Supreme Court revives lawsuits against Palestinian authorities from US victims of terrorism attacks
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday revived long-running lawsuits against Palestinian authorities from Americans who were killed or wounded in terrorism attacks in the Middle East.
The justices upheld a 2019 law enacted by Congress specifically to allow the victims' lawsuits to go forward against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority.
The attacks occurred in the early 2000s, killing 33 people and wounding hundreds more, and in 2018, when a U.S.-born settler was stabbed to death by a Palestinian assailant outside a mall in the West Bank.
The victims and their families assert that Palestinian agents either were involved in the attacks or incited them.
Ari Fuld (right) and Miriam Fuld (left). Ari was an Israeli-American national who was murdered on Sunday by a Palestinian terrorist in Gush Etzion
Facebook / Ari Fuld
The Palestinians have consistently argued that the cases shouldn't be allowed in American courts.
The federal appeals court in New York has repeatedly ruled in favor of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority, despite Congress' efforts to allow the victims' lawsuits to be heard.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals first ruled in 2016 against the victims of the attacks from 20 years ago, tossing out a $654 million jury verdict in their favor. In that earlier ruling, the appeals court held U.S. courts can't consider lawsuits against foreign-based groups over random attacks that were not aimed at the United States.
Palintiff lawyer Kent Yalowitz (Right) makes his opening statement in this court sketch during Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organization.
REUTERS
The victims had sued under the Anti-Terrorism Act, signed into law in 1992. The law was passed to open U.S. courts to victims of international terrorism, spurred by the killing of American Leon Klinghoffer during a 1985 terrorist attack aboard the Achille Lauro cruise ship.
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
The jury found the PLO and the Palestinian Authority liable for six attacks and awarded $218 million in damages. The award was automatically tripled under the law.
After the Supreme Court rejected the victims' appeal in 2018, Congress again amended the law to make clear it did not want to close the courthouse door to the victims.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Layoff notices delivered to hundreds of Voice of America employees
Layoff notices were sent Friday to 639 employees of Voice of America and the U.S. agency that oversees it, effectively shutting down the outlet that has provided news to countries around the world since World War II. They included employees at VOA's Persian-language service who were suddenly called off administrative leave last week to broadcast reports to Iran following Israel's attack. Three journalists working for the Persian service on Friday, who left their office for a cigarette break, had their badges confiscated and weren't allowed back in, according to one fired employee. In total, some 1,400 people at Voice of America and the U.S. Agency for Global Media, or 85% of its workforce, have lost their jobs since March, said Kari Lake, Trump's senior advisor to the agency. She said it was part of a 'long overdue effort to dismantle a bloated, unaccountable bureaucracy.' 'For decades, American taxpayers have been forced to bankroll an agency that's been riddled with dysfunction, bias and waste,' Lake said in a news release. 'That ends now.' VOA began by broadcasting stories about American democracy to residents of Nazi Germany, and grew to deliver news around the world in dozens of languages, often in countries without a tradition of free press. But President Donald Trump has fought against the news media on several fronts, with the complaint that much of what they produce is biased against conservatives. That includes a proposal to shut off federal funding to PBS and NPR, which is currently before Congress. Most VOA employees have been on administrative leave since March 15, their broadcasts and social media posts mostly silenced. Three VOA employees who are fighting the administration's dismantling of VOA in court were among those receiving layoff notices on Friday. 'It spells the death of 83 years of independent journalism that upholds U.S. ideals of democracy and freedom around the world,' plaintiffs Jessica Jerreat, Kate Neeper and Patsy Widakuswara said in a statement. The Persian-language employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing legal case, was in the office Friday when colleagues were barred from reentry. The person was afraid to leave for the same reason — even though authorities said their work had been halted — until receiving a layoff notice. Steve Herman, VOA's chief national correspondent who was in the process of retiring to take a job at the University of Mississippi, called the layoffs an 'historic act of self-sabotage with the U.S. government completing the silencing of its most effective soft-power weapon.' It's not clear what, if anything, will replace Voice of America programming worldwide. The Trump-supporting One American News Network has offered to allow its signal to be used. Although plaintiffs in the lawsuit called on Congress to continue supporting Voice of America, Herman said that he is not optimistic that it will survive, even if a Democratic president and Congress take over. For one thing, every day it is off the air is another day for viewers and readers to get into another habit for obtaining news. 