Opinion: Do you really need separate antivirus software? Probably not
I had a conversation with a friend the other day at the gym. He is buying a new Windows PC and he's thinking of investing in new antivirus software, and he asked me what I used for antivirus software.
He had his last PC for more than 10 years and he had been using one of the large antivirus suites that was charging him by the year.
Companies like Norton, McAfee, AVG and Bitdefender have antivirus and security solutions that can help keep your PC safe, but those features overlap with a lot of the features of Windows' built-in Defender product.
If you search for recommendations for the best antivirus suite, you'll find a lot of lists.
Likewise, if you search for, 'do I need antivirus software,' you'll find some pretty good arguments that you can go without it.
I think you need to examine your individual use case as you shop for antivirus and security software.
My personal recommendation is most home users really do not need to pay for antivirus or security software.
Microsoft and Apple provide built-in antivirus solutions. Browsers like Google Chrome and others do a really good job of warning you when you're wading into dangerous territory online. Email providers like Google and Microsoft and Yahoo scan your email for dangerous attachments.
If you're running Windows 11 (and you do need to be running Windows 11), you can go to your Settings and then Privacy and Security and then Windows Security to see a dashboard of the different security categories monitored by Windows Security.
If you click the Virus & Threat Protection, you'll see the last scan and results as well when the virus definitions were last updated. There are red, yellow and green status icons for each section, so you can see at a glance any areas that need your attention. Just make sure you keep current with updates.
Likewise for Apple computers. Just keep current on your operating system and security updates from Apple.
What happens if you click on something in a browser and you start getting strange pop-ups or web pages redirect you to some scammy ad page? That can happen, and for those instances, I download and use Malwarebytes, which can scan and repair your system when you suspect you've clicked on something bad.
Malwarebytes has a free version (for Mac or Windows), and you should try it if you need it. I do recommend paying for it if you need it on a regular basis, but I don't recommend leaving it installed on your computer. When I've had to use it, I'd load it, run it and let it clean up and then uninstall it.
I just don't think any software that's running on your system and doing largely the same thing as the built-in security software is a good thing. In my experience, third-party live antivirus protection apps can and do slow things down.
I fully expect many of you will disagree with me, and I don't mind. Erring on the side of caution is not a bad thing.
If you use your computer for a small business, or you make your living using your computer, you may feel safer with a security suite installed. I don't have a problem with you using any software that helps you feel safer online. – Tribune News Service
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
19 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Don't kneecap us: Google opposes Chrome break-up in antitrust fight
NEW YORK, May 31 — Google yesterday urged a US judge to reject the notion of making it spin off its Chrome browser to weaken its dominance in online search. Rival attorneys made their final arguments before US District Court Judge Amit Mehta, who is considering imposing 'remedies' after a landmark decision last year that Google maintained an illegal monopoly in search. US government attorneys have called on Mehta to order Google to divest itself of Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. They also want Google barred from agreements with partners such as Apple and Samsung to distribute its search tools, which was the focus of the suit against the Silicon Valley internet giant. Three weeks of testimony ended early in May, with Friday devoted to rival sides parsing points of law and making their arguments before Mehta in a courtroom in Washington. John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, told Mehta that there was no evidence presented showing people would have opted for a different search engine without the exclusivity deals in place. Schmidtlein noted that Verizon installed Chrome on smartphones even though the US telecom titan owned Yahoo! search engine and was not bound by a contract with Google. Of the 100 or so witnesses heard at trial, not one said 'if I had more flexibility, I would have installed Bing' search engine from Microsoft, the Google attorney told the judge. 'More flexibility' Department of Justice (DoJ) attorney David Dahlquist countered that Apple, which was paid billions of dollars to make Chrome the default browser on iPhones, 'repeatedly asked for more flexibility' but was denied by Google. Google contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. 'Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition,' said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston. 