Social media erupts after Indian media falsely claims destruction of Pakistan's Karachi Port
In what appears to be a major disinformation campaign, several major Indian media outlets are claiming to have damaged or destroyed the Port of Karachi and other Pakistani targets, airing video evidence that many have proven to be fabricated.
Throughout Thursday night, a multitude of Indian news channels with broad local audiences, such as Aaj Tak, India Today, Zee News, and Business Today, among others, broadcast various videos of the supposed attack.
The unverified footage spread quickly online soon after, with many citizens of India celebrating the reported attack.
Verified Drone Footage from Balochistan confirms large-scale devastation at #KarachiPort — a blow now officially acknowledged by the Karachi Port Authority.
Precision of #IndianNavyAction leaves no room for denial.
Jai hind 🇮🇳 pic.twitter.com/2QoF4ypf4q — Shilpa Sahu (@shilpasahu432) May 9, 2025
Some also drew comparisons to Operation Trident, a 1971 military attack launched by the Indian Navy on Karachi during the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, leaving the port of Karachi heavily damaged. The INS Vikrant, India's first aircraft carrier, played a major role in enforcing the naval blockade of East Pakistan during the war.
🚨BREAKING: INS Vikrant strikes again! Karachi Port in flames.
Port infrastructure decimated
Lahore command center hit
Islamabad bases under fire
Echoes of 1971—Karachi burned for days back then! 🇮🇳💪🏻 pic.twitter.com/FwgkzqMihr — THAKUR SUNIL SINGH (@HackSentry) May 8, 2025
While the official X account of Karachi's Port Authority first confirmed the allegations, it later issued a statement claiming that India hacked its account. The Port Authority also confirmed that no damage was done to the port.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Other reports that circulated, later also debunked as fake, floated that Islamabad had been captured by the Indian Navy alongside Pakistan's chief of army staff, General Asim Munir. Indian media reports also later falsely claimed that Munir had been arrested and that a coup was underway in Pakistan.
AajTak has destroyed Karachi Port.
Zee Media has destroyed Islamabad.
Republic TV has arrested Asim Munir.
Sudarshan has destroyed Pakistan.
Unreal Clownery🤡 — Mohit Chauhan (@mohitlaws) May 8, 2025
Outlets like Outlook India debunked many of the videos circulated by Indian broadcasters. One image that was circulated widely is reportedly from a 2020 BBC report on Gaza, not Karachi.
Several social media users living around the port joined in on the efforts to counteract the false claims, posting pictures and videos of the port and other sites being intact.
My office is hardly 2 kms from Karachi Port, this is the view from the rooftop. All calm and business as usual. pic.twitter.com/V7YNmtwoQz — Faizan Lakhani (@faizanlakhani) May 8, 2025
After the reports on the destruction of the port emerged, social media users seemingly debunked the claims as fake news and expressed their anger towards Indian media outlets.
"We are becoming a global joke," one social media user posted on X. "There are global observers watching closely and this is the show we put up?! Shameful."
While many social media users from India are frustrated with India's claims, others have employed a dose of irony when commenting on the faulty news reports.
India 'destroyed' Karachi port and we, the people of Karachi, didn't even know. Imagine that this fake news comes from one of India's leading news channels.pic.twitter.com/I4pcG6wbWD — Naimat Khan (@NKMalazai) May 8, 2025
"Indian media and pundits fed their audiences Bollywood level propaganda last night," one social media user wrote on X. "The world is laughing, Indians are fuming, and Karachi and Lahore remain intact."
Tensions between India and Pakistan have been at fever pitch since gunmen killed 26 civilians in a famous tourist spot in India-administered Kashmir's Pahalgam on 22 April.
Soon after, India began launching air strikes on several locations in Pakistan, in what it called a retaliatory action against "terrorists" to avenge the Pahalgam attack. In the ensuing salvos, Pakistan is confirmed to have downed at least one Indian jet, with the Pakistani government claiming they downed five jets.
Last night, several Indian cities reported blackouts while the Indian government accused Pakistan of unsuccessfully launching attacks on Indian civilian infrastructure in 15 different locations.
