
How the Revolution carved out space for women's liberty
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Abigail did not appreciate this banter. In a letter to another Massachusetts woman, she noted that John was 'very saucy' about her 'list of female grievances.' And she was right about the law: Before and after the Revolution, men controlled their wives' property, their income, even their legal identities.
Advertisement
But many historians have uncovered evidence that in an unjust world, American women found small but real ways to shape their own lives. The Revolutionary War, with its emphasis on individual liberty, played a key role in encouraging and accelerating this process.
One researcher, Lee Virginia Chambers-Schiller, has shown that the number of women choosing not to marry — only a couple of percentage points at the start of the conflict — increased rapidly in the years after. Another, Susan E. Klepp, has shown that the women who did marry chose to have fewer children. After a postwar baby boom, birth rates began to fall, with women marrying later and using techniques like herbal abortifacients to space their pregnancies further apart.
Advertisement
Both Klepp and Chambers-Schiller are making inferences from demographic data. But exciting new research has uncovered examples of regular women speaking and acting for themselves. These women — war widows, working-class mothers, elderly Black women — drew inspiration from the Revolution itself, which gave them new ideas, new circumstances, even new language to argue for lasting changes of their own.
The Abigail Adams statue at the Boston Women's Memorial on Commonwealth Mall.
Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff
Telling the system what it wanted to hear
The Revolution was a violent and tumultuous time for many Americans. On remote farms and in occupied cities, women worried about being robbed or murdered or raped. In a forthcoming book, Lauren Duval, a professor at the University of Oklahoma, details the terrible ways in which the war hit the home front. A Long Island woman named Elizabeth Johnstone was raped by two British soldiers while her 4-year-old daughter watched and wept. A Philadelphia woman named Elizabeth Drinker wrote that she was 'afraid to go to bed.' Drinker continued: 'Every noise now seems alarming that happens in the night.'
These years of chaos — husbands and sons dying in battle, homes and belongings being seized or destroyed — had enormous impacts on American women. They responded with a canny mix of strategy and survival. Their actions did not always generate public records. (Drinker described her fears in a private diary.) But historians have discovered some surprising and revealing archives.
Advertisement
One such archive is the legal petitions representing and often written by 18th-century women. While researching the 2023 book 'In Dependence: Women and the Patriarchal State in Revolutionary America,' Jacqueline Beatty read thousands of these petitions — pleas to charities, courts, and legislatures; divorce cases; and deeds for manumission, among other examples. These petitions allowed women to do something rare in this era: make demands for themselves.
The war gave them plenty of opportunities. Beatty, a professor at York College, writes that during the Revolution the number of petitions 'increased exponentially.' A woman named Margret Clendening asked the South Carolina legislature for help. 'The ravages of the war and the loss of her husband,' she said, had devastated her family. A woman named Mary Dunton begged a Pennsylvania council for a pass to travel to New York, where the British had imprisoned her husband. Although the Colonies' new army and government had failed to free him, Dunton argued that she could 'effect his exchange or liberty.'
Another petition came from 'Daphne, an African,' who submitted her request for aid to the Massachusetts General Court. Daphne's owner was a British loyalist who'd fled Boston during the war. After the state seized his property, it had not taken adequate care of Daphne, who, in the words of her petition, was 'unfirm and wholly unable to support herself in a very advanced age.'
In petition after petition, women added their signature or their mark — they engaged with the legal system and advocated for themselves.
As Beatty points out, this advocacy often required them to play to gendered stereotypes, to flatter the men who remained in charge. In her famous letter, Abigail told John that 'if particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion.' But most women in this period chose a less radical tone.
Advertisement
Dunton emphasized that she had 'no support but what arose from the labor of her husband'; Clendening stressed that she was caring for a 'number of small children, whose support and education depends wholly upon the industry of your petitioner'; Daphne dwelled not on the evils of slavery but on 'the short time which probably she has to live.'
This approach was calculated: Women understood that they lived in an unfair system, and they told that system what it wanted to hear.
The Revolution did change that system in subtle ways. Debates about the British king, and the American government that would replace him, popularized ideas like independence and individual liberty — what the Declaration of Independence famously called 'unalienable rights.' Women borrowed those ideas to advance their own causes. Hannah Ellis, who lost her husband at the Battle of Monmouth, asked for the 'relief which is due her.' Her husband, she wrote, had 'bled and died … in defense of the rights of mankind.'