'It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products.' Google attorney Schmidtlein noted that more than 80 percent of Chrome users are outside the United States, meaning divestiture would have global ramifications. 'Any divested Chrome would be a shadow of the current Chrome,' he contended. 'And once we are in that world, I don't see how you can say anybody is better off.' The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. The online search antitrust suit was filed against Google some five years ago, before ChatGPT made its debut, triggering AI fervor. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings. Kneecap Google? Testimony at trial included Apple vice president of services Eddy Cue revealing that Google's search traffic on Apple devices declined in April for the first time in over two decades. Cue testified that Google was losing ground to AI alternatives like ChatGPT and Perplexity. Mehta pressed rival attorneys regarding the potential for Google to share data as proposed by the DoJ in its recommended remedies. 'We're not looking to kneecap Google,' DoJ attorney Adam Severt told the judge. 'But, we are looking to make sure someone can compete with Google.' Schmidtlein contended that data Google is being asked to share contains more than just information about people's online searches, saying it would be tantamount to handing over the fruit of investments made over the course of decades. 'There are countless algorithms that Google engineers have invented that have nothing to do with click and query data,' Schmidtlein said. 'Their remedy says we want to be on par with all of your ingenuity, and, respectfully your honor, that is not proportional to the conduct of this case.' — AFP
The Star
20 hours ago
- The Star
Microsoft wants to radically change the way you surf the web
Microsoft sees artificial intelligence transforming the Internet as fundamentally as mobile phones have over the past two decades. But the technology's limitations could curb Microsoft's grand vision. Generative AI – which creates content based on a user's request – burst into the zeitgeist in late 2022 when Microsoft-backed OpenAI launched ChatGPT, a conversational chatbot that could take a simple request and generate anything from a limerick to a college essay. Less than three years later, Microsoft has a plan to move beyond ChatGPT and its copycats by creating the foundation for a new version of the internet. Microsoft and its tech peers say the technology is moving fast. The industry is pouring billions into AI infrastructure and companies are restructuring corporate workforces to create agile teams for a shifting landscape. A week before Microsoft announced its ambitions for a new AI ecosystem, the company laid off more than 6,000 people in an effort to flatten management layers. Microsoft calls it the "open agentic web," with users sending AI-powered "agents" out into the void to do their bidding. Casual consumers primarily interact with AI now through a Google search – one that repeatedly drums up false answers – or a ChatGPT-esque chatbot that generates a conversation. In Microsoft's eyes, chatbots are old news. Microsoft's vision is a digital world in which autonomous agents interact with each other throughout the Internet. For example, a user who wants to schedule a vacation will delegate an agent to venture through the muck and find flights, hotels and an itinerary that fit their budget, work that users currently have to do themselves. At the company's developer-focused Build conference in Seattle last week, CEO Satya Nadella explained the framework Microsoft wants to provide as it tries to remake the web. He used more technical examples of the agents, demonstrating them fixing bugs in computer code, creating PowerPoint presentations and sorting expense reports. All of the demonstrations were done toward the top of what Microsoft calls the AI stack. Other companies, and Microsoft, are building agents and AI models to interact with the data below them. Toward the bottom of the stack is an infrastructure that Microsoft supports. One aspect of it is establishing a protocol, the set of rules computers follow to talk with one another. Microsoft favors one called Model Context Protocol. Kevin Scott, the company's chief technology officer, likens it to HTTP in the Internet, a standard that everyone can use to build out the web. The new protocol allows AI agents to go from website to website, collecting data and interacting with other agents. "It's filling an incredibly important niche," Scott said during a keynote address on May 19. Of course, Microsoft isn't alone in looking for the next big thing in AI. OpenAI spurred a wave of competing products from companies like Google, Meta and Elon Musk's xAI. The tech giants' looking beyond chatbots and angling to change the web from click-based to agent-based is creating a new competition. Chirag