
House prosecutor: Compressing impeachment trial would deny due process
"Yung away ng magkapitbahay, hindi yan nare-resolve sa Katarungang Pambarangay in one day," San Juan City Rep. Ysabel Maria Zamora said of the proposal to compress the impeachment trial into a period of less than three weeks.
House impeachment prosecutor and San Juan City Representative Ysabel Maria Zamora on Tuesday said that the proposal to compress the timeline of the impeachment trial against Vice President Sara Duterte would deny both sides due process—and advised Senator Robin Padilla to review the Constitution after he filed a resolution to dismiss the impeachment complaint outright.
'Senator Padilla has to maybe review the Constitution. Maybe some of his advisors should advise him on constitutional law and that you cannot kill an impeachment by mere resolution,' Zamora told reporters in an interview.
Zamora also opposed Senate Majority Leader Francis Tolentino's resolution for a compressed impeachment trial timeline of 19 days.
'Well, for me, that compressed timeline is unacceptable. Not acceptable for the simple reason that it will deny due process to both sides,' she said.
The Senate on Tuesday finally convened as an impeachment court to put Duterte on trial over seven articles of impeachment, including the question of how P612.5 million in confidential funds was spent.
Zamora said two days each is not enough for the House prosecution panel and the defense to present all of their evidence.
'This is both on a procedural side and on the substantive side of due process. Ang naisip ko nga po, yung away ng magkapitbahay, hindi yan nare-resolve sa Katarungang Pambarangay in one day [A dispute among neighbors cannot be resolved by the barangay justice system in one day]. What more an impeachment case against the Vice President where we have numerous voluminous documents or evidence to present. So we have to give both parties their right to due process,' she said.
She also revealed that for five hours on Monday, the House prosecution panel practiced the reading of the Articles of Impeachment by House prosecutor and Batangas Representative Gerville Luistro and responding to possible questions that will be raised by the senators.
About 15 private prosecutors joined the House prosecutors during the rehearsal, she added.
Meanwhile House spokesperson Princess Abante said the House welcomed Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero's taking his oath as the impeachment court's presiding officer on Monday evening.
"Ginalaw na po ang baso [They have made their presence felt]," she said. 'The House of Representatives welcomes this development… Nakinig na po ang Senado sa mga pahayag, hindi lang ng Kamara, kundi ng iba't ibang sektor ng lipunan [The Senate has listened to the calls, not just by the Congress, but by different sectors of society].'
On Padilla's resolution to dismiss the impeachment complaint, Abante said, 'The Speaker has always said that he leaves it to the discretion of the Senate on how they will act on the impeachment trial. But there are various experts, both from the academe and the legal sectors, that state [that] the senator-judges cannot move to dismiss the trial on their own.'
'Ang hiling lang po natin, maging faithful sila sa alituntinin ng Konstitusyon [Our only request is that they remain faithful to the rules of the Constitution]. Because in a society that follows the rule of law, the Constitution will always be supreme,' Abante added.
President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos has also said that it is clear the impeachment proceedings will cross over from the current 19th Congress to the 20th Congress.
'Naging senator-judge din si President Bongbong Marcos. I understand where he's coming from. Ang importante sa Kamara ngayon, masimulan ang impeachment trial [President Marcos has been a senator-judge himself...What's important is that the impeachment trial begin],' Abante said.
'Ang nakalagay naman sa Konstitusyon ay to try and decide. Hindi naman sinabi roon kung anong Congress ang magde-decide. Ang sinasabi ay simulan at tapusin at magbigay ng desisyon ang Senado,' she explained.
(What it says in the Constitution is to try and decide. It does not say which Congress will decide. What it says is to begin the trial, end the trial, and hand down the Senate's decision.)
Abante also said Vice President Duterte's present personal trip abroad will not derail the proceedings.
'I believe the impeachment rules have, meron naman siyang nakalagay kung paano ang pag-serve at notify sa accused. Ang requirement kasi diyan is personal service pero meron din naman sa rules if personal service cannot be made. Ang importante, simulan na ng Senado ang trial para alam na rin natin kung ano na yung mga susunod na hakbang ng prosecutors at ano na ang mangyayari sa impeachment process,' Abante stressed.
(I believe the impeachment rules have a provision on how the accused may be notified. the requirement is personal service but there are also rules for when personal service cannot be made. What's important is that the Senate being the trial so that we the prosecutors will know the next steps to take and what will happen in the impeachment process.)
Abante declined to comment on the Duterte defense team's allegations that the impeachment complaint is flawed, saying this is already the subject of the Vice President's petition before the Supreme Court challenging the House impeachment.
