Byker Estate's energy bills to drop, Newcastle City Council says
People living on a housing development should see their heating bills cut by up to 31% this year, despite council bosses imposing three new charges.Residents on the Byker Estate pleaded for a reprieve from Newcastle City Council last year amid complaints some households were being hit with "ridiculous" costs.It is connected to a local authority-managed district heat network (DHN) which supplies homes with heating and hot water, but its properties are not metered and people are charged a flat monthly rate regardless of how much energy they use.The Labour-run council said it did not benefit financially and it was pleased bills would fall.
The network is not subject to the energy price cap, which has been a source of frustration for the likes of pensioner Roberta Davidson.She appeared before councillors in December after her bills jumped from £108 to £213 per month.She questioned why charges imposed on homeowners by the council were substantially more than those being paid by the estate's social housing tenants, whose energy bills are set by Karbon Homes.Council bosses have now revealed their proposed DHN charges for 2025/26 and say households will see overall reductions of between 9% and 31%, depending on the size of their property.That is despite the authority adding extra fees to bills starting from next month, which will total an average of £233, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.They are a £2,000 administration fee split across all 159 private homeowners on the estate, a 5% fund to finance major repairs and a 5% contingency which the council says will help "smooth out" unexpected fluctuations in energy prices or unexpected repair costs.
'People power'
Due to a fall in gas prices, a council report confirms the amount households are charged for energy use will fall to £18.92 per year per sqm from as high as £49 for some residents.But their infrastructure charge covering costs such as staffing and maintenance will be set at £366.32 per year in 2025/26, having previously been between £217.30 and £376.30.Byker councillor Nick Hartley, of the Green Party, said the overall reduction in bills "goes to show the power of residents campaigning".The council previously refused to use public funds to subsidise the bills.A spokesman said: "As a council, we do not benefit in any way financially from the heat networks and charge residents only for their usage."The new charges will allow us to ensure that the full costs of running the network are covered by those attached to it and are not subsidised by other residents in the city."We are very pleased to be able to tell residents that their bills will reduce for the 12 months from April 2025."However, until all costs are reconciled in the following year (approximately June 2026), we need to be clear that the final cost does remain subject to how the network actually operates during 2025/26."
Follow BBC Newcastle on X (formerly Twitter), Facebook and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Winter fuel payment U-turn in numbers
The government's decision to largely reverse its cuts to winter fuel payments has raised questions about its spending and savings plans - and its fiscal Verify has been looking at the the key numbers. What has changed on winter fuel? At the time Labour won the 2024 general election, the Department for Work and Pensions was projecting that 10.8 million pensioners in England and Wales would be eligible for winter fuel payments in payments are worth either £200 or £300 per household. The new government, in order to save money, decided that only pensioners in receipt of pension credit (a separate benefit aimed at low-income pensioners) would receive winter fuel payments that winter - and said that would reduce the number of individual recipients to 1.5 the government has changed course - after widespread criticism - and said that, from 2025-26, all pensioners will get it, although it will be clawed back in the following tax year from individuals earning £35,000 and claims this means about 9 million pensioners will now be eligible.. The effect of this is largely to undo the impact of its initial policy in terms of the numbers affected. How much will this cost? The government estimated that the cost of the winter fuel payment system it inherited in 2024-25 would have been £ estimated that its initial reform last year would cut this bill by £1.4bn in 2024-25 (rising to £1.5bn in 2025-26) taking the cost of the system down to £0.5bnNow the government says the cost of the system after its latest change will be £1.25bn - a saving of £450m relative to a system in which all pensioners were eligible to receive the government added that this £450m saving has not yet been certified by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) - the government's official if it transpired, this saving would be only a third of the original £1.5bn savings target. And some analysts think the overall net saving for the government could actually be lower Labour's initial 2024 reform, winter fuel payments were only available to those in receipt of a separate benefit aimed at low-income pensioners, called pension year, the government initiated a campaign to encourage the hundreds of thousands of pensioners who are eligible for pension credit, but who do not claim it, to start doing latest data shows almost 60,000 more pension credit claims were awarded than otherwise might have been, likely because of the government's awareness campaign. With each annual pension credit claim costing the government £3,900 a year on average, the former Lib Dem pensions minister Steve Webb has calculated that the total annual cost of these new claims could be about £ additional cost would offset around half of the £450m savings claimed by the