
How the Revolution carved out space for women's liberty
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Abigail did not appreciate this banter. In a letter to another Massachusetts woman, she noted that John was 'very saucy' about her 'list of female grievances.' And she was right about the law: Before and after the Revolution, men controlled their wives' property, their income, even their legal identities.
Advertisement
But many historians have uncovered evidence that in an unjust world, American women found small but real ways to shape their own lives. The Revolutionary War, with its emphasis on individual liberty, played a key role in encouraging and accelerating this process.
One researcher, Lee Virginia Chambers-Schiller, has shown that the number of women choosing not to marry — only a couple of percentage points at the start of the conflict — increased rapidly in the years after. Another, Susan E. Klepp, has shown that the women who did marry chose to have fewer children. After a postwar baby boom, birth rates began to fall, with women marrying later and using techniques like herbal abortifacients to space their pregnancies further apart.
Advertisement
Both Klepp and Chambers-Schiller are making inferences from demographic data. But exciting new research has uncovered examples of regular women speaking and acting for themselves. These women — war widows, working-class mothers, elderly Black women — drew inspiration from the Revolution itself, which gave them new ideas, new circumstances, even new language to argue for lasting changes of their own.
The Abigail Adams statue at the Boston Women's Memorial on Commonwealth Mall.
Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff
Telling the system what it wanted to hear
The Revolution was a violent and tumultuous time for many Americans. On remote farms and in occupied cities, women worried about being robbed or murdered or raped. In a forthcoming book, Lauren Duval, a professor at the University of Oklahoma, details the terrible ways in which the war hit the home front. A Long Island woman named Elizabeth Johnstone was raped by two British soldiers while her 4-year-old daughter watched and wept. A Philadelphia woman named Elizabeth Drinker wrote that she was 'afraid to go to bed.' Drinker continued: 'Every noise now seems alarming that happens in the night.'
These years of chaos — husbands and sons dying in battle, homes and belongings being seized or destroyed — had enormous impacts on American women. They responded with a canny mix of strategy and survival. Their actions did not always generate public records. (Drinker described her fears in a private diary.) But historians have discovered some surprising and revealing archives.
Advertisement
One such archive is the legal petitions representing and often written by 18th-century women. While researching the 2023 book 'In Dependence: Women and the Patriarchal State in Revolutionary America,' Jacqueline Beatty read thousands of these petitions — pleas to charities, courts, and legislatures; divorce cases; and deeds for manumission, among other examples. These petitions allowed women to do something rare in this era: make demands for themselves.
The war gave them plenty of opportunities. Beatty, a professor at York College, writes that during the Revolution the number of petitions 'increased exponentially.' A woman named Margret Clendening asked the South Carolina legislature for help. 'The ravages of the war and the loss of her husband,' she said, had devastated her family. A woman named Mary Dunton begged a Pennsylvania council for a pass to travel to New York, where the British had imprisoned her husband. Although the Colonies' new army and government had failed to free him, Dunton argued that she could 'effect his exchange or liberty.'
Another petition came from 'Daphne, an African,' who submitted her request for aid to the Massachusetts General Court. Daphne's owner was a British loyalist who'd fled Boston during the war. After the state seized his property, it had not taken adequate care of Daphne, who, in the words of her petition, was 'unfirm and wholly unable to support herself in a very advanced age.'
In petition after petition, women added their signature or their mark — they engaged with the legal system and advocated for themselves.
As Beatty points out, this advocacy often required them to play to gendered stereotypes, to flatter the men who remained in charge. In her famous letter, Abigail told John that 'if particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion.' But most women in this period chose a less radical tone.
Advertisement
Dunton emphasized that she had 'no support but what arose from the labor of her husband'; Clendening stressed that she was caring for a 'number of small children, whose support and education depends wholly upon the industry of your petitioner'; Daphne dwelled not on the evils of slavery but on 'the short time which probably she has to live.'
This approach was calculated: Women understood that they lived in an unfair system, and they told that system what it wanted to hear.