Once the Revolution ended, women began applying the language of 'rights' not only to their men but to themselves. Beatty traces this transformation by analyzing divorces requested by women. These surged after the Revolution. According to Beatty's analysis, women in Boston filed for five divorces in the 1770s. In the 1780s, they filed for 15 — and by the 19th century, that number had climbed to 30 or more per decade, easily outpacing the city's population growth.
Advertisement
The terms in these cases also shifted. Elizabeth Finney filed for divorce because her husband beat her and threatened her. Her petition said that he had 'wholly subverted … all that comfort and happiness which she had a right to expect.'
Mary Lobb also invoked her legal rights when describing her husband's abuse. So did Catherine France when she explained that her husband took the money she made as a laundress and spent it on alcohol. So did Nancy Robinson when she claimed that her husband had slept with other women and 'destroyed' her 'peace and felicity.'
In their petitions, these women emphasized that they had played the role of faithful and submissive wife. But they also leveraged that role to get what they needed: safety, alimony, freedom. Sally Jones Wilson accused her husband of adultery. Her petition made the next step clear: 'a right accrues to the said Sally, to be loosed from the bonds of matrimony.'
Newfound confidence
Historians have argued for a long time that the Revolution inspired women in various ways, but they've often focused on domestic topics. There were the women who decided not to marry. (A Massachusetts woman wrote a poem championing this option: 'Round freedom's fair standard I've rallied and paid, / A vow of allegiance to die an old maid.') Or there were the women who decided to have fewer children. Elizabeth Drinker, the Philadelphia woman who was 'afraid to go to bed,' had eight children. In the years after the war, Drinker's daughters averaged just over four children each.
If the Revolution empowered women in these domestic realms, though, it seemed to make less of a difference in politics and law. There were small steps, most notably when New Jersey allowed some women to vote, but the state reversed that right in 1807. America remembered the ladies, briefly, only to forget them.
Advertisement
And yet new scholarship like Beatty's suggests this was only part of the picture. The women who filed their own legal petitions engaged directly with the legal system. They understood that change was messy and slow — that it sometimes moved backward, as in New Jersey, and that it often required one to operate within an unfair set of laws. But just as the Revolution inspired women to take control of their bodies and their domestic duties, it also inspired them to view themselves as American citizens with American rights. Women in this period, writes Beatty, 'developed a new consciousness of and confidence in their ability to demand these rights from the state.'
That mindset eventually led to more activism, which led to more rights: the right to own property, the right to vote, the right to equal pay. It started with the Revolution, and it continued through 19th-century figures like Louisa May Alcott, one of the post-Revolutionary women who decided not to marry.
The reason, to Alcott, was obvious: 'To many of us,' she wrote, 'liberty is a better husband than love.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
Dear James: I Love Going Naked on the Beach
Editor's Note: Is anything ailing, torturing, or nagging at you? Are you beset by existential worries? Every Tuesday, James Parker tackles readers' questions. Tell him about your lifelong or in-the-moment problems at dearjames@ Don't want to miss a single column? Sign up to get 'Dear James' in your inbox. Dear James, In the second half of last year, I went to a naturist beach for the first time. I was afraid on my whole walk there that I would chicken out. But there was nobody around for miles—so I stripped. Since then, I've done it five more times, at various beaches, with growing confidence, in front of other people who have and have not been clothed. I've found great peace in lying naked on the sand, listening to the waves. But: Over the winter I started to get these feelings of shame and guilt. I was raised a very strict Catholic. And although my mother has been dead for a decade, I can suddenly feel her strong disapproval from beyond the grave. It's a conundrum. How would you handle it? Dear Reader, Well, I was in church on Sunday morning for the Feast of Pentecost, celebrating the wacky mandate of the Holy Spirit to go where it pleases—to land, if it likes, right on top of somebody's head (your head, my head, anybody's head) and nest there in a throbbing bolus of flame. So yup, I'm ready to get Catholic about this. I'm ready to get dogmatic. Your body is a gift from God. In the appropriate place (such as a naturist beach), you should be able to go as naked as Adam in the garden and feel not a twinge-let of shame. You should be like the primal newborns in the Doors' ' Waiting for the Sun ': 'At first flash of Eden / We raced down to the sea / Standing there on freedom's shore.' (Who dares to say Jim Morrison isn't a great American poet?) Isn't that the true spirit of nudism? They don't call it a birthday suit for nothing. Shed your clothes; shed everything that cramps or abashes you. Air out those musty parts. Unshadow yourself. Let it all flap. Be a real American. Scamper shoeless across the sand into liberty's gold-green sunrise. Me, I'm not great at being naked. It makes me feel too … naked. So I know where you're coming from. But you've done so well, made such strides in self-development. The confidence, the peace, the waves: Keep going! Of course—as at any breakthrough moment, any evolutionary threshold of the psyche—you're being swarmed by the old demons, now at extra strength: guilt, disgrace, an image of your mother scolding you. They are to be stoutly resisted. Imagine instead your mother's delight in you as a baby, in all your sweet-smelling, roly-poly nudeness. Imagine reality taking pleasure in itself across the surface of your skin. Last word here goes to Gerard Manley Hopkins, great Catholic sensualist, nudist in his heart: 'The Holy Ghost over the bent / World broods with warm breast and with ah! bright wings.'

