Cannabis competitor flowering in convenience stores
BOSTON (SHNS) – One representative called it a 'wonderful, reefer-smelling bag' and another worried a drug-sniffing dog might alert to him at the airport later as he passed the bundle of products down the Cannabis Policy Committee dais Wednesday.
The bag didn't contain items sold in legal retail marijuana stores here, or even marijuana items sold on the illicit market. Inside were products purchased legally and without clear state regulation from gas stations, convenience stores and vape shops around Massachusetts, each one purporting to be a legal hemp product under federal law but offering the same kind of high as cannabis.
These intoxicating hemp-based products largely fall into a gray area of the law and between the regulatory cracks. Since the gummies, energy shot-like drink bottles and seltzers proliferated across Massachusetts convenience store checkout counters and social media feeds in recent years, lawmakers and regulators have already expressed a desire to straighten out what is and is not cannabis, and how it should all be regulated.
'In my opinion, if it smells like it, looks like it, I think it is it,' Cannabis Policy Committee co-chair Sen. Adam Gomez said Wednesday after hearing concerns about hemp products from legal cannabis retailers and others.
The products at issue get around the regulation that comes with cannabis by calling themselves hemp products, but the distinction between hemp and cannabis 'is really just a legal fiction, a legal creation,' Jesse Alderman, co-chair of Foley Hoag's nationwide cannabis practice, told the committee.
Hemp is defined as cannabis that contains no more than 0.3% Delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive compound of marijuana, by dry weight at the time of harvest. The 2018 federal farm bill removed hemp from the Controlled Substances Act and gave oversight of hemp production to federal and state departments of agriculture.
Alderman said 0.3% Delta-9 THC by weight would be a very small amount in a plant, but can be equivalent to a far greater amount of THC in a processed final product 'so that while they have a concentration of less than 0.3% while measured dry, they are intensely psychoactive.'
'I mean, they can knock your socks off,' he said.
On the committee's docket Wednesday was H 168 from Newburyport Rep. Dawne Shand, which would require the Cannabis Control Commission to regulate hemp-derived cannabinoid products and require a hemp endorsement from the CCC for their sale and transfer of such products.
It would define or redefine CBD, cannabinoids, Delta-8 THC, Delta-9 THC, and more. Something would be considered a 'hemp-derived cannabinoid product' if it is derived from hemp, intended for human consumption and contains more than 0.5 milligrams of THC per serving and 2.5 mg per multi-serving package.
'The intoxicating hemp industry makes a mockery of cannabis laws in states like Massachusetts, where we have attempted to create a fair, legal and safe cannabis market,' Shand said. 'The intoxicating hemp products are pure product competitors — beverages, edibles, pre-rolls, vapes — same high.'
Peter Gallagher, CEO of the licensed cannabis producer and retailer INSA, passed the bag of hemp products among committee members and explained that he bought more than 100 hemp products from more than 20 stores around the state and sent them out for testing.
'What we found was quite alarming. Approximately 90% of those products would qualify as cannabis, meaning that the percentage of Delta-9 was well above 0.3%. In fact, in some cases, it was well north of 10%. Not only that, about a third of those products wouldn't have passed the strict regulatory testing that's required by the state of Massachusetts, and would have failed for microbials, pesticides, in some case banned pesticides in the United States, as well as heavy metals and residual solvents,' he said, adding that none of the stores checked an ID and some were not charging sales tax at all.
He said among the products purchased was a package of edibles that contained 1,200 milligrams of THC per piece and about 36,000 mg for the entire package — well in excess of the state's legal limit for cannabis of 5 mg per piece and 100 mg per package.
'What we're seeing is cannabis is being sold in gas stations, convenience stores and vape shops under the guise of hemp. This really looks a lot like what we saw in 2019 with the vape crisis, where illegal, unregulated, untested vape cartridges were being sold with cutting agents in them and ultimately led to people harming themselves,' Gallagher said. 'I think a lot of consumers today don't understand that what's being purchased in these gas stations, convenience stores, vape shops, or even online, is different and potentially more damaging, especially with the synthetic cannabinoids, than what you're able to purchase in the regulated dispensaries.'
Republican Rep. Michael Soter of Bellingham has also filed legislation to regulate CBD and hemp products (H 179) and to regulate Delta-9 THC (H 173). He said Wednesday that his bills are based on conversations with the owner of a CBD store in his district, someone who has many of the same concerns as Gallagher.