The Revolution did change that system in subtle ways. Debates about the British king, and the American government that would replace him, popularized ideas like independence and individual liberty — what the Declaration of Independence famously called 'unalienable rights.' Women borrowed those ideas to advance their own causes. Hannah Ellis, who lost her husband at the Battle of Monmouth, asked for the 'relief which is due her.' Her husband, she wrote, had 'bled and died … in defense of the rights of mankind.'
Once the Revolution ended, women began applying the language of 'rights' not only to their men but to themselves. Beatty traces this transformation by analyzing divorces requested by women. These surged after the Revolution. According to Beatty's analysis, women in Boston filed for five divorces in the 1770s. In the 1780s, they filed for 15 — and by the 19th century, that number had climbed to 30 or more per decade, easily outpacing the city's population growth.
Advertisement
The terms in these cases also shifted. Elizabeth Finney filed for divorce because her husband beat her and threatened her. Her petition said that he had 'wholly subverted … all that comfort and happiness which she had a right to expect.'
Mary Lobb also invoked her legal rights when describing her husband's abuse. So did Catherine France when she explained that her husband took the money she made as a laundress and spent it on alcohol. So did Nancy Robinson when she claimed that her husband had slept with other women and 'destroyed' her 'peace and felicity.'
In their petitions, these women emphasized that they had played the role of faithful and submissive wife. But they also leveraged that role to get what they needed: safety, alimony, freedom. Sally Jones Wilson accused her husband of adultery. Her petition made the next step clear: 'a right accrues to the said Sally, to be loosed from the bonds of matrimony.'
Newfound confidence
Historians have argued for a long time that the Revolution inspired women in various ways, but they've often focused on domestic topics. There were the women who decided not to marry. (A Massachusetts woman wrote a poem championing this option: 'Round freedom's fair standard I've rallied and paid, / A vow of allegiance to die an old maid.') Or there were the women who decided to have fewer children. Elizabeth Drinker, the Philadelphia woman who was 'afraid to go to bed,' had eight children. In the years after the war, Drinker's daughters averaged just over four children each.
If the Revolution empowered women in these domestic realms, though, it seemed to make less of a difference in politics and law. There were small steps, most notably when New Jersey allowed some women to vote, but the state reversed that right in 1807. America remembered the ladies, briefly, only to forget them.
Advertisement
And yet new scholarship like Beatty's suggests this was only part of the picture. The women who filed their own legal petitions engaged directly with the legal system. They understood that change was messy and slow — that it sometimes moved backward, as in New Jersey, and that it often required one to operate within an unfair set of laws. But just as the Revolution inspired women to take control of their bodies and their domestic duties, it also inspired them to view themselves as American citizens with American rights. Women in this period, writes Beatty, 'developed a new consciousness of and confidence in their ability to demand these rights from the state.'
That mindset eventually led to more activism, which led to more rights: the right to own property, the right to vote, the right to equal pay. It started with the Revolution, and it continued through 19th-century figures like Louisa May Alcott, one of the post-Revolutionary women who decided not to marry.
