How Trump is bypassing Los Angeles's sanctuary city hurdles
While the media has focused on President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard to quell immigration riots in Los Angeles, there is a much more significant aspect of his crackdown on sanctuary cities and states. The Trump administration has found an innovative way to neutralize California's sanctuary policies, forcing local officials to hand over illegal migrants for deportation despite state and local sanctuary laws and policies that bar them from doing so.
California law enforcement officials can refuse to cooperate with 'ICE detainers,' requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement to transfer illegal migrants held in local jails to federal immigration officials. That is because ICE detainers are nonbinding and can be disregarded by the local agency.
But Bill Essayli, Trump's recently appointed U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, has come up with a way to compel California's cooperation. Local officials can 'ignore detainers, but they can't ignore [federal criminal] warrants,' he told me in an interview.
So, in his first weeks in office, Essayli launched Operation Guardian Angel, a federal task force that is scanning criminal databases every day to identify illegal migrants arrested in the Los Angeles area, and then checking their fingerprints against immigration records to see whether they have previously been deported. If they have, Essayli charges them with illegal reentry, a federal crime, and obtains an arrest warrant from a federal judge, which cannot be ignored by sanctuary jurisdictions.
The operation has been underway for less than a month, but already California is being forced to hand over dozens of illegal migrants to ICE each week. Fox News's Bill Melugin reported on one of the first ICE detentions under Operation Guardian Angel of a previously deported illegal migrant, who had just been arrested in a robbery in the sanctuary jurisdiction of Los Angeles. Once the concept is proven there, the Justice Department can deploy Operation Guardian Angel across California — and then nationwide. 'It could be done in every sanctuary city,' Essayli told me. 'Every jurisdiction has access to these databases, and everyone who's booked in a jail has to be fingerprinted.'
His pioneering effort will save lives. Indeed, if Operation Guardian Angel had been in place 10 years ago, Kate Steinle might still be alive today. In 2015, the young California woman was shot in the back on a San Francisco pier by an illegal migrant, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, who was free because the city refused to honor an ICE detainer. Zarate had been deported five times and thus could easily have been charged with the federal crime of illegal reentry, which would have compelled San Francisco to hand him over to ICE.
According to police, in February an illegal migrant in the Los Angeles area named José Cristian Saravia-Sánchez shot and killed a 48-year-old father of two who interrupted him attempting to steal a neighbor's catalytic converter. Saravia-Sánchez had been arrested 11 times between June 2022 and August 2024, but Essayli says local law enforcement was prevented by state law from complying with an ICE detainer. Saravia-Sánchez was deported in 2013, so had Operation Guardian Angel been in effect, local police could have been forced to turn him over to ICE — and two Inglewood boys might still have their father.
Stories such as this are why, Essayli said, most local sheriffs who have had their hands tied by sanctuary policies want to cooperate with ICE. 'We briefed the sheriffs. A lot of the sheriffs were excited. They were like, 'We've been waiting for this.'' Others, he said, were incredulous when presented with their first federal arrest warrants. 'They looked like they're having a heart attack,' he said. 'A lot of them were like, 'Well, what are these?' I said: 'It's a warrant. You deal with warrants every day. There's nothing different about this.''
So far, he has faced no resistance from local law enforcement, Essayli said. He cautions that anyone interfering with the federal warrants will face serious consequences. I asked him what can be done if the illegal migrants found in criminal databases have not been previously deported. They could be charged with other federal crimes, Essayli said. 'If they have a firearm, it could be possession of a firearm. If they have a drug offense, we can hit them with a drug offense. If they have fraud, we can charge fraud. There's a lot of charges we can take federally other than illegal reentry.'
But gathering evidence for these crimes takes time, during which the suspects could be released. Charging migrants with illegal reentry is the fastest way to obtain a federal warrant. 'It's a very simple case. You're here, you've clearly committed an offense because you're not supposed to be here,' he says.
Essayli says that the politicians behind California's sanctuary policies are not only putting the lives of American citizens at risk but also making things worse for the illegal migrants they are purporting to protect. 'If they had just complied or honored our ICE detainers, a lot of these people would just be processed administratively,' he said. But by forcing him to get federal criminal warrants, 'they are causing these illegal aliens to potentially have to serve prison time before their deportation.'