'I believe that the destruction is permanent,' Herman said, 'because we see no indication in the next fiscal year that Congress will rally to fund VOA.' By the time another administration takes power that is more sympathetic to the outlet, 'I fear that VOA will have become forgotten,' he said. ___ David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Welcome to the Resistance? Tucker Carlson Is Leading New Anti-War Movement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Comedian Jon Stewart never expected to nod in agreement with Tucker Carlson. But as the former Fox News host grilled Senator Ted Cruz over U.S. involvement in Israel's war on Iran, Stewart, a longtime critic of Carlson, found himself aligned with an unlikely ally. "We're in such a bizarro world, you've got me nodding my head to Tucker Carlson videos," Stewart said on his podcast Thursday. "You got Tucker Carlson going, 'Why are we going to war with Iran again?' And I'm like, 'Yeah, you tell him, brother!'" The fiery exchange between Carlson and Cruz, part of a now-viral two-hour interview, illustrated the public civil war erupting among Trump allies over the conflict between Israel and Iran, and redefined Carlson's role in the current landscape — not just as a conservative firebrand, but as one of the leading critics of Trump-era foreign policy. Carlson, once a full-throated supporter of the Iraq War, is now one of the most vocal anti-interventionists on the American right. His opposition to military action in Iran isn't particularly surprising for those who have followed him from his perch at Fox News to his role as a podcast host and independent content creator. He holds similar views on the war in Ukraine. But the force of his criticism, especially toward figures like Cruz, caught many off guard. That includes many on the left, like Stewart, who wondered why Carlson was asking some of the more pointed questions in the media about the U.S. role in the latest Mideast conflict. Former Fox News television personality Tucker Carlson speaks to guests at the Family Leadership Summit on July 14, 2023 in Des Moines, Iowa. Former Fox News television personality Tucker Carlson speaks to guests at the Family Leadership Summit on July 14, 2023 in Des Moines, Iowa. Photo byWelcome to the Resistance? Carlson's interview and opposition to intervention has found support beyond his usual base. Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, former Obama staffer Tommy Vietor, and liberal pundits like Mehdi Hasan and Hasan Piker all praised Carlson for confronting Cruz in ways mainstream media often do not. The reason it matters Ted that you didn't know Iran has over 90 million people is that it makes any regime change war far more difficult, costly, and prolonged than Iraq which had about 25 million in 2003. — Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) June 18, 2025 "I haven't seen Ted Cruz get pummeled like this since Trump insulted his wife and father during the 2016 primary," Vietor said. "If he keeps these interviews up, Tucker Carlson is going to have to start selling body bags." Mehdi Hasan, the former MSNBC host turned Substack creator, said he was struck by the contrast with mainstream interviewers. "I remain amazed that it took Tucker Carlson to ask these obvious questions of a U.S. senator, and expose the nonsense that he peddles about Israel and God and the Bible," Hasan said. "All these years, all of the Sunday show interviewers and the rest never asked these simple questions." Hasan Piker, the popular podcaster considered by some to be the "Joe Rogan of the left," added: "Why is Tucker Carlson capable of conducting an adversarial interview about the dangers of American intervention in Iran with Ted Cruz better than everyone else in legacy media? Shame." Eric Alterman, a CUNY distinguished professor of journalism at Brooklyn College, told Newsweek the interview "made quite a splash" because major outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and MSNBC rarely press Republican politicians with such direct, confrontational questions. He said traditional media often avoid challenging topics like Israel out of fear of appearing partisan or facing backlash. "Mainstream media usually want to present both sides. They're hesitant to seem biased," Alterman said. "And with Democrats currently lacking clear direction, many outlets are reluctant to take the lead themselves." He added that mainstream pundits also tend to be strongly supportive of Israel. "So when Trump signals support for Israel in a possible war with Iran, there's often little pushback," he said. Carlson, unconstrained by such limits as a now self-employed online gadfly, didn't hesitate to press Cruz on his support for Israel. "You don't know anything about Iran," he told the Texas senator during the interview, even questioning his understanding of Israel's significance to Christians. Cruz responded by accusing Carlson of antisemitism, saying, "You're asking, why are the Jews controlling our foreign policy. That's what you just asked." Carlson pushed back, in another clip from the one-on-one that went viral: "That does not make me an antisemite, and shame on you for suggesting otherwise." Yet his interrogation of Cruz—raising accusations of antisemitism and criticizing the influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)—revealed a deeper divide over what "America First" means in 2025. MAGA