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tampa City Council member Gwen Henderson dies at 60
Gwendolyn Henderson, a Tampa City Council member, has died, a council member confirmed with the Tampa Bay Times. She was 60 years old. Henderson went to Florida A&M University for her bachelor's degree in education. She went on to receive a master's of education and an education specialist degree from Saint Leo University. She was the chairperson of the city's Community Redevelopment Agency board and was a board director on the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority. Council member Luis Viera said Tampa administrators notified him and other council members of Henderson's death. He didn't have information on the cause of death. 'Gwen had a passion for Black History - from 1619 to today. If you wanted to see the beauty of Gwen's heart, you should stop by her dream realized - her Black English bookstore,' Viera wrote in a text message to the Times. 'That bookstore was about the pride she had in the journey of her family and families like hers. It showed a beautiful heart. Gwen's life and values were intertwined in the journey of Black Tampenos.' Council member Lynn Hurtak said in a statement she was shocked and saddened to hear the news of Henderson's death this morning. Hurtak said Henderson, similar to herself, was a neighborhood advocate. 'She dubbed me 'Fifteen,' and I in turn called her 'Sixteen' in reference to our places in the sequence of the very few women to ever serve on city council,' Hurtak wrote. 'I deeply regret that I will no longer be able to enjoy her laughter, infectious spirit, and boundless energy as we continue our work to build a Tampa that works for everyone.' This is a breaking news story and will be updated. Check back at
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Kid rotting': why parents are letting their children go wild this summer
Name: Summer kid rotting. Age: The name is new, but long school summer holidays started spreading in the 1840s, thanks to the US educational reformer Horace Mann. Appearance: Laidback and a little messy. What's this Kid Rot then? Does have a brother? No, it's a 2025 way of describing 'letting your kids do nothing in the summer holidays', also known as a 'wild summer'. American parents are fighting back against (or giving up on) expensive, overscheduled summers of camps and activities for their offspring. 'What if, some are daring to wonder, my kid does nothing?' the New York Times reported. A return to the old ways, huh? When I was young, we were sent out with a penknife, a tin of pipe tobacco and a bottle of dandelion and burdock on the day school broke up. It was strongly suggested we should not return home until 1 September. No, you weren't. No, OK, we weren't. , watching TV and fighting. We'd have loved expensive, overscheduled summers! Well, some US parents are sick of paying through the nose to keep their kids out of trouble – one interviewed by the NYT spent $40,000 (£30,000) on occupying her three children for eight weeks. Inflation is making summer camps unaffordable for many: a survey found 30% of parents go into debt or defer payments. And while the situation isn't as bad in the UK, it's still a struggle for parents: research last year found UK summer childcare costs £1,000 a kid on average. Ouch! And kids don't even seem to enjoy organised summer stuff much: 'It was a fight every day to get them to go,' one parent told the NYT. 'He cried every single day at drop-off,' a journalist at the Cut said of her son's summer camp. Related: Readers reply: Should schools take a long summer break – or does it harm children's learning? Maybe a bit of boredom isn't so bad. Being bored is being rebranded as the better option for pushy parents. 'I tell them their kid will be more 'ahead' with their own experimentation,' a US educational consultant reassures her anxious clients. But 'their experimentation' will be whatever the algorithm decides – kids will be glued to YouTube, won't they? Yes, screen time is a concern, and if the little darlings manage to enable in-app purchases, your iPad could prove a more expensive babysitter than the fanciest camp. If they're going to be screen rotting all day every day, parents could at least put them to work - give them a bitcoin and a day-trading account and see how much money they can make by September. A bitcoin is currently worth 81 grand – you'd get a lot of fancy summer camps for that. Do say: 'We're having a wild summer.' Don't say: 'Yeah, we're going large at Glasto, microdosing in Mykonos, then an ayahuasca retreat in Peru. What are the kids doing? No idea.'