Why banning social media for NZers under 16 is a bad idea – and will affect adults too
By Alex Beattie of
Photo:
RNZ
Analysis:
Government coalition partners National and Act are at odds over proposed restrictions on social media use by New Zealanders aged 16 and under.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon recently announced a National Party private member's bill that would require social media companies to verify someone is aged 16 or older. Luxon said social media was not "always a safe place for young people".
But ACT Party leader David Seymour has dismissed National's proposal, saying it was "simple, neat and wrong".
Even if the member's bill is not chosen out of the parliament biscuit tin, global interest in getting young people off social media is increasing.
In late 2024, Australia passed a law banning children aged under 16 from social media platforms. Advocates, police and politicians in the United Kingdom, United States and elsewhere have all proposed similar laws.
While there is merit in young people spending more time offline, and there are real concerns about the impact of social media on wider society, it's not clear that outright prohibition will achieve what is hoped for.
Here are 10 reasons a blanket ban is not the answer.
Lobby group Before 16 has compared social media to tobacco, saying the platforms should be treated as a public health harm. The implication is that young people could get addicted to social media.
But the standard for diagnosing addiction is high. Most young people are not addicted to social media; they have a habitual relationship with it that is hard to change.
Likewise, comparing digital experiences to food may not capture the full range of interactions and impacts. This often implies value judgements, suggesting online experiences are all about "dopamine hits" (similar to sweet treats) and inherently less valuable or "unhealthy" compared to offline experiences.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says social media is not 'always a safe place for young people'.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The language of the ban seems to suggest the relationship between social media and users goes in one direction - that people are simply exposed to the good and bad of platforms such as Facebook, TikTok and X. But using social media is not like going outside and getting burnt by the sun.
While social media affects people, it's also a tool we use to actively shape and create meaning for ourselves. It provides social scaffolding for day-to-day lives, identity formation, communication with family overseas, community support, and even a place to complain about parents.
One of most influential books behind the ban is Jonathan Haidt's The Anxious Generation. Haidt claims a causal link between social media use and increased anxiety and depression in Gen Z (those born between 1995 and 2012).
But this claim is highly contentious and has been criticised for failing to consider other causes for the rise in anxiety in young people.
At best, there may be a correlation between social media and poor mental health - they are happening at the same time. Young people are also grappling with the climate crisis, increasing inequality and global instability. These variables are difficult to isolate in a study, meaning social media becomes an easy target.
Critics of social media also assume everyone has a negative experience online. And yes, if you tend to compare yourself to others on social media then you might end up feeling bad about your life.
But not everyone thinks this way or uses social media to compare what they have (and don't have) with others.
Moral panics can occur when emerging technologies challenge established social norms.
Phenomena such as "phubbing" (using a phone to snub someone) challenge what is considered "socially acceptable" behaviour, triggering a deluge of think pieces about how they hurt society.
While some skills may decline (such as reading and writing) with new technology, others like visual or oral storytelling practiced on social media are on the rise.
Banning social media could mean young people miss out on valuable digital skills.
ACT Party leader David Seymour has called the social media ban bill 'simple, neat and wrong'.
Photo:
RNZ / Calvin Samuel
Getting young people off social media might not be a big deal for kids who fit within their community. But if you are young, gay and live in a small town, for example, social media may provide the only space where you can feel safe or celebrated for who you are.
Social media is also a key means for immigrants to stay in touch with their families and culture.
There are also problems with how the ban is supposed to work - something Australia is still grappling with despite already passing a ban into law (which comes into effect at the end of this year).
Policymakers have yet to explain how age verification technologies would work without giving away more personal data to media platforms. And everyone would have to verify their age, regardless of whether they are under 16 years old or not.
Young people are savvier with technology than older generations. They lead with innovations such as FINSTA (fake Instagram) accounts - fake profiles that allow people to post more privately on Instagram without the pressure of conforming to expectations or the judgement of people who know them.
Blanket bans could hurt this technological adeptness and creativity and stop young people from teaching us how to navigate our online and offline lives.
Media literacy is also a crucial skill in today's media saturated age. The skill of unplugging could become part of that curriculum.
Temporarily going offline is an excellent way to make students aware of their relationship with social media. Schools could have media-free classes or courses to build awareness, encourage new habits and support students to develop new routines.
