Health care providers push for cost-of-living adjustments, against new taxes in two-year budget plan
The Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee crafts the budget proposal to be sent to the full Legislature for consideration. (Emma Davis/ Maine Morning Star)
With much of Gov. Janet Mills' two-year budget proposal to close a projected $450 deficit focused on cuts and taxes related to health programs, public hearings last week on those sections saw sizable pushback from health care providers and parents of children with disabilities.
In particular, objections centered on the governor's proposed taxes on ambulance services and pharmacies and cuts to mental health supports, as well as an item left out of her plan: expected cost-of-living adjustments for health care providers, a decision those testifying and lawmakers argue is illegal.
A snow storm last week postponed the final hearing for health-related initiatives to Feb. 24, when the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, which sets the budget, and the Health and Human Services Committee are slated to hear from the public about social services, including General Assistance, which helps municipalities pay for basic necessities for those who can't afford them.
Cost-of-living adjustments and General Assistance have already proven to be contentious issues in negotiations for the more pressing change package to address a Medicaid funding shortfall in the current fiscal year.
Lawmakers also heard from the public last week about proposals for the two-year budget related to the judiciary, particularly the need to sufficiently fund indigent defense and the Victims of Crimes Act.
Click on the section to jump ahead to coverage of individual budget hearings:
Cost-of-living adjustments
Taxes
Mental health
Judiciary
Darryl Wood, the executive director of Life Enrichment Advancing People, or LEAP, a nonprofit that provides residential services and case management for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, said his organization had to close group homes after struggling to find and retain staff.
Wood was among the health care providers and parents of children with disabilities who turned out en masse last week to object to Gov. Janet Mills' decision to withhold anticipated cost-of-living adjustments. The raises were set to take effect Jan. 1 but providers were notified by the Mills administration in December they would not be coming.
An inability to pay providers competitive wages would also hurt the people who rely on the care they provide, which Kim Humphrey told lawmakers would be the case for her son, Daniel, an adult with severe autism who lives in a group home and helps deliver meals on wheels to seniors.
'Without adequate funding, Daniel loses the hard-earned skills that allow him to participate in his community,' Humphrey said. 'The proposed budget will devastate my son's life.'
Humphrey urged lawmakers to use some of the state's currently maxed out rainy day fund, a move Mills and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have previously objected to.
The suspension of cost-of-living adjustments will also impact the ability to hire and retain workers for NeuroRestorative Maine, which provides rehabilitation for brain injuries, said program director Jennifer Jello. Jello also pointed to language in the budget plan that would make future adjustments subject to available appropriations.
'Without that predictability of implementation, there could be detrimental impact to existing care and provider capacity,' Jello said.
Others pointed to the Mills administration's recent settlement agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to improve the children's behavioral health system, which explicitly requires annual cost-of-living adjustments for community-based services in line with the state law.
The possibility of reinstating cost-of-living adjustments in the current fiscal year also remains in limbo. After Democrats seemed poised to vote through a change package without Republican support on Feb. 11, an amendment to offer modest cost-of-living adjustments this year for essential support workers showed some promise — though ultimately fell through.
The Legislature's presiding officers opted to delay final enactment votes on the supplemental, however, leaving open the possibility cost-of-living adjustments could make their way into a bipartisan deal.
Mills proposed several tax changes that have faced pushback so far, but two of those proposals specifically involve health care and are meant to bolster MaineCare, Maine's Medicaid program.
These are a 70 cent tax on prescriptions for pharmacies and a tax on non-municipal ambulance service providers equal to 6% of their net operating revenue, the revenue from which the Mills administration says will be used to leverage additional federal dollars and eventually increase MaineCare reimbursements.
The Legislature's Blue Ribbon Commission on emergency services recommended a similar ambulance assessment in its final report released in January 2024. However, Rep. Sue Salisbury (D-Westbrook), who sat on the commission and had voted in favor of the recommendation, told lawmakers during the hearing that the group later heard that the program would be hard to manage and not have the desired effect.
Salisbury also questioned whether Mills' version of this plan would use the revenue generated to address other shortfalls in the MaineCare budget and not just help ambulance services with the gaps they'd face.
