
The seven-year wait for a dentist: why Linda Colla pulled out her own teeth
Linda Colla holds an imaginary tooth between her forefinger and thumb and pulls it. Then she adds some rotation. Extracting her own teeth required wiggling and twisting, she explains. 'It took me a couple of weeks to get each one out, because they just loosened and loosened and loosened. I used a tissue to get a better grip.'
We meet in her bungalow near Ottery St Mary in Devon, which she shares with her labrador, Cleo, and her jack russell, Josie. Before our meeting, she told me over the phone that she had kept the yanked teeth. I ask to see them. She disappears and returns with a small box. 'They're a bit grim‑looking now, because they've been out for a while.'
The three teeth in the box are yellow, certainly, but actually don't look too bad. They weren't, she says. 'There was nothing wrong with the teeth; it was gum disease.'
She points to a front incisor. It was the first to come out. Then a canine and finally a big molar. 'It sounds very dramatic, pulling them out. But actually they were already loose,' she says. There was some pain on extraction, but they had been causing her constant pain before that. 'It was too painful to eat. They just had to come out.'
I find it difficult to listen to Colla's story. A few days before meeting her, I had an extraction. This was on the NHS, after a wait of six months; another patient cancelled their appointment, so I replaced them and had the extraction done in hospital, under local anaesthetic. I can't imagine having to do it myself.
Colla, who is 75, started having problems with gum disease and her teeth in her 30s. 'It was probably too much coffee, too much wine and smoking,' she says. She was living near Nottingham and had an NHS dentist when she started having her teeth replaced by dentures in her late 30s. Over the years, her real teeth were gradually supplanted by false ones, attached to a plate.
In 2018, Colla moved to east Devon. She contacted various dental surgeries and was told either that they didn't take NHS patients or that they didn't have the capacity to take any more. 'One receptionist said they'd love to take more NHS patients, but with the budget given by the government they can only take a certain amount.'
She went on a waiting list. 'I got an email once – or was it a text? – asking if I still wanted to be on the list. I said yes, but I haven't heard anything since.' She presumes, seven years on, she is still on that list.
To have a tooth removed privately costs at least £150. Colla couldn't afford that; she used to work as a charity area manager and a dog warden, among other things, and now receives pension credit. When her three remaining real teeth became too painful to live with, about three years ago, she felt she had no choice but to take matters into her own hands.
She is by no means the first person to do so. Put NHS dentistry into a chair, get it to say ahh, shine a bright light on it and you will see a picture of neglect and decay.
Thirteen million people in England – 28% of the adult population – have an unmet need for dentistry, according to an analysis in July by the British Dental Association (BDA). That includes 5.6 million people who tried and failed to get an appointment in the past two years; 5.4 million who didn't try because they thought they wouldn't get one; and 1.25 million who were put off by the cost. The number of people on waiting lists for an NHS dentist is estimated to be about 780,000.
For new patients, the service has effectively ceased to exist. In December, ONS data showed that 94.1% of people in England who didn't have a dentist and tried to access NHS dental care in the previous 28 days were unsuccessful. There is some regional variation. London is a bit better, at 71.6%; the south-west, where Colla lives, is the second worst, at 96.7%. These are not healthy numbers.
What's more, when the BDA and the Daily Mirror called up 100 practices listed on nhs.uk as 'accepting new patients when availability allows', they found that 86 were not accepting new patients. Some practices reported a waiting list of up to 10 years. In March 2023, YouGov found that 10% of Britons had carried out their own dental work; 34% of those had pulled out – or tried to pull out – their teeth.
Shawn Charlwood, a member of the BDA's General Dental Practice committee, is well aware of the problem. 'This is people in pain, with swelling, not able to sleep, not able to go to work, not able to look after their children, just desperate for dental care, and in the end resorting to filling their own teeth, re-cementing crowns and bridges, pulling their own teeth out.'
He attributes it to two decades of underfunding and an NHS contract that is 'unfit for purpose'. This contract is an agreement between a dental practice and the NHS that specifies the number of treatments the practice will provide each year. 'Successive governments have essentially kicked that can down the road,' says Charlwood. 'Of any sector in the NHS, dentistry has seen the greatest real-term reduction in financial support and we've got a contract that doesn't allow dentists to deliver care to those who most need it.'