Abante also defended the House of Representatives from Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero's pronouncements that the House also dilly-dallied on the impeachment complaints.
'I believe the House of Representatives did its job in a timely and decisive manner. Again, [the role of the] House of Representatives is to receive the complaint, to verify the complaint as to its form, substance and grounds, to make sure that it will be properly passed by the correct number of members of the House of Representatives, and it will be transmitted to the Senate. All these were done by the House of Representatives in a timely and decisive manner. Kung gaano katagal o kung gaano kabilis, hindi na yan kasama sa kailangang alalahanin ng Senado. Ang kailangang alalahanin ng Senado ay ang kanilang tungkulin sa impeachment process ayon sa Konstitusyon. Sabi ng Konstitusyon, proceed forthwith,' Abante said.
(However long or quickly it took, it's not part of what the Senate must remember, and that is it is their duty according to the Constitution to proceed with the trial forthwith.)
Asked for her reaction to Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa's claim that the country will be further divided by an impeachment trial, Abante replied, 'Well, ang impeachment trial, provided 'to ng Constitution. Merong mga dahilan para pagdaanan ito. Kung siguro unnecessary ang mga impeachment proceedings in all governments, dapat wala ito sa Constitution, di ba? So ako, tingin ko, kailangan munang masimulan at ang ating mga Senator-judges, makinig doon sa paglahad ng mga ebidensya and they will have the opportunity to decide on the case.'
(An impeachment trial is provided for in the Constitution. There are reasons why it must be undertaken. If impeachment proceedings are unnecessary, than it wouldn't be in the Constitution, right? So, as I see it, the trial must first begin and the senator-judges must listen to the evidence as it is laid out and they will have the opportunity to decide on the case.) — BM, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
an hour ago
- GMA Network
House defers accepting articles of impeachment; to seek Senate guidance
'We are certain and it is in the face of the impeachment complaint, that we are fully and strictly compliant with the requirements of the Constitution,' House prosecutor Batangas Rep. Gerville "Jinky Bitrics" Luistro said in a briefing on Wednesday, June 11, 2025. The House of Representatives will defer the acceptance of the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte while they are seeking clarification from the Senate impeachment court on its requests, a lawmaker said Wednesday. 'We will be seeking for clarification first and that's why we opted to defer receiving the orders,' Batangas Representative Gerville "Jinky Bitrics" Luistro said in a briefing. This comes after 18 senators on Tuesday voted for the return of the articles to the House. The senators are asking the House to certify the non-violation of the one-year ban on impeachment complaints and sought assurance from the 20th Congress that it is willing and ready to pursue the impeachment complaint. 'We are certain and it is in the face of the impeachment complaint, that we are fully and strictly compliant with the requirements of the Constitution,' Luistro said. 'Pangalawa [Second], they're asking for reconfirmation of the 20th Congress, whether it will pursue the impeachment complaint against the vice president. How can this order be complied [with] when the 20th Congress does not yet exist?' she later added. Aside from this, Luistro said they will seek clarification regarding a letter that is circulating on social media that the presentation of articles has been rendered moot. 'That is part of their own rules and we are ready to present the articles. Why suddenly, biglang rendered moot. No less than the rules of the impeachment of the Senate provides for the same,' she said. Luistro said that the House is not defying or disobeying the impeachment court. 'As soon as we are clarified about the issues surrounding the order of the Senate last night, for as long as they are within the bounds of the law, the prosecution panel will comply,' she said. The lawmakers also said that it is up to the Office of the Secretary General to receive the articles of impeachment. Luistro, meanwhile, earlier welcomed the service of the summons to Duterte, saying this means that the impeachment trial can no longer be stopped as the court has acquired jurisdiction over her. 'Finally, the people of the Philippines will see from the answer of the Vice President what her defenses are,' she said. 'Isa lamang po ang ibig sabihin nito. 'Yung pag-acquire po ng jurisdiction ng impeachment court sa ating respondent, kay Vice President Sara Zimmerman Duterte, it only shows na tuloy na tuloy na ang impeachment trial,' she added. (This only means one thing. The impeachment court's acquisition of jurisdiction over our respondent, Vice President Sara Zimmerman Duterte, only shows that the impeachment trial is definitely moving forward.) Confident? When asked about the possibility that the senators would retain their position following the trial, Luistro said the decision of the senators would be hard to preempt. 'Mahirap po isipin o sabihin na 'yung boto kahapon ay 'yun na rin ang magiging boto sa impeachment case sapagkat wala pa po ni isang ebidensyang naiilatag ang prosecution,' Luistro said. (It's difficult to assume or say that yesterday's vote will be the same vote in the impeachment case because not a single piece of evidence has been presented yet by the prosecution.) This was echoed by Antipolo Representative Romeo Acop, who said that he remains hopeful that the senator-judges will rule in their favor. 