Labour ‘throwing trans people under the bus' says transgender councillor
One of Labour's only transgender councillors has resigned from the party, accusing it of 'throwing trans people under the bus'.
In a post on X on Friday morning, Dylan Tippetts, who has represented Compton ward on Plymouth city council since 2022, wrote: 'I cannot continue to represent a party that does not support my fundamental rights. I cannot as a trans person continue to support the Labour party.'
Tippetts, who was the first Labour councillor to represent the area, will now sit as an independent and confirmed he would not seek re-election.
He said: 'The Labour party nationally has thrown transgender people under the bus and has taken us backwards decades. Everyone deserves the right to live peacefully, and the Labour party continues to deny transgender people that basic right.'
Tippett's resignation comes after senior government figures, including Keir Starmer, welcomed the 'clarity' provided by the supreme court's ruling on biological sex.
The UK supreme court ruled last month that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 referred only to 'a biological woman' and to 'biological sex', with subsequent advice from the equalities watchdog, the Equality and Humans Rights Commission, amounting to a blanket ban on trans people using toilets and other services of the gender they identify as.
Responding to the judgment, which has sent shockwaves through the UK's transgender community, the prime minister said: 'A woman is an adult female, and the court has made that absolutely clear. I actually welcome the judgment because I think it gives real clarity.'
Bridget Phillipson moved to reassure the community. The equalities minister told the Commons: 'The ruling of the supreme court was clear about the importance of biological sex, but I would not want any trans person … anywhere across the country to be fearful.'
Subsequently, the Guardian reported that 14 national LGBTQ+ charities had written to Starmer seeking an urgent meeting to discuss what they described as 'a genuine crisis for the rights, dignity and inclusion of trans people in the UK'.
On Thursday a cross-party committee of MPs wrote to the EHRC seeking assurances that its guidance on how organisations interpreted the ruling did not ignore the needs of transgender people.
A spokesperson for Plymouth Labour Group said: 'We are very disappointed that Cllr Tippetts has taken the decision to resign from the Labour party after he was informed on Thursday evening that he was being replaced as chair of the taxi licensing committee.
'The residents of Compton ward deserve three committed councillors so we hope Cllr Tippetts will work hard to represent them during his final year in office.'
Tippetts has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Canada agrees to ratify Britain's accession to major trans-Pacific trade pact
Ottawa will seek to introduce legislation to its parliament this autumn to formally approve Britain's entry to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The UK joined the bloc in 2024, but Canada is yet to ratify its accession – meaning Britain still faces pre-CPTPP trade barriers in exporting to the country. Following a bilateral meeting between the Prime Minister and his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney on Sunday, Downing Street said: 'Prime Minister Carney confirmed that Canada would ratify the UK's accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), seeking to introduce legislation to their parliament in the autumn. 'This will bring huge benefits to UK businesses by lowering tariffs when buying from and selling to Canada. 'They also agreed to set up a joint taskforce to turbocharge progress on other areas of mutual benefit, including technology and artificial intelligence – in support of shared growth and our national security. 'The taskforce will also look to make progress on the wider UK-Canada Free Trade Agreement.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Silence on bullying at universities ‘like Post Office scandal', says Cambridge chancellor hopeful
The culture of silence on bullying at universities is like the Post Office scandal, a candidate in the running to be the next Cambridge University chancellor has claimed. Prof Wyn Evans, one of 10 hopefuls who could become Cambridge University's next figurehead, said academics were routinely made to feel as if their allegations about bullying and harassment were isolated cases. In an interview with The Telegraph, the astrophysics professor at Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy claimed he was subject to 'prolonged retaliation' after he tried to blow the whistle over mistreatment of a colleague. Prof Evans raised concerns with the university in July 2021 that a female member of staff in his department in the 'throes of extreme mental distress' was being bullied by a more senior employee, adding that he was worried about her welfare as a result. Cambridge University appointed an independent barrister to investigate the claims, but also tasked them with probing separate allegations made about Prof Evans's own behaviour. It took more than a year and a half before the investigation was completed. The barrister concluded that Prof Evans's intervention met the legal threshold for whistleblowing, but that the behaviour reported by him did not constitute bullying. The lawyer dismissed the personal allegations made against Prof Evans and said the claimant provided no evidence to substantiate them. Prof Evans told The Telegraph that the drawn-out process had an enormous impact on his mental health, and that at his lowest ebb during the investigation, he had thoughts of ending his own life. 