STATEMENT - Canada is stronger when human rights are protected
OTTAWA, ON, May 28, 2025 /CNW/ - Following the 2025 Speech from the Throne, Charlotte-Anne Malischewski, Interim Chief Commissioner of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, congratulates Prime Minister Mark Carney along with all members of Canada's new Parliament and issues the following statement:
Now is an opportunity for the country to remain true to Canadian values, to look at what unites us, and to put in place bold policies that strengthen our country.
Canadians care about human rights— 86% agree that human rights have a social and democratic benefit. Our commitment to human rights – to equality, dignity and respect for all – is what makes us who we are. It is a Canadian value, and a defining part of our shared identity.
Today, Canada faces significant and complex challenges. This government has committed to addressing the rising cost of living and the urgent need for adequate housing, to championing the safe integration of artificial intelligence into society, and to standing firm in protecting of our sovereignty.
We believe that meaningful, sustainable solutions to these challenges must be rooted in a steadfast commitment to human rights. Whether we are growing our economy, making housing more affordable, addressing systemic racism and the rise in hate, creating a barrier-free Canada, upholding Canada's diversity and serving the most vulnerable, or ensuring that every person has the opportunity to live free from discrimination, Canadians are looking for leadership that reflects their values and aspirations.
As we chart the course ahead, we must lead with the values of equality, dignity, and respect for all. This means advancing accessibility for people with disabilities, closing persistent pay gaps through pay equity, and removing systemic barriers so that everyone can fully participate in society.
Building a strong Canada will take all of us. Making sure everyone is included and can participate will only make us stronger.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
38 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Finding what's missing in the Winnipeg housing market
Opinion Last week, Winnipeg city council spent several long days and late nights debating a sweeping set of zoning bylaw amendments that could fundamentally change how our city is built in the future. Like all Canadian cities that signed on to the federal government's Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF), Winnipeg is being asked to revamp its planning policies to allow greater density and more diverse housing types to be built in every neighbourhood across the city. The federal government recognizes that if we are going to build more housing supply in cities to balance market demand and create more affordability, it can't be accommodated by simply expanding outward in sprawling low-density suburbs. Brent Bellamy photo New rules for infill housing can invigorate Winnipeg neighbourhoods. The costs of infrastructure and municipal services can no longer be supported by low density growth, evidenced by increasing taxes, reduced services, and deteriorating infrastructure. The federal government is using the financial carrots of HAF to push cities into making uncomfortable changes to policies that regulate where housing can be built. The planning changes being implemented effectively eliminate single-family zoning, allowing at least a duplex to be built on almost any lot in the city. It will also allow up to threeplexes and fourplexes depending on lot size, location, and considerations like proximity to transit and existing street conditions. To speed up development, these new housing types will be allowed as-of-right, meaning that if they meet certain restrictions like height, lot coverage, and setbacks, they can be built without a public hearing. The need for cities to densify, combined with ever-rising land and construction costs, means that the future of housing will be less and less about single-family homes. Already only one-quarter of new homes built in Winnipeg each year are houses, with three-quarters being multi-family dwellings. This is an almost perfectly inverted ratio from 25 years ago. Current zoning policies effectively segregate densities, protecting single-family neighbourhoods and pushing most multi-family options into downtown high-rises or six-storey buildings on large streets. The new zoning changes will allow smaller multi-family developments to be peppered throughout neighbourhoods instead of being relegated to their fringes. Many people prefer the quality of life offered in a single-family home, and much of what is desirable in that lifestyle can be more affordably found in the types of housing these new zoning changes promote, commonly called 'missing middle housing.' Low-rise, multi-family housing types like townhouses, duplexes and fourplexes can offer more flexible and diverse living arrangements than a neighbourhood that is exclusively single-family, accommodating a wider range of household sizes, ages, and income levels. Missing middle housing can fit seamlessly into the character of walkable residential neighbourhoods, while still increasing density and providing a greater range of home sizes and affordability options. This housing diversity responds to the