£3,000 banners for Nottinghamshire road project that might not happen 'gathering dust'
Banners that cost Nottinghamshire taxpayers more than £3,000 are 'gathering dust' as the road project they were promoting remains uncertain. Nottinghamshire County Council spent £3,145 plus VAT to install 17 banners along the A614 and A6097 corridor between Ollerton and East Bridgford.
The banners promoted a major scheme to improve roundabouts and junctions across the corridor, but work on that project is yet to start amid continued funding uncertainty. The banners themselves were taken down after less than a year due to weather damage and the county council initially said they would be installed again this February.
Two months on, it has now been confirmed the banners will not go up again until after the county council election on May 1 and that the cost to reinstall them will be £2,210. Councillor Steve Carr, a Nottinghamshire County Independent Group councillor for Bramcote and Beeston North, said: "The fact that the Conservatives who run Nottinghamshire County Council have wasted thousands of pounds of taxpayers' money on roundabout banners along the A614 and A6097 corridor is appalling.
READ MORE: Plans to build 3,000 homes on Nottinghamshire farm are back on the table despite huge opposition
READ MORE: Criminal back behind bars for sneaky act he carried out while police waited for him to open door
"This project may never happen and the banners are now sat in Oak House gathering dust. £3,145 plus VAT for these banners might seem like small change to some but when you consider that the Conservatives have just wasted £40,000 on a rock sculpture near Yorkshire or £26.5million on a new Council HQ they may not even need – it is yet another example of the wasteful spending culture at the county council."
The county council has previously defended its financial contribution to the Scrooby Rock sculpture, saying it is attracting tourists and boosting the local economy. The Conservative-run authority also disputes the £26.5 million figure for the building of its new Oak House HQ - saying the cost was actually £19 million.
Councillor Sam Smith, Nottinghamshire County Council's leader, said: "The banners will go back up to advise road users that improvements are coming soon. It delivers on their priorities and it's important people know we are delivering on their priorities.
"Instead of focusing on the banners, the Conservative leadership at the county council continues to push the government for the twenty million pounds we've been promised after we managed to secure money from the East Midlands Mayor. The project remains shovel-ready and, instead of them focusing on banners, it would be good to have the support of the Ashfield Independents in lobbying ministers."
The Department for Transport has previously confirmed that it is reviewing the major £35 million scheme, which was first proposed back in 2019. The project was originally due to get underway in August 2024, but the general election last year threw promised government funding into doubt.
Nottinghamshire County Council previously said the overall scheme would cost £34.4 million, with the previous government pledging £24 million and the Conservative-run council investing £10 million. Yet the authority says every six months of delay on the project increases costs by £1 million.
The East Midlands Combined County Authority (EMCCA), led by East Midlands Mayor Claire Ward, recently announced £7.5 million of investment for the project which the county council hopes will act as a "catalyst". The EMCCA says its investment "will address a cost shortfall and thus enable the Department for Transport to consider the full business case and potentially allow the scheme to progress".
"We continue to work closely with Nottinghamshire County Council and will make any announcements in due course", the Department for Transport previously said. Councillor Smith confirmed slots are now being booked in for the reinstallation of the banners in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump on Insurrection Act: ‘I would certainly invoke it'
President Trump on Tuesday said he would 'certainly' invoke the Insurrection Act to respond to the demonstrations on the streets of Los Angeles over his immigration policies, if he deemed the move necessary. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible.' When asked what would lead him to decide an insurrection is taking place, Trump said that in certain areas of Los Angeles last night 'you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible.' The president had previously suggested he's open to invoking the Insurrection Act, which is a power used sparingly in U.S. history that allows for the use of the military to quell a rebellion. He made the decision to send in the National Guard to Los Angeles without a request from Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in an unprecedented move to respond to protests of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement raids. He told reporters on Sunday, 'depends on whether or not there's an insurrection' when asked about invoking the law. 'We're just going to see what happens. If we think there's a serious insurrection … we're going to have law and order,' he said. When asked what the bar would be for sending in the Marines, Trump said, 'The bar is what I think it is.' By Monday, 700 active-duty Marines were sent to Los Angeles. As of Monday, a total of 4,000 California National Guard troops were sent in. The Pentagon estimates the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to the California city will cost around $134 million, the Defense Department's acting comptroller said Tuesday. The president said on Tuesday he would keep the National Guard in place 'until there is no danger' and he also insisted that some demonstrators in Los Angeles are paid insurrectionists. Trump had flirted with the idea of using the Insurrection Act during the 2020 protests over police brutality following the killing of George Floyd in his first term in office. And, he referenced the possibility of doing so during the campaign in the event of protests against his victory, saying he would do so in Democrat-run states.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Net migration set to plummet to pre-Brexit levels