Shah, a professor of information science at the University of Washington, said this could be a problem. The World Wide Web Consortium, a neutral party, has maintained standards for the internet's development since 1994. Microsoft can dictate the standards it wants for an agentic web but nobody has to accept them, Shah said. "I don't see this as changing the web," he said. "I see this as one set of ideas that already has competition." Shah has worked for Microsoft in the past but does not currently. Since the idea behind the agentic web is an ecosystem of errand runners zooming around autonomously, its success is predicated on pulling accurate information and doing things correctly. Since ChatGPT launched in 2022, chatbots and other AI-infused tech have struggled with accuracy. Last month, social media users discovered a quirk with Google's AI Overview. If a user added the word "meaning" to a nonsensical idiom, Google's AI would confidentially spit out a fictitious origin for the phrase. In the week leading up to Build, xAI's Grok chatbot started promoting conspiracy theories about white genocide in South Africa on Musk's social media platform, X. The replies from Grok were under posts wholly unrelated to the conspiracy theories. XAI said it was due to an unauthorised modification. On May 20, a day after Nadella and Scott announced their agentic web ambitions to a crowd of hundreds, 404 Media reported that the Chicago Sun-Times had used AI to create a book recommendation article. The problem? The list featured nonexistent books from authors and completely made-up quotes. Humans make mistakes on the Internet as well. They're duped by misinformation, they fall for phishing scams and they read clickbait. But they understand the consequences of those mistakes, Shah said. Chatbots and agents don't. If an agent makes a mistake, will it know before it interacts with another and compounds it? "It's the equivalent to giving someone US$100 (RM425) and telling them to go shop for you," Shah said. "And that's low risk, but think about health care, legal issues and making financial decisions. "There are great consequences to making mistakes there." A new language AI adoption is another obstacle Microsoft faces. The company boasts that developers are pumping more agents into the ecosystem. It also said several websites like the live events platform Eventbrite and e-commerce company Shopify adopted a new software language project called NLWeb that allows a more fluid AI experience. NLWeb, like HTML was for the Internet, is Microsoft's plan to revamp the way the web works. It's exciting technology for those in the tech industry. Shah said it's what developers have been hoping for, creating a natural language for casual Internet users to search websites. But just like self-driving cars, while the technology is improving, there's a limit to widespread use. Autonomous vehicles are tested and deployed in limited markets. Microsoft hopes for the world to adopt the agentic web, but the future of it could be quite limited. "We're not ready, all of us, to give up our agency to these systems," Shah said. "It's not radically replacing the web as we know it." – The Seattle Times/Tribune News Service
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Microsoft unit in Russia to file for bankruptcy, database shows
FILE PHOTO: A view shows a Microsoft logo at Microsoft offices in Issy-les-Moulineaux near Paris, France, March 21, 2025. REUTERS/Gonzalo Fuentes/File Photo (Reuters) -One of Microsoft Corp's subsidiaries in Russia plans to file for bankruptcy, according to a note published on the official Fedresurs registry on Friday. Microsoft did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. President Vladimir Putin said this week that foreign service providers like Microsoft and Zoom should be "throttled" in Russia to make way for domestic software solutions. Microsoft continued providing key services in Russia after Moscow's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, but in June 2022 it said it was significantly scaling down its operations due to changes to the economic outlook and the impact on its business there. The U.S. tech giant had already removed Russian state-owned media outlet RT's mobile apps from the Windows App store and banned advertisements on Russian state-sponsored media in the days after the invasion. The note posted on Fedresurs on Friday said that Microsoft Rus LLC was intending to declare bankruptcy. The TASS news agency reported that Microsoft has three other Russian units - Microsoft Development Centre Rus, Microsoft Mobile Rus and Microsoft Payments Rus. It was not immediately clear how those units might be affected. Alphabet-owned Google's Russian subsidiary filed for bankruptcy in 2022, saying that the seizure of its bank account by Russian authorities had made it untenable for its Russian office to function, including paying Russia-based employees, suppliers and vendors. (Reporting by Alexander Marrow, Gleb Stolyarov and Maxim Rodionov; Editing by Susan Fenton)