'My biggest part of it is that I think there are a lot of CBD shop owners that are very concerned, like you are, about the Delta-9 levels and making sure that we regulate that, because I think what we're seeing in the level of that stuff out there is extremely toxic and we need to regulate it and we need to put more focus on that,' he said. 'I just want to make sure that we're kind of all aligned in what we're trying to do. We're not trying to hurt your industry, and I'm not trying to kill a CBD industry.'
Local News Headlines
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on WWLP.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WWLP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
5 hours ago
- CNN
Texas could soon ban THC products. The state's booming cannabis industry is fighting back
Holden Hylander carefully trims the top of a hemp plant inside a greenhouse, one of 3,000 plants that he oversees at this farm nestled in the sprawling Hill Country of Texas. Once processed, these crops will be turned into millions of gummies that are sold legally in the burgeoning THC market throughout the state. But those products may never make it to the shelves, as a bipartisan-passed bill now awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature to ban the sale and possession of THC consumables. By the time Hylander's plants are fully grown and ready to harvest in September, the products they become might be illegal. 'We spent a lot of time getting our processes down and following the rules,' said Hylander, director of farm operations for Hometown Hero, a veteran-owned cannabis company based in Austin. 'I've gotten licenses five years in a row and had zero complaints about what we do, but yet it's kind of getting pulled out from under us.' While marijuana is illegal in Texas, less potent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products became legal after a federal law in 2018 and a state law in 2019 essentially greenlit the hemp-growing industry. These laws were designed to expand agricultural opportunities for hemp farmers and allow the sale of CBD oils as wellness products, but critics argue the legislation inadvertently paved the way for the sale of stronger substances, like delta-8 THC or delta-9 THC, which can mimic the effects of weed. CBD and THC both come from hemp plants and can be used to treat anxiety, sleep, and pain, but THC is more potent and has psychoactive effects. Both are currently legal in Texas, but THC levels must be less than .3% delta-9 THC. The new law, if it goes into effect, would only allow for the sale and possession of less-potent, non-intoxicating hemp-derived products, like CBD. In the past six years, the cannabinoid industry has skyrocketed in Texas, largely due to the stronger THC products. The industry generated $5.5 billion last year alone in sales revenue, $2.1 billion in wages and $267 million in tax revenue, according to estimates from Whitney Economics, a data firm that produces reports for the broader cannabis industry. Supporters worry that if the ban goes into place in September, many of the industry's 5,500 registered hemp sellers — along with tens of thousands of jobs — could disappear overnight and push the demand back into the black market. According to the Department of State Health Services, registered sellers sell THC products at about 8,600 locations, many of them gas stations and convenience stores. While the ban would exempt products that only contain non-psychoactive compounds such as CBD, industry leaders say the market for those products alone is not profitable or sustainable for retailers who solely focus on hemp products. 'This ban is a gift to the cartels,' state Rep. James Talarico, a Democrat who opposed the bill, said in a speech last month. Leading the charge against THC products is the state's conservative lieutenant governor, Dan Patrick, who accuses the industry of producing items that far exceed the legal .3% limit of THC and marketing those products – like gummies, cookies and chips – to children. Supporters of the ban say the products are too easily available and have become a public safety issue, citing examples of adults and children who've experienced medical problems after consuming them. 'Nothing is more important than stopping a kid getting a hold of this junk,' said Patrick at a fiery news conference last week after the bill had been passed. It's unclear whether Abbott plans to sign or veto the bill. If he doesn't take action by June 22, the bill automatically becomes law. A spokesperson from his office told CNN the governor 'will thoughtfully review any legislation sent to his desk.' The hemp industry and opponents of the ban say the lieutenant governor is grossly misrepresenting the manufacturing of these products. They argue that legislators created the industry in the first place, and that the vast majority of hemp companies are responsible businesses that closely follow industry and state-mandated standards. They say the products have become a popular and safer alternative to pharmaceutical drugs and alcohol for help with anxiety, pain and sleep – and that the number of adults who benefit far outweighs the rare examples of those who experience extreme symptoms. It's also an industry that's thriving off a national trend of people moving away from alcoholic beverages. According to a 2024 study, a higher number of Americans reported using cannabis every day than drinking alcohol daily. On Monday at the state Capitol, a coalition of military veterans, farmers and business owners – along with the Texas Hemp Business Council – wheeled boxes into the governor's office with what they say are 5,000 handwritten letters and a petition with more than 100,000 signatures from Texans who want Abbott to veto the bill, known as SB3. 