People behind bars work, too, but often they're denied basic rights
(Stock photo by)
As workers around the world unite this May Day to celebrate hard-fought rights and demand justice in our workplaces, let us not forget those who are too often left out of these conversations: people in prison.
People behind bars labor every day — cooking, cleaning, maintaining prison facilities, even fighting wildfires. Yet unlike other workers, they have few rights, are paid pennies or nothing at all, and are without access to the most basic human needs and at the mercy of others with little to no recourse.
In Colorado, people in prison can be denied family visitation — calls, video chats, or in-person visits — if they choose not to participate in a prison work program. This practice is cruel, coercive, and completely out of step with the values May Day represents.
The Right to Family and Community Connection Act, House Bill 25-1013, would enshrine the right to family visitation as a matter of law — one that cannot be stripped away for refusing to work.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Prison labor is already a form of economic injustice. But when you tie a worker's ability to see their children or speak to a parent to their willingness to work under these conditions, it's not just economic coercion, it's inhumane.
Coloradans — regardless of party — know that family isn't a reward. It's a lifeline. It's also one of the most powerful tools for rehabilitation. Research shows that people in prison who maintain strong family bonds are less likely to reoffend and more likely to successfully reintegrate into society.
This isn't just smart public policy. It's basic humanity.
We don't have to look far to see the human cost. David Turner, a 24-year-old father of two, was placed on Restrictive Privileges status for 'failure to work' — punished after being marked absent on days he wasn't scheduled and for a shift he missed while receiving medical care. For 43 days, David was confined 22 hours a day, cut off from his family — not even allowed to send letters to his children.
As David put it, 'Getting out of prison and back to my family is very important to me, and knowing I can be kept in prison longer if I attempt to choose not to work coerces me to work against my will … I feel like a slave being forced to work against my will by CDOC. Everybody does.'
No one should be forced to choose between enduring forced labor or losing all contact with the people they love.
May Day reminds us that the dignity of labor must be fiercely protected — and that includes the dignity of those whose rights are denied and whose voices are often silenced.
This May Day, let's extend our solidarity to all workers, including those behind prison walls. Let's fight for fair wages, safe conditions, and freedom from retaliation — and for the fundamental human right to stay connected to the people we love.
Every person — no matter where they are – needs the right to stay connected to their loved ones without fear of retaliation or exploitation. The Right to Family and Community Connection Act would guarantee that right.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
David Hogg won't run again after DNC votes to redo vice chair elections
David Hogg will not seek reelection to his Democratic National Committee leadership position after the party announced Wednesday that members had voted to redo the vice chair contests he and Malcolm Kenyatta won in February. 'Ultimately, I have decided to not run in this upcoming election so the party can focus on what really matters,' Hogg said in a statement. Hogg's decision not to run again ends a monthslong intraparty fight between the young gun control advocate and much of the national committee that has distracted from the party's efforts to rebuild after devastating 2024 election losses. The outgoing vice chair has accused party leaders of attempting to oust him from his position over frustration with his plan to primary 'ineffective' Democratic incumbents in safe seats through his PAC Leaders We Deserve. DNC members have argued that Hogg has mischaracterized the vote. The initial challenge to how the committee handled the February 1 vote for two vice chair positions was made in late February, months before Hogg announced his primary initiative. Still, members' feelings toward Hogg and his ongoing, public dispute with party leaders loomed large over the vote. The proposal to hold a new election passed 75% to 25% with 89% of DNC members participating. DNC chairman Ken Martin praised Hogg for his work on the committee. 'I commend David for his years of activism, organizing, and fighting for his generation, and while I continue to believe he is a powerful voice for this party, I respect his decision to step back from his post as Vice Chair,' Martin said in a statement. 'I have no doubt that he will remain an important advocate for Democrats across the map.' Had Hogg run again, he would have faced Kenyatta in an election for a position which, under the DNC's gender parity rules, must go to a man. 'I'm grateful to the overwhelming support I've received in this reelection from DNC members and I look forward to getting back to work electing Democrats up and down the ballot,' Kenyatta said in a statement. 'I wish David the best.' Voting for the other vice chair seat will run from Sunday morning through Tuesday afternoon. Three female candidates who were in the running in February will be eligible: Kalyn Free, an Oklahoma Democratic activist who filed the challenge, as well as Kansas state party chair Jeanna Repass and Washington state party chair Shasti Conrad. Separately, the DNC is also weighing a new proposal put forth by Martin that would officially require elected party leaders to stay neutral in primaries. The DNC is expected to vote on that measure at an August meeting. This story has been updated with additional details. CNN's Arlette Saenz contributed to this report.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Parent reacts to Southside Stadium nearing completion
