
Trump vs Ramaphosa: Not quite game, set and match
Editorial: Not quite game, set and match
Did the presence of businessman Johann Rupert and golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen give President Cyril Ramaphosa and his team a false sense of security when they entered the Oval Office on Wednesday?
Surely, they were aware that US President Donald Trump would need to save face from the glare of why he gave refugee status to 49 Afrikaners from South Africa if there was no 'white genocide' as he claimed.
If the team had prepared for the meeting as a sports team prepares to win a match, maybe things would have gone smoother.
A game-plan was needed on what to do when Trump, well-known for his antics, such as giving a war leader a dressing down for not wearing a suit, pulled out his card. Instead of the South African team tagging each other and calmly steering the ship through Trump's ambush, it degenerated into an airing of the country's dirty laundry.
The result was not what Trump had been looking for. Still, in front of international media, the delegation revealed the country had a massive and uncontrollable crime problem. What's worse, as News24 columnist Jonny Steinberg pointed out in last week's Friday Briefing, South Africans are inured to violence. This had been the basis upon which Trump had been able to leverage to build all his lies and misinformation.
Perhaps in some ways, this meeting will serve as an intervention, and now, finally, the South African government will work harder to make this a better and safer place for all.
In this week's Friday Briefing, News24's investigations editor Pieter du Toit writes that while Ramaphosa may have handled himself well, the show was an indictment of SA's poor governance. We also have input from author John Matisonn and political analyst Mpumelelo Mkhabela on Wednesday's meeting.
We end off with a Q&A with Investec's chief economist, Annabel Bishop, about Budget 3.0, which also took place on Wednesday.
You can read the submissions below.
SA's grim night in Washington must lead to positive change – and 'Kill the boer' must go
President Cyril Ramaphosa carried himself with dignity and aplomb – but the reality of the South African situation demands urgent and fundamental change, writes Pieter du Toit.
Read the rest of the article here.
Ramaphosa did South Africa proud, but it's time to worry
John Matisonn writes that on Wednesday night, Cyril Ramaphosa showed once again why you want him by your side in a tight diplomatic spot, but it also revealed a country that needs to fix its crime and its economy.
Read the rest of the article here.
Mud games in diplomacy and Johann Rupert's stunning intervention
It was astonishing to see Donald Trump, who once condemned 'fake news' and thus popularised the phrase, rely on fake news to make policy in full view of the world, writes Mpumelelo Mkhabela.
Supplied
Q&A with Annabel Bishop | 'Credit rating agencies unlikely to react negatively' to Budget 3.0
Investec chief economist Annabel Bishop tells in-depth writer Muhammad Hussain that the third SA Budget is a more balanced and realistic approach that would have avoided a lot of market disruption had it been presented in the first place.
Read the rest of the article here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Anger and Resignation as Trump's Travel Ban Hits Africa
When Africans woke up to the news this week that seven of the 12 countries on President Trump's new travel ban list were African nations, the response, for many, was a mix of resignation and anger. Resignation because several African nations were previously banned during Mr. Trump's first term, including Nigeria, Africa's most populous country. Anger because they were unsure what African governments could do to get the ban lifted, if it would lead to family separations and how exactly each country landed on the list in the first place. 'I think it's a discriminatory decision, a decision he's taken out of racism,' Narciso Edjang, a 19-year-old medical student in Malabo, the capital of Equatorial Guinea, said of Mr. Trump's announcement. Equatorial Guinea is one of the seven African nations Mr. Trump targeted in the travel ban announced on Wednesday night. The others are Chad, the Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan. The ban goes into effect on Monday. Mr. Edjang had hoped to one day study medicine in the United States, where, he said, training was much better than in Equatorial Guinea, a country that is rich in oil but mired in pervasive poverty and inequality. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Travel Ban Could Dampen Relations, African Union Warns
US President Donald Trump's travel ban on seven African nations could dampen economic and diplomatic ties, a continental bloc warned. Trump on Thursday signed a proclamation that restricts travel by foreign nationals from 12 countries, including Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan, citing the need to counter the threat of terrorist attacks and safeguard the public.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Trump travel ban for national security sparks uncertainty and questions
The Brief A new Trump travel ban due to terror concerns has been implemented. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on Monday. A mixed reaction has followed with some FOX 2 - The Trump administration is expanding its travel ban, now blocking entry from a dozen countries, with restrictions added to several more. What we know The move is said to combat terrorism which was first announced last night and already, the new rules are facing pushback. The new order bans travelers from 12 countries, mostly in Africa and the Middle East, citing national security concerns, and it lays out partial travel restrictions for seven additional countries. Some are questioning the controversial travel restrictions. Ruby Robinson is an attorney at the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center. "Congress needs to step forward, there needs to be immigration reform," she said. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe," Trump said. Robinson said that it is similar to the so-called "Muslim ban" from Trump's first term. "We are not shocked, nor are we necessarily surprised by the fact that it has arrived," Robinson said. "I think many of us was expecting it." Some of the countries banned are already firing back by suspending visas for Americans. There are some exemptions for now, like those competing in the 2026 World Cup. But for some immigrant families, it adds a new layer of worry, those like David Fishman say. "People that are going to visit family will still go to some of these countries, but there is I guess somewhat of a fear that they may not get back in through," said Fishman, president of Cadillac Travel Group. Local travel companies are warning clients about necessary travel documents and updated visas. "We make sure that they can get there and get back and many times to be very honest. we tell them to go directly to the airlines," he said. "Because we don't want to be have the responsibility of the situation which is saying do not go." There is also an expected rush for those still needing government approval. "I expect anybody who had an appointment today or tomorrow to ask for their visa to be issued as soon as possible and to be on that first flight before this goes into effect," Robinson said. What we don't know The ban is set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on Monday. The president has said that banned list could be revised if countries make material improvements, but also that new countries could be added if threats come up. The Source Information for this report came from interviews and a proclamation from the Trump administration.