The reason, to Alcott, was obvious: 'To many of us,' she wrote, 'liberty is a better husband than love.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Python Huntress' takes on invasive snakes in the Everglades
By Maria Alejandra Cardona OCHOPEE, Florida (Reuters) -Amy Siewe was a successful real estate agent -- but her life changed after she captured her first python in Florida's Everglades. "I just had this fascination with snakes. So when I learned that there was a python problem here in Florida ... I went on a hunt, I caught a nine-foot (2.75-meter) python, and that was it. I was hooked!" she said. Within two months she had sold her business in Indiana and moved to Florida to become a python hunter. Now, with more than 600 dead pythons under her belt, she is known as the "Python Huntress" -- one of a handful of women amongst hundreds of men hunting the invasive Burmese python in Florida's Everglades wetland ecosystem. "This python is about 10 feet (3 meters) long," she says as she wrestles a snake she has just captured in the tall grass in the middle of the night. "It's probably about three years old, and to date it's eaten about 200 of our native animals, including mammals and birds." Burmese pythons have been spreading through the Everglades National Park since Hurricane Andrew in 1992 destroyed a breeding facility for the pet trade, freeing some 900 snakes. Originally native to Southeast Asia, the python can grow up to 18 feet (5.5 meters) long and has a voracious appetite, consuming the local wildlife, including mammals, birds and even alligators. The Everglades is a unique subtropical ecosystem, with the largest continuous mangrove ecosystem in the Western Hemisphere. It is home to a vast array of unique species, including the endangered Florida panther, the American alligator and the American crocodile. But it provides no natural predators to the Burmese python, allowing the population of the invasive species to balloon. Scientists have noted dramatic declines in raccoons, opossums, bobcats, and rabbits in the region. "There's an estimated 500,000 pythons out there," Siewe said. The pythons, which are hunted by night, cannot legally be transported alive, so they are killed on site after being captured and measured. Once home, Siewe skins the dead snakes, and then has the skins professionally tanned into leather to be made into purses, wallets, watch bands and other goods. It takes an average of 12 hours to catch one. "So it's not that effective, right," she admits. "We're always going to have pythons in Florida. What we're trying to do is figure out how to decrease their numbers. Hunting right now is the most effective tool that we have."


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Photos Reveal US Air Force Spying Capabilities
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Recently released photos show a fleet of specialized United States military aircraft staged on a flight line, highlighting their capabilities for a wide range of intelligence-gathering missions. The 55th Wing of the U.S. Air Force, an intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance unit headquartered at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, told Newsweek in a statement that its aircraft and personnel conduct missions that defend the U.S. and safeguard global security. Why It Matters The U.S. Air Force often deploys its reconnaissance aircraft overseas to gather intelligence on America's adversaries. Forward deployment locations include Kadena Air Base in Japan, Royal Air Force Mildenhall in the United Kingdom, and Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. American spy flights off the coasts of Russia and China have been intercepted by Russian and Chinese fighter jets. Moscow has stated it will not allow its borders to be violated, while Beijing has accused Washington of conducting "close-in reconnaissance" near its territory. Several U.S. Air Force RC-135V/W Rivet Joint aircraft park on the flight line at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska on June 1, 2025. Several U.S. Air Force RC-135V/W Rivet Joint aircraft park on the flight line at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska on June 1, 2025. Chad Watkins/U.S Air Force What To Know A set of seven photos released by the 55th Wing over the weekend shows several U.S. Air Force aircraft parked on the flightline at Offutt Air Force Base at night on June 1. These aircraft included the RC-135U Combat Sent, the RC-135V/W Rivet Joint, and the WC-135 Constant Phoenix. They are developed from the C-135 Stratolifter transport aircraft. The Combat Sent can locate and identify foreign military radar signals, while the Rivet Joint detects, identifies, and geolocates electromagnetic signals. The Constant Phoenix conducts air-sampling missions, collecting particulates in the air for detecting nuclear explosions. A U.S. Air Force RC-135U Combat Sent aircraft, right, parks on the flight line at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska on June 1, 2025. A U.S. Air Force RC-135U Combat Sent aircraft, right, parks on the flight line at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska on June 1, 2025. Chad Watkins/U.S. Air Force In the statement, the 55th Wing stated that the unit has global reach and enduring strategic impact by maintaining forward-deployed units around the globe, ensuring what it described as "rapid and persistent global ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] coverage." In addition to the aforementioned specialized aircraft, the Nebraska-based unit operates the so-called "rapidly deployable" RC-135S Cobra Ball, which is designed for collecting data on ballistic missiles, a vital information that cannot be obtained by "any other source." What People Are Saying The 55th Wing of the U.S. Air Force, in a statement to Newsweek: "While we do not disclose operational status or comment on specific interactions with foreign military aircraft for operational security, the 55th Wing remains steadfast in executing its mission with precision, professionalism, and strict adherence to international standards." Offutt Air Force Base, on its website: "[The 55th Wing's] mission is to provide dominant information warfare forces through electromagnetic spectrum operations, information operations, intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and nuclear command, control and communications to the Joint Forces and national leadership, any time, any place." Two U.S. Air Force WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft, left and center, and an RC-135U Combat Sent aircraft park on the flight line at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska on June 1, 2025. Two U.S. Air Force WC-135 Constant Phoenix aircraft, left and center, and an RC-135U Combat Sent aircraft park on the flight line at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska on June 1, 2025. Chad Watkins/U.S. Air Force What Happens Next It remains to be seen how the U.S. military maintains its worldwide airborne spying missions amid tensions on the Korean Peninsula, across the Taiwan Strait, and in the Middle East.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are dads doing enough? What the data tells us about the state of modern fatherhood.