Pakistan's military strongly denied any involvement in these attacks but said it killed 40 to 50 Indian soldiers in cross-border fighting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
8 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Fifty Years After Emergency, The Present Modi Regime's Authoritarianism Is No Less Stifling
By P. Sudhir It may appear rather unusual to recall the inglorious sequence of events that began at midnight on June 25, 1975, with the declaration of the Internal Emergency. However, we are reminded of those immortal words of wisdom: 'those who tend to forget the lessons of history are condemned to repeat them.' These words compel us to revisit that dark chapter in the history of Indian democracy. The late 1960s had dealt a blow to the Congress party's monopoly on power, with opposition parties securing victories in several states. In response, Mrs Indira Gandhi repositioned herself through a series of progressive-sounding slogans such as Garibi Hatao, bank nationalisation, and the abolition of the privy purse. Departing from traditional political practice, she concentrated power in herself, bypassing strong state-level leaders and directly appealing to the masses at the grassroots. This approach yielded some gains for Mrs Gandhi. However, what truly bolstered her bid for political hegemony was India's intervention in support of the Bangladesh liberation struggle. The eventual establishment of an independent Bangladesh and the decisive defeat of Pakistan significantly enhanced her stature. The presence of the Soviet Union also played a crucial role in deterring potential US intervention aimed at rescuing Pakistan's military regime. This reinforced Mrs Gandhi's stature and ensured her victory in the 1971 general elections. Nevertheless, this overall picture could not stop the CPI(M), which emerged as the single largest party in the West Bengal Assembly. But, this was not allowed to progress naturally. The 1972 assembly elections were thoroughly rigged, paving the way for nearly half a decade of semi-fascist repression. This period of authoritarianism seamlessly merged with the declaration of the Emergency on the midnight of June 25, 1975. During much of the Emergency, Gandhi's political opponents were imprisoned, and the press was censored. Over 10,000 political opponents, journalists, and activists were jailed under her regime. Meanwhile, the country was grappling with a series of economic challenges stemming from the recent war with Pakistan, droughts, and the global oil crisis of 1973. Rising unemployment and inflation further fuelled public discontent and political opposition. These growing pressures, coupled with Mrs Gandhi's sense of personal insecurity and legal setbacks – particularly the threat of losing her Lok Sabha membership – contributed to the decision to impose Emergency. In essence, the Emergency of 1975 was declared due to a combination of political, social, and economic factors. The government invoked Article 352 of the Constitution, which permits the declaration of an Emergency in the event of war, external aggression, or internal disturbance. The official justification cited threats to national security and public order, leading to the suspension of fundamental rights and the concentration of power in the executive. Exposing the political dynamics that led to the Emergency, A K Gopalan, leader of the CPI(M) group in the Lok Sabha, stated during the debate on the Statutory Resolution for Approval of the Emergency proclamation on July 21, 1975:'The warning given by our Party about the rise of the tendency towards totalitarian and one-party dictatorship over the last three years has proved true with the sudden declaration of the new Emergency.'He went on to say that this abrupt move by the ruling party to extricate itself and its leader from a deepening personal and political crisis was a sign of weakness, not strength. It was designed to crush opposition voices and people's movements. He also exposed the false narrative that this Emergency was aimed against the extreme Right and Left adventurists. The inevitable followed, and the Congress, along with Indira Gandhi, could not avert political defeat. The eighteen-month Emergency has gone down in contemporary Indian history as a grave aberration and a sordid disruption of democracy. A broad coalition of forces ensured the restoration of democracy following the 1977 Lok Sabha elections. Today, Narendra Modi invokes the Emergency era, describing its imposition on June 25, 1975, as a 'black spot on the Constitution' of India. He has declared, 'These 50 years since the Emergency remind us to protect our Constitution and democracy with pride. The countrymen must resolve that such a travesty will never be allowed to happen again. We commit ourselves to ensuring a vibrant democracy and fulfilling the common man's dreams as outlined by the Indian Constitution.' However, this posturing is increasingly turning into a great hoax – an attempt to camouflage the RSS-BJP's own most obnoxious assault on Indian democracy, as it has unfolded over the past eleven years. Looking back fifty years later, the Emergency can be seen as the first major onslaught on India's democratic system – one that severely curtailed civil liberties and democratic rights. But it is a mistake, as many tend to do, to draw a direct comparison between the Emergency of 1975 and the present situation. The past decade under Modi is often referred to as an 'undeclared Emergency,' but such a comparison is misplaced on several counts. The current scenario has emerged against the backdrop of a global resurgence of the ultra-right, amidst a changed correlation of political forces in favour of imperialism. This phase has ushered in an era of finance capital driven global economies, marked by sharp inequality, rampant unemployment, and overwhelming corporate dominance. Accompanying this are unprecedented levels of identity-based polarisation and a relentless hate campaign, fostering the 'othering' of fellow citizens in both economic and social spheres. Thus, the present assault on democracy and constitutional principles is far more insidious. It has led to the rise of institutionalised authoritarianism – or what some observers term 'electoral autocracy.' In the Indian context, this authoritarian shift has been spearheaded by the RSS, injecting the toxic ideology of Hindutva, which seeks to fundamentally transform the very idea of India. This idea of India – born from the anti-colonial struggle – was anchored in a democratic, secular, socially just, and federal republic. The current onslaught is therefore more pervasive and stifling, aimed at dismantling the foundational principles of Indian citizenship. In hindsight, the 1975 Emergency now appears almost amateurish compared to the full-fledged authoritarianism we are experiencing today. While the current regime may seem harder to dislodge, the experience of fighting back against the Emergency in the 1970s should inspire confidence. A people united, with the will to resist the pernicious ideology of the RSS and reclaim democracy, can still meet and overcome today's challenge. (IPA Service)
Middle East Eye
12 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Muslim Brotherhood rallies around Iran, calls for Islamic unity against Israel
