Trump withdraws funding for research aimed at saving babies with heart defect
The Trump administration has revoked funding was for a pioneering heart device designed to save the lives of critically ill infants, only days after it was granted by the US department of defense.The $6.7 million grant, awarded to Dr James Antaki and his team at Cornell University on 30 March, was meant to support the next phase of development for the PediaFlow device . The battery-sized pump is designed to help newborns with congenital heart defects survive until they can undergo surgery or receive a transplant.But on 8 April, the department of defense issued a stop-work order, effectively cancelling the funding without offering a reason. The research team now faces an uncertain future, with Antaki warning that staff layoffs and a halt in development are likely if new funding isn't secured within 90 days.'It's hard to accept,' Antaki told NBC News. 'This is more than a project — it's a mission. We're doing this for the children.'The cancellation is one of several abrupt funding withdrawals linked to broader cost-cutting measures introduced by US president Donald Trump's revived administration. The department of government efficiency, overseen by Elon Musk, has led the charge in slashing academic and scientific grants deemed 'non-essential.'Medical professionals have expressed alarm at the move. 'This device has enormous potential,' said Dr Evan Zahn, a paediatric cardiologist. 'Losing this funding is a real setback for paediatric medicine.'Roughly 1 in 100 babies are born with heart defects in the US each year. With ongoing research, Antaki believes PediaFlow could offer hope to thousands of families — but only if the work is allowed to continue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Promises kept': Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' ends Medicaid for illegal immigrants; what it means
The White House on Monday announced that President Donald Trump's flagship legislative proposal, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB), will put an end to taxpayer-funded healthcare for undocumented immigrants in the United States. The announcement comes amid rising tensions in bustling Hollywood, as Los Angeles sees intensified demonstrations and clashes with law enforcement over ongoing immigration raids. 'More than 1.4 million illegal immigrants — including cold-blooded criminals, like those arrested this weekend in Los Angeles — are currently on Medicaid, stealing benefits meant for American citizens,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, sharing a post on the administration's official website. According to the White House, the OBBB aims to preserve Medicaid for US citizens by eliminating access for undocumented immigrants. It also proposes major immigration enforcement measures , including: Funding 10,000 new ICE agents and 3,000 Border Patrol officers Annual deportation targets of 1 million criminal illegal immigrants $10,000 annual bonuses for immigration enforcement personnel over the next four years 'Promises made, promises kept,' the statement said, positioning the bill as a cornerstone of Trump's 2025 agenda. What is Medicaid cut? Cutting Medicaid funding could trigger a wide range of negative effects for millions of Americans, especially the most vulnerable. Here's how: Reduced access to care: With less federal and state support, states might limit covered services, tighten eligibility, or lower payments to doctors—leading many providers to stop accepting Medicaid patients altogether. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Düsseldorf: Gutes Hören sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung Gutes Hören Undo Higher personal costs: Patients may face increased copays, deductibles, or other out-of-pocket expenses, making essential healthcare less affordable. Loss of coverage: Stricter eligibility rules or scaled-back benefits could push many off the program entirely. Harm to vulnerable groups: Low-income families, seniors, and people with disabilities, who depend heavily on Medicaid—would be hit hardest by these cuts. However, the sweeping bill, which also includes major tax cuts, is projected to add around $3 trillion to the US national debt, drawing sharp criticism from some quarters, most notably Elon Musk. The world's richest man and former Trump adviser called the legislation a 'disgusting abomination' and warned it would saddle American citizens with 'crushing, unsustainable debt.' Trump fired back, saying, 'Elon was wearing thin. I asked him to leave — and he just went CRAZY!' Despite the high-profile spat, tensions appear to have cooled now. Both men have since dialled down their attacks, and a mutual softening in tone can be observed.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's cuts are 'devastating' for vulnerable women worldwide: UN
The United Nations Population Fund ( UNFPA ) has faced budget cuts before, but the impact of President Donald Trump 's policies has been even more "devastating" for reproductive health worldwide, chief Natalia Kanem told AFP. The agency has been targeted by US conservatives since the Kemp-Kasten Amendment's enactment in 1985 by Congress , when the administration of then president Ronald Reagan rallied against China's population policies, accusing Beijing of promoting forced abortions and sterilizations. All subsequent Republican presidencies have cut US funding to UNFPA, and the second Trump administration is no exception. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Over 40 and Struggling With Belly Fat? Try 1 Teaspoon Daily (See Results Fast!) getfittoday Undo "We've had over $330 million worth of projects ended," virtually overnight, in "some of the hardest hit regions of the world" like Afghanistan, Kanem said in an interview coinciding with the release of the UNFPA's annual report Tuesday. "So yes, we are suffering." Live Events Kanem pointed to the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan as an example, where over the years more than 18,000 pregnancies were delivered by "heroic midwives" who "conducted these over 18,000 deliveries without a single maternal death, which you know, in a crisis situation is extraordinary." "Those maternity wards today have closed. The funding cuts immediately have meant that those midwives are no longer able to do their jobs," Kanem said. Although it is too soon to estimate the precise impacts of the US cuts, they will inevitably result in increased maternal mortality and more unintended pregnancies, according to Kanem. "What's different this time for UNFPA is that our ecosystem of other reproductive health actors who might be able to fill in for us," Kanem said, adding they are "reeling from huge impact of having their funding denied." The Trump administration has slashed many such external aid programs. "So it is very lamentable that this year, to me, has been drastically worse than ever before, precisely because now everybody is caught up in the whirlwind." "The withdrawal of the United States from the funding arena for reproductive health has been devastating," Kanem said. - Desire and rights - American policy is not only marked by funding cuts, but also a challenge to gender equality matters. "There will be debates about concepts, but there shouldn't be any debate about the non-negotiability of the rights and choices of women and adolescent girls," Kanem emphasized. "We always embrace change, but we should not compromise on these common values which spell the difference between life and death for women and girls all around the world," she continued. "Women deserve support. Adolescent girls deserve to finish their schooling, not become pregnant, not be bartered or sent off into marriage as a non-solution to issues that families may face." The UNFPA's annual report, published Tuesday and based on the results of an survey of 14,000 people from 14 countries -- nations which represent over a third of the world's population -- also underscores concerns that millions of people around the world cannot create the families they desire. More than 40 percent of those over the age of 50 reported not having the number of children they wanted -- with 31 percent saying they had fewer kids than they desired and 12 percent saying they had more than they wanted. More than half of respondents said economic barriers prevented them from having more children. Conversely, one in five said they were pressured into having a child, and one in three adults reported an unintended pregnancy. The majority of people "live in countries where fertility rates have fallen so far and so fast that they are below replacement," Kanem said. "We know that the issue of population pressure takes almost like a headline drastic view. Some people think there are way too many people. Others are saying we don't have enough, women should have more babies," Kanem said. "What UNFPA really cares about is a woman's true desire, rights and choices," Kanem said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 hours ago
- First Post
Federal judge strikes down Trump's anti-diversity and anti-transgender grants
U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar said Monday that the federal government cannot force recipients to halt programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion or acknowledge the existence of transgender people in order to receive grant funding read more A federal judge in California has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing anti-diversity and anti-transgender executive orders in grant funding requirements that LGBTQ+ organizations say are unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar said Monday that the federal government cannot force recipients to halt programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion or acknowledge the existence of transgender people in order to receive grant funding. The order will remain in effect while the legal case continues, although government lawyers will likely appeal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The funding provisions 'reflect an effort to censor constitutionally protected speech and services promoting DEI and recognizing the existence of transgender individuals,' Tigar wrote. He went on to say that the executive branch must still be bound by the Constitution in shaping its agenda and that even in the context of federal subsidies, 'it cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities for disfavored treatment or suppress ideas that it does not like or has deemed dangerous.' More from World Mpox epidemic remains international health emergency warns WHO The plaintiffs include health centers, LGBTQ+ services groups and the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society. All receive federal funding and say they cannot complete their missions by following the president's executive orders. The San Francisco AIDS Foundation, one of the plaintiffs, said in 2023 it received a five-year grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to expand and enhance sexual health services, including the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The $1.3 million project specifically targets communities disproportionately affected by sexual health disparities. But in April, the CDC informed the nonprofit that it must 'immediately terminate all programs, personnel, activities, or contracts' that promote DEI or gender ideology. President Donald Trump has signed a flurry of executive orders since taking office in January, including ones to roll back transgender protections and stop DEI programs. Lawyers for the government say that the president is permitted to 'align government funding and enforcement strategies' with his policies. Plaintiffs say that Congress — and not the president — has the power to condition how federal funds are used, and that the executive orders restrict free speech rights.
