logo
Have motorways become our worst roads? Closures, potholes and poor driving is marring our fastest routes

Have motorways become our worst roads? Closures, potholes and poor driving is marring our fastest routes

Daily Mail​17 hours ago

The nation's motorways are in drastic need for improvement to bolster journey times and make them safer, according to a new survey.
From rampant dangerous driving going unpunished to misleading and poor signage, deteriorating road conditions, and an abundance of closures in the last 12 months, motorists have plenty to complain about when detailing their recent experiences when using Britain's fastest-moving routes.
The AA, which polled over 14,000 drivers about their opinions on the country's 'M' roads, says they are marred by a variety of issues and are in need of 'urgent improvement' - as well as increased enforcement.
And the motoring group also called for a dedicated education drive to ameliorate illegal behaviour, with middle-lane hogging, undertaking, tailgating and phone use all dangerous antics that are rife while vehicles travel at speeds of 70mph.
It comes in the wake of new figures published this week that show motorway closures in England rose by 18 per cent in 2024.
Do you agree with everything drivers had to say about the worsening state of the nation's M roads today?
Dangerous driving on the rise
Drivers are said to be 'fed up with the reckless antics of others' on motorways.
Top of the most common frustration is middle lane hogging - when motorists refuse to move over to lane one and cruise, often driving well below the speed limit in the middle lane.
Of the 14,000 people polled, almost nine in ten (88 per cent) said they have observed this behaviour, which causes both congestion and frustration among other road users.
The same percentage of motorists polled said they've also experienced tailgating while driving on the fastest-moving roads, ramping up the risk of accidents.
Undertaking, swooping (weaving between lanes at speed) and changing lanes without indicating is also prevalent, with more than four in five motorists witnessing this regularly when they've taken to the motorway.
The survey also exposes critical safety concerns around people handling their phones (63 per cent) and failing to wear seatbelts (15 per cent drivers, 14 per cent passengers), despite the risk of facing enormous fines and penalty points if caught - and new roadside cameras now capable of identifying and enforcing this type of illegal activity.
Other frustrating and downright dangerous antics seen regularly include drivers crossing chevrons to make an exit slip road at the last second, which three in five motorists have spotted in the last 12 months.
Drivers trying to force their way into slow-moving lanes during traffic jams and heavy congestion (79 per cent) and not allowing other traffic to merge at junctions (63 per cent) were also identified by the licence-holding panel.
Misleading signage
The survey revealed significant frustrations among drivers regarding the accuracy and reliability of motorway signage.
Three quarters of those polled told the AA they have encountered lane closure signs with no incident occurring when they passed the affected area.
Additionally, two thirds reported experiencing signs indicating congestion blockage, only to find no clear and obvious reason for long queues when they eventually travelled through the stretch impacted.
Other areas of concern include two thirds reporting seeing signs warning of debris in the road but then not seeing any, two in five experiencing speed limit signs being removed and changed to 'end' while the traffic was still stationary or slow-moving, and a third coming across breakdowns and collisions without any warning from overhead gantries.
Almost a third of drivers say they are sickened by the volume of litter they've seen at the side of motorways in the last 12 months
Deteriorating road conditions
Another gripe that triggered widespread dissatisfaction among drivers is the state of road surfaces on motorways.
One in ten said they had seen road markings fading to almost nothing.