'You know why? During the Erap impeachment trial, they had the number. Pero bakit nag baliktad? Kasi nakita na 'yung ebidensya. As the gentle lady from Batangas said, wala pang naipre-presenta na ebidensya,' he said. (You know why? During the Erap impeachment trial, they had the number. But why did they change their votes? Because the evidence was revealed. As the gentlelady from Batangas said, not a single piece of evidence has been presented yet.) 'Siguro kapag nakita na ng mga tao at saka senator judges 'yung mga pieces evidence, baka magbago po ang isip nila,' he added. (Maybe once the people and the senator-judges see the pieces of evidence, their minds might change.) Those who voted yes include Senate President Chiz Escudero and Senators Ronald 'Bato' Dela Rosa, Robin Padilla, Christopher Lawrence "Bong" Go, Francis Tolentino, Imee Marcos, Cynthia Villar, Mark Villar, Jinggoy Estrada, JV Ejercito, Ramon Revilla Jr., Joel Villanueva, Lito Lapid, Alan Peter Cayetano, Pia Cayetano, Loren Legarda, Raffy Tulfo, and Juan Miguel Zubiri. The negative votes came from Minority Leader Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III, Deputy Minority Leader Risa Hontiveros, and Senators Grace Poe, Sherwin Gatchalian, and Nancy Binay. — BM, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Musk says some of his posts about Trump ‘went too far'
Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, spending nearly $300 million in last year's US elections and taking credit for Republicans retaining a majority of seats in the House and retaking a majority in the Senate. REUTERS/ Kevin Lamarque/ File photo Billionaire businessman Elon Musk said on Wednesday he regretted some of the posts he made last week about US President Donald Trump as they had gone "too far." Trump said on Saturday his relationship with Musk was over after they exchanged insults on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk has since deleted some posts critical of Trump, including one signaling support for impeaching the president, and sources close to the world's richest man say his anger has started to subside and he may want to repair the relationship. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X on Wednesday, without saying which specific posts he was talking about. Tesla shares in Frankfurt rose 2.7% after Musk's post. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, spending nearly $300 million in last year's US elections and taking credit for Republicans retaining a majority of seats in the House and retaking a majority in the Senate. Trump then named him to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. Musk left the role late last month after criticizing Trump's marquee tax bill, calling it too expensive and a measure that would undermine his work at the Department of Government Efficiency. Declaring their relationship over on Saturday, Trump said there would be "serious consequences" if Musk decided to fund US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Trump also said he had no intention of repairing ties with Musk. On Monday, Trump said he would not have a problem if Musk called and that he had no plans to discontinue the Starlink satellite internet provided to the White House by Musk's SpaceX but might move his Tesla off-site. "We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well," Trump said. Musk responded with a heart emoji to a video on X showing Trump's remarks. — Reuters


GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Group lauds House panel's call for charges vs. Sara Duterte over confi funds
The Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT) expressed support Wednesday for a House committee's recommendation to file charges against Vice President Sara Duterte and other officials over the alleged misuse of confidential funds in the Office of the Vice President (OVP) and the Department of Education (DepEd). In a statement on Wednesday, ACT described the report by the House Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability and its subsequent adoption by the House plenary as a "crucial step toward upholding integrity and transparency in public service." The recommended charges against Duterte relate to technical malversation, perjury, bribery, and plunder. ACT said the proposed charges "represent a significant stride toward holding public officials accountable for corruption, plunder, betrayal of public trust, and culpable violations of the Constitution." The teachers' group renewed its call to abolish confidential and intelligence funds across all civilian government agencies. "These unaccountable and discretionary funds must instead be rechanneled toward strengthening social services, increasing the salaries of government workers, and expanding support for the agricultural sector," ACT said. On Tuesday, the House of Representatives adopted the Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability's report recommending charges against Duterte and other officials. Speaking at the House plenary, committee chair Manila Representative Joel Chua noted that exhaustive deliberations were held regarding obstruction of inquiry, misuse of confidential funds, and interference and bribery, among others. The recommendations were based on the committee's investigation into the alleged misuse of confidential funds amounting to P500 million in the OVP and P112.5 million in the DepEd from 2022 to 2023. The House plenary's decision came on the same day that the Senate convened as an impeachment court to try Duterte over alleged misuse of confidential funds and other high crimes. Duterte has denied the allegations leveled against her. — VDV, GMA Integrated News