The NHS dental contract is complicated. Practices vary in how much NHS dentistry they provide, depending on the size of the contract they have with their local branch of NHS England. They are paid a fixed sum for a specific amount of dental work; when that money is used up, their only option is to offer private care.
Treatment comes in three bands. Band 1 includes examination, advice and scale and polish; band 2 includes fillings, root canals and extractions; and band 3 includes bridges, crowns and dentures. But the practice is paid one fee for treatment within a band. 'Whether you need a small number of fillings or a large number of fillings and a lot of treatment, you would still fall into that band, so the dentist would be paid the same,' says Charlwood.
Patients with a higher disease burden require more time in the chair, which is incompatible with the rigid system of targets for NHS dentists. Some small changes have been made to the contract recently, 'but, in essence, if you haven't seen a dentist for a long time and need a lot of work, the contract really does not support dentists to deliver that care', says Charlwood. 'That is fundamentally the problem – and many dentists are subsidising NHS activity through their private activity and patients. Clearly, that isn't what we want; we want NHS dentistry to stand on its own two feet.'
Colla is more than happy to have a go at the previous government. 'The NHS has been starved of funding for years. We've had the Tories for the last 14 years and they've made an absolute hash of everything. But when you put people like Boris Johnson in charge, what do you expect?'
What about the Labour government? Charlwood says it started off making the right noises. The BDA met the health secretary, Wes Streeting, the Monday after Labour won the general election: 'He absolutely agreed that NHS dentistry was in crisis.' For the first time in the 76-year history of NHS dentistry, it was a doorstep issue during the election campaign. YouGov polling for the BDA in May showed that access to dentistry was a bigger concern than education or even crime. The access crisis combined with the cost of living crisis means that millions who can't afford to go private, such as Colla, have nowhere to go.
Seven months after the election, how is the government doing? 'To be honest, we've not seen a lot of progress,' says Charlwood. 'You could argue that, since July, things have objectively become a little bit worse. The budget added new costs for practices. We're employing receptionists, nurses and other staff and their employer national insurance contributions will have gone up.
'I think the profession has been very patient, but goodwill is in short supply and patience is running out. Frankly, ministers need to offer something for the thousands of demoralised NHS colleagues thinking twice about what they're going to do next. Many practices are finding it hard to deliver the care to patients and balance the books as well; they are having to subsidise NHS activity through their non-NHS activity.'
If something isn't done soon, Charlwood says, the service will continue to decline and it will become ever more difficult to get NHS dentistry – for children as well as adults. NHS data suggests that 45% of children did not see an NHS dentist in the year to March 2024, while a significant number haven't seen a dentist for longer than that. On average, 119 extractions of children's teeth are undertaken every working day in England, two-thirds of those because of tooth decay; this decay is the principal reason for hospital admissions for children aged five to nine. Like gum disease, says Charlwood, tooth decay is preventable.
The state of children's teeth and the lack of care for them is what most upsets Colla, now that she has pulled out the last of her teeth. 'They have got their whole lives ahead of them and this is the legacy they have got: bad oral health for the rest of their lives. I mean, we're going back to the 1800s, aren't we? When I was a kid, you had dentists coming around the schools, checking the teeth.'
Charlwood says England spends a smaller proportion of its health budget on dentistry than any other European country: 'Not just Germany, Holland, France, but every European nation – the whole lot.' He says the state of the country's teeth is apparent even just on a walk down the high street. 'I notice it clearly – it's what I'm interested in – and I think it's embarrassing and it's not necessary. As well as pain, swelling, infection, the ability to work or go to school, there are all the social issues if you've got poor dentition – job interviews, interacting with people in face-to-face roles – that all become more difficult.'
Colla says: 'You do not realise what teeth mean to you until you lose them. Teeth are confidence-builders … When they took out my front teeth, I cried.'
After pulling out her last three teeth, Colla was left with visible, confidence-sapping gaps, which the state wouldn't fill for her. For that, she managed to cobble together the money to go private. 'He didn't charge me for the initial consultation, which was good of him. Then it was nearly £300 to put three on the plate.'