As Father's Day approaches, American dads insist they're doing a lot more parenting than the men who raised them, according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll. Some dads even claim they're doing more than the women they're parenting with. Yet the survey of 1,560 U.S. adults also taps into the complexities and contradictions of contemporary fatherhood, revealing that even the most egalitarian dads might see themselves in ways that don't quite match up with how others see them. Their partners included. I know a little something about this. One of my duties as national correspondent for Yahoo News is to collaborate on our monthly polls with YouGov, a leading public-opinion firm. I write the questions, then analyze and report on the results. At the same time, my wife and I are trying our best to help our two kids — a 9-year-old girl and an 8-year-old boy — grow up to be good people. Like many other millennial parents — I just turned 43 — we aspire to contribute equally to that effort. And so I figured Father's Day would be as good a time as any to ask my fellow dads some of the questions I'm always asking myself. How much are we really doing these days? And is it enough? Gender roles are a perennial topic in the parenting world, and the general consensus is that even though more opposite-sex couples than ever believe in 50/50 parenting — and even though dads have become more involved over the years — moms still do most of the domestic labor. According to a 2023 study by the Pew Research Center, for example, wives in so-called egalitarian marriages — that is, couples where each partner earns about the same amount of money — still spend more than twice as much time on housework than their husbands, and almost two hours more per week on caregiving, including tending to children. 'Egalitarian' husbands, meanwhile, spend three-and-a-half more hours per week on 'leisure activities' than their wives. Yet there may be more to the data than meets the eye, at least based on the results of the new Yahoo News/YouGov poll. For one thing, nearly two-thirds of American dads (63%) now say they spend more time with their kids than their fathers spent with them — and a full 37% describe that generational difference as 'significant.' Dads feel like they're putting in the hours and making progress. What's more surprising, however, is that a third of fathers (34%) also say they carry more than half of their family's "mental load," while another four in 10 (39%) say they shoulder about half. Combined, that's roughly three-quarters of dads who believe the balance is either 50/50 or skewed in their direction. In contrast, just 28% of dads admit to bearing less than half (14%) or none (4%) of their family's mental load. It's fair to say those numbers contradict what researchers have found — and what most moms would tell us if we asked them the same questions about the fathers in their lives. When I shared the poll with my wife and asked how she would answer for me, we agreed on everything — except mental load. And when I told her how many dads seem to believe they shoulder at least half the mental load, she scoffed. My sense is that this disparity reveals a lot about the state of dads today. For the record, I don't really think I take on more of the mental load than my wife — not as the term is typically defined. But I also think the tasks we typically define as 'mental load' fail to fully capture what dads tend to contribute. Here's how the poll put it: 'Mental load refers to the cognitive and emotional effort involved in managing and coordinating household tasks, responsibilities and relationships. As a father, how much of your family's mental load do you believe you carry?' Again, nearly three out of four dads say they do half or more of this invisible labor — these hidden forms of care. Yet when asked which specific parenting responsibilities they 'regularly take on,' relatively few fathers with children aged 18 or younger pick things like 'make the kids' doctor appointments' (36%), 'sign up the kids for camps/school activities/lessons' (26%), 'schedule playdates with the kids' friends' (18%), 'volunteer for school activities' (15%) or 'book babysitters/child care' (10%) — i.e., the classic mental load stuff. Instead, these dads are much more inclined to say they "play with the kids" (72%), "help with homework" (54%), "take the kids on outings" (52%), 'put the kids to bed' (44%) and 'make dinner' (42%). So it's not like dads are deluded. When asked point-blank about their role — Who are your kids closer to? Who spends more time parenting? Who would your kids' school call first? — a majority of fathers answer either 'me' or 'it's about equal.' But an even larger majority answer either 'it's