In addition to opposing the ambulance tax, Jeffrey Austin, vice president of government affairs for the Maine Hospital Association, urged the committee to reject MaineCare rate cuts Mills has proposed starting in 2027, arguing they are also in conflict with Maine law.
'This is not just a rate cut that they're proposing,' Austin said. 'It's a wholesale change to the methodology used to reimburse hospital-based doctors that is supposed to under the law go through a rate reform process.'
Taxes take center stage in budget debates
The pharmacy tax also saw strong pushback.
While the Maine Pharmacy Association is supportive of efforts to improve MaineCare reimbursements, executive director Amy Downing said, 'Funding this initiative through a tax on pharmacies is an unsustainable and dangerous path.'
More than 10% of the state's retail pharmacies have closed in the past decade, and Downing argued the tax would place additional financial strain on those that remain, potentially forcing them to reduce hours, cut services or close altogether.
'The state's argument that increased MaineCare reimbursements will offset this tax in aggregate is flawed,' Downing said. 'Pharmacies with a high percentage of MaineCare patients might break even, but those serving a more diverse mix of patients, including those on Medicare, private insurance or paying out of pocket, will be unfairly penalized.'
This is a concern for Steven Royer, vice president of the Kennebec Pharmacy and Home Care, a MaineCare and commercial health insurance provider. After several closures in recent years, they have two pharmacy operations: a long-term care pharmacy and an infusion therapy pharmacy that provides medications and nursing services in home settings.
Most of the patients served by the two pharmacies do not have MainCare, as many are seniors who are on Medicare, Royer said.
'While I understand that some pharmacies receive an increased reimbursement for MaineCare prescriptions, this increase would not offset the tax being assessed in our pharmacies due to our patient population,' Royer said.
Emily Hill, chief resident in the Family Medicine Residency at Central Maine Medical Center in Lewiston, said the system she works in day-to-day is already fragile.
'I acknowledge the difficult choices you all have to make, especially given the tenuous federal funding environment,' Hill said. 'However, I want to highlight today that these savings are ultimately costs, costs that will be shouldered by the hard working Mainers who work in healthcare and, most importantly, these will all be felt by patients.'
Mental health providers urged lawmakers to reject Mills' plan to not move forward with two crisis receiving centers in Kennebec and Aroostook counties authorized last year, in response to the mass shooting in Lewiston. Two other centers will still be built in Lewiston and Penobscot County.
They argued the state should divest in law enforcement strategies to address substance use and mental health issues and instead use those funds to support community programs, such as the centers.
'Access to care remains a challenge, as is evidenced by long wait lists for community-based services and individuals languishing in emergency departments instead of receiving the behavioral health support they need,' said Jennifer Christian, associate director of Alliance for Addiction and Mental Health Services.
Halting funding for more crisis centers will exacerbate this, Christian said, as will withholding cost-of-living adjustments for providers and Mills' plan to reduce workforce incentives.
The governor has proposed a decrease from $2.5 million annually to $1 million annually for recruitment and retention incentives for staff who provide medication management services.
Mainers object to proposed program cuts ahead of governor's budget address
Betsy Sweet, speaking on behalf of the Behavioral Health Community Collaborative, said the frustration being felt in hospitals and jails will not be fixed with more beds or capital infrastructure.
'Here is my plea to you: we need to do this differently,' Sweet said. 'We ask that your committees look beyond the line by line entries and blippies and look at the overall picture.'
The appropriations committee is the only committee already poised to connect the dots between spending across issue areas.
'They are so connected,' Sweet said, 'and you are the ones that can make those connections not just intellectually, but financially.'
This tension between requests for investments in measures that supporters say would prevent reliance on state government long term and requests to expand existing state structures was also seen in the budget hearings for other issue areas.
Maine only hired its first five public defenders in 2022. Mills added two offices and 10 more public defender positions the following year. Last month, the Kennebec County Superior Court ruled that Maine violated people's Sixth Amendment rights by failing to provide indigent legal representation.
The governor's proposed budget doesn't create any new positions for public defense services, which leaves the state with a half baked system, said Jim Billings, executive director of the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services.
The state has five offices in the northern and western regions of the state, but no public defender structure in the most populous counties. The list of cases without counsel in the state has been hovering around 1,000 cases for months, according to Billings.
