logo
Georgia House panel OKs bill to bar trans girls from playing school sports on girls' teams

Georgia House panel OKs bill to bar trans girls from playing school sports on girls' teams

Yahoo20-02-2025

Rep. Josh Bonner, right, presents his transgender sports bill before committee, alongside Chelsea Thompson, general counsel for Frontline Policy Council. Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder
A House subcommittee moved forward a bill that would bar transgender girls from playing sports on girls' teams in schools of all grade levels, including college.
'All we're attempting to do through this legislation, Mr. Chairman, is simply provide a level playing field for the girls in Georgia,' said the bill's sponsor, Fayetteville Republican Rep. Josh Bonner. 'To make sure that when they step on that athletic field, that all things are equal, so that, essentially, biological males are not competing against biological females.'
Speaker Jon Burns listed the measure as a top priority for this year's session. House Bill 267, also known as the Riley Gaines Act, also mandates separate restroom, locker and sleeping facilities for student athletes based on the sex they were assigned at birth during sporting events, but allows for 'reasonable accommodations' including allowing the use of a single-occupancy restroom for students who do not feel comfortable using facilities that correspond to their sex at birth.
Republicans like Dawsonville Republican Rep. Brent Cox called the bill a victory for women's sports. Cox said the bill reminded him of his mother, who graduated high school in 1961 and was an exceptional basketball player in a time when women were often not encouraged to play sports.
'She fought (for), as many have, (the 1972 sports gender equity law) which now we know under Title IX,' he said. 'And myself coaching, it's something that I personally am passionate about, the girls having the opportunities to play against the girls, because of all that happened from the early parts of the 1900s to get us to where we are today.'
Unlike a girls' sports bill that recently passed the Senate, the proposed House legislation also replaces the word 'gender' with 'sex' throughout the state's code.
'It addresses any number of areas of code, everything from the legal, in terms of dealing with legal documents, to organ donation, to crime statistics and reporting, that kind of thing,' Bonner said. 'And that's simply to make sure that when we collect that data, that we have very decisive and definitive data points so that we know everything from the crime statistics to how they're annotating that sex on their organ donations and things like that.'
The removal of gender from the state's landmark 2020 hate crimes law in particular vexed Democratic state Rep. Park Cannon, an Atlanta Democrat.
The bill would remove crimes based on the victim's gender as a category for enhanced sentences under the law, though it would keep sex and sexual orientation as eligible categories, among others like race and religion. It specifies that state agencies that keep track of vital statistics for things like public health, economic measurements or crime identify each individual by their sex at birth.
Cannon said those changes will strip transgender Georgians from the hate crime law's protections.
'If someone does experience a hate-based incident, which, here in District 58, we have recently seen Atlanta Police capture somebody who has intentionally been harming transgender women, it would not allow for the Georgia Bureau of Investigations to get that information and store it appropriately.'
'It was a bipartisan bill,' she added. 'It was one of my most proud moments being a member, and so to juxtapose feeling so proud with that legislation and feeling so vulnerable with this legislation, I'm really hoping that the majority will make some amendments and sit on this bill throughout the rest of the session.'
More than a dozen people came to the subcommittee's Wednesday hearing, mostly to urge members to vote against the bill.
Audrey Lux said she competed in women's rowing as a college student in states including Georgia but never won it big.
'I managed to avoid all controversy and publicity during my time in crew. The reason you haven't heard of me on the news is because I was simply not a great athlete,' she said. 'And that doesn't fit well into your narrative. I practiced just as hard as the other women, but I was simply not as fast as some of them, and that's just the biological reality.'
Lux and other opponents of the bill argued that transgender people are relatively uncommon in the first place and are not particularly likely to be dominant in or even play sports. They compared keeping them out through legislation to bullying a vulnerable population.
'This bill, in short, is part of a larger project to strip all dignity and rights from transgender Georgians out of the law,' said Brittany Stancoff. 'And that is not something I particularly appreciate, as we haven't done anything to deserve this. I sell used books. I don't see how this is some widespread issue when there is only one case you can keep bringing back up over and over and over.'
Stancoff was referring to Riley Gaines, the namesake of Georgia's bill who became an outspoken opponent of transgender participation in girls' sports after she and other swimmers competed against and shared a locker room with a transgender woman at a 2022 championship held at Georgia Tech in Atlanta.
The NCAA changed its eligibility rules after that competition following numerous complaints.
Bonner offered a different Riley to testify at Wednesday's hearing, Riley Jones, daughter of South Forsyth Republican Rep. Todd Jones and former high school state champion for girls' pole vault.
Jones said she didn't compete against any transgender athletes but likely would have lost if she had.
'The reason why I was able to win my state title was because I only went against girls,' she said. 'If I went against boys, they would have killed me. My senior year, I went 12'6' to win the state record and to win the competition. The boys, I believe there were three over 15'6', and now that's not even the woman's record.'
The bill could now be headed to the full House Education Committee. It will need to pass the full House by Crossover Day, March 6, to have a clear chance of becoming law under the normal process.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US governors are divided along party lines about military troops deployed to protests