Another fifth remarked on the dangerously poor condition of tarmac, including potholes on these fast-moving routes.
And almost a third were sickened by the volume of litter they've seen at the roadside during journeys.
Data provided by National Highways shows that instances of motorway closures increased by almost a fifth last year, causing huge delays for millions of people
MOST CLOSED MOTORWAY JUNCTIONS IN 2024
Rank Junction Location Direction Total number of road closures Region
1 A1M J63 Northbound 127 North East
2 M53 J8 Northbound 99 North West
3 M6 J21/J21a Northbound 72 North West
4 M621 J7 Southbound 56 Yorkshire and Humber
5 M621 M1/J7 Eastbound 55 Yorkshire and Humber
6 M62 J37/38 Eastbound 52 Yorkshire and Humber
7 M621 J27/1 Eastbound 52 Yorkshire and Humber
8 M25 J28/27 Anti-clockwise 50 South East
9 M53 J12/11 Northbound 47 North West
10 M3 J5/4A Eastbound 46 South East
Source - Co-op Insurance FOI request to National Highways
Motorway closures up a fifth last year
A separate study by Co-op Insurance this week revealed that road closures on England's motorways rose by 18 per cent in 2024, causing huge delays and plenty of headaches for millions of people.
Data from National Highways - the Government-owned company responsible for England's motorway network - obtained using a Freedom of Information request highlighted that the number of closures increased to more than 6,870 last year.
Incidents where there was a total closure of both carriageways, grinding the entire stretch of trunk road to a halt, rose by 14 per cent with just over 280 shutdowns recorded.
The worst affected stretches included parts of the A1M and M6 where motorists faced the most disruption.
So far this year (to the end of April), the M6 between Junction 6 and Junction 7 near Birmingham is the section drivers have needed to avoid like the plague due to the highest volume of road closures.
Motorways statistically safest roads - but there's 'room for improvement'
Jack Cousens, head of roads policy at the AA, says road casualty statistics suggest motorways are the safest type of road, but there remain 'several reasons that need addressing to make them safer'.
Official road casualty data for 2023 shows that despite motorways accounting for a fifth of all road traffic journeys, they see the lowest proportion of road deaths (5 per cent) and casualties as a whole including injuries (4 per cent).
By contrast, rural road fatalities (60 per cent) are overrepresented compared to the proportion of rural road traffic (44 per cent). Similarly, urban roads account for a much higher proportion of road casualties (63 per cent) than their relative traffic level (35 per cent).
Cousens says responsibility lies with drivers to help improve conditions on motorways.
'Middle lane hogging and tailgating are everyday occurrences, while two thirds are spotted using a hand-held mobile phone at speeds around 70mph. The prevalence of dangerous driving behaviours is alarming and highlights the need for stricter enforcement and better driver education,' he commented.
'Additionally, the high incidence of misleading signage, particularly around breakdowns and potential obstacles in the lane, alongside poor road conditions is a major frustration for drivers.
'Ensuring that motorway information is accurate and timely, and that road conditions are regularly maintained, is crucial for safety as well as improving the overall driving experience.'
A National Highways spokesperson told This is Money: 'Middle-lane hogging and tailgating frustrates drivers, increases congestion and can lead to collisions, which is why we regularly display advice to help improve driving habits.
'This issue also forms part of our Little Changes campaign to highlight the small steps we can all take to make motorways safer, reduce congestion and keep traffic flowing.
'The message is simple – always allow plenty of room between you and the vehicle in front, and unless overtaking move into the left-hand lane.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Road closures ahead for Corby station to town link
Road closures ahead for Corby station to town link