'Not even a droplet of compassion' 'My problems all started when I intervened on [my colleague's] behalf. I contacted a prominent figure in the university for help in dealing with the victim… No help was offered. There was not even a droplet of compassion for the victim,' he said. 'As is very common in whistleblowing cases, there was then prolonged retaliation against me. The retaliation caused significant disruption to my work and my mental health. I went on sick leave. Sleep was an elusive luxury [and] I was plagued with recurrent nightmares.' The astrophysics professor has promised to introduce an ombudsman at Cambridge University to investigate 'serious abuses or mismanagement' if elected chancellor. The scientist, whose research is around the formation of the Milky Way, launched a blog about his ordeal in 2023 calling for other academics to come forward with their own experiences. The 21 Group, named after the percentage of Cambridge University employees who reported being subjected to bullying or harassment in an internal staff survey, has seen almost 300 academics from around the world share their stories about bullying and harassment to date. Prof Evans described their revelations as similar to the Post Office scandal, in which victims were repeatedly told they were the only ones struggling with the company's faulty Horizon software despite more than 900 of them later being wrongly prosecuted for theft. 'If you remember in the sub-postmaster scandal, the Post Office was telling each individual sub-postmaster that, you know, 'it's just you were having problems with Horizon'. And it was only when they got together and they found that it was actually very common and almost ubiquitous, and the Post Office had been telling untruths,' he said. 'So it's something similar to that, that by helping all these people come together, we're much more powerful at fighting back against the universities. The knowledge that what has happened to you has happened to many other people is powerful because you realise that it isn't an individual personal experience.' The 21 Group has seen more than 8,000 visitors to its website in the past week alone, according to Prof Evans, with most academics active on the platform claiming to be from research-intensive universities across the UK. Some allege they have been stripped of research funding as part of power struggles with more senior colleagues. Free speech 'There are many young researchers who find their grants blocked because of sort of academic jealousy or of the feeling of being threatened. I think that's actually very common,' said Prof Evans. He claimed the issue was at the heart of broader free speech problems at universities, with institutions failing to properly address bullying and harassment allegations for fear of reputational damage. In his independent report into Prof Evans's whistleblowing claims, the external barrister appointed by Cambridge University said he regretted the length of time that the investigation took and 'the effect this will undoubtedly have had on all those involved'. The barrister also raised concerns that several staff members pulled out of providing testimony over fears they would face retaliation. Prof Evans, a don at the university for more than 20 years, claimed it was 'all quite unlike the Cambridge University as it really could be'. 'The magnificent role the university could play in encouraging greater empathy, diversity, kindness and inclusion as well as public interest in scholarship and learning, is undermined by its poor culture,' he said. 'Culture is set by the people at the top. This is one of things I would change as chancellor.' Cambridge University said it strongly refuted Prof Evans's claims. The astrophysics professor will run against rival candidates including Sandi Toksvig, the comedian and ex-presenter of the Great British Bake Off, and Gina Miller, the anti-Brexit campaigner, in the race to become the next Cambridge chancellor. The successful candidate will replace Lord Sainsbury of Turville, who was elected to the role in 2011 and stepped down last year. He had succeeded Prince Philip, the late Duke of Edinburgh, who held the position for 35 years. Voting is set to take place both online and in-person for the first time next month, with a winner set to be announced in the week beginning July 21, 2025. A spokesperson for Cambridge University said: 'We strongly dispute claims made in this version of events but cannot comment further on ongoing cases. The university takes allegations of bullying and harassment extremely seriously.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trans police officers blocked from strip-searching biological women