The Muslim Brotherhood, one of the most powerful political entities in the Middle East, has rallied around Iran in the wake of Israel's devastating strikes on the country and urged disparate Muslim groups to unite and 'confront the Zionist entity'. In a letter addressed to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday, the acting head of the movement, Salah Abdel Haq, said his group expressed 'full support' for the Islamic Republic as Israel's assault stretched into a second week. Haq described Israel's attacks as a broader assault on the resistance axis in the region, saying they mark 'a new phase of aggression against Palestine', driven by Israel's goal of weakening regional powers with the backing of the United States and other western states. 'We are one nation, in the religious, spiritual, civilisational, and geopolitical senses alike,' he said, adding that Israel 'does not differentiate between our ethnicities or sects'. 'Our primary weapon… is the unity of the Islamic Ummah,' he said, before calling on Muslim forces to overcome past divisions and redirect their focus toward 'confronting the Zionist entity'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Haq's letter came as Hezbollah released a statement expressing support for Khamenei following threats by Israeli and US leaders that he could be killed. 'Threats to assassinate [Khamenei] are foolish and reckless, and will have disastrous consequences… Merely uttering them is an offence to hundreds of millions of believers and those connected to Islam, and it is utterly reprehensible. Today, we are more determined and united around him.' Regional fallout On Thursday, sources close to Hezbollah told Middle East Eye that the Lebanese group could join the hostilities if the United States intervened directly, or if Iran's supreme leader was killed. Those scenarios would 'shift the calculations' and may push the group into the conflict. A senior Iranian official echoed one of the red lines, telling Al Jazeera that Hezbollah would intervene if Washington did. Earlier on Thursday, Iranian ballistic missiles struck several cities across Israel, with extensive damage reported at the Israeli stock exchange building in Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv, as well as a major hospital in the south of the country. Khamenei assassination could draw Hezbollah into Israel-Iran hostilities, say sources Read More » Images seen by MEE showed shattered glass and debris strewn onto the streets outside the stock exchange, with damage also reported at several nearby offices and residential buildings. Meanwhile, at least 40 people were reported injured when a missile struck near the Soroka hospital in Beersheba, the latest ballistic missile strike to successfully evade Israel's air defences. Iran denied claims that it directly attacked the hospital, saying it launched a 'precise and direct' attack on a nearby Israeli military target. 'The target of attack was the large [Israeli army] Command and Intelligence headquarters and the military intelligence camp in the Gav-Yam Technology Park,' the Iranian state news agency IRNA reported. In response, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Khamenei 'can no longer be allowed to exist'. 'Khamenei openly declares that he wants Israel destroyed - he personally gives the order to fire on hospitals,' Katz said at the scene. 'Such a man can no longer be allowed to exist.' When asked about Katz's comments, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu replied that 'no one is immune', but added that 'in war, I believe one must choose words carefully and execute actions with precision.' Later on Thursday, the White House said that US President Donald Trump would decide within the next two weeks whether the US would get directly involved in the conflict. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump had set the timeframe, as he believed there was a 'substantial chance of negotiations' with Iran 'in the near future'.
Middle East Eye
13 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump resumes visa applications for international students, but with increased vetting
The State Department announced on Wednesday that it is ending the pause on visa applications for foreign students. However, the process, which has been suspended since May, will include intensive online vetting, including requiring applicants to set all of their social media privacy settings to 'public'. The State Department said it needed to 'ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests'. The announcement also asserted that applicants needed to prove that they would 'engage in activities consistent with the terms for their admission', which is being seen as an attempt to deter students from participating in pro-Palestine activism on university campuses in the US. On 25 March, the Trump administration arrested Tufts graduate Rumeysa Ozturk after her profile was posted on a pro-Israel doxxing website. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Ozturk had been targeted for writing an opinion article in a student newspaper the year before, criticising Tufts University's response to a pro-divestment vote from the student senate. Ozturk was released from detention in May, but her detention set a precedent for a larger crackdown by the Trump administration on foreign students. In April, the visas of thousands of international students were revoked seemingly indiscriminately. Several students went into hiding or self-deported over fears that they would be arrested. The Trump administration abruptly backtracked on the decision to revoke visas weeks later. Wednesday's move to review the social media accounts of foreign students is also not the first time the Trump administration has used social media vetting to monitor international students. On 9 April, the Trump administration announced that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would be screening the social media accounts of international students at universities affiliated with 'antisemitic activity'. The State Department also reportedly told consulates to prioritise applicants hoping to attend a college where less than 15 percent of the student body were international students. On 28 May, US President Donald Trump asserted that Harvard University should cap international enrollment at 15 percent. Chinese international students Chinese international students have come under particular scrutiny from the Trump administration in recent months. The 270,000 Chinese international students studying in the US make up around a quarter of the 1.1 million international students in the country. On 28 May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the DHS would be working closely with the State Department to 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students'. Rubio's statement singled out students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields'. It reflects accusations from the Trump administration that Chinese international students pose a national security risk. On 11 June, Trump backtracked on the plan to revoke visas for Chinese students. He posted that the presence of Chinese international students 'has always been good with me'.