BBC News

time44 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Road closures ahead for Corby station to town link

Motorists have been warned about overnight closures of a main route through a town work will take place between 19:00 and 06:00 BST between 16 June to 4 July on Elizabeth Street in Corby, Northamptonshire, North Northamptonshire Council said. It is part of a project designed to provide a safe and attractive route between the town centre and the railway stops along Elizabeth Road will be temporarily suspended and a taxi rank will stop operating during the closures. The previous Conservative government provided the money for the new link which will cover Elizabeth Street, Oakley Road and Station was part of a £19.9m package of underpass on Oakley Road will be removed as part of the project. North Northamptonshire Council said it hoped the new route would mean "more people will be encouraged to travel on foot and cycle between the town centre and station, which not only improves people's health and well-being levels but has a positive impact on the environment".A full diversion will be in place during the closures, and residents will also be able to use George Street between 18:00 and 08:00 BST. Access for residents and businesses "will be maintained wherever possible" although "vehicle access may be restricted during the overnight closures", the council information is available on the council's website. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

5mph speed limits: another bonkers Labour idea to make drivers' lives hell
5mph speed limits: another bonkers Labour idea to make drivers' lives hell

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

5mph speed limits: another bonkers Labour idea to make drivers' lives hell

The war on motorists grows more bizarre every day. Wales, long ruled by Labour, remains the source of the most bonkers ideas. Earlier this year, Jane Hutt MS, the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, appeared to be floating the idea of a speed limit of 5mph being appropriate 'in some circumstances'. 🚨WELSH GOVERNMENT TO INTRODUCE 5MPH SPEED LIMITS?🚨 Welsh Government minister @JaneHutt appears to endorse cutting speed limits to as low as 5mph, before saying the 20mph policy, which cost taxpayers £32m, was "welcomed by the people of Wales". Out of touch. — DOGE Wales 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿💰 (@SeneddWaste) May 20, 2025 That is roughly the speed of a horse-drawn carriage, so long as it was walking. A trotting horse would typically do double that speed, leaving Ms Hutt in the dust in her car, presumably before being promptly turned into glue for speeding, if the Senedd had its way. Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised. After all, this is the administration which famously withdrew support 'for all major road projects in Wales because of climate change', and pushed through the controversial 20mph blanket speed limit across all residential roads and busy pedestrian streets in 2023. Nearly two years since the imposition of the policy, Welsh drivers remain furious. And who can blame them? The speed limit is a stick with which to beat drivers into swapping their cars for bicycles and public transport. 'To suck every bit of joy out of driving and make life miserable for drivers,' as a friend once put it. He's picked up nine points, all for driving around 24 or 25 miles per hour, after struggling to rein in a life-long habit of driving at a slightly more reasonable and efficient pace. 'I spend the whole time looking at the speedometer,' another told me. 'The journey to work takes about 20 minutes longer, so I burn fuel for longer and pay more for it'. With a minimum fine of £100 and three penalty points for going over the limit and prosecutions starting at 26mph, the costs to motorists are considerable. The risk of loss of licence and even livelihoods for some is a real danger. There are also more cars on the road for longer, resulting in increased stop-and-go traffic, with frequent braking and accelerating also contributing towards greater fuel consumption and associated costs. Then there's the wider costs. The Welsh government's own research reportedly found that the 20mph policy could potentially cost the economy £4.5bn, though spread over 30 years. This analysis was signed off by the minister for climate change in January 2023 as 'a fair and reasonable view of the expected impact' of the policy, but – in line with the eco evangelism proudly adopted by her government – that she was 'satisfied that the benefits justify the likely costs'. But it's not only in Wales that drivers are being driven out of town. This side of the border motorists are being caught out by 'low traffic neighbourhoods' which not only imposed steep fines when the often imperceptible borders are innocently breached, but have been blamed for increasing pollution on major roads where poorer residents typically live. One scheme set up by Lambeth council in south London was deemed unlawful by the High Court after it ruled the authority had failed to properly listen to residents' concerns. Cash-strapped councils are raising ever-growing sums from parking permits and fines. Across Britain, local authorities have raised £360m from residential parking permits over the last five years, according to Cinch, the online car dealer. Top of the list was Wandsworth Borough Council, which collected £38m from residential permits between 2020 and 2024 alone. And that's before you add in fines from mistakes like driving in bus 'gates' and lanes as well as car parking charges. Back to Wales and its obsession with slow driving. Sense has prevailed in Wrexham at least, with some roads already returning to a 30mph limit. We must not let the age-old argument of safety hold back progress. An infamous New York Times article from 1928 raised concerns around 'horseless carriages' being driven without the added intelligence of a second creature. The answer was to improve safety, not to place restrictions that would make them less efficient than the horse-drawn carriages they were destined to replace. The same is true today, with technology gradually making cars safer. That's not to mention the improved air quality the advent of electric cars – over which I have other concerns, perhaps best discussed in another piece – will usher in at least in this country. As ever, families and businesses are left to pick up the price of government interference, through higher running costs and missed opportunities caused by delays, and in some cases, even the loss of livelihood.