This much is certain: The riots will be contained, and order will soon be restored to Los Angeles's streets. But Operation Guardian Angel is coming to a sanctuary city near you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs resolutions killing California's zero-emissions rules
This story was originally published on Trucking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Trucking Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump moved to sever California's EPA waivers by signing a series of joint resolutions Thursday, rolling back the Golden State's strict truck and auto emissions policies. The president's signing of joint resolutions under the Congressional Review Act reverses the Biden administration's approval of California's Advanced Clean Trucks rule. That earlier rule called for requiring 75% of Class 8 trucks sold in the state to be zero-emissions vehicles by 2035. Another resolution also prevents the state's low-nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions rule for heavy-duty trucks from being implemented, per a statement by the president. The NOx rule intended to regulate emissions from manufacturers by cutting heavy-duty NOx emissions by 90% and overhaul engine testing procedures. The Trump administration has described his predecessor's environmental policies as overreach and unjustified mandates. Trump said the congressional moves he signed further restrict California from implementing a similar policy in the future. "Under the Congressional Review Act, the EPA cannot approve any future waivers that are 'substantially the same' as those disapproved in the joint resolutions," Trump said in a statement. "Accordingly, the joint resolutions prohibit the EPA from approving future waivers for California that would impose California's policy goals across the entire country and violate fundamental constitutional principles of federalism, ending the electric vehicle mandate for good," the statement said. In response, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared the federal measures illegal and moved to sue the federal government, seeking to pursue the state's zero-emission vehicle policy. Newsom signed an executive order on Thursday for the state to continue regulation requiring that 100% of sales of new vehicles be zero emission by 2035 for cars, pickup trucks and drayage trucks and by 2045 for medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Trucking leaders applauded Trump for the measures. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association said the news was a big win for both men and women behind the wheel. 'Our 150,000 small-business members have been saying it all along—electric trucks just aren't a realistic option right now. They're too expensive, the charging infrastructure isn't there,' OOIDA President Todd Spencer said in an emailed press release to Trucking Dive. Industry advocates, including the American Trucking Associations and the Washington Trucking Associations, also warned that electric truck technology and charging infrastructure were not caught up to accommodate California's ambitious EV policies. 'We've done our part to reduce carbon emissions while keeping America's economy moving,' ATA President and CEO Chris Spear said in a press release. 'But what we need is federal leadership to set realistic and achievable national emissions standards. And today brings us one step closer toward that goal,' he added. Werner Enterprises truck driver Gina Jones shared a similar sentiment, speaking as part of the signing ceremony at the White House. 'We cannot allow one state's regulations to disrupt our entire nation's supply chain,' Jones said. 'Allowing California to do so would have [negatively] impacted the hundreds of thousands of truck drivers who deliver critical goods across the country each and every day.' Recommended Reading Congress revokes Advanced Clean Trucks waiver, creating ambiguity for refuse fleets Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio

18 minutes ago
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But the iconic American steelmaker and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a ' golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected against cutbacks in steel production. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. U.S. Steel rose $2.66, or 5%, to $54.85 in afterhours trading Friday. Nippon Steel's original bid to buy the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in late 2023 had been valued at $55 per share. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work, what other provisions are in the national security agreement and how specifically the $11 billion would be spent. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the order 'ensures U.S. Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' James Brower, a Morrison Foerster lawyer who represents clients in national security-related matters, said such agreements with the government typically are not disclosed to the public, particularly by the government. They can become public, but it's almost always disclosed by a party in the transaction, such as a company — like U.S. Steel — that is publicly held, Brower said. The mechanics of how a golden share would work will depend on the national security agreement, but in such agreements it isn't unusual to give the government approval rights over specific activities, Brower said. U.S. Steel made no filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday. Nippon Steel originally offered nearly $15 billion to purchase U.S. Steel in an acquisition that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest into U.S. Steel. American officials now value the transaction at $28 billion, including the purchase bid and a new electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that they say Nippon Steel will build in the U.S. after 2028. Nippon Steel had pledged to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, and using his authority Biden blocked the transaction on his way out of the White House. But Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement once he returned to the White House in January. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans,' although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' Trump said. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citizens of Augusta prepare ahead for ‘No King's' protest
AUGUSTA, Ga (WJBF) – Protestors will be waving their flags and signs in opposition to the Trump administration. This is just one of more than 1,000 protestors that are expected to happen on Flag Day across the country; there is also a protest planned in Aiken. People joined together before the protest to make their flags and signs. Krista Gentry, Communication Lead for Indivisible CSRA, said, 'A lot of the people in the community are really upset about what is going on, on a national level in our country and they're scared, and they want to come out and show that they're not okay with what's going on and want to see changes.' The name 'No King's' came from the 50501-organization dismissing the idea of a 'king' ruling the United States, advocating for democracy. Organizers say the protests are purposefully happening on the Army's 250th birthday, Flag Day and President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. 'We just want to draw attention away from that and to communities. We don't want this authoritarian feeling celebration happening for one person in Washington D.C. I think it's crossing a dangerous line with the use of the military,' said Gentry. 1,400 people are already signed up to attend the protest in Augusta with the potential for more to show up. 'It's actually really, really encouraging and is instilling my faith again in humanity and our country. The community here is so supportive, and I think they really care about what's going on and they want to make their voices heard,' Gentry said. Organizers say this will be a nonviolent protest and anyone who does not follow that will be asked to leave. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.