time27 minutes ago

US governors are divided along party lines about military troops deployed to protests

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is calling President Donald Trump's military intervention at protests over federal immigration policy in Los Angeles an assault on democracy and has sued to try to stop it. Meanwhile, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is putting the National Guard on standby in areas in his state where demonstrations are planned. The divergent approaches illustrate the ways the two parties are trying to navigate national politics and the role of executive power in enforcing immigration policies. In his live TV address this week, Newsom said that Trump's move escalated the situation — and for political gain. All 22 other Democratic governors signed a statement sent by the Democratic Governors Association on Sunday backing Newsom, calling the Guard deployment and threats to send in Marines 'an alarming abuse of power' that "undermines the mission of our service members, erodes public trust, and shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.' The protests in Los Angeles have mostly been contained to five blocks in a small section of downtown; nearly 200 people were detained on Tuesday and at least seven police officers have been injured. In Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they're planning to deploy military troops for protests. Since Trump's return to office, Democratic governors have been calculating about when to criticize him, when to emphasize common ground and when to bite their tongues. The governors' responses are guided partly by a series of political considerations, said Kristoffer Shields, director of the Eagleton Center on the American Governor at Rutgers University: How would criticizing Trump play with Democrats, Republicans and independent voters in their states? And for those with presidential ambitions, how does that message resonate nationally? Democratic governors are weighing a number of considerations. 'There probably is some concern about retributions — what the reaction of the administration could be for a governor who takes a strong stance," Shields said. And in this case, polling indicates about half of U.S. adults approve of how Trump is handling immigration, though that polling was conducted before the recent military deployment. On other issues, Democratic governors have taken a variety of approaches with Trump. At a White House meeting in February, Maine Democratic Gov. Janet Mills told Trump, ' we'll see you in court ' over his push to cut off funding to the state because it allowed transgender athletes in girls' school sports. Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer, a possible 2028 presidential candidate, publicly sparred with Trump during his first term but this time around, has met with him privately to find common ground. Initially, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green referred to Trump as a 'straight-up dictator," but the next month he told a local outlet that he was treading carefully, saying: 'I'm not going to criticize him directly much at all." Apart from their joint statement, some of the highest-profile Democratic governors have not talked publicly about the situation in California. When asked, on Wednesday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's office pointed to a Sunday social media post about the joint statement. Whitmer didn't respond. The office of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who is set to testify before Congress on Thursday about his state laws protecting people who are in the country without legal status, reiterated in a statement that he stands with Newsom. The office said 'local authorities should be able to do their jobs without the chaos of this federal interference and intimidation.' Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, in an interview Wednesday in The Washington Post, said Trump should not send troops to a weekend protest scheduled in Philadelphia. 'He's injected chaos into the world order, he's injected it into our economy, he is trying to inject chaos into our streets by doing what he did with the Guard in California," Shapiro said. As state attorney general during Trump's first term, Shapiro routinely boasted that he sued Trump over 40 times and won each time. As governor he has often treaded more carefully, by bashing Trump's tariffs, but not necessarily targeting Trump himself. Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has often clashed with Newsom, a fellow term-limited governor with national ambitions. Newsom's office said DeSantis offered to send Florida State Guard troops to California. 'Given the guard were not needed in the first place, we declined Governor DeSantis attempt to inflame an already chaotic situation made worse by his Party's leader,' Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo said in an email to The Associated Press. Speaking on Fox News on Tuesday, DeSantis said the gesture was a typical offer of mutual aid during a crisis — and was dismissive of the reasons it was turned down. 'The way to put the fire out is to make sure you have law and order,' he said. Protests against immigration enforcement raids have sprung up in other cities — and a series of 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned for the weekend — with governors preparing to respond. In Connecticut, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont said he has spoken with his public safety commissioner to make sure state and local police work together. 'I don't want to give the president any pretext to think he can come into Connecticut and militarize the situation. That just makes the situation worse,' said Lamont, who called Trump "a little eager to send federal troops and militarize the situation in Los Angeles.' It is unclear how many Texas National Guard members will be deployed or how many cities asked for assistance. In Austin, where police used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred protesters on Monday, the mayor's office said the National Guard was not requested. San Antonio officials also said they didn't request the Guard. Florida's DeSantis said law enforcement in his state is preparing 'The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you,' DeSantis said Tuesday. 'And we will make an example of you, you can guarantee it.' ___ Associated Press reporters Nadia Lathan and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas; Sophie Austin in Sacramento, California; Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan; Andrew DeMillo in Little Rock, Arkansas; Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut; Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York; Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago; contributed.