government for its latest changes to winter fuel eligibility. How can the government afford this U-turn? When Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the tightening of winter fuel payments in 2024, she said the £1.5bn per year savings were needed to stabilise the public those savings were entered into the OBR's budget calculations. Now the savings will only be £450m per year - or even lower - a gap of at least £1bn will open up in the government's Treasury said it will address this gap in the next Budget in the Autumn of 2025 and said "it will not lead to permanent additional borrowing".Assuming the OBR does not raise its GDP growth and tax revenue forecasts in the Budget, giving the government more money to fill the gap, this will imply ministers would either have to raise additional taxes or cut spending elsewhere to close this roughly £1bn gap .However, it should be noted that £1bn is a relatively low sum in the context of the public 2025-26 the government is projected by the OBR to spend £1,347bn and to borrow £ is also worth noting that the projected savings from the government's working age welfare reforms, announced earlier this year, are considerably higher than the savings from changing eligibility for winter fuel changes in eligibility for personal independence payments and the cuts to universal credit incapacity payments are projected by the OBR to save the government £4.8bn a year by 2029-30. If the government were to reverse or water down those reforms, as some Labour MPs are urging, it would create a considerably larger financial headache for the chancellor in terms of meeting her fiscal rules specify that she has to be projected to be on course to balance the government's day-to-day spending budget (which excludes spending on infrastructure) by March 2025, the OBR projected that she had just £9.9bn of "headroom" against this rule, a very small amount of leeway given the size of overall government spending and the welfare cuts would wipe out around half of many economists expect the chancellor's projected headroom to be further eroded by the OBR in any case in the Autumn Budget as a result of downgraded growth forecasts and an increase in government market borrowing costs in recent months. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Restart coal mining and bring back traditional steelmaking to Wales, says Nigel Farage
Nigel Farage has called for the blast furnaces at Port Talbot's steelworks to reopen as Reform UK sets its sights on the Welsh Senedd elections in 2026. On a visit to the town, the party leader said the resumption of traditional steelmaking should be the ambition. Farage has also suggested some coal mines could re-open in Wales to power the production of steel in Port Talbot. Speaking at a press conference, the Reform UK leader said he believes his party has a chance of ending Labour's long-standing dominance in Wales during the Senedd elections next May amid opinion poll momentum and gains made at the local polls last month. The Labour UK government has backed plans for a new £1.25 billion electric arc furnace at the Tata steelworks, with the switch-on due in 2027 as part of the push towards greener production. The plant's last blast furnace was shut down in September 2024, and nearly 2,000 people in Port Talbot have lost their jobs. Criticising the government's current plans, Farage said: "The electric arc is fine for recycling steel, it doesn't produce the virgin steel needed for military hardware, but the problem is that it uses vast amounts of electric in the the most expensive industrial electric prices in the world. "I very much doubt that furnace will ever be switched on . Our ambition is to reindustrialise Wales. Our belief is that we should make our own steel. Our belief is - for what uses coal still has - we should use our own coal. "I'm not saying let's open up all the pits, what I am saying is there are specific types of coal for certain uses that we still need in this country and we need for the blast furnaces here that we should produce ourselves." Tata Steel had been working to fully decommission and strip most of the iron and steelmaking assets across the Port Talbot site by the end of 2024, leaving little possibility of restarting the blast furnaces in their current company said many of the existing 'heavy end' assets - such as blast furnaces and coke ovens - had reached the "end of their operational life."Tata Steel CEO Rajesh Nair has previously said that there was "no way" the blast furnaces could be kept going, for both technical and financial Cameron Pleydell-Pearce, a steel expert and professor at Swansea University, told ITV Wales it would not be as straightforward as simply reopening the furnace in isolation, saying that there would be a need to import iron ore due to its low availability in the Pleydell-Pearce said: "One of the things that's important to remember is the furnace in Port Talbot was not shut down with the mind to restart it.""If you want to open any steel plant, you're going to have to invest hundreds of millions, if not billions, depending on the configuration that you want.... Because we're in a position where this furnace is going to be hard to restart, just from a technical perspective, it has to factor into it as well. So it's not just the investment that you're making, but the technical complexity of restarting."He continued: "It's not impossible, but the question is whether or not that fits into the strategy that's right for the UK. We have an abundance of scrap in the UK, so a scrap-recycling strategy makes sense. In other locations, there are plentiful supplies of iron ore and lower energy costs, so it might make sense for those locations to go with more ore-based steelmaking." Speaking about Farage's proposals, Chris Bryant, MP for the Rhondda and Ogmore, said: "This is really cruel politics from Nigel Farage, trying to pretend he's got a plan and he hasn't got a plan at all. "He couldn't afford what he's saying and the truth is the mines aren't going to re-open, they shouldn't re-open, these would be dangerous jobs and would be economically unviable. He should go home and be ashamed of himself."It makes me really cross that somebody waves this kind of flag, populism at its absolute worst. He knows he can't achieve it, he knows it wouldn't be right for climate change, for the economy, he knows he's on a hiding to nothing." A spokesperson for Community Union, one of the largest unions representing steelworkers at Tata's Port Talbot site, said: 'We will always support credible policies that create more well-paid jobs in the steel sector, but our steel communities deserve better than to be used as a political football. If Reform have serious plans for the future of our steel sector in Wales, they should set them out in full.' A Welsh Labour spokesperson has accused the Reform UK leader of bringing "fantasy politics" and a "magic money tree" to the town. They said: 'The people of Wales will see through the false hope and false promises of a public-school boy from England who does not understand them and does not understand Wales. In a wide-ranging press conference, Farage also announced a number of policies of immigration in Wales if Reform UK topped the polls next May: A pledge to put local people at the front of the social housing queue and to stop the use of any building for asylum seeker accommodation To scrap nation of sanctuary status for Wales To stop funding for "woke" policies including: £10.5 million for Equality, Inclusion and Human Rights budget, £440,000 on developing insects for food, including insect-based food for children and to end funding to the Wales Refugee Council. Farage's speech comes as Reform seeks to draw a line under internal clashes after chairman Zia Yusuf quit the party on Thursday only to return 48 hours later, saying the resignation had been 'born out of exhaustion'. He referenced this disagreement in his speech saying: "We hit a speed bump- it could've been that we were driving more than 20mph", jibing at the Welsh Government's default speed limit policy - something he has pledged to scrap if Reform UK were in power in the Senedd. It followed a row in which Yusuf described a question to the Prime Minister concerning a ban on burkas from his party's newest MP, Sarah Pochin, as 'dumb'. During his speech Farage also welcomed two independent Merthyr Tydfil Councillors who have defected to Reform UK - Andrew Barry and David Hughes. When pressed on whether there would be more high-profile defections in the Senedd or in Parliament, and if he'll name any candidate to stand as First Minister in Wales, he insisted "we very much want to look at Reform Wales being autonomous. There are names in Wales that I am talking to."
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Winter Fuel Payment: Labour restores 2025 allowance to millions
Older people are being urged to check if they qualify under new income rules ❄️ Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Winter Fuel Payment will be reinstated for around 9 million pensioners in England and Wales Reversal follows criticism of Labour's earlier decision to cut eligibility Pensioners earning under £35,000 will get it automatically; others will repay through tax Payment remains means-tested, but with a higher income threshold than last winter Scotland and Northern Ireland to receive extra funding to match the new rules The Government has reversed its decision to drastically cut the Winter Fuel Payment, meaning around nine million pensioners in England and Wales will receive the support this winter — a sharp rise from just 1.5 million last year. The Winter Fuel Payment is a tax-free payment of up to £300 to help older people with heating costs during the winter. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As one of its first decisions, the Labour Government cut eligibility, restricting payments only to pensioners receiving Pension Credit, in a move aimed at plugging a £22 billion gap in the public finances. This reduced the number of recipients by almost 10 million. In a £1.25 billion U-turn, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she will reinstate the payment to most pensioners who previously received it. This follows widespread criticism and political pressure, including poor results for Labour in the local elections. Who is eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment? Although millions more will now receive the payment, it is still means-tested — just at a higher income threshold than last winter. Reeves said: 'I don't think it is right that the very richest pensioners have their fuel bills subsidised.' Pensioners with an income below £35,000 a year will receive the Winter Fuel Payment automatically Pensioners with an income over £35,000 a year will also receive it, but it will be reclaimed through tax later You must have reached state pension age by the week starting 15 September 2025 The devolved governments in Scotland and Northern Ireland will also receive additional funding so they can match the new eligibility criteria in their nations too. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Pensioners who don't wish to receive the payment can choose to opt out, according to the Treasury. The Treasury says the U-turn won't involve extra Government borrowing, but fiscal experts have warned it may require tax rises or cuts elsewhere. The Chancellor has promised to explain the funding in the Autumn Budget. Are you struggling to make ends meet as costs continue to rise? You can now send your stories to us online via YourWorld at It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.
