
How the Revolution carved out space for women's liberty
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Abigail did not appreciate this banter. In a letter to another Massachusetts woman, she noted that John was 'very saucy' about her 'list of female grievances.' And she was right about the law: Before and after the Revolution, men controlled their wives' property, their income, even their legal identities.
Advertisement
But many historians have uncovered evidence that in an unjust world, American women found small but real ways to shape their own lives. The Revolutionary War, with its emphasis on individual liberty, played a key role in encouraging and accelerating this process.
One researcher, Lee Virginia Chambers-Schiller, has shown that the number of women choosing not to marry — only a couple of percentage points at the start of the conflict — increased rapidly in the years after. Another, Susan E. Klepp, has shown that the women who did marry chose to have fewer children. After a postwar baby boom, birth rates began to fall, with women marrying later and using techniques like herbal abortifacients to space their pregnancies further apart.
Advertisement
Both Klepp and Chambers-Schiller are making inferences from demographic data. But exciting new research has uncovered examples of regular women speaking and acting for themselves. These women — war widows, working-class mothers, elderly Black women — drew inspiration from the Revolution itself, which gave them new ideas, new circumstances, even new language to argue for lasting changes of their own.
The Abigail Adams statue at the Boston Women's Memorial on Commonwealth Mall.
Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff
Telling the system what it wanted to hear
The Revolution was a violent and tumultuous time for many Americans. On remote farms and in occupied cities, women worried about being robbed or murdered or raped. In a forthcoming book, Lauren Duval, a professor at the University of Oklahoma, details the terrible ways in which the war hit the home front. A Long Island woman named Elizabeth Johnstone was raped by two British soldiers while her 4-year-old daughter watched and wept. A Philadelphia woman named Elizabeth Drinker wrote that she was 'afraid to go to bed.' Drinker continued: 'Every noise now seems alarming that happens in the night.'
These years of chaos — husbands and sons dying in battle, homes and belongings being seized or destroyed — had enormous impacts on American women. They responded with a canny mix of strategy and survival. Their actions did not always generate public records. (Drinker described her fears in a private diary.) But historians have discovered some surprising and revealing archives.
Advertisement
One such archive is the legal petitions representing and often written by 18th-century women. While researching the 2023 book 'In Dependence: Women and the Patriarchal State in Revolutionary America,' Jacqueline Beatty read thousands of these petitions — pleas to charities, courts, and legislatures; divorce cases; and deeds for manumission, among other examples. These petitions allowed women to do something rare in this era: make demands for themselves.
The war gave them plenty of opportunities. Beatty, a professor at York College, writes that during the Revolution the number of petitions 'increased exponentially.' A woman named Margret Clendening asked the South Carolina legislature for help. 'The ravages of the war and the loss of her husband,' she said, had devastated her family. A woman named Mary Dunton begged a Pennsylvania council for a pass to travel to New York, where the British had imprisoned her husband. Although the Colonies' new army and government had failed to free him, Dunton argued that she could 'effect his exchange or liberty.'
Another petition came from 'Daphne, an African,' who submitted her request for aid to the Massachusetts General Court. Daphne's owner was a British loyalist who'd fled Boston during the war. After the state seized his property, it had not taken adequate care of Daphne, who, in the words of her petition, was 'unfirm and wholly unable to support herself in a very advanced age.'
In petition after petition, women added their signature or their mark — they engaged with the legal system and advocated for themselves.
As Beatty points out, this advocacy often required them to play to gendered stereotypes, to flatter the men who remained in charge. In her famous letter, Abigail told John that 'if particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion.' But most women in this period chose a less radical tone.
Advertisement
Dunton emphasized that she had 'no support but what arose from the labor of her husband'; Clendening stressed that she was caring for a 'number of small children, whose support and education depends wholly upon the industry of your petitioner'; Daphne dwelled not on the evils of slavery but on 'the short time which probably she has to live.'
This approach was calculated: Women understood that they lived in an unfair system, and they told that system what it wanted to hear.
The Revolution did change that system in subtle ways. Debates about the British king, and the American government that would replace him, popularized ideas like independence and individual liberty — what the Declaration of Independence famously called 'unalienable rights.' Women borrowed those ideas to advance their own causes. Hannah Ellis, who lost her husband at the Battle of Monmouth, asked for the 'relief which is due her.' Her husband, she wrote, had 'bled and died … in defense of the rights of mankind.'
Once the Revolution ended, women began applying the language of 'rights' not only to their men but to themselves. Beatty traces this transformation by analyzing divorces requested by women. These surged after the Revolution. According to Beatty's analysis, women in Boston filed for five divorces in the 1770s. In the 1780s, they filed for 15 — and by the 19th century, that number had climbed to 30 or more per decade, easily outpacing the city's population growth.