She has plans for the ones she pulled out. 'When I've got the money, I shall cover them in gold and hang them round my neck. Why not? People have done worse than hang teeth around their neck, haven't they?' she says, laughing. For now though, her teeth go back in the box.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Back pain can be eased with walking – but there's a specific number of minutes to reach per day
Hitting 10,000 steps a day is a goal for millions of us. But the number of minutes we walk for may be a more important target to focus on. Scientists believe being on your feet for over an hour-and-a-half every day could slash the risk of chronic lower back pain. Norwegian and Danish researchers found people who walk for over 100 minutes a day cut this risk by almost a quarter compared to those who clocked 78 minutes per day or less. They also discovered faster walkers were less likely to have chronic back pain—but the effect was less pronounced than walking for longer. Experts, who labelled the findings important, urged policy makers to push walking as a 'public health strategy' to reduce the risk of the agonising condition. In many cases, lower back pain starts suddenly and improves within a few days or weeks. But if it sticks around for more than three months, it's classed as chronic, according to the NHS. In some cases, it can be considered a disability. In the study, 11,194 Norwegians, with an average age of 55, were quizzed on their health and how much exercise they did per week. Almost a sixth (14.8 per cent) reported suffering from lower back pain, answering 'yes' to the following questions, 'During the last year, have you had pain and/or stiffness in your muscles or joints that lasted for at least three consecutive months? and 'Where have you had this pain or stiffness?' Participants were considered to have the condition if they answered yes to the first question and reported pain in the lower back to the second. Both men and women were involved in the study, and 100 minutes was found to be the optimum length of time for both sexes, and all ages. Writing in the journal JAMA Network Open, the researchers concluded: 'Compared with walking less than 78 minutes per day, those who walked more than 100 minutes per day had a 23 per cent reduced risk of chronic lower back pain. 'The reduction in risk of chronic lower back pain leveled off beyond a walking volume of about 100 minutes per day. 'Our findings suggest that daily walking volume is more important than mean walking intensity in reducing the risk of chronic lower back pain. 'These findings suggest that policies and public health strategies promoting walking could help to reduce the occurrence of chronic lower back pain.' The researchers also noted that their results are 'likely generalisable beyond the Norwegian adult population, as physical inactivity prevalence in Norway is comparable to that observed in other high-income countries'. They did note some limitations of the study, including that participants with higher walking volume tended to exercise more often and reported higher physical work demands, which might give them a physical advantage over other members of the group. In the UK, musculoskeletal conditions (MSK)—including back pain—are the second biggest reason for people being 'economically inactive'—where someone is out of work and not looking for work. Figures released by the Government in December 2024 revealed that MSK conditions affect approximately 646,000 Britons, 1-in-4 of the 2.8m who are claiming long-term sickness benefits. MSK comes second only to mental health issues for reasons why people are unable to work. It was estimated that 23.4 million working days in the UK were lost due to MSK conditions in 2022. NHS waiting lists for MSK community services are the highest of all community waits in England, with 348,799 people in September 2024 waiting to see a specialist. As part of their Get Britain Working White Paper, the Government pledged a £3.5million package to 17 Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) across England to improve local MSK services.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
NHS 'faces hike in drugs prices' as part of government's trade deal with Trump as US president seeks to help Big Pharma
The NHS could see billions added to its annual drugs bill under the trade deal done by Keir Starmer with Donald Trump 's America. The president wants foreign countries to pay more for drugs made in the US to help Big Pharma firms make more money abroad. The health service in England currently uses a drug-pricing scheme that sees drug-makers discount the price of medicine sold in bulk to avoid it busting a £20billion cap. But manufacturers have claimed the system is not viable and risks investment in the UK because it is more expensive than the schemes used by other countries. They pay back almost a quarter of their UK sales to the Government in rebates to avoid busting the cap, far more than the 15 per cent estimated and way above the average 5.7 per cent rebate in France, 7 per cent in Germany and 9 per cent in Ireland. The deal done at the start of May promised the sector 'significantly preferential treatment', with ministers vowing 'to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the UK'. A White House source told the Telegraph it expected the NHS to start paying more to improve the balance sheets of American firms. Last week the CEO of Pfizer accused the UK and other European nations of 'free-riding all these years' on the back of US-based investment in pharmaceuticals. Albert Bourla told a conference that given US pressure on European countries to pay more, prices there could increase. He suggested