'SB3 violates the very principles Texas prides itself on: small government, individual freedom, and free enterprise,' said Cynthia Cabrera, president of the Texas Hemp Business Council. Texas isn't the only state that's wrestled with the emergence of these products. According to a 2023 report from The National Cannabis Industry Association, 17 states have banned delta-8 THC, for example, and seven states have severely restricted it. Last year, the Florida legislature passed a bill that would significantly restrict the sale of hemp-derived THC products, but Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed it, saying the regulations would be 'debilitating' to small businesses. In Texas, some law enforcement officials have spoken out against the growing industry and claim that more access to cannabis poses dangers to users. 'We see the psychotic episodes. We see the suicide attempt,' said Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis at a news conference hosted by the lieutenant governor last week. 'We sit down with parents who are heartbroken and devastated after something has happened with their child, after they consume something that everybody thought was safe.' Joel Rodriguez, a 25-year-old college student, said he's still recovering from what he called an addiction to THC products that he purchased online and at vape shops in the McAllen, Texas area. In 2022, Rodriguez said, he took one hit from a vape product that he said contained a mixture of synthetic delta-9 and delta-8, as well as two other cannabinoids known as HHC and THC-P, though he doesn't recall the exact brand. He said he immediately felt symptoms of paranoia that didn't subside for weeks. 'Everything started getting dizzy. I started to hear voices. I could hear people's thoughts. I would hear things crawling out of the walls,' he told CNN. 'I thought the sun was talking to me.' His family got him medical attention at a hospital, where he said he was diagnosed with cannabis-induced psychosis and prescribed a variety of prescription drugs. Rodriguez said he continued using vape products that he purchased in the Rio Grande Valley, and his family got him support at rehabilitation centers in Texas and Utah over the past three years. To this day, he said he's still taking clozapine to treat symptoms of schizophrenia and will need it indefinitely. He and his mother, Didi, appeared at a news conference at the Texas state Capitol on Monday to urge Abbott to sign the bill. 'In the world of cannabis-induced psychosis, we as families, we struggle to fight for our loved ones' well-being and put them back in … the path of wellness,' she said. 'It's a dark, horror-filled war against unseen enemies.' While incidents of cannabis-induced psychosis are rare, more studies are being done on why some people seem to be more susceptible than others. The votes on this bill have not fallen along strict party lines. Democratic State Sen. Roland Gutierrez voted with Patrick to ban these THC products. Gutierrez told CNN that while he wants to see Texas fully legalize and regulate cannabis, the current law in Texas has opened the door to many 'bad actors' selling dangerous synthetic products to young people. What we're selling to kids on the street and in convenience stores is just a bunch of crap,' Gutierrez said. The senator said he supported the move to ban THC products after lawmakers also voted to expand the ability of military veterans to get prescriptions under the state's restrictive medical marijuana program. 'Cannabis is a great healer of many things. It has to be regulated in some way,' Gutierrez said. 'But that's not what's happening in Texas.' Industry experts concede there may be some bad actors selling products that contain synthetics or illegal amounts of THC, but they say the overwhelming majority of companies follow the rules because they want to stay in business. Groups like the Texas Hemp Business Council have lobbied for more regulations, like age minimums, in previous legislative sessions but have not succeeded. 'I don't understand how Texas politicians can decide they're gonna create something. And then on a whim, six years later decide, 'Eh, we don't like how this went. We're gonna completely wipe it out. We're gonna shut down the industry and we're gonna harm all these individuals and all these small businesses in Texas,'' said Lukas Gilkey, co-founder of Hometown Hero, the Austin-based company that owns the hemp farm where Holden Hylander works. In Patrick's news conference last month, he displayed a variety of THC products before the cameras and specifically focused on a bag of edibles made by Hometown Hero. 'I don't know what's in it because no one knows what's in it,' he said. 'It can poison you — not just children, but adults.' Gilkey said he chuckled when he saw Patrick pick on his company's edibles, because his products label all of the ingredients and include a QR code on the packaging for people who want to learn more about the product. He said the products are sent to Drug Enforcement Administration partner labs and go through rigorous testing for accuracy standards, as well as testing for harmful constituents. 