Advertisement
The terms in these cases also shifted. Elizabeth Finney filed for divorce because her husband beat her and threatened her. Her petition said that he had 'wholly subverted … all that comfort and happiness which she had a right to expect.'
Mary Lobb also invoked her legal rights when describing her husband's abuse. So did Catherine France when she explained that her husband took the money she made as a laundress and spent it on alcohol. So did Nancy Robinson when she claimed that her husband had slept with other women and 'destroyed' her 'peace and felicity.'
In their petitions, these women emphasized that they had played the role of faithful and submissive wife. But they also leveraged that role to get what they needed: safety, alimony, freedom. Sally Jones Wilson accused her husband of adultery. Her petition made the next step clear: 'a right accrues to the said Sally, to be loosed from the bonds of matrimony.'
Newfound confidence
Historians have argued for a long time that the Revolution inspired women in various ways, but they've often focused on domestic topics. There were the women who decided not to marry. (A Massachusetts woman wrote a poem championing this option: 'Round freedom's fair standard I've rallied and paid, / A vow of allegiance to die an old maid.') Or there were the women who decided to have fewer children. Elizabeth Drinker, the Philadelphia woman who was 'afraid to go to bed,' had eight children. In the years after the war, Drinker's daughters averaged just over four children each.
If the Revolution empowered women in these domestic realms, though, it seemed to make less of a difference in politics and law. There were small steps, most notably when New Jersey allowed some women to vote, but the state reversed that right in 1807. America remembered the ladies, briefly, only to forget them.
Advertisement
And yet new scholarship like Beatty's suggests this was only part of the picture. The women who filed their own legal petitions engaged directly with the legal system. They understood that change was messy and slow — that it sometimes moved backward, as in New Jersey, and that it often required one to operate within an unfair set of laws. But just as the Revolution inspired women to take control of their bodies and their domestic duties, it also inspired them to view themselves as American citizens with American rights. Women in this period, writes Beatty, 'developed a new consciousness of and confidence in their ability to demand these rights from the state.'
That mindset eventually led to more activism, which led to more rights: the right to own property, the right to vote, the right to equal pay. It started with the Revolution, and it continued through 19th-century figures like Louisa May Alcott, one of the post-Revolutionary women who decided not to marry.
The reason, to Alcott, was obvious: 'To many of us,' she wrote, 'liberty is a better husband than love.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
How much the average American would pay for some peace and quiet
The average American would pay $2,521 for a day of peace and quiet — while parents would pay $1,147 more. That's according to a new survey of 2,000 Americans (30% of whom are parents), which explored the importance of quality time to recharge and the barriers to getting enough of it. Results showed the average respondent only gets 9.5 hours per month to themselves with the biggest barriers being family obligations (50%), work commitments (32%) and financial constraints (24%). 8 The average American would pay $2,521 for a day of peace and quiet — while parents would pay $1,147 more. SWNS 8 The most frequent barriers to getting an adequate amount of sleep is work, commitments, and financial constraints. SWNS Social obligations (22%) and guilt for finally getting free time (13%) were also listed as reasons respondents don't get the alone time they crave. A little over half of respondents (53%) said they need more alone time than they're currently getting. And the lengths respondents said they'll go to were surprising. Nearly 38% of respondents admit to lying to a partner, friends or family in order to get some time to themselves. 8 The average person claims they needs more alone time than they are currently getting. fizkes – The most common lie shared among participants was 'I'm not feeling well' (54%), followed by 'I have a lot of work to do' (40%), 'I have a headache' (33%), 'I have an appointment' (33%) and 'My phone's about to die, so I can't talk' (32%). 8 Out of 2,000 respondents, the average hours people get to themselves is only 9.5 per month. SWNS 8 Often times people will lie to lie to their partner, family, or friends, just to get some alone time. SWNS The survey, conducted by Talker Research on behalf of Apple Vacations, pinpointed the dollar amount people attribute to certain elements of relaxation and found the average parent polled values a lazy morning to themselves at $325. It's no wonder then that people would be willing to pay an average of $339.8 for just one extra hour of sleep. And the feeling extends to vacations, with 40% of respondents saying they've booked a trip specifically for peace and quiet. 8 The price people are willing to pay for an extra our of sleep is an average #339.8. SWNS 8 According to parents, a lazy morning to themselves is valued at $325. SWNS 'In a world where silence feels like a luxury, it's clear people aren't just craving quiet,' said Dana Studebaker, Vice President of Marketing, Consumer Brands, Apple Vacations. 'They're willing to invest in it. Everyone deserves moments that are truly their own.' How would respondents spend this precious, uninterrupted time alone? One in six said they'd be happy doing anything as long as it wasn't a chore or obligation. And one in eight said they'd want to binge TV or movies (13%) or spend the day at the beach (12%). 8 How people spend their precious time alone varies. Antonioguillem – Interestingly, two-thirds agreed (66%) that visiting family does not count as a restful vacation. 'When people are willing to spend hundreds — or even thousands — just for a little peace and quiet, it says a lot about how rare true rest has become,' added Michael Lowery, Head of Global Consumer Brands, Apple Vacations. 'Sometimes the most valuable thing you can give yourself is time without expectation.' Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 Americans (18+ who traveled in the past 12 months); the survey was commissioned by Apple Vacations and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between April 22 – April 28, 2025.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Munitions depot explosion at Kadena Air Base leaves four injured