Net migration is set to plummet to pre-Brexit levels in the next year, the Government's chief immigration adviser has said. Prof Brian Bell, the chairman of the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC), claimed that falling job vacancies and an increase on the restrictions for foreign workers and students were likely to push net migration down from its current figure of 430,000 to 200,000 within a year. That would return it to the pre-Brexit net migration average of between 200,000 and 250,000 before Boris Johnson became prime minister and opened up work and student visas. Prof Bell's claim would mean net migration would fall to a quarter of its record peak of 906,000 in the year ending June 2023. However, he warned that it would probably result in staff shortages in hospitality and retail, including chefs, waiters and shopworkers, which will be excluded from the list of highly-skilled or shortage occupations to benefit from overseas recruitment. Sir Keir Starmer's White Paper has proposed that some 180 occupations will no longer be eligible to recruit overseas. Migrants will only be able to obtain a job if the position is graduate-level or above in an attempt to end low-paid migration. 'Foreign workers will be limited to occupations that are crucial for the industrial strategy or for the missions of the Government. Key sectors that will not be eligible therefore are, for example, hospitality,' said Prof Bell. 'So we've seen over the last few years that, for example, chefs, there's quite been quite a lot of visas issued for chefs. That will cease once that sector is removed from eligibility, and it won't be added back in because it's not part of the industrial strategy. 'You would see hospitality suffering. Retail will be unlikely to access it, whereas advanced manufacturing and life sciences will still have access, partly because they're more likely to be graduate jobs anyway and so remain eligible.' Labour's efforts to reduce net migration follows restrictions introduced at the start of last year by the Conservatives to bar foreign workers and students from bringing in their dependants and the introduction of higher salary thresholds for migrants seeking skilled jobs in the UK. Prof Bell said the Tories' measures, combined with a slump in vacancies, would cause net migration to fall further than had been expected by the Office for Budget Responsibility. 'I think it's possible that we'll get down to more like the 200,000 mark,' he said. Official data published on Tuesday showed that the number of available jobs fell by 63,000 between March and May to 736,000 vacancies as companies held back on hiring and replacing workers who left. However, he forecast that as the economy grew net migration would revert to between 250,000 and 300,000. It could fall lower depending on the impact of the White Paper plans to require foreign skilled workers to be graduates, ban the overseas recruitment of foreign care workers and raise English language standards. 'I think we'll revert to about 300,000 although probably a little lower given the White Paper's recent changes which, if enacted, will reduce net migration by perhaps about 80,000 at the average. So somewhere just below 300,000 would seem like a plausible medium-term scenario,' said Prof Bell. His comments came as he launched a report by the MAC which warned that a proposed reduction in family visas aimed at reducing net migration risked breaching human rights law. The MAC said that raising the annual salary threshold required for a Briton to bring their foreign partner or spouse to the UK from its current £29,000 to £38,700 is 'most likely' to conflict with rules ensuring rights to a family life under the European Convention on Human Rights. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maui vacation rental bill draws support, opposition at heated hearing
Owners and managers of some Maui vacation rentals predicted that Mayor Richard Bissen's proposal to convert 6, 100 units into long-term housing will not work and could have unintended consequences. Some argued at Monday's hearing of the Maui County Council's Housing and Land Use Committee that most Valley Isle residents cannot afford the $4, 000 and more they need in monthly rent to keep up with mortgages, taxes, association fees and other expenses. Several said the value on their units ever since Bissen proposed Bill 9 last year has plummeted and they have received no offers—either from local residents or out-of-state investors frightened away because they might not be able to use them as short-term rentals. As a result, they said, renters and buyers who can afford the rent or sales costs might move in from the mainland, meaning Bill 9 would not attain its goal of affordable housing for residents. One woman said she listed one of her two Kihei rental units for sale for $900, 000 last year, then dropped the price to $600, 000 and still received no offers, which she said proves the cost of her unit remains out of reach for local residents. At Monday's hearing, 176 people signed up to testify but only 52 had the chance to speak. The meeting adjourned until June 18 when Council members are prepared to hear a full day of additional testimony. They also earmarked June 23 for a possible third day of hearings. All nine Council members serve on the Housing and Land Use Committee and their votes will provide a preview of what could happen when Bill 9 goes before the Council. The proposal has drawn 'passionate discussion ' that has included bullying and threats, Committee Chair Tasha Kama said. People on both sides of Bill 9 told the committee they have been harassed, and one said he was threatened in person that his house should be burned. Kama regularly admonished people in the audience to refrain from cheering for comments both for and against Bill 9. The hearing began with Bissen and members of his administration arguing the need to reign in housing costs and create more affordable housing for residents, which was exacerbated by the Aug. 8, 2023, wildfires that destroyed 3, 500 homes and killed 102 people. Bissen amended Bill 9 to give owners three years to transition out of the short-term rental industry, either by renting long term or selling to local residents. Proponents and opponents for the bill repeatedly cited a University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization study in April that predicted losses of jobs, property taxes and visitors among other negative economic impacts of Bill 9. But Bissen said the UHERO report does not tell the 'full story ' of the ongoing departures of Maui families, kupuna, local knowledge and critical workers such as teachers and firefighters, in addition to forcing children to grow up somewhere other than Maui. He argued that short-term rentals have helped exacerbate Maui's housing shortage and have been banned in places like London, Los Angeles and New York. At the same time, Bissen said, 'we cannot build fast enough.' Bill 9, by contrast, will 'make immediate progress, not years down the line, ' he said. Currently, only 4 % of homes are affordable for local residents, Bissen's executive assistant Matt Jachowski said. He cited the UHERO report that the price of condos would drop 25 % in 2027, which would make them affordable to 11, 600 more Maui households. Bill 9 also has been forecast to lead to a 33 % drop in tourists, which would give Maui a ratio of 1 visitor for every 3.3 residents, putting it more in line with other island counties. Before the wildfires, Maui had a ratio of one tourist for every 2.3 residents, Jachowski said. The need for clean water also hurts construction development and Jachowski said vacation rentals use 60 % to 120 % more water than permanent housing. 'We have a moral obligation to act, ' Bissen said. 'The status quo is failing our people.'