'He tries to make it seem like there's no regulation on these products when that's the opposite. This industry is heavily regulated within Texas. We have a lot of requirements that we have to go through to be fully legal within Texas,' Gilkey told CNN. 'We show everything we're required to by law.' If the ban goes into effect, roughly 200 employees at his company could be out of a job, he said. 'I moved here because the governor himself said that this was a state that supported small businesses,' said Gilkey, a Coast Guard veteran who also serves as an advocate for the hemp industry. 'That's why he came here. And now to be in a position where the state is deciding that they changed their mind on something is very unfortunate.' After fierce debate, lawmakers ultimately passed reforms this legislative session to expand the state's medical cannabis law as a concession. The new provisions increase the number of licensed dispensaries from three to 12 and add 'chronic pain' as an eligible medical condition. However, critics say the reforms are hardly enough to help the large population of Texans who use THC products for symptoms. Dave Walden, an Army veteran and senior vice commander for the VFW Department of Texas, said at a news conference on Monday that he became reliant on opioids while seeking care at the VA but said the drugs 'nearly destroyed' him. 'Since 2018, I haven't touched a single opioid,' he said, holding up a THC product. 'I've rebuilt my life. I've become a better leader, a better husband, a better father, and ultimately a better man. But now Senate Bill 3 wants to turn this into contraband. It wants to turn me and thousands of other veterans into criminals for choosing an alternative that works for us.' State Rep. Brian Harrison was among two House Republicans who opposed the ban. He further bucked his own party on Monday by publicly calling for Abbott to veto the bill, describing it as government overreach that will lead to an economic disaster. 'The government is not your parent,' he told CNN on Monday. 'And I'm very concerned about what it's going to do to Texas adults who want, or who rely on these products, and it either pushing them into much more dangerous and unregulated black markets or to more deadly and addictive pharmaceuticals.'
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tennessee hemp retailer uprooting store over new legislation
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Governor Bill Lee recently signed legislation to regulate the hemp industry, which some retailers say will force them out of the state or put them out of business. The bill, which passed last legislative session, essentially bans smokable hemp flower in Tennessee, the majority of what Ben Whitelaw, owner of The Flower Shop in Chattanooga, sells. 'They've banned CBD hemp. That's what they've done. All of it. THCA and CBD hemp. It's all going to be gone,' Whitelaw said. The bill includes several provisions, including a ban on .3% THCA, which lawmakers argue turns into THC when burned: the same chemical in marijuana that gets the user high. 'We were all told when we voted for hemp that, well, it's the nonintoxicating cousin to marijuana. You don't have to worry about people getting high. Well, y'all, that horse has left the barn,' House Majority Leader William Lamberth (R-Portland) said. Lawmakers who backed the bill have long described the hemp industry as 'the Wild West,' due to the lack of regulation. They argued new rules will protect consumers so they know what products they're purchasing. However, Whitelaw believes the bill was drafted for a different reason, partially because the Alcoholic Beverage Commission (ABC) will become the regulating agency of the hemp industry under the legislation. 'This bill was brought about to destroy the infrastructure we had created and hand the scraps to the alcohol industry so they could make money off the really light strength drinks and edibles that are still allowed under this bill.' Whitelaw told News 2 the majority of the products he sells will soon be banned. He plans to use his retirement fund to close down his store and move it to North Carolina. 'We're going to try to move it to North Carolina, as close to the border as possible and continue to help residents of Tennessee if they wish to come and see us,' Whitelaw said. Hemp industry experts hope to sue the state over the legislation, but finding the money to pay the legal fees will likely be a challenge. ⏩ The bill is set to become law Jan. 1. 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Worries fuel push to elevate water woes on policy agenda
BOSTON (SHNS) – The Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources got its feet wet Tuesday, diving into testimony on bills dealing with water. Water and water infrastructure generally do not grab the spotlight in the way that other policy areas like transportation, education and housing do, but lawmakers and advocates who testified before the committee stressed their major economic, public health and environmental implications. Testimony Tuesday touched on issues related to PFAS, lead and other contaminants; water quality standards for private wells; drought management strategies; and the future of the networks of pipes that move water to and from homes. 