needs of people at different stages of life, whether it's a rental or starter home for a young person, a downsizing option for a senior ageing in their community, or a family home. A concern often raised about missing middle development is that it can mean the loss of smaller, older houses that are often affordable. Winnipeg is fortunate in some ways to have the oldest housing stock of any major city in Canada, with one in five houses being more than 80 years old, and one in 10 more than a century old. An old housing stock creates affordability, but it can't be relied on as a strategy to achieve that forever. We must allow our housing stock to be organically replenished in a way that will respond more specifically to the evolving needs of people today and in the future. Change will happen to our aging neighbourhoods whether we like it or not, but we can shape and guide this change by designing zoning regulations that push more multi-family housing towards smaller scale, neighbourhood focused developments that provide a more desirable lifestyle option for many. When a small bungalow is demolished for a fourplex, one house may be lost, but three more families are able to gain access to the neighbourhood. The new construction may not be as affordable immediately, but a neighbourhood's transition to higher density happens slowly, and as more and more older houses are lost over time, the infill will age and start a new cycle of affordability. In today's market, most new missing middle housing is built as rental properties, but 10 years ago it would likely have been condominiums. Market trends change, and by creating zoning regulations that promote this scale of development, more ownership options and home types will appear in the future. As this housing type becomes more prevalent and ages over time, it will replace the old bungalow as a common type of starter home that is the first step in the property ladder for young people. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. The idea of allowing different densities and housing types to sit on the same street is not a new one. Many of our most beloved older neighbourhoods have houses, townhouses, condominiums and apartment buildings sitting comfortably side-by-side. Higher-density neighbourhoods serve the greater good of reducing the cost of infrastructure and services needed to support new growth, helping to keep taxes down. It also improves support for local shops and amenities like libraries and community centres, while making public transit more effective, and improving walkability. New zoning bylaws that will create more missing middle housing over time will result in more diverse and livable communities that provide varied ownership models, home types and sizes. Missing middle housing will also allow broader access to good neighbourhoods, creating a more prosperous, affordable, and socially equitable city in the future. Brent Bellamy is creative director at Number Ten Architectural Group. Brent BellamyColumnist Brent Bellamy is creative director for Number Ten Architectural Group. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Canada Standard
2 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Opinion: 'Don't Look, Just Leap', Carney and Ford Agree
Prime Minister Mark Carney and Ontario Premier Doug Ford seem to think that environmental assessment laws governing new pipelines, mines, nuclear power plants, ports, power dams, and transmission lines are no longer needed. Trust us, they say. Give us and the other politicians in our cabinets unfettered discretion to decide in secret which projects are in the national interest, where free-fire special economic zones should be established, and which corporations we should accept as trusted partners in exploiting Canada's natural wealth No need for serious debate in legislatures, they say. Ontario's Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act , was whipped through the provincial legislature in eight weeks. Carney wants Bill C-5, the Building Canada Act , enacted by Parliament by Canada Day, July 1. Independent scientists, civil society, and local communities need not be consulted on new megaprojects, they say. Governments know best. Yes, Indigenous nations must be heard from on account of that pesky Constitution and Supreme Court. But those consultations must be done quickly because project approvals are guaranteed within two years to ensure certainty for investors. View our latest digests Yes, they say, Canada's boreal forest is burning, atmospheric and other rivers are overflowing, and sea levels are rising. But action to address the climate and biodiversity emergencies really must be put on hold on account of the tyrant to the south. We need to let the U.S. President-not to mention the big investment banks-know that Canada can lay steel and pour concrete as fast as his country can. Benefits to Canadians from these national interest projects must wait, as well. Beginning roughly a half-century ago, Conservative federal and Ontario governments enacted laws requiring development projects to be assessed so that their environmental effects could be avoided, or at least mitigated. Ontario's Environmental Assessment Act was enacted in 1975, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act in 1992. Premier Bill Davis amd Prime Minister Mulroney