the Trump administration should treat the sector like Nato defence spending and demand US allies pay more of their GDP into it. The US is also demanding the UK use fewer cheaper drugs from China, the Telegraph claimed. The President threatened to slap a 25 per cent tariff on UK pharmaceuticals entering the US, which last year totalled £6.6 billion. He also issued an executive order last month directing drugmakers to lower the prices of their medicines to align with what other countries pay. Health Secretary Wes Streeting is reviewing the rebate, which is likely to be wrapped in with ongoing US tariff talks, sources add. The UK spends a smaller share of its overall healthcare costs on medicines than any comparable country, according to the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), whose members includeUS drugs giants such as Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck and Biogen.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
I thought my aching leg was from working from home – but it was sign of killer timebomb from pill millions take
A MUM put her aching leg down to being inactive while working from home - until she was hospitalised, riddled with blood clots caused by her daily pill. Amy Pitt says she is 'grateful that she's still here' to raise her two young sons, after doctors said she could have died if she left it any longer. 6 6 The 37-year-old is now urging others to be wary of the same pills. Despite using the same contraceptive pill since a teenager, she now urges other women to 'make sure they're aware of the risks' before starting the oral contraceptive. The combined hormonal contraception pill causes the potential risk of a blood clot in your leg or lung, which affects one in 1,000 people, according to the NHS. Amy, who lives in Solihull, West Midlands, said: "It's just a bit shocking. My pill could have killed me.' The civil servant was prescribed the combined pill in September 2024 to prevent her getting pregnant following her IVF birth and to help her gain weight. Having had no previous issues, when Amy began experiencing pain in her left leg in May she blamed it on being inactive. Amy said: "I work from home and I started feeling the usual aches and pains in my left leg. "I thought 'maybe it's because I don't do enough because I often work from home'. I'm not active or walking around but I'm not unfit. "It just got gradually worse and it got to the point where it was aching quite a lot. I thought I'd pulled a muscle or something. "I contacted 111 and they said 'book an appointment, we'll send you a link'. I couldn't use the link but I thought 'I'm just going to leave it. It's not going to be anything serious. I'm wasting their time and they're clearly so busy'. Understanding blood clots "It was only the next day I woke up and it was swollen and a bit discoloured. My left leg felt longer than the other one. When I was standing straight, one wasn't touching the floor. "It's basically the groin bit that was solid and bulging. When I stood up it was very hard to touch. I got a tape measure out and one leg was two or three inches difference in the top of my leg. The pain had also gotten worse in my tummy." After calling 111 they booked her a hospital appointment and she had blood tests before scans to test for a possible tumour. However, numerous tests and scans revealed Amy had an occlusive thrombus and extensive blood clots in the major veins in her leg. She also had a pulmonary embolism, a life-threatening condition where a blood clot blocks an artery in the lungs. Amy said: "It's just crazy because I'm only young and I've got a blood clot caused by the Pill. "The doctor said 'your blood clots are so extensive. One of them is completely blocking the blood flow'.' Due to fly to Greek island of Crete a week later, doctors warned this 'could've been fatal for her' due to the cabin pressure. Flights can increase the risk of a blood clot already. And people who have a recent blood clot diagnosis are not advised to fly. Amy says: "I have two children so I was just thinking 'could you imagine if I'd gone on that flight. I could've been stuck in another country'. It's scary. "They said it was the pill and that I had to stop it today so it went straight in the bin. "I should've looked at it before taking it again but you rely on the doctors to tell you what's suitable and what's not. "I'm so grateful I got checked out when I did. I just knew that I couldn't afford not to get this checked because I've got two children." Amy admitted her leg may stay swollen for up to a year and is currently taking blood thinning medication to allow the blood clots to dissolve. She now wants to spread awareness to other women about the potentially 'life-threatening' risks. 6 6 6 6 Amy said: "I'm just grateful that I'm still here. Even now there's still potential that more clots could go from the leg to the lungs. I'm constantly on edge. 'Do I need to call the doctor'. It's given me a bit of anxiety. "It's just waiting for these clots to dissolve and hope that my life will get back to normal. "I'm on blood thinners now, so any bump to the head you have to call 111 because it can cause internal bleeding. "I have to carry an alert card in case I'm in an accident. Thankfully I've had no injuries so far. "I don't think I was aware this was one of the risks. That's what I've got to take accountability for. "In the small print of all these medications it does tell you all the risks. I think I was a bit naive. "Just make sure you talk to your doctor about the risks and make sure you're aware of the risks yourself. Read the small print. The odds of you getting one are low but the odds are still there. It could be life-threatening."