'Massachusetts is facing a growing water infrastructure crisis. The pipes that deliver drinking water, the systems that treat wastewater and the stormwater infrastructure that protects our neighborhoods is decades or even centuries old. The U.S. EPA estimates that Massachusetts needs almost $37 billion in drinking water and clean water investment over the next 20 years. That is billion, not million,' Jennifer Peterson, executive director of the Massachusetts Water Works Association, told lawmakers. Peterson pitched a bill (H 1022 / S 563) that would establish a program for upgrading and expanding water infrastructure and would call for $200 million in annual state funding. She said state assistance is critical since 'water infrastructure investment is a shared responsibility among rate payers, the state and the federal government.' Local ratepayers have been burdened by, in some cases, double-digit water rate increases in recent years and the Trump administration's fiscal 2026 budget proposes to reduce funding for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund by 90%, she said. The bill, filed by Rep. Ted Philips of Sharon and Sen. John Cronin of Fitchburg, would dedicate $2 billion to expand the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority's capacity with an emphasis on 'improving drinking water quality and increasing housing capacity,' designate $375 million for the HousingWorks infrastructure program, allocate $138 million for the Massachusetts Clean Water Trust, and provide $78.5 million for the Commonwealth Sewer Rate Relief Fund, according to a summary from Cronin. 'The infrastructure is aging, and we really need to start investing in it. And there's not enough money on the local level, there just isn't. Certainly not with Proposition 2 1/2, that makes it crushing,' Paul Anderson, vice president of the Barnstable County Water Utilities Association, told the committee. Sen. Becca Rausch, the Senate co-chair of the committee, pressed Peterson, Anderson and others on where the roughly $3 billion contemplated in the bill should come from. 'I'll be very frank, right, having done this role and for a number of years now … nobody ever wants to pay more taxes. So where would we get $3 billion for this?' she asked. Peterson responded that the bill calls for a revival of the Water Infrastructure Advisory Committee that was created in a 2014 water law but has been mostly dormant since about 2018. She said that group would 'discuss where the new revenue sources would come from.' She said the conversation in previous years revolved around taxes on products that have a connection to water infrastructure. 'Back in 2012 when Representative [Carolyn] Dykema and Senator [James] Eldridge were leading the Water Infrastructure Finance Commission, toilet paper tax, pharmaceutical tax — things that had a nexus to water — were discussed, but there was never any consensus around how to move those forward,' she said. Rep. Mike Connolly of Cambridge was joined by Middlesex District Attorney Marian Ryan to support legislation (H 920) that would require the Department of Environmental Protection to create and administer a voucher program to cover the costs of PFAS filtration equipment for households in municipalities where PFAS levels exceed the maximum contamination levels. Citing the Sierra Club, Connolly said 96 communities in Massachusetts had water systems that exceed that maximum containment level for PFAS as of February, up from 56 communities a few years earlier. 'There may be a question as to why the district attorney's office is involved in this water issue. It is what Representative Connolly referenced. I feel that part of the privilege of serving as the district attorney is to be looking at really a whole menu of prevention efforts,' Ryan said. 'We know, as the representative just mentioned, the problem with PFAS in water has grown by 47% in the last four years. Many of those communities are in my county.' The bill got a favorable report from the Environment Committee last session but then died in House Ways and Means, according to the committee's summary. Connolly said the version he filed this session has been updated to reflect feedback from key stakeholder groups. Ryan said the bill would provide vouchers for people to obtain two PFAS filtration devices in a five-year period, and it would cover the costs to change the filters every six months as recommended. She said the filters are placed at the point of water service, like faucets, washing machines, tub spouts and more. The district attorney said a set of filtration devices for a household costs about $300, and the replacement filters cost less than $50 each. Rep. Danillo Sena of Acton focused his testimony on well water, which he said is common throughout his district. Across Massachusetts, about 500,000 people rely on private wells for their water service, he said, but the state has no standards for private well testing or water quality. 'Because of this, many families don't know what is in their water. They purchase their home with no guarantee that their water is safe. Contaminants like lead, arsenic, bacteria and PFAS have been found in wells across Massachusetts. These have long-term effects on health, and with children at more risk than adults,' he said, testifying in support of a bill (H 1049) he filed. 'This legislation ensures that homeowners do not need to worry about the quality of their water through creating standards of wells [and requiring] testing. The Massachusetts Constitution established the right of clean air and water. We must uphold that right and protect 500,000 residents that currently do not have any legal protection.' Similar legislation from Sen. Jamie Eldridge and Reps. Natalie Blais and Meghan Kilcoyne (S 585 / H 900) was also on the committee docket Tuesday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