Transgender police officers will no longer be able to strip-search people of a different biological sex to them. Six forces across England had previously been accused of a lack of urgency in changing policies to ensure detainees should only be searched by an officer of the same sex in the wake of the landmark legal ruling on the definition of sex in April. The constabularies of Merseyside, Sussex, Surrey and Northumbria, as well as the Metropolitan Police and the British Transport Police, previously allowed trans officers to search people if their gender matched the sex of the detainee. This allowed biological male officers who identified as female and had a gender recognition certificate to strip-search women. However, recent interim guidance issued by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) has now been sent to all police forces stating that strip searches 'must be conducted with officers of the same biological sex as the person being searched'. This was based on legal advice following the Supreme Court ruling that found that sex is biological under the Equality Act. Now, it has emerged that the six police forces have reversed their stance and are adopting the NPCC guidance. The reversal has been hailed as a victory by women's rights campaigners who launched a legal challenge on this point. 'Forces have finally about-turned' Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'The British Transport Police, the Met Police and several other forces have finally about-turned on strip-searching policies based on gender recognition certificates. 'They should never have considered a man with a £5 certificate based on a change of pronouns and a medical diagnosis of 'dysphoria' as suitable to strip-search women and girls.' The NPCC guidance offers detainees who are transgender the ability to request to be searched by an officer who is of their gender, and not their biological sex. A biological man who identifies as a female, for example, could request the strip-search to be performed by a female officer. The NPCC guidance says that 'as far as operationally viable' this option will be provided to people whose 'lived-in gender is not the same as their biological sex'. For these individuals who are being strip-searched by police, the guidance indicates that written consent from the detainee, the searching officer and the authorising officer will be needed. In these instances, which the NPCC identifies as a rare occurrence, the officer will not be of the same sex as the detainee. 'Dangerous loophole' Ms Forstater called the NPCC guidance, which allows opposite-sex strip-searching by 'consent', a 'dangerous loophole'. 'It leaves female officers exposed to pressure and coercion within the custody suite and when out on the beat. 'This is particularly concerning given the years in which trans lobby groups have trained forces across the UK to centre the demands of trans-identifying men and disregard women's rights and needs. 'The question remains: how has the ethical and legal position of police forces across the UK deteriorated to such a point that they are putting such immense effort into enabling something as sordid as opposite-sex strip-searching?' Campaigners are now investigating if this is a breach of the law under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). This ensured intimate searches would not be done by a person of the opposite sex. Sex Matters believes this loophole for transgender detainees may be in breach of the law following the ruling of the Supreme Court case that defined sex under the Equality Act 2010. Some female officers have anonymously raised concerns that if they were asked to strip-search a trans woman who has male genitalia they may feel unable to refuse the request for fear of being branded 'transphobic' or unprofessional. 'Nonsensical jumble' The Police Federation called the suggested consensual regime for transgender detainees a 'wholly unworkable idea' and called the guidance a 'nonsensical jumble'. 'We believe that the only lawful option following the Supreme Court decision is to exempt transsexual officers from searching either biological sex and this should be the default situation for all transsexual officers,' it added. All police forces have been approached for comment. A National Police Chiefs' Council spokesman said: 'Those in policing and our communities would benefit from a clear and consistent position across the country in this complex and sensitive area. 'The guidance is explicit that officers will face no career detriment from declining to carry out searches, and any search not conducted in line with biological sex must have the written consent of the detainee, the officer carrying out the search as well as the authorising officer. 'The interim guidance is based on legal advice and has been developed after seeking views across policing as well as those of partners. It reflects working practice that already happens every day across policing, where officers and detainees make requests about searches for a multitude of reasons. 'We understand the depth of feeling there is on these issues, both among transgender communities, as well as those who hold gender-critical views. Policing remains committed to treating everyone with fairness, dignity and respect.'