Uber's UK driverless taxi trial has Brits all saying the same thing
Uber's UK driverless taxi trial has Brits all saying the same thing

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Uber's UK driverless taxi trial has Brits all saying the same thing

Futuristic robotaxis could soon be driving on UK roads, as Uber confirms its latest trial. However, the news has sparked debate online - with many brits sharing the same concern Uber has revealed futuristic plans to bring driverless taxis to the UK, but Brits have pointed out one big problem. Fully autonomous robotaxis — self-driving cars with no human safety net — could be deployed on London 's roads in the spring of 2026, the taxi firm has announced. The ambitious project is being conducted in partnership with Wayve, a UK-based artificial intelligence company that has been developing and testing driverless vehicle technology on the capital's streets under human supervision — as current regulations require. ‌ CEO and co-founder of Wayve, Alex Kendall, said: "The UK has been Wayve's home since 2017 — building this technology here has been an incredible journey, from testing our first prototype in Cambridge to deploying the world 's first end-to-end AI driver on public roads, starting in London and expanding nationwide. ‌ "Accelerating commercial self-driving pilots to 2026 positions the UK as a leading destination for the deployment of L4 self-driving technology. These early pilots will help build public trust and unlock new jobs, services, and markets. For Wayve, this means we can prioritise the UK for early deployment and help deliver safer, cleaner mobility to the UK. We're excited to bring the benefits of L4 autonomous mobility to cities around the UK." Changes in policy regarding driverless vehicles were revealed in the build-up to Uber's announcement — the government initially aimed to introduce autonomous cars onto British roads by 2026. However, this timeline was later pushed back to the latter half of 2027. Despite this, the government put forward an accelerated regulatory framework to allow smaller-scale autonomous commercial services, such as buses and taxis, to operate sooner, with the aim of fostering innovation and positioning Britain as a global leader in autonomous transport technology. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander emphasised the significance of this development, stating: "The future of transport is arriving. "Self-driving cars could bring jobs, investment, and the opportunity for the UK to be among the world leaders in new technology. With road safety at the heart of our pilots and legislation, we continue to take bold steps to create jobs, back British industry, and drive innovation to deliver our Plan for Change." While Uber is yet to confirm whether the robotaxis in the London trial will be available for public use, the company has stated it intends to integrate these vehicles into its UK app as a regular option as soon as legislation permits. The details of the trial, including the number of vehicles and operational specifics, are still being finalised. Uber and Wayve are working closely with regulators to ensure the vehicles meet safety and operational standards before they hit the streets without a human driver. ‌ Uber's London trial follows similar initiatives worldwide — Uber launched a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas in March 2025, and claiming its driverless vehicles there could work 20 hours a day, seven days a week — customers have the choice between a regular taxi or robotaxi, if there's one available, with no difference in fare. According to the Department for Transport, the industry could create approximately 38,000 jobs and contribute £42 billion to the UK economy by 2035. However, the introduction of driverless taxis raises social concerns, particularly regarding employment. GMB national secretary Andy Prendergast, emphasised the need to consider the 'significant social implications' of autonomous vehicles, including potential job losses for professional drivers. While members of the Great British public all seem to be saying the same thing about robotaxis on social media. ‌ One person wrote: "Not only would I not get in one, I wouldn't want to drive on the same road as one." A second posted: "No. No bloody way. For starters. How will they avoid the potholes? I'm sure London must have some even if it far less than the rest of us." Another agreed: "I wouldn't trust them but also wouldn't use them because it's taking people's jobs away!" While a fourth chimed in: "It's hard enough to trust an ordinary taxi." Although clearly in the minority, at least online, not everyone is so lacking in trust. One commenter said: "Yes, I can't wait to get a driverless car when you don't need a driving licence." While someone else added: "Arrogant human drivers are the biggest danger." Uber's upcoming robotaxi trial in London represents a major step toward integrating autonomous vehicles into everyday urban transport, with the potential to reshape the future of mobility in the UK and beyond — but it remains to see whether Brits will trust the tech enough to use it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store