about equal' or 'their mother.' In other words, dads understand that the parenting scales still aren't perfectly balanced. Why, then, do so many dads seem to think that we're carrying more of the mental load than we get credit for? My guess is that we consider that category to be a little more capacious than our partners do. For the initial draft of the Yahoo News/YouGov Father Day's poll, my editors — both moms — floated a fairly narrow set of options for the 'parenting responsibilities' question: booking babysitters, volunteering at school, making doctor appointments and so on. I responded with some additional choices that 'might capture more of what most dads do': playing with the kids, going on outings, cleaning up after dinner, etc. I also told my editors that 'in general, I think mental load conversations miss things like this (even if they are more about household management than parenting, per se): take care of the house, take care of the yard, take care of the car, take care of the garbage, take care of the finances. We didn't end up asking dads about those duties. But looking back, I can't help but wonder if they would have polled even higher than, say, playing with the kids — and if they were the kinds of responsibilities our dad respondents had in mind when assessing their own share of the mental load. For me, I think the answer is yes. In 2010, I wrote an essay for Newsweek explaining why marriage mattered so much to me; it was a direct rebuttal to a piece by two of my female colleagues about why the institution is 'quite simply, no longer necessary." I agreed with my coworkers that all of marriage's 'antiquated ancillary benefits — its grubby socioeconomic justifications' — no longer really applied. But that, I argued, was 'the point.' 'Dustin and I are not 'getting anything' out of this deal,' I explained. 'Or at least we're not getting what previous generations of men and women were conditioned to expect. I'm not getting a cooking, cleaning, child-rearing machine. She's not getting a bringer-home of the bacon. I clean. Both of us cook. Sometimes, Dustin earns more money than I do. Sometimes she doesn't. We both go to work every day. We both have careers. And when we have children, we'll both take turns staying home to raise them. 'In other words,' I continued, 'our roles within the relationship are not defined by gender. They're defined by who we are as people. … In a world where the practical reasons for marriage no longer apply, the only reason left is love.' Fifteen years and two kids later, nearly every word of that essay still rings true to me. I do all of the laundry — and almost all of the cleaning. She packs lunches; I make dinner. She works longer hours. I drop off the kids at school in the morning, then pick them up in the afternoon. I coach their soccer teams. She plays with them more. We both read books at bedtime. But if I'm being honest with myself, our 'roles within the relationship' are still somewhat 'defined by gender.' As my wife was quick to point out when I shared the mental load results with her, she's the one who makes the doctor appointments, schedules the playdates, books the babysitters and signs up for summer camps. 'OK,' I said. 'But what about all the 'invisible labor' I do?' I mentioned the finances, the house, the yard, the car, the garbage. 'That doesn't have anything to do with parenting,' she responded. 'It's household management,' I responded. 'Someone has to do it.' 'But someone would have to do it even if we didn't have kids,' she said. I think we both have a point here. I feel like I'm doing about half of the hands-on parenting, plus a bunch of hidden work that keeps our lives running smoothly. She feels like she's doing about half of the hands-on parenting, plus a bunch of hidden work that keeps our kids' lives running smoothly. We've gravitated toward these roles — mine indirectly related to parenting, hers directly — because of gender. Or, more specifically, because of gender expectations. The truth is, I don't feel judged for not volunteering at school, or not packing a particularly healthy lunch, or not hosting a playdate. My wife does. She even judges herself. As a dad, I tend to feel OK about how much I do. As a mom, she tends to feel guilty for not doing more. We've inherited and internalized different standards of what it means to be a parent — and hers are higher. That's hard to shake. Egalitarian dads might think they're shouldering half of the mental load, or more. But as hard as we're lifting, most of us still don't know what that feels like. __________________ The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,560 U.S. adults interviewed online from May 22-27, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.9%.