No one is arguing that social media hasn't had a negative effect on individuals and society as a whole. But instead of a ban, why not work to improve the platforms?
We could focus regulatory efforts on creating safer spaces, like we do with physical buildings.
Overseas advocacy work on children's digital rights shows how we can protect children from algorithms, gamification and other predatory tactics used by social media platforms, rather than introducing an outright ban.
Alex Beattie is a lecturer in media and communication at Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington.
This story was originally published on
The Conversation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
PM Must Stop Changes Further Failing Children
Press Release – New Zealand Labour Party Christopher Luxon must step in and cancel boot camps and restore funding to frontline community providers before its too late, Labour childrens spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said. Today's damning report on Oranga Tamariki shows Māori children are being left with little chance of success, or even survival, after their experiences in the state care system, and Minister for Children Karen Chhour is making it worse. 'This report is the first of its kind and reveals a disturbing and urgent problem which can no longer be ignored by the Prime Minister who has overseen dangerous changes to Oranga Tamariki during his term in government,' Labour children's spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said. 'The Government has cut early intervention, continued with botched bootcamps that have never worked, and taken away funding from community-run services that help children and whānau. 'Christopher Luxon has allowed an ACT Minister to recklessly erode the services that have been built up to support children. 'As well as repealing Section 7AA, Karen Chhour has removed a key target for placement of children with whanau, and removed the target for investment for services provided by Iwi organisations. 'The Government has taken away actions specifically put in place to address the significant disparities for Māori children in care. 'Christopher Luxon must step in and cancel boot camps and restore funding to frontline community providers before it's too late,' Willow-Jean Prime said.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Auckland CBD's community engagement model could be used in suburbs
Police Minister Mark Mitchell says a similar model of community engagement as was done in the central city could be implemented in Northcote. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Social housing, rough sleepers and police responsiveness have been flagged as priorities for Auckland's Northcote community, after a meeting with the police minister this week. The meeting at the Northcote Birkenhead rugby club on Monday night brought together residents and business owners with Police Minister Mark Mitchell, as well as local MP Dan Bidois, police district commander Naila Hassan and other police staff. Mitchell told RNZ the community said to him that they had noticed a change. "I've literally done hundreds of these public meetings around the country over the last few years, and the nice thing is for me is they seem to getting more and more positive in terms of, people are starting to see and notice a real difference in terms of, certainly, on the law and order and pubic safety side of it," he said. Mitchell said managing rough sleepers was a wide issue. "It's been around for a while, we've been working on that in the CBD too," he said. "Often, many of these people have actually got safe homes and beds to go to, it's more of a lifestyle choice where they're coming together as a community, and of course there's all the social issues around them, not only can they cause issues themselves but they can become targets too, for those coming into the CBD." Community members also raised concerns over some residents in local Kāinga Ora housing, with Mitchell focusing on those who did not live up to the "social contract that they have when they're provided tax-payer funded housing". "The government's been far more proactive in making sure that there is actually action taken against those people, because they do cause massive issues in the communities they're in," Mitchell said. There was an expectation that residents in social housing make their communities as safe and harmonious as they could, he said. When it came to the prioritisation of police callouts, a concern voiced by a local shopkeeper, Mitchell said officers had to put greater risk callouts first. "Of course police always have to prioritise, and they always have had to prioritise, it'll be based on risk to human life first and foremost, and then they sort of start working down from there," he said. Mitchell said a similar model of community engagement as was done in the central city could be implemented in Northcote. "I said the model that we used for the Auckland CBD was very effective, and that was bringing all the stakeholders together," he said. "I suggested that [MP for Northcote] Dan Bidois take the lead on that, get everyone together; local board, business associations, residents and ratepayers associations or residents' associations, and the government agencies if they need them, make up a list of what the biggest issues are, and concerns and just start working through it." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
NZ joins allies, puts travel bans on Israeli ministers
New Zealand has joined other countries in putting travel bans on two Israeli government ministers, prompting swift criticism from Israel and a rare rebuke from the United States to its allies. The two men at the centre of the bans: Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich are right wing hardliners who's support is essential to Netanyahu's coalition government. Our government said sanctioning the two men was the right thing to do. But opposition parties said it should have gone much further, much faster, accusing the government of cowardice. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