Billings also said Mills' proposed allocations to pay outside counsel fall drastically short from what's needed. Maine has long relied on private attorneys to represent low-income defendants in the absence of indigent defense infrastructure.
Currently, Public Defense Services is paying between $3 and $4 million per month for outside counsel fees, which Billings said means the system will run out of funding for this in April 2026.
'This is also disastrous for trying to recruit new members of the bar to do [Public Defense Services] work or to even maintain the meager roster we have,' Billings said.
Another budget item of concern when it comes to the judiciary is funding for the Victims of Crime Act.
The budget includes a $3 million ongoing allocation, however that only covers half of the funding gap created by a reduction in VOCA funding from the federal government, said Francine Garland Stark, executive director of the Maine Coalition to End Domestic Violence. Garland Stark asked lawmakers to increase the allocation to $6 million.
Shira Burns, executive director Maine Prosecutors Association, also urged lawmakers to close the gap. Six of Maine's eight prosecutorial districts and the Office of the Attorney General rely on VOCA grant funding for their Victim Witness Advocate programs, and those six districts get get $55,000 each year to support salaries of VWAs, an amount that has not increased in well over a decade, Burns said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Thom Tillis avoids censure at NCGOP convention despite MAGA backlash
Back in 2023, the North Carolina Republican Party censured Sen. Thom Tillis during its annual convention for 'blatant violations' of the party's platform. This year, after Tillis opposed some of President Donald Trump's nominees and policies and MAGA conservatives pushed for a 2026 primary challenger, another censure vote seemed possible. But at the party's convention, which took place from June 5 through Sunday, no such action was taken, signaling a smoother path to re-election for Tillis — at least for now. 'Republicans across the state look forward to a robust primary and the convention shows Republicans are unified to keep our Senate seat to ensure President Trump's agenda has the votes in Congress to continue delivering for the American people,' said NCGOP spokesperson Matt Mercer in a message following the convention, held this year in Greensboro. Mercer said no censure motions were introduced this year. MAGA Republicans have taken issue with Tillis in the past few months for questioning Trump's pick of Pete Hegseth, as Defense secretary, though, Tillis ultimately voted for Hegseth. Tillis told Trump he wouldn't confirm Ed Martin as the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia due to their differing views on the Jan. 6 insurrectionists. Tillis says he has 'no tolerance for anyone who entered' the Capitol on Jan. 6. Tillis is also pushing back on provisions within a more than 1,000-page reconciliation bill that Trump and House Republicans named the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Chief among Tillis' concerns are 'no tax on tips,' a campaign promise Trump made, and cutting clean energy tax credits. The friction is not new. Since joining the Senate, Tillis has found himself at odds with far-right factions of his party for his willingness to work with Democrats and decisions they've seen as disloyal to Trump. Once widely favored by the party, Tillis' favorability is on shaky ground. Tillis has been a mainstay in North Carolina politics, beginning his political career on local boards in Cornelius before being elected in 2006 to the North Carolina House. There, Tillis worked his way into leadership positions, and served as the House Republican Caucus campaign chairman where he traveled across the state recruiting Republicans to run for office. He is credited with playing a significant role in taking the House majority away from Democrats. Republican House members rewarded him by electing him speaker of the House, where he led the chamber through debates on same-sex marriage, election laws, Medicaid expansion and restructuring the state tax code. By the time he ran against Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan, The New York Times called Tillis 'a favorite among the party establishment.' But that sentiment faded as Tillis found his footing in Congress and established himself as a moderate willing to work with Democrats to get major pieces of legislation passed. That led to Tillis' first censure in 2023, for voting in favor of same-sex marriage and working on the largest piece of gun legislation passed in 30 years. Two years prior, the state party censured then-Sen. Richard Burr, a Winston-Salem Republican, after he voted to impeach President Donald Trump following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Tillis, 64, a Huntersville Republican, is running for a third term in 2026. He was first elected in 2014, defeating Hagan, who served one term. And he's one of 53 Republicans helping to hold the party's slim majority in the Senate, over the minority's 47 seats. MAGA conservatives have taken to social media to call for a primary challenger to Tillis in 2026, though no candidate has emerged. Contenders they floated early on included names like former Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson or Lara Trump. She's the president's daughter-in-law, who grew up in North Carolina but resides in Florida and just joined Fox News. Neither seem likely. Don Brown, a retired Navy JAG officer, and Andy Nilsson, a retired businessman, threw their names out to challenge Tillis, but neither have large name recognition. Democrats are waiting to learn whether former Gov. Roy Cooper, who left office in January after being term-limited out, will challenge Tillis. Former Rep. Wiley Nickel, a Democrat from Cary who has a history of winning challenging races but has not yet run statewide, jumped ahead of Cooper and announced he would seek the Democratic nomination. Tillis announced last week he has added big names to his campaign team including three people who served on Trump's reelection campaign: Tony Fabrizio, Tim Saler and Jim McCray. The 2026 election in North Carolina is expected to be the most expensive Senate race in U.S. history, a record Tillis broke twice in his race against Hagan and again in 2020 against attorney Cal Cunningham.