loyalists like Laura Loomer, in a particularly profane post, called Carlson a "c--- warmer for Arabs", while Trump mocked Carlson publicly, calling him "kooky" and suggesting he should find a TV network to hire him if he wanted anyone to listen. The full interview with Cruz is approaching 8 million views on Carlson's X account, and another 2.5 million on YouTube — or more than three times Fox News' average primetime audience. For Alterman, the media analyst, the virality of the exchange with Cruz underscored Carlson's unique media position. "Tucker can do this because he has his own platform and audience," he said. "Even if Trump denounces him, his followers will stick with him. He's not beholden to the traditional media structure, and he's not scared of Trump like many others are." A Media Giant Of His Own Senator Ted Cruz pictured in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on April 02, 2025 in Washington, DC (left) and Tucker Carlson at a Turning Point Action campaign rally at the Gas South Arena on October... Senator Ted Cruz pictured in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on April 02, 2025 in Washington, DC (left) and Tucker Carlson at a Turning Point Action campaign rally at the Gas South Arena on October 23, 2024 in Duluth, Georgia (right). More Win McNamee/Anna Moneymaker/GETTY Carlson's growing influence, particularly on platforms like X and YouTube, reflects a broader shift identified in the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025. According to the report, Americans—especially younger, conservative-leaning men—are increasingly turning away from traditional outlets in favor of personality-driven voices across digital platforms. The study found that 54 percent of U.S. adults now primarily access news through social media and video networks, with trust in conventional journalism continuing to erode. The report also revealed a striking finding: 14 percent of Americans encountered political content from Tucker Carlson in the week following the Trump inauguration, placing him ahead of many institutional media brands in terms of reach among key demographics. The authors noted that "right-leaning audiences now dominate the conversation on platforms like X," with Carlson cited as one of the most influential figures in the new fragmented media environment. That independence has allowed Carlson to shape political narratives in ways mainstream journalists often cannot—or will not. "The media landscape is splintering," Alterman said. "Different groups trust different voices. Tucker is speaking directly to a segment of the Trump base that's skeptical of endless war and not particularly attached to the old neocon worldview." As The Independent's Richard Hall observed of Carlson: "He knows the ways of the neocons — their secrets, their tricks, their dodges — because he was once one of them." In that way, Carlson's transformation from a cheerleader of the Iraq War to one of its fiercest critics on the right is what makes his case against Iran so potent—and so politically disruptive.
Los Angeles Times
18 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge orders Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil freed from detention
NEW YORK — A federal judge on Friday ordered the U.S. government to free former Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil from the immigration detention center where he has been held since early March while the Trump administration sought to deport him over his role in pro-Palestinian protests. Ruling from the bench in New Jersey, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said it would be 'highly, highly unusual' for the government to continue to detain a legal U.S. resident who was unlikely to flee and hadn't been accused of any violence. In reaching his decision, he said Khalil is likely not a flight risk and 'is not a danger to the community. Period, full stop.' He ordered Khalil released from a detention center in rural Louisiana later Friday. The government had 'clearly not met' the standards for detention, he said later in the hourlong hearing, which took place by phone. Khalil was the first arrest under President Donald Trump 's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy. Farbiarz had ruled earlier that the government couldn't deport Khalil on those grounds, but gave it leeway to continue pursuing a potential deportation based on allegations that he lied on his green card application. Khalil disputes the accusations that he wasn't forthcoming on the application. Khalil's lawyers had asked that he either be freed on bail or, at the very least, moved from a Louisiana jail to New Jersey so he can be closer to his wife and newborn son, who are both U.S. citizens. The judge noted Khalil is now clearly a public figure given his prominence during the campus protests and since his detainment. He was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. His lawyers say the Trump administration is simply trying to crack down on free speech. Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The international affairs graduate student served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists. He wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics. The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country as it considers their views antisemitic. The judge noted Khalil has no criminal record and the government has put forward no evidence to suggest he's been involved in violence or property destruction. Marcelo writes for the Associated Press.