Four members of Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force were injured after a munition exploded on Kadena Air Base on Monday. The Air Force's 18th Wing, based out of Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, confirmed that an explosion occurred at a munitions storage site on the northern side of the base. No U.S. personnel were injured and local authorities said that there is no risk of further explosions, according to the U.S. Air Force and Kyodo News. Members of the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force were working in the munitions storage area, managed by the Okinawa Prefectural Government, when one item exploded, leaving four Japanese troops injured. According to Japanese media, the explosion happened while JSDF members were preparing to safely dispose of an unexploded ordnance. Per reports, the depot is a temporary storage spot, mainly used for leftover unexploded munitions from World War II. Okinawa was heavily bombed during World War II, as part of the U.S. military's campaign to capture the island in 1945. 80 years later and Japanese and American authorities continue to locate and dispose of unexploded ordnance, with more than 2,000 tons of munitions taken out. This is a developing story. A Marine Corps reply-all email apocalypse has an incredible real-life ending Army shuts down its sole active-duty information operations command Army plans to close more than 20 base museums in major reduction Former Green Beret nominated to top Pentagon position to oversee special ops The Navy's new recruiting commercial puts the 'dirt wars' in the past

Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
State grants helps Fairmont State University plant more trees on campus
FAIRMONT — The number of native trees on the campus of Fairmont State University recently increased with help from a grant from the West Virginia Division of Forestry. In April, students and staff planted American holly, Blackhaw viburnum, common witch hazel and eastern redbud trees with the goal of boosting biodiversity on campus. Dubbed the Community EquiTree grant program, which originates on the federal level, helped plant alongside Campus Drive East, which is adjacent to Fairmont State's residence halls and outdoor recreation areas, which "will allow more students and local community members to experience the trees and their benefits," according to a press release. "As a public institution, Fairmont State University is committed to fostering a beautiful, welcoming campus where students, faculty, staff, and community members feel a true sense of belonging," the press release continued. Fairmont State's Creative Sustainability Council, a group of students, faculty and staff members, spearheaded the initiative. Assistant Construction Manager Devin Carpenter, Associate Professor of English Nathaniel Myers, and Councilmember and architecture major Ryan Williams collaborated on the grant. 'The trees themselves are a great project, helping to develop this underused space on campus into something that is both a beautiful showcase of West Virginia trees and helps to mitigate local issues like soil erosion or larger ones like global warming," Williams said. "But even more than that, I hope projects like this inspire more students to get involved. The more people are engaged with their community and campus, the more we can improve and better serve the present and the future.' The WVDOF Urban and Community Forestry program cooperates with communities to promote the long-term care of trees in cities and communities throughout the state. The program also establishes guidelines for planting, caring for and protecting trees throughout West Virginia. Fairmont State's project meets the goals of this program by providing an opportunity for students to get involved with community sustainability projects, for faculty to improve their instruction by helping others understand the importance of trees and nature, and for everyone to better understand and engage with their local environment during and after the planting. "As the trees grow, their benefits will as well. The canopies will help shade the area, especially nearby asphalt parking lots and roads, which can store heat. The roots of the trees will grow into the hillside, stabilizing the soil and preventing erosion. Additionally, their fall foliage will create a beautiful scene familiar to many West Virginians," states the press release. 'The planting of these native species not only aids in beautifying our campus but also offers back to nature a piece of what urban development once removed," Carpenter said. In the coming months, the Creative Sustainability Council will measure the success of the tree planting program using surveys to be administered in the local community and among students. A ceremonial tree planting was held on April 25, 2025 to mark the beginning of the project, which is expected to be completed this month. 'We are all very proud of Ryan and his hard work on this project,' Myers said. 'Hopefully this will inspire future projects that will contribute to sustainability on our beautiful campus.'