David Hogg Takes Multiple Swipes at Democrats: 'Asleep at the Wheel'
David Hogg Takes Multiple Swipes at Democrats: 'Asleep at the Wheel'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

David Hogg Takes Multiple Swipes at Democrats: 'Asleep at the Wheel'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. David Hogg took multiple swipes at Democrats as he announced that he will not fight to hold onto his leadership role in the Democratic National Committee. Hogg decried "a serious lack of vision from Democratic leaders, too many of them asleep at the wheel" in a lengthy thread on X on Wednesday night, adding that three Democratic House members have died this year after being reelected in November, giving Republicans an expanded majority. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) had voted to nullify the February 2025 elections that appointed Hogg as vice chair, citing procedural violations. In his Wednesday posts he also criticized the "crisis of competence and culture" that protects complacency and rewards seniority. It "has already cost us an election and millions of Americans their rights. Let's not let it cost us the country," he said. "We must change the culture of our party that has brought us here and if there is anything activism or history teaches us it's that comfortable people, especially comfortable people with power, do not change. In this moment of crisis, comfort is not an option." David Hogg attends the Fast Company Innovation Festival 2024 at BMCC Tribeca PAC on September 17, 2024 in New York City. David Hogg attends the Fast Company Innovation Festival 2024 at BMCC Tribeca PAC on September 17, 2024 in New York City. Eugene Gologursky//Getty Images for Fast Company This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law
Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Female athletes appeal landmark NCAA settlement, saying it violates federal antidiscrimination law

Eight female athletes filed an appeal Wednesday of a landmark NCAA antitrust settlement, arguing that women would not receive their fair share of $2.7 billion in back pay for athletes who were barred from making money off their name, image and likeness. US District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week, clearing the way for direct payments from universities to athletes and the end of the NCAA's amateurism model. The athletes who appealed the settlement competed in soccer, volleyball and track. They are Kacie Breeding of Vanderbilt; Lexi Drumm, Emma Appleman, Emmie Wannemacher, Riley Hass, Savannah Baron and Elizabeth Arnold of the College of Charleston; and Kate Johnson of Virginia. They have standing to appeal because they previously filed objections to the proposed settlement. Advertisement College soccer player Lexi Drumm leaves federal court in Oakland, Calif. on April 7, 2025. AP Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement that the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. 'We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion,' Hare said. 'Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports.' Advertisement The law firm representing the plaintiffs in the settlement issued a statement saying the appeal would delay payments to hundreds of thousands of athletes by a minimum of several months. 'These attorneys are pursuing an appeal based on a Title IX issue that Judge Wilken already disposed of correctly, quickly and multiple times,' the statement said. The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. The NCAA logo at center court of The Consol Energy Center in Pittsburgh on March 18, 2015. AP Advertisement Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. 'This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes,' Hare said. 'Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case.' The appeal was filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, and was first reported by Front Office Sports. It would be heard by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store