozen House Republicans said in a statement in April that 'any resolution must ensure that U.S. law is followed, and that the Chinese Communist Party does not have access to American user data or the ability to manipulate the content consumed by Americans.' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) told reporters that month that Trump 'ought to enforce the statute and ban TikTok. This middle way, I don't think is viable.' But it's not clear what would prevent Trump from approving indefinite extensions or a deal that doesn't meet the letter of the law. As Hawley acknowledged while speaking to reporters in April, 'Congress, we don't have an enforcement arm of our own.'
Washington Post
32 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Musk's X sues New York over requirement to show how social media platforms handle problematic posts
NEW YORK — Elon Musk 's X sued Tuesday to try to stop New York from requiring reports on how social media platforms handle problematic posts — a regulatory approach that the company successfully challenged in California. New York's law, which Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul signed late last year, is poised to take effect later this year. X maintains that the measure impinges on free speech rights and on a 1996 federal law that, among other things, lets internet platforms moderate posts as they see fit. New York is improperly trying 'to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process' by requiring 'politically charged disclosures' about it, Bastrop, Texas-based X Corp. argues in the suit. 'The state is impermissibly trying to generate public controversy about content moderation in a way that will pressure social media companies, such as X Corp., to restrict, limit, disfavor or censor certain constitutionally protected content on X that the state dislikes,' says the suit, filed in federal court in Manhattan. New York Attorney General Letitia James' office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the case. The law requires social media companies to report twice a year on whether and how they define hate speech, racist or extremist content, disinformation and some other terms. The platforms also have to detail their content moderation practices and data on the number of posts they flagged, the actions they took, the extent to which the offending material was seen or shared, and more. Sponsors Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly Member Grace Lee, both Democrats, have said the measure will make social media more transparent and companies more accountable. The law applies broadly to social media companies. But X is among those that have faced intense scrutiny in recent years, and in a 2024 letter to an X lobbyist, the sponsors said the company and Musk in particular have a 'disturbing record' that 'threatens the foundations of our democracy.' The lawmakers wrote before Musk became, for a time, a close adviser and chainsaw-wielding cost-cutter in Republican President Donald Trump's administration. The two billionaires have since feuded and, perhaps, made up . Since taking over the former Twitter in 2022, Musk, in the name of free speech, has dismantled the company's Trust and Safety advisory group and stopped enforcing content moderation and hate speech rules that the site followed. He has restored the accounts of conspiracy theorists and incentivized engagement on the platform with payouts and content partnerships. Outside groups have since documented a rise in hate speech and harassment on the platform. X sued a research organization that studies online hate speech – that lawsuit was dismissed last March. The New York legislation took a page from a similar law that passed in California — and drew a similar lawsuit from X . Last fall, a panel of federal appellate judges blocked portions of the California law, at least temporarily, on free speech grounds. The state subsequently settled , agreeing not to enforce the content-moderation reporting requirements. ___ AP Technology Writer Barbara Ortutay contributed from San Francisco.
Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer Says US Not Targeting Steel Ownership in Trade Talks
By and Ellen Milligan Updated on Save The UK does not need to push out British Steel's Chinese owners in order to cut a deal to reduce US tariffs on steel, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. Speaking to journalists at the G7 summit in Canada, Starmer said there was 'further work to do in relation to steel' in negotiations with President Donald Trump but that 'doesn't require us to change the ownership of British Steel.'