YOUNGSVILLE, La. (KLFY) — After countless of meetings and campaigns, a Southside High School parent is proud to say the construction of the football stadium is almost complete. Eric David is one of many parents who spearheaded the efforts to get a football stadium built at Southside High School. Now that there is a tangible football field and stands for the crowd to sit in, David is more than excited for the games to come. 'It's definitely a surreal feeling.' David said, 'It's definitely a surreal feeling. I guess I'd be lying if I said I thought this day would finally come.' David, along with many other Southside parents, traveled with their football team for 8 seasons as they also campaigned for the stadium to be built. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Louisiana Board of Ethics decides on LPSS board member's request While attending school board meetings, creating a social media group, even pitching a sales tax for the school zone to fund the stadium, David reflected on the years spent fighting for the field. 'Kind of feeling helpless.' David said. 'And not knowing, not understanding why other people couldn't see the need as much as the parents and the students and faculty here.' That need would finally be met in February of last year when the school board announced funding would be allocated to build the stadium. With the construction nearly complete, David said he's excited to see the benefit it brings to local businesses and to the home field pride at Southside. 'And that's what I kind of hoped would happen, that this can be a Friday night place where community can gather and root on our team.' David said. 'A lot of thanks to Lafayette Parish and our superintendent, our board members to finally doing the right thing. And they put the work in the research and the work into to finally get a stadium on Southside campus.' Although his kids have now graduated from Southside High School, David said there are still plans for his family to be in those stands on Friday nights. Momentum builds for revitalizing Bertrand Drive in Lafayette Senate GOP seeks to cut SALT cap, triggering fight with House An Active Weather Pattern Will Continue Through the Weekend… Thief steals new weed eater from veterans, police officer speaks out What to know about the new 'Nimbus' COVID variant Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Second major protest against Trump planned across Oregon, nationwide
Thousands of Oregonians are expected to take part in a wave of protests on Saturday, June 14, as part of the nationwide 'No Kings' movement — a coordinated series of protests against President Donald Trump and presidential overreach. More than 1,500 protests are planned across the country, including dozens in Oregon cities large and small. The official 'No Kings' website lists hundreds of protests. Here's where to find them. The demonstrations fall on a significant date: June 14 marks Trump's 79th birthday, as well as Flag Day, and the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. The Trump administration plans to hold a military-style parade in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the event, featuring tanks and other military displays, which critics say is emblematic of Trump's overreach as president. Organizers at Indivisible Oregon, the Portland-based chapter of the progressive group Indivisible, say the protests are intended to be peaceful demonstrations, pushing back against the planned display in Washington, D.C., which they call a troubling sign of Trump's increasing authoritarianism. 'This display of might, before a president who already behaves like a dictator and views the military as his personal foot soldiers, intended to intimidate opponents and solidify his image as a strongman, necessarily elicits comparisons with the worst totalitarian regimes — the Soviet Union, North Korea, China, Iraq, and Nazi Germany,' Indivisible Oregon wrote on its website. Protests follow months of unrest and political fallout The June 14 protests are the latest in a series of organized events against Trump and his policies, following Memorial Day rallies, May Day demonstrations, and the April 'Hands Off' protests. That earlier wave of actions targeted Trump's relationship with billionaire Elon Musk, who at the time headed the controversial Department of Government Efficiency. That group slashed federal budgets and shuttered agencies while increasing federal contracts for Musk's companies. Much has changed since the spring. Musk left the administration in May following significant financial losses at Tesla, where he is CEO. Since then, Musk has had a dramatic falling out with Trump, at one point writing on his social media platform, X, about the president's ties to registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Many of those posts were later deleted. Concerns grow over federal crackdown on dissent In California, Trump has drawn sharp criticism for deploying Marines and members of the California National Guard to quell protests against immigration officials. Jules Boykoff, a political science professor at Pacific University who studies protest movements, said that decision may inspire others locally to stand up and protest. 'Some recent events have upped the poignancy of the moment,' Boykoff said. 'They have upped the ante politically. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if we saw enormous crowds across the country.' Gov. Tina Kotek said Monday that she has no plans to deploy the Oregon National Guard this weekend and pushed back strongly against federal interference. 'I am the commander in chief (of the Oregon National Guard),' Kotek told reporters June 9. 'We are taking care of our communities. If there is any activity that needs to be taken care of, it will be done by local law enforcement. Right now, all protests have been peaceful and there's no reason to think that it'll be otherwise.' 'This is what a healthy democracy looks like' Boykoff said the Trump administration uses violent police response as a way of crushing dissent and the country is experiencing a unique moment in its history. 'And what a moment it is, where the governor of Oregon has to proactively suggest not wanting the National Guard called out,' Boykoff said. 'The fact that she has to preemptively stand up for basic protocol speaks to the uniqueness of this moment. And that injects unpredictability as well.' But that should not stop people from exercising their rights, he said. 'Just because a protest doesn't lead to an automatic outcome doesn't mean that it's useless,' he said. 'This is how the fabric of social relations is woven, as people find who their allies are, their comrades are, and it builds moving forward. It's not always X to Y, it's often a circuitous path to social change.' Oregon is well known for its activism and its history of protests. Portland earned the nickname 'Little Beirut' because of protestors in the early 1990s. Boykoff said those demonstrations have helped current organizers learn and grow. 'That doesn't come around by accident,' Boykoff said. 'It comes from layers and layers of history and organizing. This is what democracy looks like. This is what taking full advantage of the First Amendment looks like. This is what a healthy democracy looks like … It's people meeting in community centers and basements and outside of city council meetings, talking about what they want to bring to the table.'