understood that bureaucrats and consulting engineers don't always get it right, and that the singular focus on economic growth can sometimes leads to ecological disaster. Look before you leap. Ensure that government decisions to approve new highways, oil sands mines, or pipelines at least consider possible adverse environmental effects. Otherwise you get Chornobyl, Fukushima, Deepwater Horizon, and the Mount Polley and Giant mines. Ontario's Bill 5 and federal Bill C-5 effectively override these environmental assessment laws for the very projects that most need assessment and public discussion. Thank goodness we have elected such wise men who truly understand that a tunnel under the 401 highway, a trans-Canada energy corridor, and new roads to the Arctic are environmentally sustainable and will generate amazing benefits to regular Canadians. As catastrophic climate change and species extinctions accelerate, Canadians may be comforted by the thought that oil and gas and mining companies and investment banks will enjoy healthy profits for at least a few more quarters. Stephen Hazell is a veteran environmental lawyer, a member of the Energy Mix Productions Board of Directors, and an advisor to two national organizations assessing the impacts of Bill C-5. Source: The Energy Mix
Canada Standard
7 hours ago
- Canada Standard
"Carney had no options": Foreign affairs expert KP Fabian on Canada's invitation to PM Modi for G7 Summit
New Delhi [India], June 8 (ANI): Foreign affairs expert KP Fabian on Sunday shared his insights on Canada's decision to invite Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 Summit. Speaking with ANI, he said, 'Carney had no options. The others said, Listen, India must be there. It's a vital link in the supply chain and any talk of Indo-Pacific stability.' Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, the host of this year's summit, reportedly faced significant pressure from other G7 members after initially hesitating to invite Prime Minister Modi. This reluctance was largely due to domestic political backlash within Carney's own Liberal Party, triggered by a diplomatic row linked to the killing of a Khalistani separatist in British Columbia in June 2023. He added, 'Now, of course, one should expect big demonstrations by the World Sikh Federation and others, but then it is for the government of Canada to deal with it.' Fabian remarked that India, as the world's fourth-largest and fastest-growing economy, must be included in G7 discussions given its strategic importance in global trade and Indo-Pacific stability. Fabian pointed out that India has participated in the G7 Summit in the past, including five times during former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh's tenure. He added that Canada's hesitation ultimately yielded to pressure from the G7 nations, who recognised India's critical role. He further said, 'Carney is walking a tightrope when it comes to Canadian values. At a press conference, he was asked whether he believes the Indian government was involved in the killing of Nijjar. He refused to answer, citing the ongoing RCMP investigation. That's quite ironic. When did this happen, and why is the RCMP taking so long to conclude the investigation? And if you recall, why did Justin Trudeau accuse India before the investigation was even complete? Canadian political leaders have shown a lot of inconsistency. In the end, Mark Carney did the right thing, though it took some time -- and that's that.' The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is investigating the incident, but no conclusions have been drawn yet. Despite these political challenges, Carney reaffirmed Canada's commitment to the G7 summit's agenda. On Friday (local time), he said that G7 countries will discuss important issues, including security and energy, emphasising that India's presence at this intergovernmental political and economic forum is essential. Carney emphasised that India, being the fifth-largest economy and the most populous country in the world, must be at the table. 'Let's put the two aspects in context -- first is, we are in the role -- Canada's in the role of the G7 chair and in those discussions as agreed with our G7 colleagues, include important discussions on energy, security, on digital future, critical minerals amongst others and partnerships actually in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing world,' he said. Prime Minister Modi received a call from his Canadian counterpart, who extended India's invitation to attend the G7 Summit. 'Glad to receive a call from Prime Minister @MarkJCarney of Canada. Congratulated him on his recent election victory and thanked him for the invitation to the G7 Summit in Kananaskis later this month. As vibrant democracies bound by deep people-to-people ties, India and Canada will work together with renewed vigour, guided by mutual respect and shared interests. Look forward to our meeting at the Summit,' PM Modi wrote in his post. The G7 Summit (Group of Seven) is an informal grouping of seven of the world's advanced economies and the European Union. Its members meet annually at the G7 Summit to discuss global economic and geopolitical issues, according to the G7's official website. The members of the G7 are France, the US, Germany, Japan, Italy, Canada, and the UK. (ANI)