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'
The 'one big, beautiful bill' may not be so singular, after all. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is teasing follow-up legislation to the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that Republicans can push though using the same special budget reconciliation process that requires only GOP votes. That tool can be used once per fiscal year, with the current fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. So after Republicans are done with the 'big, beautiful bill,' the GOP trifecta has, in theory, two more shots to muscle through party-line legislation before the next Congress comes into power after the midterms. Johnson floated plans for a second reconciliation bill while rebutting concerns from deficit hawks on the budget impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which includes an extension of tax cuts and boosts to border and defense funding, with costs offset in part by new requirements on low-income assistance programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'Everyone here wants to reduce spending,' Johnson said Friday morning on CNBC. 'But you have to do that in a sequence of events. We have a plan, OK? This is the first of a multistep process.' 'We're going to have another reconciliation bill that follows this one, possibly a third one before this Congress is up, because you can have a reconciliation bill for each budget year, each fiscal year. So that's ahead of us,' Johnson continued, also pointing to separate plans to claw back money based on recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'We're also doing rescissions packages. We got the first one delivered this week from the White House, and that will codify many of the DOGE cuts.' The promise of another reconciliation bill is somewhat surprising given the crux of the debate that dominated the early weeks of the year: Should Republicans divide up their agenda into two bills, passing the first quickly to give Trump an early win on boosting funding for border enforcement and deportations? Or would putting all of Trump's priorities into one bill — which would contain both bitter pills and sweeteners for different factions of the razor-thin majority — be a better political strategy? Trump eventually said he preferred 'one big, beautiful bill,' a moniker that became the legislation's official title in the House last month. It's not clear what would be in a second piece of legislation. Multiple House Republicans who spoke with The Hill were unaware of plans for more reconciliation bills and were not sure what could be included in them. 'I think we need to see what's left on the table after the first one,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said. And to muster through multiple reconciliation bills is a delicate prospect. If members know more reconciliation bills are coming, that complicates the argument that everything in the current package — even policies some factions dislike that others love — need to stay in one megabill. The Speaker declined to elaborate on what might be in such a package when asked in a press conference last week. 'I'm not going to tell you that,' Johnson said. 'Let's get the first one done.' 'Look, I say this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing of us identifying waste, fraud, abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity. So we have lots of ideas of things that might be in that package.' Republicans had started planning for the current legislative behemoth months before the 2024 election so they would be prepared to quickly execute on their policy wish list if they won the majority. 'This isn't something we just drew up overnight. So, we'll go through that same laborious process,' Johnson said. But some members have ideas of what else they'd like to see. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said that he'd hope a second bill would do more to tackle rolling back green energy tax credits and make further spending cuts. Ultimately, though, it will be Trump's call, Norman said: 'I know when the president gets involved, it adds a lot of value.' And Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) speculated that passing the 'big, beautiful bill' would inspire members to keep going with another bill. 'People like the feeling of winning,' Pfluger said.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' narrowly passed the House by a single vote and is now stalled in the Senate. We take a closer look at this massive tax plan that gives permanent breaks for the wealthy while slashing Medicaid, food assistance, and clean energy programs. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, it would add at least $2.4 trillion to the national deficit–hardly a win for fiscal conservatives. Even Elon Musk slammed it as a 'disgusting abomination.��